Re: Log for attempted build of gnupg2_2.0.21-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)
Eric Dorland dixit: >> testing message digests takes too long on this >> slow platform (I noticed that as I ran top on >> the buildd while upgrading its chroot basedir) >> and builds are killed after inactivity for a while >Well that's a shame. Any suggestions? Only the really unconstructive one: Exclude the tests if DEB_BUILD_ARCH (not DEB_HOST_ARCH because the slowness is a property of the system compiling the source) matches m68k. Cc’ing the porters list for additional feedback, if any… bye, //mirabilos -- Gast: „Ein Bier, bitte!“ Wirt: „Geht auch alkoholfrei?“ Gast: „Geht auch Spielgeld?“ PS: سمَـَّوُوُحخ ̷̴̐خ ̷̴̐خ ̷̴̐خ امارتيخ ̷̴̐خ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1309040945570.21...@herc.mirbsd.org
Re: Log for attempted build of gnupg2_2.0.21-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)
On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Eric Dorland dixit: > > >> testing message digests takes too long on this slow platform (I > >> noticed that as I ran top on the buildd while upgrading its chroot > >> basedir) and builds are killed after inactivity for a while > > >Well that's a shame. Any suggestions? > > Only the really unconstructive one: > > Exclude the tests if DEB_BUILD_ARCH (not DEB_HOST_ARCH because the > slowness is a property of the system compiling the source) matches m68k. > > Cc'ing the porters list for additional feedback, if any? How about a test for actual inactivity? (E.g. processes blocked for too long, or process cumulative CPU time not accumulating.) Or just make the timeout adjustable or optional. When was the last time you needed it? Finn > > bye, > //mirabilos > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.LNX.2.00.1309042150370.7516@nippy.intranet
Re: Log for attempted build of gnupg2_2.0.21-2 on m68k (dist=unstable)
Finn Thain dixit: >How about a test for actual inactivity? (E.g. processes blocked for too >long, or process cumulative CPU time not accumulating.) > >Or just make the timeout adjustable or optional. When was the last time The timeout is a feature of the buildd software we cannot disable. >you needed it? Not too long ago, indeed. bye, //mirabilos -- Gast: „Ein Bier, bitte!“ Wirt: „Geht auch alkoholfrei?“ Gast: „Geht auch Spielgeld?“ PS: سمَـَّوُوُحخ ̷̴̐خ ̷̴̐خ ̷̴̐خ امارتيخ ̷̴̐خ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1309041611040.31...@herc.mirbsd.org
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
Hi, I am an active porter for the alpha architecture in that I run two buildd servers and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For alpha, I - test some packages on this architecture - maintain buildds I am not a DD/DM Bill MacAllister -- Bill MacAllister Infrastructure Delivery Group, Stanford University -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/717d01a4fc1ba4fcc23b1...@trainmaster.stanford.edu
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
Hello, I am not currently a porter but I would like to be one for the architectures ppc64 and sparc64. I currently have no hardware, but I will be obtaining ppc64 and sparc64 systems in the very near future (within 2 weeks). I do have advanced C knowledge and have programmed for 12 years. I have programmed for i386, amd64, powerpc, mips, and sparc. I have never contributed to Debian before, but have worked on multiple personal projects. I am not a DD/DM. -- Steven Gawroriski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130904174347.1dc61d4b.ste...@multiphasicapps.net
Re: Roll call for porters of architectures in sid and testing
Hi, I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: For SPARC64, I - test a lot of the packages for KDE4 Desktop - testing and currently preparing patches for Iceweasel - test Vanilla build of the Linux kernel, trying to find out why everything after 2.8 breaks certain builds. - currently own a Sun Blade 2500, a Netra X1, and a SunFire T2000 - help port random projects to Sparc64 For Alpha, I - test basic functionality of Xorg and XFCE - port random projects to Alpha I am not a DD/DM On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of > that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which > port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an > overview of which of the porters are (still) active for each > port. Once the results from the role-call are in, we will request > other information about the status of the ports. In the meantime, feel > free to update and collect info about the ports in the Debian wiki[WIKI]. > > If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of > jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in > the port to the Release Team before > 1st of October 2013. Please explain the level of your involvement in > the port. > > Feel free to use the following template as your reply: > > """ > Hi, > > I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend > to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release: > > For , I > - test (most|all) packages on this architecture > - fix toolchain issues > - triage arch-specific bugs > - fix arch-related bugs > - maintain buildds > - ... > > > > > """ > > Niels, on behalf of the release team > > [LAST-BITS] > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/08/msg6.html > > [WIKI] https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/Jessie > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSIu2TAAoJEAVLu599gGRC86EP/j/7FEZ9pxpTEHrBI41GTu6r > nENS5kAZAuxFQHfYLtKexBcgneGd6cgdmr3cIoh1ZL9lJgXq74X8FL5IbWNqUw9S > o9UQWpZJiwIIlH4fqSgFVLIphI0DQr7dXI7xcDIm4kl6Fdruo1tGxX8xqL23jzdP > nQb3jrXv3bj5943MfWeCbODILv2N6qev9VtWeQ6Wmh8PvxRUl7VqgdQaeHtlMsUp > TQT5fz0cw8gc2amlwlOZxaGDV2C8mHboJIKMEsu79BK4SlFSED9rXn4juFPUnAgG > uADsMdBBqEIgSMN42cPHQju+KLfJe/+xScmlzzDS/d7aWWs02TibcQ1ZnPi+bcgp > bd/Wa0lms+Fc2OpcuFle9Lwo+2B+ka1Dd3itm+D0SbmrxoGi6CuMMwydLcQbSJ73 > hHw9HJEIQr2x/ZItNPJrSvvj50rwYXcmFbxtVAwv2pFXfQ37iukYgAaaMvnwpNNJ > 6dM1coCF9skNkXLO8rkZ+5aupGgjpS9BdKKAEQrPy/aoaW9KNCZrLQeA4C3QySBU > OcCNBv7taSjVAVNszKtRIQpu2gzFGAV0u9Gj41qW1JzDHYrmAvMyGxrndOxTmaFr > p05QWgcMsPhNvdHjd6sWLyzJ5NYUKksCPMRgCc0BEd6moIyrt7UFsp2+guJZPBJ0 > pffEJGK2iGtrWmJfElof > =TUeZ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130901073351.a92862...@thykier.net > >
