Re: No network interface detected

2011-04-16 Thread Miguel Figueiredo 
On Saturday 16 April 2011 06:55:20 Ravi Roy wrote:

[... ]

> I would appreciate if I can get source repository where I can take source of
> this package (udev_153-1). I would build it from source ...

http://snapshot.debian.org/package/udev/

[...]

-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201104161013.55868.el...@debianpt.org

Re: No network interface detected

2011-04-16 Thread Ravi Roy 
Thanks Miguel :)

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote:

> On Saturday 16 April 2011 06:55:20 Ravi Roy wrote:
>
> [... ]
>
> > I would appreciate if I can get source repository where I can take source
> of
> > this package (udev_153-1). I would build it from source ...
>
> http://snapshot.debian.org/package/udev/
>
> [...]
>
> --
> Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
>
> Miguel Figueiredo
> http://www.DebianPT.org 
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201104161013.55868.el...@debianpt.org
>
>

Bug#537535: Offer for help, first patch

2011-04-16 Thread Regis Boudin 
Hi Joey

> > First, I took a stab at implementing debconf-get-selections, see patch
> > attached. It seems to work, but any feedback would be very welcome. I
> > added entries to cdebconf.conf-dist for the --installer option, which I
> > hope is the correct way.
> 
> That's probably a good clean way to do it. I hope that cdebconf does not
> try to use those stanzas in normal operation, /var/log/installer may not
> always exist.

I guess the alternative would be to have a separate conf file
in /usr/lib/cdebconf that would only contain the installer db info.

> > I also had a look at Colin's patch, found a bug in debconf-escape, and
> > hope to send a working patch very soon. A pointer to test the escape
> > CAPB would be welcome as well, as I started work on it, based on the
> > Colin's patch.
> 
> Doing a SUBST of something\nwith\nnewlines and checking it is
> displayed as mutiple lines would be a good test. There are
> few packages that use it, and probably mostly for error display.

Ok, will have a look, thanks.

> > Obviously any comment, feedback, or pointer to ways I could help would
> > be very welcome.
> 
> The other blocking bugs of #328498 are of course relevant. The key thing
> is the template autoloading stuff and general tweaks so cdebconf can be
> used when installing packages.

I already have #328498 on my radar, thanks. I'll try to keep with this
bug for now, it seems a very good entry point to start learning about
the cdebconf internals and interfaces ; but will have a look at the
others as well.

Last question, how would you like me to provide patche(s) ? Is one for
each utility ok ?

Regis




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1302975741.2386.11.camel@x200s

Bug#245465: use swap size, not RAM

2011-04-16 Thread Adam Borowski 
What if we looked at the size of available swap rather than RAM?

People don't really expect to have their actual memory eaten by something
that appears to be a disk filesystem (and used to be one).  I'd say that
eating some of swap space would be less surprising.

In other words: a machine with 64MB RAM + swap will want to use tmpfs (much
faster than a regular filesystem), but one with 1-2GB and no swap probably
won't.

-- 
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
//  Never attribute to stupidity what can be
//  adequately explained by malice.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110416175645.ga20...@angband.pl

Bug#537535: Offer for help, first patch

2011-04-16 Thread Joey Hess 
Regis Boudin wrote:
> Last question, how would you like me to provide patche(s) ? Is one for
> each utility ok ?

If you're going to have a lot of patches, it would probably make sense
to keep them in git.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

2011-04-16 Thread Daily build aggregator 
Debian installer build overview
---

Failed or old builds:

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_cdrom_gtk 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_cdrom-xen 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom-xen.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_netboot 
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_netboot-gtk 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_netboot-xen 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-xen.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_hd-media 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_hd-media.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_hd-media_gtk 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_hd-media_gtk.log

* FAILED BUILD: armel Apr 15 22:27 joey@box build_ads_cf 

http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_ads_cf.log

* FAILED BUILD: armel Apr 15 22:30 joey@box build_iop32x_netboot 

http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 11 00:07 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_cdrom 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_cdrom.log

* OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 11 00:09 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_netboot 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 11 00:12 buildd@praetorius 
build_powerpc_netboot-gtk 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_netboot-gtk.log

* OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 11 00:14 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_hd-media 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_hd-media.log

* OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 11 00:15 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_cdrom 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_cdrom.log

* OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 11 00:17 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_netboot 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_netboot.log

* OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 11 00:20 buildd@praetorius 
build_powerpc64_netboot-gtk 

http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_netboot-gtk.log

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 16 23:40 debian-cd@pettersson 1sidamd64 
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1sidamd64

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 16 23:40 debian-cd@pettersson Csidamd64 
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Csidamd64

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 16 23:40 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidamd64 
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2sidamd64

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 16 23:50 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidmulti-arch-1 
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2sidmulti-arch-1

* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 16 23:50 debian-cd@pettersson Csidmulti-arch-1 
http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Csidmulti-arch-1


Totals: 100 builds (15 failed, 7 old)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qbgll-0001be...@ravel.debian.org