Processing of cdebconf_0.147_amd64.changes
cdebconf_0.147_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdebconf_0.147.dsc cdebconf_0.147.tar.gz cdebconf-priority_0.147_all.udeb cdebconf_0.147_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0_0.147_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.147_amd64.deb cdebconf-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb cdebconf-text-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk_0.147_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
cdebconf_0.147_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb cdebconf-gtk_0.147_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.147_amd64.deb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb cdebconf-priority_0.147_all.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.147_all.udeb cdebconf-text-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb cdebconf-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb cdebconf_0.147.dsc to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.147.dsc cdebconf_0.147.tar.gz to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.147.tar.gz cdebconf_0.147_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.147_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.147_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-dev_0.147_amd64.deb libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb libdebconfclient0_0.147_amd64.deb to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0_0.147_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-gtk_0.147_amd64.deb - optional admin cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-priority_0.147_all.udeb - standard debian-installer cdebconf-text-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb - standard debian-installer cdebconf_0.147.dsc - source utils cdebconf_0.147_amd64.deb - extra utils libdebconfclient0-dev_0.147_amd64.deb - optional libdevel libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer libdebconfclient0_0.147_amd64.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 568381 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568381: debconf segfauls with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text
On Friday 05 February 2010, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:52:23PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > > I've traced this to Colin's commit that adds the "passthrough" > > > frontend (r59807). If I revert that the text frontend works fine > > > again. > > Fixed in r62177. I've asked Otavio on IRC if it's OK to upload this, > since I don't want to inadvertently stomp on d-i release preparation. Thanks a lot Colin. Works fine again now. AFAIK Otavio is planning another D-I upload (a few other components migrated only a few days ago), so it would be nice to get this in especially as without it s390 is unusable. So I've gone ahead and uploaded with 'high' priority. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568381: marked as done (debconf segfauls with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:02:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#568381: fixed in cdebconf 0.147
has caused the Debian Bug report #568381,
regarding debconf segfauls with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
568381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.146
Marko Jung reported that d-i segfaults when you use
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text. I can reproduce this. A strace is below. What
else do you need?
| HTTP proxy information (blank for none):
| Prompt: '?' for help>
|
| Checking the Debian archive mirror ..25%..50%..75%..100%..200%
| Segmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation
fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation
fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation
fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation
fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation fauSegmentation
write(1, "are setting up a home network, y"..., 80are setting up a home
network, you can make something up, but make sure you use
) = 80
write(1, "the same domain name on all your"..., 44the same domain name on all
your computers.
) = 44
write(1, "Domain name:\n", 13Domain name:
) = 13
write(1, "Prompt: '?' for help, default=ho"..., 36Prompt: '?' for help,
default=home> ) = 36
read(0,
"\n", 4096) = 1
write(1, "\n", 1
) = 1
write(4, "0 ok", 4) = 4
write(4, "\n", 1) = 1
read(5, "GET netcfg/get_domain\n", 1022) = 22
write(4, "0 home", 6) = 6
write(4, "\n", 1) = 1
read(5, "GET debconf/priority\n", 1022) = 21
write(4, "0 high", 6) = 6
write(4, "\n", 1) = 1
read(5, "X_SAVE\n", 1022) = 7
open("/var/lib/cdebconf/questions.dat", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 6
fstat64(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x40022000
write(6, "Name: anna/choose_modules\nTempla"..., 4096) = 4096
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
Segmentation fault
+ EXIT=139
+ sleep 5
+ set -e
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cdebconf
Source-Version: 0.147
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cdebconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.147_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.147_amd64.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.147_all.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.147_all.udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
cdebconf_0.147.dsc
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.147.dsc
cdebconf_0.147.tar.gz
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.147.tar.gz
cdebconf_0.147_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.147_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.147_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-dev_0.147_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.147_amd64.udeb
libdebconfclient0_0.147_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0_0.147_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 568...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frans Pop (supplier of updated cdebconf package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:28:57 +0100
Source: cdebconf
Binary: cdebconf libdebconfclient0 libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-udeb
cdebconf-priority libdebconfclient0-udeb cdebconf-slang-udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf-gtk-udeb cdebconf-gtk
Architecture: source all amd64
Version:
Bug#568475: keyboard-configuration: Please use pc104 for *_PL.
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:19:24AM +0100, Piotr Engelking wrote: > > As of version 1.51, keyboard-configuration uses pc105 as the default > keyboard model for *_PL locales. Please use pc104 instead, as this the > keyboard that is normally used in Poland. True, but pc104 works only for people having a pc104 keyboard while pc105 works for both. Is there something that doesn't work properly with XKBMODEL="pc105" (other than printing the keyboard layout)? Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568529: overwrites MBR of installation medium
Package: debian-installer Severity: grave During installation of debian squezee using USB flash drive (hd-media) grub-installer has overwritten its MBR (obviously, it has /dev/sda device associated with it). I'm aware that device enumeration issues were reported in #517563 and #516280 and are present in errata for lenny release RC2, but I believe that installer should not overwrite installation medium under any circumstances. The problem seems to be located in grub-installer script[1]. When grub-installer/only_debian is set to true the bootdev is set unconditionally to '(hd0)'. Installer should make sure that this device is not installation medium by any chance. I've set severity to grave because of data loss (MBR), but the case is obviously not so common so feel free to reduce it. [1] packages/arch/i386/grub-installer/grub-installer -- Piotr Lewandowski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#568529: overwrites MBR of installation medium
reassign 568529 grub-installer 1.49 severity 568529 serious thanks On Friday 05 February 2010, Piotr Lewandowski wrote: > I'm aware that device enumeration issues were reported in #517563 and > #516280 and are present in errata for lenny release RC2, but I believe > that installer should not overwrite installation medium under any > circumstances. Agreed. But I'm lowering the severity to serious (still "not suitable for release") as a boot sector can be repaired. I would not expect any actual data loss. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#568529: overwrites MBR of installation medium
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 568529 grub-installer 1.49 Bug #568529 [debian-installer] overwrites MBR of installation medium Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'grub-installer'. Bug #568529 [grub-installer] overwrites MBR of installation medium Bug Marked as found in versions grub-installer/1.49. > severity 568529 serious Bug #568529 [grub-installer] overwrites MBR of installation medium Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
debian installer, kernel and keyboard
Hi. I have read the message: http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2009/12/msg00490.html and I have the same problem. I cannot install debian due to this, the keyboard does not respond when the kernel is loaded. I have not found information on what kernel is present in the debian installer, how can I do this? Is there new information when the kernel will be updated according to the information in the message i refer to? A reply is much appreciated. Kenneth
Re: debian installer, kernel and keyboard
On Friday 05 February 2010, Kenneth Macdonald Karlsen wrote: > I have not found information on what kernel is present in the debian > installer, how can I do this? If your keyboard is not working that can be tricky :-) For daily built images you can go to [1] and then select the link for "other images" for your architecture. There you will find a file named MANIFEST.udebs which lists kernel module udebs included in the current images and the package names for those include the kernel version. > Is there new information when the kernel will be updated according to > the information in the message i refer to? We're currently working on an alpha release in which this issue will not be fixed. After that a switch to the new kernel should hopefully happen fairly soon. But it will take at least about a month. Sorry for any inconvenience. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFH] Errata and announcement help need
On Monday 01 February 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Current issues: > - sparc images are broken > - powerpc images are broken (a possible fix in the way) > - kfreebsd images are broken (some patches are still needed to be >merged) * Some USB keyboards may not work due to missing kernel modules. See #561036, #567431. Fixed in SVN ready for upload of .32 kernel udebs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
iso-scan teaser (hd-media install)
This is work in progress. Yes, this makes use of the 'humandev()' function and templates from partman. But no, it does not depend on partman. :-D More in a few days. <>
Re: Having a look at g-i … Got a working image!
Kartik Mistry (03/02/2010): > Just thought: Can we get some ideas from how Ubuntu installer is > working? I've not used it much but it seems working in most of > cases.. Since Otavio didn't point me there, I assumed such a move wasn't started there, so I followed Josselin's and Otavio's proposals, and discussed how to deal with my roadmap with them. Speaking of roadmap, it looks like Julien Cristau and I, helped by Josselin Mouette, reached a possibly interesting state, as reported in the following blog entries: 1. http://ikibiki.org/blog/2010/02/05/GI_part_3/ 2. http://ikibiki.org/blog/2010/02/06/GI_part_4/ The latter's conclusion is (as that was the case for the previous blog entries) my next roadmap: getting rid of rough edges, as well as turning some of the dirty hacks into some patches suitable for inclusion in the respective packages. (I welcome Cc's.) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
