Re: Debian Installer Bullseye RC 3 release
Hello, Kenneth Schack Banner wrote: > The torrent mirror seems to have a bug, i was not able to download the > unofficial release using a bittorrent clinet, but i was able to download it > with http/ftp This is completely out of our area :) I don't know who would be best to contact, but probably debian-...@lists.debian.org will know. > Under the installation I used high contrast mode and am wondering if its > possible to use "automatically login" due to my next bug? Mmm, I don't think there is something like that implemented already, but I'll not as a TODO. > After the installation and a reboot i meet a login window, where im not able > to use the magnifier (super + mouse wheel) and either invert colors (super + > m/n) Indeed, now submitted upstream https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/206 https://github.com/canonical/lightdm/issues/207 Note that you have the F1 and F2 shortcuts which provide limited visual tricks. > The other bug i experienced is if i use F2 + alt (run program) > And i type terminal and hit enter i get an error, there is 1 choice > "mate-terminal". Well, yes. I don't think they will consider it as a bug, because apparently the text field is supposed to be the command name, not just an approximation of the name, even if the list below provides hints as what an approximation could be. > In high contrast there is maby more icons there is not in high contast, one > i found was Firefox. Indeed. For firefox that's because we have firefox-esr. I have reported it as https://bugs.debian.org/992982 For the others it's just missing icons, I have reported it as https://github.com/mate-desktop/mate-themes/issues/293 Thanks for your reports, Samuel
Re: java-atk-wrapper: which files ar used in /run/user/1000/*
Hello, I could reproduce your issue. Halim Sahin, le lun. 14 juin 2021 11:08:08 +0200, a ecrit: > when a running desktop crashs or a user does > sudo systemctl lightdm restart > > a11y including orca etc works as expected. > Only java apps which use atk-wrapper is completely inaccessible. > > Then removing all files in /run/user/1000/* works or a full reboot. > > My Question is: which files are needed by java-atk-wrapper? > > It could be an issue of atk-wrapper if it can't determine some > interfaces and use obsolete sockets etc. Well, it's quite involved. Apparently when running lightdm restart or the session crashes, the dbus session bus does not actually terminate. And thus the at-spi bus does not terminate either... But the only way that jaw uses to determine whether an at-spi bus is running is the venerable AT_SPI_BUS X property, which went away with the X session. C applications go through the at-spi bus which they happen to find through the session bus. It's removing /run/user/1000/bus (the session bus) that "fixes" jaw by making dbus recreate a new session bus, and thus at-spi create a new at-spi bus, and set its address in the AT_SPI_BUS X property, and then jaw can find it. So as usual with bugs there are actually two issues: - Bad dbus cleanup on lightdm restart or session crash. That is a bit surprising, I though all the systemd etc. stuff was precisely meant to keep that kind of thing sane... - jaw still relying on the AT_SPI_BUS X property (but possibly some other toolkits do that as well, but on wayland it'll have to go through a session bus anyway). Samuel
Re: java-atk-wrapper: which files ar used in /run/user/1000/*
Samuel Thibault, le jeu. 26 août 2021 01:09:46 +0200, a ecrit: > - Bad dbus cleanup on lightdm restart or session crash. That is a bit > surprising, I though all the systemd etc. stuff was precisely meant to > keep that kind of thing sane... I have submitted https://bugs.debian.org/992990 > - jaw still relying on the AT_SPI_BUS X property (but possibly some > other toolkits do that as well, but on wayland it'll have to go > through a session bus anyway). I have fixed it in version 0.38.0-4 of jaw. Samuel
