Re: [RFT] Test of Debian Installer 6.0 - Beta1 images

2010-10-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Ian,

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Ian Campbell  wrote:
> I tested debian-testing-i386-amd64-source-DVD-1.iso under both 32 and 64
> bit Xen and the installation went fine.

Cool.

> I didn't see a debian-testing-amd64-i386-powerpc-netinst.iso CD image to
> test, is that expected?

It is generated with the dailies. That's why you did not find it.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854         http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin6fkcya7=oy=gn9dxuc-zn+e4jz3hutvc72...@mail.gmail.com



Re: [RFT] Test of Debian Installer 6.0 - Beta1 images

2010-10-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello,

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stefano Canepa  wrote:
> Is it so different from this:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20101002-5/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso?
>
> I just finished to migrate my father notebook from Windows using this
> netinst and everything when smooth till the end except an error reading
> the CD but it's a CD-RW I used many times to test D-I.

Good that it has worked.

The image has some changes that are not being include in b1 for now.
But most of image is the same ATM.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854         http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinb3lvcyfn9f62jmludpzmvqdgmdz5pgbpty...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#524342: Problem might be related to raid metadata version

2010-10-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach bugrep...@public-files.de  
[2010.10.04.0208 +0200]:
> grub-pc segfaults when raid is root. As mentioned before the boot
> partition is seperate of that raid in the first 500MB of the first
> disk (ext3). Lilo runs fine.

Please try to remove the spare and see if the segfault persists.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft   Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"when a gentoo admin tells me that the KISS principle is good for
 'busy sysadmins', and that it's not an evolutionary step backwards,
 i wonder whether their tape is already running backwards."


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)


Re: [PATCH] d-i manual: nuke references to kernel-img.conf

2010-10-04 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting maximilian attems (m...@stro.at):
> In squeeze it is no longer necessary or useful to generate or
> to consult kernel-img.conf.
> 
> Thanks to the new bootloader policy, see:
> http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-update-hooks.html


Thanks for the patch. I added committing it to my TODO list (I'll also
try to learn about updating translation files for the D-I
manualwe're stil lin the process of taking things over after
Frans' loss, for the D-I manual).



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processing of apt-setup_0.48_i386.changes

2010-10-04 Thread Archive Administrator
apt-setup_0.48_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  apt-setup_0.48.dsc
  apt-setup_0.48.tar.gz
  apt-setup-udeb_0.48_all.udeb
  apt-mirror-setup_0.48_all.udeb
  apt-cdrom-setup_0.48_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1p2lbr-0007bf...@franck.debian.org



Bug#524342: Problem might be related to raid metadata version

2010-10-04 Thread bugreport

grub-pc segfaults when raid is root. As mentioned before the boot partition is 
seperate of that raid in the first 500MB of the first disk (ext3). Lilo runs 
fine.

Output of mdadm -D /dev/md0

/dev/md0:
Version : 1.2
  Creation Time : Sun Oct  3 19:01:49 2010
 Raid Level : raid1
 Array Size : 1455076216 (1387.67 GiB 1490.00 GB)
  Used Dev Size : 1455076216 (1387.67 GiB 1490.00 GB)
   Raid Devices : 2
  Total Devices : 3
Persistence : Superblock is persistent

Update Time : Mon Oct  4 02:04:51 2010
  State : clean
 Active Devices : 2
Working Devices : 3
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 1

   Name : kalypso:0  (local to host kalypso)
   UUID : 6726fc4a:a16d65f3:7fb16d57:01f1757e
 Events : 46

Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
   0   850  active sync   /dev/sda5
   1   8   211  active sync   /dev/sdb5

   2   8   37-  spare   /dev/sdc5


 Original-Nachricht 
> Datum: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200
> Von: martin f krafft 
> An: bugrep...@public-files.de, 524...@bugs.debian.org
> CC: 598...@bugs.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Bug#524342: Problem might be related to raid metadata version

> also sprach bugrep...@public-files.de 
> [2010.10.03.1638 +0200]:
> > from the installation system. After that I booted into the
> > installation and tried to install Grub again on the MBR, but even
> > though I had a simple boot partition that Lilo was able to boot
> > from I got a segfault from both Grub-legacy and Grub-PC trying to
> > install those.
> 
> Does the segfault go away if you let the array synchronise fully
> first?
> 
> -- 
>  .''`.   martin f. krafft   Related projects:
> : :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
> `. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
>   `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004000857.24...@gmx.net



apt-setup_0.48_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2010-10-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.48_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.48_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.48_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.48_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.48_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.48_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.48.dsc
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup_0.48.dsc
apt-setup_0.48.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup_0.48.tar.gz


Override entries for your package:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.48_all.udeb - extra debian-installer
apt-mirror-setup_0.48_all.udeb - extra debian-installer
apt-setup-udeb_0.48_all.udeb - standard debian-installer
apt-setup_0.48.dsc - source admin

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 598457 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1p2lnj-u1...@franck.debian.org



Re: [RFT] Test of Debian Installer 6.0 - Beta1 images

2010-10-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 10:11 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Ian,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Ian Campbell  wrote:
> > I tested debian-testing-i386-amd64-source-DVD-1.iso under both 32 and 64
> > bit Xen and the installation went fine.
> 
> Cool.
> 
> > I didn't see a debian-testing-amd64-i386-powerpc-netinst.iso CD image to
> > test, is that expected?
> 
> It is generated with the dailies. That's why you did not find it.

I know, it just wasn't clear if the set of images you were asking for
testing on was supposed to include the dailies or not, I guess not.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell

Wow, I'm being shot at from both sides.  That means I *must* be right.  :-)
-- Larry Wall in <199710211959.maa18...@wall.org>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1286198309.23155.2740.ca...@zakaz.uk.xensource.com



Re: [RFT] Test of Debian Installer 6.0 - Beta1 images

2010-10-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 16:35 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Steve has build the images using what is supposed to be Beta1 release.
> I have done two full installations using i386 DVD and it went very
> well.
> 
> I would like to ask help to test this image set.so we can release it
> on the begin of next week.

I tested debian-testing-i386-amd64-source-DVD-1.iso under both 32 and 64
bit Xen and the installation went fine.

I didn't see a debian-testing-amd64-i386-powerpc-netinst.iso CD image to
test, is that expected?

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Rainbow - I Surrender

 8am is an ungoldly hour to be awake :)
* gorgo usually gets up at 11am


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1286182430.23155.1986.ca...@zakaz.uk.xensource.com



Bug#598457: marked as done (apt-setup: Fail to find install CD at the end of pkgsel (and endless loop))

2010-10-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:47:07 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#598457: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.48
has caused the Debian Bug report #598457,
regarding apt-setup: Fail to find install CD at the end of pkgsel (and endless 
loop)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
598457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598457
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package:  apt-setup
Version:  1:0.47
Severity: grave
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
UserTags: debian-edu

In Debian Edu, we set the debconf severity to critical while pkgsel is
executing to hide the automatically configured tasksel question.  This
has worked just fine until recently.  The DVD installation recently
broke, and was fixed with the upload of apt-setup version 1:0.47
closing #595903 and the related up load of base-installer version
1.112.  With this fix in place, the installer now enter a endless loop
at the end of the pkgsel run, when load-install-cd is called.

The cause for the loop seem to be that 'apt-cdrom ident' no longer
work.  The loop become endless because the debconf question asked
during the loop is only of severity high, and everything below
critical is ignored when Debian Edu run pkgsel.postinst.

This patch raises the severity of the question, and I suggest this is
implemented to make sure the loop do not become endless when using
debconf severity critical.

I have no idea why the check_id() call always fail, and this should be
fixed too before this bug can be considered solved.  Without
remounting the install DVD, the grub stage fail later in the install
process, and the installation as a whole fails.

Setting the severity to grave, as this problem breaks the entire
installation.

