Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:13:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:

> What would the device name for a CD be in AmigaOS?

That's rather free to choose.

> Fine, so all we'd need to know is the path to the install script on the 
> CD as seen by AmigaOS? Or does it correctly try to launch the script of 
> the same basename in the same directory if the script file name is 
> missing?

Uhm, well, I believe that AmigaOS tries to locate the script in the same
directory. Alternatively the script location must be set explicitly. 

-- 
Ciao...//  Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/   http://blog.windfluechter.net

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-16 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:13:11AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> AmigaOS has 2 choices for paths:

Basically 3 choices: 

>   - paths involving the device name (which may depend on the driver)
>   - paths involving the volume name (the label)

- paths involving an assign name (assign cd0: cdrom: or so)

Assigns a nice way to shorten path names as you can assign some sort of
"drive letter" to paths and can even add multiple paths to that assignment
to expand the search path like in "assign c: sys:c" && "assign c: work:c
add". 
This was for example used to access installation of apps. Instead of
work:apps/graphics/3D_Animation/Imagine you just accessed the application by
its assign name called Imagine: for example. When you moved the application
later, you just needed to update the assign line in the User-Startup config. 
Gz... good ol' times... :)

-- 
Ciao...//  Fon: 0381-2744150 
  Ingo   \X/   http://blog.windfluechter.net

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij_public_key.asc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Reviewing data in the debian-cd packages

2008-09-16 Thread Kolbjørn Barmen
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 04:13:12AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> 
> > What would the device name for a CD be in AmigaOS?
> 
> That's rather free to choose.
> 
> > Fine, so all we'd need to know is the path to the install script on the 
> > CD as seen by AmigaOS? Or does it correctly try to launch the script of 
> > the same basename in the same directory if the script file name is 
> > missing?
> 
> Uhm, well, I believe that AmigaOS tries to locate the script in the same
> directory. Alternatively the script location must be set explicitly. 

One can also refer to root of device simply by using :

So if the script is CD0:s/linux-launch and there is an icon in
CD0:amiga/launch.info with iconx (newer amigaos doesnt even need that, you
just set the icon to be of type "Launch from CLI", or "CLI" as tooltype)
that points to :s/linux-launch, that will work fine, even if the CD is
inserted in CD1: or CDR0: or whatever.


-- kolla


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Please reupload unifont (unifont_5.1.20080914-1_m68k.changes)

2008-09-16 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi,

about :  unifont_5.1.20080914-1_m68k.changes

Can porter to m68k re-upload this?

I did sponsor uploaded with amd64 packages.  So the following from
anthony is m64k porter issue. (d-devel post exists too.)

On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:45:20PM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> Osamu and Anthony:
> 
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > there was a little bug active in the night, getting a number of packages
> > rejected instead of properly uploaded. In case you uploaded a package
> > with a .changes having one of the following names you want to redo it.
> > Sorry for that.
...
> > unifont_5.1.20080914-1_m68k.changes
> 
> There's probably nothing we can do about this if an autobuilder was
> trying to build it, but just wanted to make sure you saw this.

Although this is font package, there is a package requiring porting:
 Package: unifont-bin
 Architecture: any

Osamu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-09-16 Thread Frank P. Szymanski
Hi Michael,

> And I was wondering all the time who the Atari expert was who didn't
> make it to the meeting :-)

;-)

>>> Is there a MiNT driver for the USB port on the EtherNAT as well? That
>>> might be useful to tackle next.
>> Unfortunately not. There is only a closed source beta mouse driver.
>> http://www.janthomas.org.uk/
> That won't help much ...

Well, I knew that, I just wanted to show in which state usb drivers for
EtherNat are.

> Why not transfer code the other way this time :-) Though I did not use
> the MiNT driver source beyond figuring out what ethernet chip is used,
> and to glance the register base address ...

May I ask why? I mean FreeMiNT is open source as well.

> Anyway, in this case asking the EtherNAT developers for information
> regarding USB HCD base address and interrupts is perhaps the easiest
way forward.

Or perhaps you can get more information from Lyndon Amsdon
(http://hardware.atari.org/netusbee/netus.htm). Rumours are spread that
Netusbee uses the same chip as EtherNat. :-)

In case you like to find someone who should test your drivers with both
EtherNat and Netusbee you know whom to ask. :-)

The only disadvantage is that I still don't have a running debian/m68k
machine due to the fact that the installer refused to work on my machine.

Regards,

Frank


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-09-16 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:39:20PM +0200, Frank P. Szymanski wrote:

> The only disadvantage is that I still don't have a running debian/m68k
> machine due to the fact that the installer refused to work on my machine.

Where did it fail? :)

Peace,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-09-16 Thread Frank P. Szymanski
>> The only disadvantage is that I still don't have a running debian/m68k
>> machine due to the fact that the installer refused to work on my machine.
> Where did it fail? :)

Actually, I don't remember. It has been half a year ago or more. At the
moment I am waiting for my ct63 so I can use the falcon in it's original
case. Rodolphe promised to send it in a week or two.

Then I will give the install procedure a second try.

Where are the current isos located?

Regards,

Frank


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [patch 3/2] m68k: Atari EtherNAT - add writew_be for data push

2008-09-16 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:47:41PM +0200, Frank P. Szymanski wrote:
> >> The only disadvantage is that I still don't have a running debian/m68k
> >> machine due to the fact that the installer refused to work on my machine.
> > Where did it fail? :)
> 
> Actually, I don't remember. It has been half a year ago or more. At the
> moment I am waiting for my ct63 so I can use the falcon in it's original
> case. Rodolphe promised to send it in a week or two.
> 
> Then I will give the install procedure a second try.
> 
> Where are the current isos located?

Ahh, iso's (runs screaming into the night).

 is the
canonical place for the daily cd buildds.

I'm in the process of getting those working again. 

I've been working on building with debimg since something bad happened
to my debian-cd configuration.

I've still got to figure out how to get the right version of parted on
there so atari partitions are recognized and get the d-i tools directory
on there. After that, amiga icons

Hopefully I'll have something reasonable for you to test about the time
you're ready to test. :)

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature