Re: Talking Back to Power: China's 'Haves' Stir the 'Have Nots' to Violence

2005-01-02 Thread R.A. Hettinga
At 9:37 AM -0600 1/1/05, Neil Johnson wrote:
>I'm not really RAH, but I play him on cypherpunks ;-)

Except that he doesn't post cryptosocialist luddite leveller blather,
except in jest, and at least he puts angle brackets around his links so
they don't break, viz,

>http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/31/international/asia/31china.html?
>ex=1105532792&ei=1&en=61c003ece2c2eadb

:-)

Cheers,
RAH
---


-- 
-
R. A. Hettinga 
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation 
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'



Re: Talking Back to Power: China's 'Haves' Stir the 'Have Nots' to Violence

2005-01-02 Thread James A. Donald
The title of this post is misleading:  The protest is anti 
government, and pro property rights.

For example:
> [...] "People can see how corrupt the government is while they 
> barely have enough to eat," said Mr. Yu, reflecting on the 
> uprising that made him an instant proletarian hero 

If he was a "proletarian" hero, he would say "the capitalists".  
Instead he said "the government".

> [...]
>
> Last month, as many as 100,000 farmers in Sichuan Province, 
> frustrated by months of fruitless appeals against a dam 
> project that claimed their land, took matters into their own 
> hands. [...]

Gee.  They took the defense of their own property rights into their 
own hands. 

> "I work like this so that my daughter and son can dress 
> better than I do, so don't look down on me,"

They are rioting for economic mobility, not for a classless society, 
but for a society where classes are not hereditary.

> "I heard him say those exact words," said Wen Jiabao, 
> another porter who says he witnessed the confrontation. "It 
> proves that it's better to be rich than poor, but that being 
> an official is even better than being rich."

The bad guys are not the rich, but those who obtain wealth through 
poliical power.

> Cai Shizhong, a taxi driver, was angered when the 
> authorities created a company to control taxi licenses, 
> which he says cost him thousands of dollars but brought no 
> benefits.

The bad deeds of the bad guys are economic regulation

> Peng Daosheng's home was flooded by the rising reservoir of 
> the Three Gorges Dam. He was supposed to receive $4,000 in 
> compensation as well as a new home. But his new apartment is 
> smaller and less well located, and the cash never arrived.

The bad deeds of the bad guys are violation of property rights 
without fair compensation.

> Li Jian, 22, took part in the plunder. A young peasant, he 
> had found a city job as a short-order cook. But he longed to 
> study computers, said his father, Li Wanfa. The family 
> bought an old computer keyboard so the young man could learn 
> typing.
> 
> "He wanted to go to high school but the school said his 
> cultural level was not high enough," Mr. Li said. "They said 
> a country boy like him should be a cook."

Again, the call for social mobility, equality of opportunity, not 
equality.

> They did not attack any of the restaurants or department 
> stores along the government square, focusing their wrath on 
> symbols of official power.

A riot against the state, not against the rich.




SIGINT and COMSEC Discussion Group

2005-01-02 Thread John Young
A. writes:

I have just launched a new discussion group related to hardware
discussion for signal analysis and communications security systems:


http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sigint/




V@lium ñ0w

2005-01-02 Thread Edwardo Burr















<>

Ño prsecirpiton

2005-01-02 Thread Barbara Kay















<>

Coast Guard to Track Ships Using Buoys

2005-01-02 Thread Eugen Leitl

Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/01/182224
Posted by: michael, on 2005-01-01 20:19:00

   from the feeling-safer-already dept.
   [1]nomrniceguy writes "The Coast Guard plans to use dozens of [2]buoys
   off the U.S. coast to extend the reach of a security system that
   monitors large vessels heading in and out of ports. The buoys are
   intended to extend the network's reach -- the Guard now receives the
   automated data only when a vessel is within about 25 miles of a port.
   The floating transmitters will relay the information from hundreds of
   miles off shore, from the middle of Lake Superior and off coastlines
   from Alaska to Maine."

   [3]Click Here 

References

   1. http://www.igc.org/jobs.html
   2. http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/12/30/port.security.ap/index.html
   3. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5717&alloc_id=12468&site_id=1&request_id=4003996&op=click&page=%2farticle%2epl

- End forwarded message -
-- 
Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
__
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net


pgpSAaFhTDMz8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


The cheapest you will find anywhere

2005-01-02 Thread Sydney Stafford



Something for everyone - from the security conscious to the developers.

 
 
 
 
 
 
House ready to pass intelligence billLawmakers
applying final touches to legislation
 
Tuesday, December 7, 2004 Posted: 10:38 AM EST (1538
GMT)
 
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A long-delayed bill overhauling the
nation's intelligence agencies is nearing passage now that President Bush and
House Armed Services chairman Duncan Hunter have endorsed a compromise
guaranteeing battlefield commanders access to top-secret
information.
 
Bush has called on Congress for months to pass 
legislation implementing the September 11 commission's recommendations to 
protect the nation from terrorists. House GOP leaders have been holding up the
bill because of Hunter's concerns that it might interfere with the military's
ability to get vital information.
 
But Hunter now supports it because House-Senate
negotiators added language to ensure Defense officials would have priority in
battlefield areas over the nation's spy satellites and other intelligence 
equipment.
 
The California congressman had worried that a new
national intelligence director, a position the legislation would create to
coordinate spy agencies, would have been able to insert himself into the chain
of command from the president to the combatant commanders.
 
House Republicans were meeting Tuesday to put the final
touches on the bill. Lawmakers from both parties expect the bill to pass and
said its reforms were long overdue.
 
"We have not in 50 years changed the intelligence
system. We've never walked away from the Cold War model," Sen. Jay Rockefeller
of West Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee,
said Tuesday on CBS' "The Early Show." "We now have a bill which will pass both
houses, I hope, that will change the intelligence system and head it in the
right direction."
 
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, the chief Republican
negotiator on the bill, told CBS that by creating the post of national
intelligence director, the legislation would create "a single individual who
will be responsible for coordinating our intelligence and who will be
accountable. We've lacked that in the current system."
 
House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Illinois, had refused
to bring the bill up before Thanksgiving because of the opposition from Hunter
and House Judiciary chairman James Sensenbrenner, R-Wisconsin. Sensenbrenner
said he would still oppose the bill in Tuesday's GOP meeting because it does not
deal with such issues as illegal immigration and asylum changes.
 
Bush, in a letter to Congress, said the bill should be
passed anyway. "These omissions from the final bill should not prevent the
Congress from passing this historic legislation now," Bush said.
 
House Intelligence chairman Pete Hoekstra, R-Michigan,
told CNN on Tuesday that while the intelligence reorganization bill was not
perfect, it is "a good solid step in the right direction."
 
"If we waited on every bill in Washington to have the
complete package done we'd never get anything done," Hoekstra said. "This is a
good solid step in the right direction, addressing many of the issues that will
make America safer, but we all agree this is not the complete and total
package."
 
Even if some Republicans oppose the bill, supporters in
the House and Senate say they have enough votes to pass the
legislation.
 
"We hope that this support will provide the final
momentum necessary to take intelligence reform across the finish line," Collins
and Joseph Lieberman, D-Connecticut, the lead Senate negotiators, said Monday in
a joint statement.
 
The legislation also would cement into law the 
existence of a national counterintelligence center to coordinate the nation's
fight against terrorism.
 
Bush had used his executive power to order officials to
set that center up, and it opened Monday in an undisclosed location in northern
Virginia, a government official said.
 
Intelligence veteran John Brennan will lead the new
counterterrorism center on an acting basis until the legislation goes into
effect, at which time the director will have to be officially nominated by the
president and confirmed by the Senate.
<>

Re: SIGINT and COMSEC Discussion Group

2005-01-02 Thread Nomen Nescio
On 2 Jan 2005 at 15:43, John Young wrote:

> A. writes:
> 
> I have just launched a new discussion group related to hardware
> discussion for signal analysis and communications security systems:
> 
> 
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sigint/

Why would we use a "groups beta" at google's when there's a big and
proven yahoogroups that's been around for ages (under various names)?





We Are the Best Cpunks

2005-01-02 Thread Berry Baca

Wide range of medss available to choose in our stores.
Saveee uup to 7o % 
Viiagraa, Ciallis, Vallium, Xanaax and many moore..

http://058.kuolocl.com/b/







Happy New Year
CUvZBhovINHKOuNzH0m20w09HFx25x0A2UNdtM3JXGUygd6lRAYE



Downl0ad the grudge movie

2005-01-02 Thread Anna Mays
Hello

Sorry this took so long to send

This is the link to the website you wanted to see.

http://www.makethisyearspecial.com/shwk.html

Let me know if you like it


Take care

Anna Mays



Prices of popular U.S. consumer electronics devices fell slightly in March as 
declines in DVD players and digital cameras outweighed gains in notebook 
computers, according to an industry study prepared for Reuters. 
Digital cameras with the power to develop a picture as big as beach towel may 
attract attention, but it's better to look for more-practical camera features 
that meet everyday needs. 








We Are the Best Cypherpunks

2005-01-02 Thread Efren Posey

I can't believe this incrediible priicess.. 

Pain Relief (from $99)
(Viicodin, Hydrocodoone, Valliium)

Men's Pillls (from $140)
(Viiagra, Leviitra)

Weight Losss (from $140)
(Phentermiine, Xeniical)

You Can't find this 0ffers available anywhere.
Visit Us T0day!

http://www.newholidayplans.com








Noo moree emailsss from us...
yZvexosgPnN6imE6Nu3oyVaolay20lqEc4QZFNd8T