Index: load-install-cd
===
--- load-install-cd (revision 64667)
+++ load-install-cd (working copy)
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 cd_label=$(tail -n1 /var/lib/install-cd.id)
 db_subst apt-setup/cdrom/media-change LABEL "$cd_label"
 while ! check_id; do
-   db_input high apt-setup/cdrom/media-change || true
+   db_input critical apt-setup/cdrom/media-change || true
db_go || exit 10
 done
 

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-setup
Source-Version: 1:0.48

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-setup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apt-cdrom-setup_0.48_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.48_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.48_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.48_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.48_all.udeb
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.48_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.48.dsc
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup_0.48.dsc
apt-setup_0.48.tar.gz
  to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup_0.48.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 598...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson  (supplier of updated apt-setup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:28:51 +0100
Source: apt-setup
Binary: apt-setup-udeb apt-mirror-setup apt-cdrom-setup
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:0.48
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Colin Watson 
Description: 
 apt-cdrom-setup - set up a CD in sources.list (udeb)
 apt-mirror-setup - set up a mirror in sources.list (udeb)
 apt-setup-udeb - Configure apt (udeb)
Closes: 598457
Changes: 
 apt-setup (1:0.48) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Set LC_ALL=C when calling 'apt-cdrom ident', since we parse its output.
 Broken by the change in 1:0.47 to use chroot-setup.sh, which sets LANG.
   * Ask apt-setup/cdrom/media-change at critical priority, since we'll enter
 an infinite loop if it isn't presented (thanks, Petter Reinholdtsen;
 closes: #598457).
 .
   [ Updated translations ]
   * Kazakh (kk.po) by Baurzhan Muftakhidinov
Checksums-Sha1: 
 81c9c0ad23292ea6e98cc18470c7159e522d9e11 1584 apt-setup_0.48.dsc
 c82da7e587ad3a291bfa3f89029329c3adfbed79 246259 apt-setup_0.48.tar.gz
 5f7cd5b163c581344277a759ca05dee5bb12

Re: [RFT] Test of Debian Installer 6.0 - Beta1 images

2010-10-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello,

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> Ah, rootskel and finish-install hadn't been uploaded with the fix for
> enabling speakup at reboot when it was used at installation time :/

No because rootskel is inside initrd and we had it uploaded before your commit.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854         http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim8ejdhe28-rrxbst+gifasoamqcvf3a63bz...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#524342: Problem might be related to raid metadata version

2010-10-04 Thread bugreport
I should have thought of that one myself (taking out the spare). But 
unfortunately I currently don't have access to that machine. I might be back as 
early as either this week or this weekend, but I am not sure. Sorry.

Background information: One of the softraid guys said that spinning down spare 
drives might work with metadata 1.2, but will not work for sure with metadata 
format 0.9. So the whole point of the ordeal to work with the new metadata 
version, that seems to be the cause of the grub headache was to get a hot spare 
that doesn't spin up.
Otherwise I could just add it as an active member.

Thx for your help, 
Malte

 Original-Nachricht 
> Datum: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 18:47:09 +0200
> Von: martin f krafft 
> An: bugrep...@public-files.de, 524...@bugs.debian.org
> CC: 598...@bugs.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Bug#524342: Problem might be related to raid metadata version

> also sprach bugrep...@public-files.de 
> [2010.10.03.1638 +0200]:
> > from the installation system. After that I booted into the
> > installation and tried to install Grub again on the MBR, but even
> > though I had a simple boot partition that Lilo was able to boot
> > from I got a segfault from both Grub-legacy and Grub-PC trying to
> > install those.
> 
> Does the segfault go away if you let the array synchronise fully
> first?
> 
> -- 
>  .''`.   martin f. krafft   Related projects:
> : :'  :  proud Debian developer   http://debiansystem.info
> `. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org
>   `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004122214.23...@gmx.net



Bug#599101: busybox: execs applets when chrooting

2010-10-04 Thread Colin Watson
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.17.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch maverick

  $ sudo busybox sh
  
  
  BusyBox v1.17.1 (Debian 1:1.17.1-4) built-in shell (ash)
  Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands.
  
  /home/cjwatson # chroot / rm --help
  BusyBox v1.17.1 (Debian 1:1.17.1-4) multi-call binary.
  
  Usage: rm [OPTIONS] FILE...
  
  Remove (unlink) FILEs
  
  Options:
  -i  Always prompt before removing
  -f  Never prompt
  -R,-r   Recurse

This is very seriously contrary to how I expect chroot to work.  It
should be executing binaries in the selected root filesystem, not
executing busybox applets!  (And no, it has nothing to do with chrooting
to / - that's just an example which doesn't require any effort to
construct.)

In Ubuntu, this caused difficult-to-track-down segmentation faults in a
few places, which is how I noticed:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594162
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651046

The attached patch fixes this.

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
  * Never execute busybox applets when chrooting (LP: #594162).

Index: debian/patches/applets-fallback.patch
===
--- debian/patches/applets-fallback.patch	(revision 64892)
+++ debian/patches/applets-fallback.patch	(working copy)
@@ -184,3 +184,14 @@
  
  # These are auto-selected by other options
  
+--- a/coreutils/chroot.c
 b/coreutils/chroot.c
+@@ -30,5 +30,7 @@
+ 		argv[1] = (char *) "-i";
+ 	}
+ 
+-	BB_EXECVP_or_die(argv);
++	execvp(argv[0], argv);
++	xfunc_error_retval = (errno == ENOENT) ? 127 : 126;
++	bb_perror_msg_and_die("can't execute '%s'", argv[0]);
+ }


Bug#598130: grub-installer cannot install grub-pc on amd64 ( perhaps other architecture )

2010-10-04 Thread Matías Parodi
 I just wanted to add that the problem is not just with GRUB but with
LILO too and it is worse than that ! I tried to complete the
installation using a version of GRUB that I know that is working for
this architecture, and it was the same, so I guess it's not (or not
just) related with GRUB.

Matt


Bug#599115: debian-installer: grub's target examples still reflect grub-legacy's behavior

2010-10-04 Thread Alon Horn

Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

hi,
using the mini.iso to install sid, choosing expert install (KDE), when getting 
to the install grub part, after refusing MBR, the examples for (hdx,y) reflect 
grub legacy behavior.
following example line saying that (hd0,4) is the first virtual partition on 
first HD, I installed to (hd0,5) resulting in istallation to the first instead 
of second (intended) virtual partition.

regards,
alon

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
DISCLAIMER: This mail message was scanned for malicious content by Quality 
Bytes Mail Security when leaving the gateway of Kibbutz Hazorea
http://qb.q-bytes.com/qbms/?c=hazorea
.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/00b44...@qbmailsec



Re: kFreeBSD version of the Debian Installation Guide

2010-10-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hello,

Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> Christian PERRIER, le Mon 20 Sep 2010 06:42:46 +0200, a écrit :
> > Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):
> > > Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> > > > Well, to keep the manual readable we should probably not replace Debian
> > > > with &debian; as it is now.  Maybe rename the existing `debian' entity
> > > > into something else like debiangnu, and then introduce &debian;
> > > > expanding to Debian?
> > > 
> > > Yes, I would recommend this solution.
> > 
> > Samuel, can you take care of it?
> 
> Sure.

I still saw several occurences of 'Debian' beeing hardcoded in the source 
code of the manual instead of an entity.
Do you intend to change that?

(If you have this on your todo list already: sorry for the noise!)


Holger

-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004215417.71073540.li...@wansing-online.de



[PATCH] d-i manual: Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting

2010-10-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hello,

in d-i manual about USB-Booting:

I noticed an discrepancy in chapter 
'Copying the files — the easy way':


There is an all-in-one file hd-media/boot.img.gz
which contains all the installer files (including the kernel)
as well as syslinux and its
configuration file.
as well as yaboot and its
configuration file.


A possible output is (for example in the manual for kfreebsd-i386):

There is an all-in-one file hd-media/boot.img.gz which contains
all the installer files (including the kernel)

(missing comma in front of which, and missing fullstop at the end)


Patch attached.


(Samuel: maybe there is something not 100% correct with the arch options
for the kfreebsd manuals?
The situation in this special paragraph in the past was: 'arch=x86' and
'arch=powerpc' are used, and both are 'bootable-usb' (the hole file
is 'condition=bootable-usb'). 
Now, kfreebsd-i386 is 'bootable-usb', but does not belong to 'x86' or
'powerpc'.)



Another problem might be, that some of the paragraphs in this file are
marked with "", others are only marked "".
Resulting in some paragraphs beeing included in an output version,
and others beeing left out. I'm unsure if this is intended.
Samuel: Since I noticed this especially for the kfreebsd-i386 d-i-manual,
this is probably an issue for you?



And: at the beginning of that file (../en/install-methods/boot-usb-files.xml)
I read several times about Linux, even in the kfreebsd manual. 
Could you check, if this is correct?



