Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

2009-12-19 Thread Rick Thomas


On Dec 17, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Frans Pop wrote:


On Thursday 17 December 2009, Rick Thomas wrote:

It may not be "grave" for the installer (indeed, you've already
established at great length that it's not an installer problem at  
all)

but that doesn't make it any the less grave for whatever package it
does belong to.  You've given me a few hints as to how to figure out
what package that might be.  Any further help -- from anyone more
knowledgeable than I -- will be appreciated, of course.


This looks like a fairly likely reason:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/gnome-core

For some reason the package was forced to testing even though it was  
not

available on all architectures.

If that is the reason, then it means that Gnome is currently not
installable on all but 5 architectures. With powerpc probably the  
only one

very many people will really care about (though that's a steadily
declining number).

It's almost certain that both the relevant package maintainer and the
release team are already aware of this and that it has been a  
conscious
choice to accept the breakage. Whether or not it should block the  
release

of D-I is up to others.

How did I get there (I needed the roundabout way because I don't  
have a

powerpc box; it would have been trivial to check in aptitude)?

- http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/
- choose squeeze -> in the most recent run, choose powerpc ->
http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/testing/1261006803/powerpc/list.php

And notice that gnome-accessibility (and a few others, but that  
seems the

most likely cause) is listed, and check the reasons.

A new version of the package (1:2.28+3) has been built for all arches:
https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/package.php?p=meta-gnome2
But looks to be blocked by other packages for now:
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=meta-gnome2


Here, for the record, is the log of an attempt to do "aptitude full- 
upgrade" on my Debian Squeeze PowerPC test machine.


Here's the part that first indicates there might be trouble...


The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 epiphany-extensions-more: Depends: epiphany-extensions (< 2.27) but  
2.28.1-2 is to be installed.
 epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.29.3-1 is to be  
installed.

 grdc: Depends: remmina which is a virtual package.
 gnome: Depends: tomboy (>= 1.0) but it is not installable



Happy Solstice!

Rick


greybox:~# aptitude -Pv full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information   
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done  
The following packages are BROKEN:
  epiphany-browser epiphany-extensions-more gnome grdc 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  gir1.0-clutter-0.8{a} gir1.0-freedesktop{a} gir1.0-glib-2.0{a} 
gir1.0-gstreamer-0.10{a} gir1.0-gtk-2.0{a} 
  gnome-disk-utility{a} gnome-js-common{a} libclutter-0.8-0{a} 
libclutter-cairo-0.8-0{a} libclutter-gtk-0.8-0{a} 
  libgdu-gtk0{a} libseed0{a} 
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  binfmt-support{u} cli-common{u} libart2.0-cil{u} libgconf2.0-cil{u} 
libglade2.0-cil{u} libglib2.0-cil{u} 
  libgmime-2.0-2a{u} libgmime2.2a-cil{u} libgnome-vfs2.0-cil{u} 
libgnome2.24-cil{u} libgnomepanel2.24-cil{u} 
  libgtk2.0-cil{u} libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil{u} libmono-addins0.2-cil{u} 
libmono-cairo2.0-cil{u} libmono-corlib2.0-cil{u} 
  libmono-i18n-west2.0-cil{u} libmono-posix2.0-cil{u} 
libmono-security2.0-cil{u} libmono-sharpzip2.84-cil{u} 
  libmono-system2.0-cil{u} libndesk-dbus-glib1.0-cil{u} libndesk-dbus1.0-cil{u} 
mono-2.0-gac{u} mono-gac{u} mono-runtime{u} 
  swfdec-mozilla{a} tomboy{u} 
The following packages will be upgraded:
  epiphany-browser-data epiphany-extensions epiphany-gecko gnome-accessibility 
gnome-core gnome-desktop-environment 
  gnome-office 
9 packages upgraded, 13 newly installed, 28 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 11.5MB of archives. After unpacking 17.7MB will be freed.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  epiphany-extensions-more: Depends: epiphany-extensions (< 2.27) but 2.28.1-2 
is to be installed.
  epiphany-browser: Conflicts: epiphany-gecko but 2.29.3-1 is to be installed.
  grdc: Depends: remmina which is a virtual package.
  gnome: Depends: tomboy (>= 1.0) but it is not installable
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Remove the following packages:
epiphany-extensions-more
epiphany-gecko
gnome

Keep the following packages at their current version:
grdc [Not Installed]

Score is 266

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] r gnome  UNINST
Rejecting the removal of gnome
Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] n
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Keep the following packages at their current version:
epiphany-browser [2.26.3-2 (now)]
epiphany-browser-data [2.26.3-2 (now)]
epiphany-extensions [2.26.1-1 (now)]
epiphany-gecko [2.26.3-2 (now)]
gnome [1:2.26+0 (now)]
gn

Processing of discover-data_2.2009.12.19_i386.changes

2009-12-19 Thread Archive Administrator
discover-data_2.2009.12.19_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  discover-data_2.2009.12.19.dsc
  discover-data_2.2009.12.19.tar.gz
  discover-data_2.2009.12.19_all.deb
  discover1-data_2.2009.12.19_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#561734: Hints how to decrease size of installer

2009-12-19 Thread Tonda Míšek

Package: installation-reports

Image version: 
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/mini.iso

Date: 2009/12/19

I did experiment to maximally decrease size of the installer and results 
are:

file name - original size - optimized size - difference - %
initrd.gz - 6404938 B - 6127255 B - 277683 B - 95.6%
setup.exe - 280420 B - 250724 B - 29696 B - 89.4%
splash.png - 6329 B - 5687 B - 642 B - 89.9%
mini.iso - 9390080 B - 9082059 B - 308021 B - 96.7%
dpkg_1.15.5.4_i386.deb - 2166906 B - 2026557 B - 140349 B - 93.5%

How I did the optimization:
initrd.gz - recompressed with 7zip (7z a -tGZip -mx=9 initrd.gz initrd)
setup.exe - compressed with UPX (upx --lzma --ultra-brute setup.exe)
splash.png - optimized with advpng (advpng -z -4 splash.png)
mini.iso - only estimated size
dpkg_1.15.5.4_i386.deb - control.tar.gz and data.tar.gz recompressed 
with 7zip


The initrd can be compressed even more with XZ. "xz -9 -e initrd" 
produces file with size 4660512 B, i.e. 72.8% (and for mini.iso - 
7615316 B, which is 81%).
The dpkg_1.15.5.4_i386.deb produced with XZ has size 125 B, which is 
57.7%.



My personal opinions:
1. Using of 7zip is "compatible way" so it can be used with minimal 
changes to build system and it can allow to place 5-10% more packages on 
the installation CD.

2. XZ will be big step forward :-)

TonyMi



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#561734: Hints how to decrease size of installer

2009-12-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 561734 debian-installer
Bug #561734 [installation-reports] Hints how to decrease size of installer
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'debian-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org