Bug#606984: More on PM G4 (Digital Audio) sound...
As of yesterday's Daily build #4, sound still doesn't work on this machine. A check of /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base-blacklist.conf found that snd-pcsp is still the only file blacklisted. Blacklisting the snd-aoa files produced the same result as before. I also tried out the weekly build of debian-testing-powerpc-xfce+lxde (sound didn't work initially, of course) and applied the same changes to the above file, blacklisting: blacklist snd-aoa blacklist snd-aoa-codec-tas blacklist snd-aoa-fabric-layout blacklist snd-aoa-i2sbus blacklist snd-aoa-soundbus After rebooting, I was able to open alsamixer and unmute both the internal speaker and the headphone port. I was able to play music successfully with CDs with VLC media player.External speakers plugged into Apple's proprietary 2.5 mm stereo mini jack sound port, however didn't work. Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3dab0774-ecd0-4579-bad7-5b804a11a...@sharedcup.com
possibly outdated wiki documentation
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Today Greetings, The above referenced documentation page refers to sid as unstable and squeeze as testing. I think these designations are not current. I have not found another way to notify a page maintainer. The person who last modified the page does not have a listed e-mail alias. Best Regards, Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d9b483e.1060...@poler.net
Bug#620881: Acknowledgement (installation-guide: MAKEDEV script absence)
Quoting João Carneiro (baptista.carne...@gmail.com): > i actually found later that the makedev package was missing, so this bug > should be reassigned to debootstrap. Not really. debootstrap installs the base system and makedev is not part of it (since the last release of the package, which indeed hasn't been updated since then...mostly because it is considered useless on modern Linux systems). That bug really belong to the IG, to have it avoid suggesting outdated actions. Thanks for your care completing information in the bug report, anyway. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: debootstrap: syntax error: unknown user 'hplip' in statoverride file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 617235 debootstrap: syntax error: unknown user 'hplip' in > statoverride file Bug #617235 [installation-reports] Can't install Debian 6.0 Squeeze Changed Bug title to 'debootstrap: syntax error: unknown user 'hplip' in statoverride file' from 'Can't install Debian 6.0 Squeeze' > reassign 617235 hplip Bug #617235 [installation-reports] debootstrap: syntax error: unknown user 'hplip' in statoverride file Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'hplip'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617235: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617235 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130203495821937.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Processed: debootstrap: syntax error: unknown user 'hplip' in statoverride file
My best guess is that this is an installation over an existing Debian system, and the partition has not been reformatted. So /var/lib/dpkg/ will contain various stuff from the old system which confuses dpkg. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#272330: marked as done (Unable to change debconf priority)
Your message dated Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:37:36 +0100 with message-id <201104052137.37151.el...@debianpt.org> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #272330, regarding Unable to change debconf priority to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 272330: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272330 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: cdebconf-priority Severity: important As a follow-up to #272325 (inability to change language in businesscard 20040918 image, linux26 profile), i tried to change the debconf priority. I could not, apparently the priority of the change debconf priority question is too low... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=el_GR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.UTF-8 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- This is fixed. -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org --- End Message ---
Update on xkb-data(-udeb)
Hi, as announced early and lately[1,2], I'm uploading xkb-data 2.1 to unstable now. 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2011/01/msg00817.html 2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2011/04/msg00091.html xkb-data 2.2 was released recently[3] (and 2.2.1[4] quickly after that to fix build issues), apparently with many changes on the descriptions / translations side. 3. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2011-April/001634.html 4. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2011-April/001638.html Changes that could be of interest for d-i / console-setup: | Files in second .changes but not in first | - | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/apl | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/tw | | Files in first .changes but not in second | - | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/extras/apl | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/extras/ir | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/extras/rs | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/extras/ru | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/extras/us Also, xkb-data now Breaks: older libx11-6. That's said to be unsupported on the udeb side (like Conflicts), so I didn't add anything to the udeb. It's probably unlikely to cause issues (there's no partial upgrade to handle in d-i). Even more so since the needed (1.4.3) version of libx11's been uploaded to sid, while this new xkb-data will go to experimental instead. But I wanted to mention that possible pitfall on this list anyway. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Apr 05 10:23 joey@box build_iop32x_netboot http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Apr 05 10:23 joey@box build_versatile_netboot http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_versatile_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Apr 05 10:38 joey@box build_ads_cf http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_ads_cf.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Apr 05 10:38 joey@box build_iop32x_network-console_glantank http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_glantank.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 04 00:06 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 04 00:08 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 04 00:11 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_netboot-gtk.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 04 00:13 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_hd-media http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_hd-media.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 04 00:15 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 04 00:16 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:powerpc Apr 04 00:20 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_netboot-gtk.log Totals: 102 builds (4 failed, 7 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q7h6j-0003yd...@ravel.debian.org
Re: possibly outdated wiki documentation
Quoting Mark Poler (m...@poler.net): > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Today > > Greetings, > > The above referenced documentation page refers to sid as unstable > and squeeze as testing. I think these designations are not current. > > I have not found another way to notify a page maintainer. The > person who last modified the page does not have a listed e-mail > alias. I just updated it and added the mention that the page is indeed quite loosely maintained. Thanks for your notice. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