Holger

-- 

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0 - L e n n y
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

--- boot-usb-files.xml	2010-10-04 00:18:30.0 +0200
+++ boot-usb-files_workingcopy.xml	2010-10-04 21:24:47.0 +0200
@@ -96,12 +96,12 @@
   Copying the files — the easy way
 
 
-There is an all-in-one file hd-media/boot.img.gz
-which contains all the installer files (including the kernel)
-as well as syslinux and its
-configuration file.
-as well as yaboot and its
-configuration file.
+There is an all-in-one file hd-media/boot.img.gz,
+which contains all the installer files (including the kernel) as well as syslinux and its
+configuration file as well as yaboot and its
+configuration file.
 
 
 



Re: kFreeBSD version of the Debian Installation Guide

2010-10-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Oct 2010 21:54:17 +0200, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> > Christian PERRIER, le Mon 20 Sep 2010 06:42:46 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):
> > > > Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> > > > > Well, to keep the manual readable we should probably not replace 
> > > > > Debian
> > > > > with &debian; as it is now.  Maybe rename the existing `debian' entity
> > > > > into something else like debiangnu, and then introduce &debian;
> > > > > expanding to Debian?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, I would recommend this solution.
> > > 
> > > Samuel, can you take care of it?
> > 
> > Sure.
> 
> I still saw several occurences of 'Debian' beeing hardcoded in the source 
> code of the manual instead of an entity.
> Do you intend to change that?
> 
> (If you have this on your todo list already: sorry for the noise!)

It's on my todo list, but if you can take the item, please do :)

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004201751.gl5...@const.famille.thibault.fr



Processing of finish-install_2.26_amd64.changes

2010-10-04 Thread Archive Administrator
finish-install_2.26_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  finish-install_2.26.dsc
  finish-install_2.26.tar.gz
  finish-install_2.26_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1p2rb7-0006pk...@franck.debian.org



finish-install_2.26_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2010-10-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters



Accepted:
finish-install_2.26.dsc
  to main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.26.dsc
finish-install_2.26.tar.gz
  to main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.26.tar.gz
finish-install_2.26_all.udeb
  to main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.26_all.udeb


Override entries for your package:
finish-install_2.26.dsc - source debian-installer
finish-install_2.26_all.udeb - required debian-installer

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1p2rie-0007mu...@franck.debian.org



Re: [PATCH] d-i manual: Preparing Files for USB Memory Stick Booting

2010-10-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello,

Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Oct 2010 21:55:17 +0200, a écrit :
> (Samuel: maybe there is something not 100% correct with the arch options
> for the kfreebsd manuals?

Yes, see "TODO: update" in build/arch-options/kfreebsd-*. All these need
to get fixed by people who actually know what kFreeBSD supports.

> Now, kfreebsd-i386 is 'bootable-usb', but does not belong to 'x86' or
> 'powerpc'.)

Yes, because syslinux wouldn't be used in the kFreeBSD case. There'd
need to be another phrase for kFreeBSD I guess, as I said in a mail some
time ago, kFreeBSD people need to give a closer look at such parts of
the manual.

> -as well as syslinux and its
> -configuration file.

I've fixed the period, thanks.

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101004231744.gk5...@const.famille.thibault.fr



D-I Manual: updating PO(T) files

2010-10-04 Thread Christian PERRIER
I need help.

I suspect that after changes to English XML files, an update is needed
to POT and PO files for translations that us gettext in th D-I Manual.

However, I can't find the right way to do this. There are scripts in
pmanual/scripts, but I can't find the right sequence of commands for
updating all PO files for all languages

Help would then be welcomed.

-- 




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#599115: debian-installer: grub's target examples still reflect grub-legacy's behavior

2010-10-04 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Alon Horn (sal...@t2.technion.ac.il):
> 
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: normal
> 
> hi,
> using the mini.iso to install sid, choosing expert install (KDE), when 
> getting to the install grub part, after refusing MBR, the examples for 
> (hdx,y) reflect grub legacy behavior.
> following example line saying that (hd0,4) is the first virtual partition on 
> first HD, I installed to (hd0,5) resulting in istallation to the first 
> instead of second (intended) virtual partition.


- Were you using a localized install?
- What mini.iso are you talking about? Daily build from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer?
- What *exact* "example" message did you see (nothing in the current
grub-installer is mentioning "(hd0,4)")?




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature