Bug#551172: debian-installer: Support option to decide from where the system should get it is users/authentication
Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Hello, I like the idea of OpenSuSE. At install time, you have to decide how users auth on the installed system, e.g.: * shadow (default) * LDAP * Windows Domäne * Some others.. It would be realy nice if d-i also provides such a way. -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.28.4--std-ipv6-32 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processed: Re: debian-installer: hungs with unstruted sources
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 501723 549880 Bug#501723: debian-installer: hungs with unstruted sources Bug#549880: debian-installer: hungs with unstruted sources Forcibly Merged 501723 549880. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#549880: debian-installer: hungs with unstruted sources
forcemerge 501723 549880 thanks Hi Robert! On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:32:13 +0200, Robert Henney wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Severity: important Whenever replying to an existing bug, please reply to the bug number as explained at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#followup With this mail, I have merged your new bug (#549880) with the original one I submitted (#501723), no need for two different bugs for the same issue. > On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:27:43PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: >> I'm not sure if this is still a bug, since it happened with an etch >> 4.0r4 i386 business-card image, but I don't know how to reproduce it, so >> I reported it anyway. Feel free to close it :-) > > I can confirm that this problem still exists in 5.0r3 powerpc netinst. > > I have an iMac G3 on which this occurs at every install attempt, so it's > very reproducible here. because of that I have not been able to get > lenny installed on it. > > there is one thing about this machine that may be a clue: > the hardware clock on the machine appears to have reset to Jan 1 of some > year, probably 1970 but without a date command installed it's hard to > tell. the system time being so far off might be confusing something in > the installer, but I can't begin to guess what. I had similar problems WRT the hardware clock, as I explained at http://bugs.debian.org/501367 You can easily reset the hardware clock removing the internal battery and leaving the machine off 2/3 days IIRC. I am not sure, but I think that I have looked at the d-i logfiles at that time and the problem seemed to be related to the RTC not being available or broken. I do not have anymore the d-i logfiles, so I can not confirm this. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca pgpbICcYyiboU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#550955: marked as done (installation-reports: installer unable to use package repositories)
Your message dated Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:45:45 +0200 with message-id <87k4yvp9s6@mimuw.edu.pl> and subject line Bug#550955: installation-reports: installer unable to use package repositories has caused the Debian Bug report #550955, regarding installation-reports: installer unable to use package repositories to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 550955: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550955 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Severity: critical I've tried today unsuccesfully to install Squeeze from today's bussiness card image on a virtual machine with bridge networking, first under VirtualBox, than under VMWare. I had no problem when installing Lenny under VMWare with the same network parameters. Regards JSB -- , dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej) Prof. Janusz S. Bien - Warsaw University (Department of Formal Linguistics) jsb...@uw.edu.pl, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Reason explained in my previous mail. JSB --- End Message ---
Bug#550955: installation-reports: installer unable to use package repositories
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl (Janusz S. Bień) wrote: [...] > I will try to reproduce the problem in a day or so. I'm unable to reproduce the problem today. Perhaps previously the Polish repositories I've tried really has been unaccessible... I will close the bug. Regards JSB -- , dr hab. Janusz S. Bien, prof. UW - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej) Prof. Janusz S. Bien - Warsaw University (Department of Formal Linguistics) jsb...@uw.edu.pl, jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl, http://fleksem.klf.uw.edu.pl/~jsbien/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551172: debian-installer: Support option to decide from where the system should get it is users/authentication
reassign 551172 user-setup thanks Quoting Patrick Matthäi (pmatth...@debian.org): > Package: debian-installer > Severity: wishlist > > Hello, > > I like the idea of OpenSuSE. At install time, you have to decide how users > auth > on the installed system, e.g.: > > * shadow (default) > * LDAP > * Windows Domäne > * Some others.. > > It would be realy nice if d-i also provides such a way. That clearly pertains to the user-setup component. Anyone feeling like implementing this? That sounds tricky as it involves the choice of installing libnss_foo packages, then configure them, etc... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#551172: debian-installer: Support option to decide from where the system should get it is users/authentication
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 551172 user-setup Bug #551172 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Support option to decide from where the system should get it is users/authentication Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'user-setup'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing of grub-installer_1.47_amd64.changes
grub-installer_1.47_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: grub-installer_1.47.dsc grub-installer_1.47.tar.gz grub-installer_1.47_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
grub-installer_1.47_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: grub-installer_1.47.dsc to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.47.dsc grub-installer_1.47.tar.gz to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.47.tar.gz grub-installer_1.47_amd64.udeb to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_1.47_amd64.udeb Override entries for your package: grub-installer_1.47.dsc - source debian-installer grub-installer_1.47_amd64.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: grub-installer_1.46.dsc grub-installer_1.46.tar.gz This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives within 23:27:25, the files will be deleted. If you didn't upload those files, please just ignore this message. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#551280: Two download locations of debian-503-i386-netinst.iso have different checksums
Package: installation-reports I am trying to install Debian 5.0.3, and decided to download the netinst iso to burn. I downloaded it twice via this link: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.3/i386/iso-cd/debian-503-i386-netinst.iso Found here: http://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst That iso had a md5sum of a7f128ff45efc3094b59889b1dbdd256 both times. I then tried downloading that file from two different mirrors listed here: http://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/ Those files had md5sums matching the MD5SUMS file, which is 52794007fa5cc7b90d18943e867f05de. Files from both sources have identical filenames: debian-503-i386-netinst.iso I'm just curious why the main download link file has a different md5sum than the mirrored version. Thanks in advance. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
