WHAT ARE YOUR KIDS DOING ON THE COMPUTER.
You should be informed. You should know what your children or employees are doing online. Now you can. For more information about this great new software, please go to our website. http://www.software4udepo.com $79.99 Download Limited Time Offer $89.99 Domestic CD $94.99 Outside U.S. For those of you who would feel more comfortable ordering off-line: Please fax your Name, Address, E-mail, Credit card number and expiration date to 309-407-7378 Please use Ref# 387 in your order. A CD-Rom will be rushed to you via first class mail. To have no other suggestions sent http://www.software4udepo.com/visit.htm
¼ºÀÎÀÚ·á½ÇÀÔ´Ï´Ù, µ¿¿µ»ó ¹«·á·Î ´Ù¿î¹ÞÀ¸¼¼¿ä!!£Û¼ºÀα¤°í£Ý
½Ç½Ã°£ ¼ºÀÎÀÚ·á½ÇÀÔ´Ï´Ù ¡Ø¡Ø¡Ø¡Ø ¼¾çµ¿¿µ»ó,ÀϺ»µ¿¿µ»ó,¿©°í»ýµ¿¿µ»óµî... °øÂ¥´Ï±î ´Ù¿î¹ÞÀ¸½ÇºÐÀº »¡¸® ¿À¼Å¼ ´Ù¿î¹ÞÀ¸¼¼¿ä!!!±¸°æÇϱâ ---> http://koreasex.wo.st Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [¼ºÀα¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ´·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä
Personal Alcohol Detector
Title: For your safe drive...and keep your safety with PersonalAlcoholDetector.. We respect your privacy and we want you to be happy. If you wish to unsubscribe from mailing list please click here For your safe drive...and keep your safety with Personal Alcohol Detector.. The key technology for the function and performance of Personal Alcohol Detector is the gas sensor. We use Advanced MEMS Gas Sensor with high accuracy.We are lookng for resellers, distributors to represent this product. If you are interested in dealing please feel free to contact us.Sincerely Yours,From Alcohol org Inc.tel : (268)702-4503We respect your privacy and we want you to be happy. If you wish to unsubscribe from mailing list please click here. We apologize for your inconvenience caused.
ADV: Extend your car's warranty! viihz
Car repairs ALWAYS come at a bad time -- extend your car's warranty today and don't be left with huge bills! (Even older cars qualify!) Buy direct and save 40 to 60%! Fill out our FREE, no obligation form and receive a quote! http://211.78.96.25/yourcar/ --- To unsubscribe, go to: http://211.78.96.25/removal/remove.htm Please allow 48-72 hours for removal.
Executable discarded
We received a message claiming to be from you which contained a virus according to File::Scan v0.30, a Perl module from CPAN at http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HD/HDIAS This message was not delivered to the intended recipient, it has been discarded. For information on removing viruses from your computer, please see http://www.google.com/search?q=antivirus or http://hotbot.lycos.com/?query=antivirus Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CDR: (bangit) Virus : W32/Klez.gen@MM Original headers: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Jun 22 08:32:28 2002 >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15862 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:36:56 -0500 >Received: (from mdom@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15795 > for cypherpunks-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:35:33 -0500 >Received: from ipop2 (ipop2.tm.net.my [202.188.0.246]) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA15781 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:34:59 -0500 >Received: from Wbebe (bin-21-213.tm.net.my [210.186.21.213]) > by ipop2.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) > with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, > 22 Jun 2002 20:28:34 +0800 (SGT) >Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:28:12 +0800 (SGT) >Date-warning: Date header was inserted by ipop2.tm.net.my >From: SuperSizePorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: CDR: (bangit) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >MIME-version: 1.0 >Content-type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="Boundary_(ID_7rRuSxShI8AsC9oppxoEtQ)" >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Unsubscription-Info: http://einstein.ssz.com/cdr >X-List-Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Loop: ssz.com >X-Acceptable-Languages: English, Russian, German, French, Spanish We received a message claiming to be from you which contained an executable attachment (batch file, script, program, etc). In order to protect users from malicious programs, we do not accept these file types thru this mail server. If you need to send the file to it's intended recipient, you must send it in an archived and/or compressed format. Your email has been sent to the intended recipient without this file included. A message detailing why it was dropped has been substitued in it's place. Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CDR: (bangit) Mime type : audio/x-wav File name : onload.exe
Executable discarded
We received a message claiming to be from you which contained a virus according to File::Scan v0.30, a Perl module from CPAN at http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HD/HDIAS This message was not delivered to the intended recipient, it has been discarded. For information on removing viruses from your computer, please see http://www.google.com/search?q=antivirus or http://hotbot.lycos.com/?query=antivirus Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Compressed Virus : W32/Klez.gen@MM Original headers: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Jun 22 08:31:30 2002 >Received: from waste.minder.net (daemon@waste [66.92.53.73]) > by locust.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MCVFE38490 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:31:16 -0400 (EDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by waste.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5MCVEL16879 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:31:14 -0400 >Received: from locust.minder.net (locust.minder.net [66.92.53.74]) > by waste.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MCV9u16865 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:31:09 -0400 >Received: from hq.pro-ns.net (hq.pro-ns.net [208.200.182.20]) > by locust.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MCV5E38476 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:31:05 -0400 (EDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >Received: from hq.pro-ns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by hq.pro-ns.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5MCV4Dx018024 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:31:04 -0500 (CDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by hq.pro-ns.net (8.12.3/8.12.2/Submit) id g5MCV3Ze018020 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:31:03 -0500 (CDT) > (envelope-from cpunks) >Received: from einstein.ssz.com (cpunks@[207.200.56.4]) > by hq.pro-ns.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5MCUpDx017875 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:30:52 -0500 (CDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >X-Authentication-Warning: hq.pro-ns.net: Host cpunks@[207.200.56.4] claimed to be >einstein.ssz.com >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15844 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:36:33 -0500 >Received: (from mdom@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15785 > for cypherpunks-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:35:02 -0500 >Received: from ipop3 (ipop3.tm.net.my [202.188.0.247]) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA15772 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:34:45 -0500 >Received: from Chxw (bin-21-213.tm.net.my [210.186.21.213]) > by ipop3.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.6 (built Apr 26 > 2002)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:28:10 +0800 (SGT) >Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:27:48 +0800 (SGT) >Date-warning: Date header was inserted by ipop3.tm.net.my >From: important_phone_call <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Old-Subject: Compressed >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >MIME-version: 1.0 >Content-type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="Boundary_(ID_9QEOphBmCv5ATH2ILegZ1Q)" >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Unsubscription-Info: http://einstein.ssz.com/cdr >X-List-Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Loop: ssz.com >X-Acceptable-Languages: English, Russian, German, French, Spanish >Subject: Compressed We received a message claiming to be from you which contained an executable attachment (batch file, script, program, etc). In order to protect users from malicious programs, we do not accept these file types thru this mail server. If you need to send the file to it's intended recipient, you must send it in an archived and/or compressed format. Your email has been sent to the intended recipient without this file included. A message detailing why it was dropped has been substitued in it's place. Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Compressed Mime type : audio/x-midi File name : noad.pif
an uncrackable msg
hello i got your e-mail address off of a web site, and i was hoping you could help me crack it, if ya dont feel like helping thats ok. hksqphpkwasyoqgjwwscocgvwtavvgsjhthgpgsjpcwgsfanvkhnsphcp iptsvwggjoaakwqsuvwhahfsqpqwwpksugphjoisqpnhwpqsnpqwfpma iskhkvpwxaighscpwvseovgthjsgpkpfwuskoogvwgsvougqwuacvcsph ihqpgsvpywjgjsgokwtseajvjhwskhopupcauwpvshcswwpggofsgwrgg ocsphtpepcaqwfsfvqhghzsfpp i have no idea how to do it and any help would be appreciated. also if ya do crack it could you tell me what it is and what decription method you usedSend and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
Executable discarded
We received a message claiming to be from you which contained a virus according to File::Scan v0.30, a Perl module from CPAN at http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HD/HDIAS This message was not delivered to the intended recipient, it has been discarded. For information on removing viruses from your computer, please see http://www.google.com/search?q=antivirus or http://hotbot.lycos.com/?query=antivirus Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CDR: Compressed Virus : W32/Klez.gen@MM Original headers: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Jun 22 08:31:07 2002 >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15836 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:36:31 -0500 >Received: (from mdom@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15785 > for cypherpunks-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:35:02 -0500 >Received: from ipop3 (ipop3.tm.net.my [202.188.0.247]) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA15772 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:34:45 -0500 >Received: from Chxw (bin-21-213.tm.net.my [210.186.21.213]) > by ipop3.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.6 (built Apr 26 > 2002)) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:28:10 +0800 (SGT) >Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:27:48 +0800 (SGT) >Date-warning: Date header was inserted by ipop3.tm.net.my >From: important_phone_call <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: CDR: Compressed >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >MIME-version: 1.0 >Content-type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="Boundary_(ID_9QEOphBmCv5ATH2ILegZ1Q)" >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Unsubscription-Info: http://einstein.ssz.com/cdr >X-List-Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Loop: ssz.com >X-Acceptable-Languages: English, Russian, German, French, Spanish We received a message claiming to be from you which contained an executable attachment (batch file, script, program, etc). In order to protect users from malicious programs, we do not accept these file types thru this mail server. If you need to send the file to it's intended recipient, you must send it in an archived and/or compressed format. Your email has been sent to the intended recipient without this file included. A message detailing why it was dropped has been substitued in it's place. Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CDR: Compressed Mime type : audio/x-midi File name : noad.pif
Executable discarded
We received a message claiming to be from you which contained a virus according to File::Scan v0.30, a Perl module from CPAN at http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HD/HDIAS This message was not delivered to the intended recipient, it has been discarded. For information on removing viruses from your computer, please see http://www.google.com/search?q=antivirus or http://hotbot.lycos.com/?query=antivirus Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: (bangit) Virus : W32/Klez.gen@MM Original headers: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Jun 22 08:33:06 2002 >Received: from waste.minder.net (daemon@waste [66.92.53.73]) > by locust.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MCWmE38681 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:32:49 -0400 (EDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by waste.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5MCWlI17238 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:32:47 -0400 >Received: from locust.minder.net (locust.minder.net [66.92.53.74]) > by waste.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MCWju17224 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:32:45 -0400 >Received: from hq.pro-ns.net (hq.pro-ns.net [208.200.182.20]) > by locust.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MCWfE38668 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 08:32:42 -0400 (EDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >Received: from hq.pro-ns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by hq.pro-ns.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5MCWeDx01 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:32:41 -0500 (CDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by hq.pro-ns.net (8.12.3/8.12.2/Submit) id g5MCWeZ4018873 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:32:40 -0500 (CDT) > (envelope-from cpunks) >Received: from einstein.ssz.com (cpunks@[207.200.56.4]) > by hq.pro-ns.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5MCV7Dx018044 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:31:13 -0500 (CDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >X-Authentication-Warning: hq.pro-ns.net: Host cpunks@[207.200.56.4] claimed to be >einstein.ssz.com >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15868 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:36:57 -0500 >Received: (from mdom@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15795 > for cypherpunks-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:35:33 -0500 >Received: from ipop2 (ipop2.tm.net.my [202.188.0.246]) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA15781 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 07:34:59 -0500 >Received: from Wbebe (bin-21-213.tm.net.my [210.186.21.213]) > by ipop2.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) > with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, > 22 Jun 2002 20:28:34 +0800 (SGT) >Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:28:12 +0800 (SGT) >Date-warning: Date header was inserted by ipop2.tm.net.my >From: SuperSizePorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Old-Subject: (bangit) >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >MIME-version: 1.0 >Content-type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="Boundary_(ID_7rRuSxShI8AsC9oppxoEtQ)" >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Unsubscription-Info: http://einstein.ssz.com/cdr >X-List-Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Loop: ssz.com >X-Acceptable-Languages: English, Russian, German, French, Spanish >Subject: (bangit) We received a message claiming to be from you which contained an executable attachment (batch file, script, program, etc). In order to protect users from malicious programs, we do not accept these file types thru this mail server. If you need to send the file to it's intended recipient, you must send it in an archived and/or compressed format. Your email has been sent to the intended recipient without this file included. A message detailing why it was dropped has been substitued in it's place. Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: (bangit) Mime type : audio/x-wav File name : onload.exe
Re: CDR: an uncrackable msg
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, David nolan wrote: > hello i got your e-mail address off of a web site, and i was hoping you could help >me crack it, if ya dont feel like > helping thats ok. > > hksqphpkwasyoqgjwwscocgvwtavvgsjhthgpgsjpcwgsfanvkhnsphcp = GEORGE BUSH DIDDLES LITTLE BOYS WHILE WATCHING TAPED FOOT > iptsvwggjoaakwqsuvwhahfsqpqwwpksugphjoisqpnhwpqsnpqwfpma = AGE OF INNOCENTS BEING MAIMED AND KILLED IN PALESTINE ST > iskhkvpwxaighscpwvseovgthjsgpkpfwuskoogvwgsvougqwuacvcsph = OP PREPARE FOR MORE ISRAELI MASSACRES OF INNOCENT CIVILIA > ihqpgsvpywjgjsgokwtseajvjhwskhopupcauwpvshcswwpggofsgwrgg = NS STOP PREPARE FOR MORE MASSACRES OF INNOCENTS BY CHINA > ocsphtpepcaqwfsfvqhghzsfpp = STOP BUSH TO SUPPORT ALL!! > i have no idea how to do it and any help would be appreciated. > also if ya do crack it could you tell me what it is and what decription method you >used Divination. -- Yours, J.A. Terranson [EMAIL PROTECTED] If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place...
SUPERCHARGE YOUR SEX LIFE FOR FREE vdpd
Now, for a very limited time, you can try the premiere sexual enhancement product made available to the public, absolutely free. With Prosextra, you'll supercharge your sex life, boost your performance levels and amplify your pleasure to new peaks of excitement. The difference this product will make in your life is totally unbelievable, and now you can test it out with absolutely no damage to your wallet. Don't suffer with a lackluster sex life for even one more minute! Take advantage of this special offer while you can. You can test drive a free sample of Prosextra, and see for yourself what an amazing effect this product has on your sex life and how it improves the quality of your whole life. Nothing will ever be the same the doldrums are over. Quantities are strictly limited. Take control and order now to avoid missing out on this incredible, life-altering offer. CLICK HERE The Solstice Team to be removed click here euouaxohvruopaddxcvglwwb
Larger breasts with NEW Electronic Bra 31928
Are you looking for a safe inexpensive alternative to breast augmentation surgery? Then you have found it! Bust Firmer is the latest advance in breast enlargement techniques, rapidly becoming the #1 way to not only increase the size of your breasts but also restore firmness and elasticity. Your email address was obtained from a purchased list, Reference # 1120-13000. If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please Click here and enter your name into the remove box. If you have previously unsubscribed and are still receiving this message, you may email our Abuse Control Center, or call 1-888-763-2497, or write us at: NoSpam, 6484 Coral Way, Miami, FL, 33155". ÿA9 2002 Web Credit Inc. All Rights Reserved.
here you go sorry so late
ADVISORS BUY RECOMMENDATION!For Cal-Bay (Symbol: CBYI) BASED ON CBYI SUCCESS, A LICENSED & REGISTERED INVESTMENT EXPERT says NOW is the time to invest in CBYI and... Rates CBYI as a speculative Long-Term BUY. Will Hit a price target of $2.00 by 2002 and $5.00 by 2003! Will achieve earnings growth of 200 to 250% in the next 2 years. Will achieve earnings of approximately 2.5¢ per share by 2003. MORE QUOTES FROM LICENSED INVESTMENT EXPERT : "We anticipate that liquidity will increase as well as coverage by additional analysts." "The company has developed a network of strategic alliances that are designed to assist the company in obtaining a DOMINANT MARKET SHARE." The current market in which Cal-Bay operates is currently estimated to exceed $900 million. Estimates calling for $25 Billion in sales by the year 2003." "We expect the company to achieve it's current goal of Nasdaq OTCBB. Once on the larger exchange, we anticipate that liquidity will increase." MORE REASONS TO OWN THE STOCK : CBYI IS GROWING AT A RAPID RATE. EARNINGS PER SHARE IS INCREASING! CBYI is one of the FASTEST growing companies in distributing environmental and safety equipment instruments. CBYI is a profitable company, has NO DEBT and is on track to beat ALL earnings estimates. CBYI has increased revenue of 50% annually! CBYI is a fully reporting SEC compliant company that has been in business since 1976. CBYI has an excellent management team with several EXCLUSIVE contracts and an IMPRESSIVE client list including: Anheuser-Busch, Chevron Refining, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, GE-Energy & Environmental Research and the U.S. Air Force. ALL removes HONERED. Please allow 7 days to be removed and send ALL address to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Certain statements contained in this news release may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be identified by such terms as "expect", "believe", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms. We are NOT a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is NOT an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. We were paid $27,000 in cash by a third party to publish this report. Investing in companies profiled is high-risk and use of this information is for reading purposes only. If anyone decides to act as an investor, then it will be that investor's sole risk. Investors are advised NOT to invest without the proper advisement from an attorney or a registered financial broker. Do not rely solely on the information presented, do additional independent research to form your own opinion and decision regarding investing in the profiled companies. Be advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the loss of your entire investment. The owners of this publication may already own free trading shares in CBYI and may immediately sell all or a portion of these shares into the open market at or about the time this report is published. Factual statements are made as of the date stated and are subject to change without notice. Not intended for recipients or residents of CA,CO,CT,DE,ID, IL,IA,LA,MO,NV,NC,OK,OH,PA,RI,TN,VA,WA,WV,WI. Void where prohibited. Copyright c 2001 ***
Re: DOJ proposes US data-rentention law.
At 18:57 21/06/2002 -0700, John Young wrote: >Data retention is being done now by programs and services >which cache data to ease loading on servers and networks. >[...] John, As a systems administrator @ an ISP, I can tell flat out that the software you describe has nothing to do with ISP services. The software provides caching services for telecom companies (ie. billing, WAP, voice mail alerts etc). I see nothing that mentions typical ISP services, like e-mail or web-browsing. It is software designed to impress the executive level with pie charts and promises of reduced hardware costs. No one likes spending $50k on a NAS or Fibre Channel / RAID 10 box. Next time John, I suggest you turn your sites on caching software like Squid. Know what? I'm not even afraid to provide the URL! http://www.squid-cache.org .. you may even discover it has US Intelligence Community(tm) links, dating back many years! Incredible, huh? ISP's like the one I work for use Squid to save on bandwidth costs by caching oft-visited websites. Unfortunately, we (like most if not all ISP's) cannot afford the massive disk arrays (or the space they would take up, even the electricity) that would be necessary to retain data *for one day*. Geez, I don't think the government gonna like that. That's doesn't even bring us to the technical abilities of all the different pieces of software that must be re-written (en masse) to satisfy government desires. For instance, let's try e-mail software.. There are numerous companies and individuals who offer their own versions of e-mail server software. Microsoft's Exchange and Ipswitch's IMail for the Windows crowd who like spending lots of money, or Qmail, Postfix, Exim and even Sendmail for the Unix crowd. There are dozen's more, but you get the point. All that software will need to be rewritten. Then all the e-mail servers will need to be upgraded and tested. THEN more disk space added just to handle all the extraneous information like from who and to, from where (say originating IP and from what server host and IP) etc etc etc ad nauseam. Whoops! Let's not forget tape backups! I'm buying 3M stock come Monday! But what happens if we have a disk failure and the logs are lost? Hmm... Anyway, that is just for e-mail.. Imagine what HTTP, or FTP, or whatever can't-live-without service someone invents in the future? Data retention is unworkable even to the biggest of companies. Even the NSA cannot store that kind of data without a significant (and secret) budget. The only ones deriving any benefit from this are law enforcement and computer hardware & commercial software manufacturers. Maybe its an economic stimulus package in disguise? -- Steve.
Get paid while doing your household chores!
Title: New Page 1 To be removed from our subscriber lists please click here.
Enquiry for Cosultancy service
Dear Sir, My name is George Keita. I am the Deputy Accountant of Cote dIvoires Societe Ivoirienne Raffiannage (S.I.R) with Headquarters in Abidjan, the capital city. My organisation is responsible for the running of the Countrys Refinery. In addition, I am a member of the committee which awarded the contract for the rehabilitation of the Refinery which suffered a fire disaster October last year. I am contacting you, having been mandated to do so by my colleagues in the contract awarding committee, purely on the basis of business to inquire if you could provide us an overseas bank account which we could use to transfer some money which we made from the contract which we awarded for the rehabilitation of the burnt Refinery. This money which we want to transfer out from here in Abidjan was made by way of inflating the value of the contract which we awarded for the rehabilitation of the burnt Refinery. The true value of the contract was USD$ 42 Million. But we inflated it to the sum of USD$62.5 Million thereby making for ourselves the sum of USD$22.5 Million. It is this money which we want to reclaim and transfer through the paying Bank here in Abidjan now that the contractors who executed the contract have started being paid. I am contacting you purely on the basis of business. I and my colleagues have worked out the modalities by which we will reclaim this USD$22.5 Million. The modality will basically require that we find a foreign businessman or woman whose offshore company we will project as having supplied consultancy service and materials for the rehabilitation of the Refinery. Once we find such a foreign businessman or woman, we will have his or her company registered through a lawyer as having supplied Consultancy Service and materials for the rehabilitation of the Refinery , backdating such registration to fall within the period the contact was awarded and thereafter, we will process the payment and have the money transferred out the overseas account. If you are interested in handling this business, I would like you to reply me and do the followings: tell me how much you would like to be paid for this transaction give me your particulars so that I and my colleagues will consider your credentials and make our final decision. If after we receive your reply and particulars, meet and decide to work with you, we will forward your particulars to a lawyer who will proceed to register you as having supplied materials for the rehabilitation of the refinery and thereafter begin to process the payment and transfer of the money to the Bank account which you will provide. Please do bear in mind that after receiving your particulars and we consider it and agree that we will go ahead to work with you, we would like to see you in person so that we will know the face of our partner. Finally, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that all of us in the contract awarding committee are still in active service in the Government. This is the major reason why we decided to look for a foreign businessman or woman like you given that in an attempt to handle this thing ourselves, we are likely to end up being exposed. In this regard therefore, we would like you to keep this matter close to your chest. While I await your reply, let me wish you the best. George Keita.Yahoo! Mail -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
¤»¤d¤»¦Ê¸Uµ§¥þ¥@¬É³Ì·sEmail¦W³æ
¤»¤d¤»¦Ê¸Uµ§¥þ¥@¬É³Ì·sEmail¦W³æ §Ú¦³¤»¤d¤»¦Ê¸Uµ§¥þ¥@¬É³Ì·sEmail¦W³æ¡A §A¥i¥H¦bªá¶O·¥¤Öªº±¡§Î¤U¡A±µÄ²¨ì¥þ¥@¬É¤»¤d¤»¦Ê¸U¤H¡I ³o¨Ç³£¬O³Ì·sªº¦a§}¡A¬O§Ú¦bºô¸ô¤W¡A¦³¨t²Î¦a¦¬¶°¤U¨Óªº¡A ¸g¹L³nÅé´ú¸Õ¡A¥u«O¯d¦³®Ä¦a§}¡A¨ÃºÉ¶q§â¤£Ä@¦¬«HªÌ±Æ°£¡C ¤w¸g¹L²Îp¾ã²z¡B±Æ§Ç¡A©Ò¥H³o¨Ç¦a§}¨S¦³¤@Ó¬O«½Æªº¡I¡I¡I ¥i¥H¥ß§Y¤W¤â¨Ï¥Î¡I¡I¡I ³o¤»¤d¤»¦Ê¸UÓ¦a§}¡A¥H¤å¦rÀ£ÁYÀɪº¤è¦¡¡A ¦¬¶°¦b¤@¤ùCD¤¤¡A¤è«K«½Æ¤@¦Aªº¨Ï¥Î¡C½Ð§´¬°«O¦s¡C ¬°¸`¬Ù¹q¤l°Ó°ÈªÌ¤§¦¬¶°®É¶¡¡A §ÚÄ@·N¥H NT$3000¤¸¤À¨É¡C ¤À¨É±M½u ¹q¸Ü¡G 02-27492314
reduce your mercant service rates
Don't Be Another E-Commerce Statistic! Accept All Major Credit Cards Like many businesses, you have probably found that not being able to accept credit cards is making your website just another pretty picture! Let's face it -- accepting credit cards online is not only a money-maker, it is an essential part of any internet commerce activity. Over 97% of all sales on the Internet are done with Credit Cards. And . . . 92% of mail orders & phone orders are done with credit cards. The numbers don't lie. 9 out of 10 potential customers can't do business with you if you don't take credit cards. YOU CAN BEGIN ACCEPTING CREDIT CARDS IN AS LITTLE AS 24 HOURS! US BUSINESSES ONLY (Depending upon the credit card program we get you qualified for) Existing Merchants: lower your rates-FREE statement analysis Why Not Increase sales by 400%? Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover & Electronic Check Same Day Approval - No Turn Downs - Easy Fax Application Retail * Web * Virtual Terminal * Mail Order * Telephone Order It only takes a few seconds! Click Here to Start Accepting Credit Cards Today! Please include your business name, contact name, phone number, and the best time to reach you. You can always get your address out of our database by stopping by our website and entering into the complete database deletion system. capitalize on over a billion dollars in processing power! get the information on the lowest rates in the industry! 0491xSiS7-544gvNq3655CaAf3-467SskV0983JiJC3-651Ogzl47
Virus discarded
We received a message claiming to be from you which contained a virus according to File::Scan v0.30, a Perl module from CPAN at http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HD/HDIAS This message was not delivered to the intended recipient, it has been discarded. For information on removing viruses from your computer, please see http://www.google.com/search?q=antivirus or http://hotbot.lycos.com/?query=antivirus Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: MIME-Version: 1.0 Virus : W32/Klez.gen@MM Original headers: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Jun 22 17:10:57 2002 >Received: from waste.minder.net (daemon@waste [66.92.53.73]) > by locust.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MLAiE60183 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:10:44 -0400 (EDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by waste.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5MLAh218296 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:10:43 -0400 >Received: from locust.minder.net (locust.minder.net [66.92.53.74]) > by waste.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MLAcu18276 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:10:38 -0400 >Received: from einstein.ssz.com (cpunks@[207.200.56.4]) > by locust.minder.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5MLARE60171 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:10:27 -0400 (EDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA21584 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:16:22 -0500 >Received: (from mdom@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA21564 > for cypherpunks-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:15:00 -0500 >Received: from epic.mail.pas.earthlink.net (epic.mail.pas.earthlink.net >[207.217.120.181]) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA21558 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:14:41 -0500 >Received: from 216-224-153-219.thegrid.net ([216.224.153.219] helo=Spmur) > by epic.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) > id 17Ls6t-0006ND-00 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:07:56 -0700 >From: info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Old-Subject: CDR: MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary=V618S5oJ4P66H9AyTy2j3ny7ZAjOn >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:07:56 -0700 >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Unsubscription-Info: http://einstein.ssz.com/cdr >X-List-Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Loop: ssz.com >X-Acceptable-Languages: English, Russian, German, French, Spanish >Subject: MIME-Version: 1.0
Virus discarded
We received a message claiming to be from you which contained a virus according to File::Scan v0.30, a Perl module from CPAN at http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/H/HD/HDIAS This message was not delivered to the intended recipient, it has been discarded. For information on removing viruses from your computer, please see http://www.google.com/search?q=antivirus or http://hotbot.lycos.com/?query=antivirus Postmaster Sender : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Recipient : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: CDR: MIME-Version: 1.0 Virus : W32/Klez.gen@MM Original headers: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat Jun 22 17:11:07 2002 >Received: (from cpunks@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA21585 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:16:23 -0500 >Received: (from mdom@localhost) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA21564 > for cypherpunks-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:15:00 -0500 >Received: from epic.mail.pas.earthlink.net (epic.mail.pas.earthlink.net >[207.217.120.181]) > by einstein.ssz.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA21558 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 16:14:41 -0500 >Received: from 216-224-153-219.thegrid.net ([216.224.153.219] helo=Spmur) > by epic.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #2) > id 17Ls6t-0006ND-00 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:07:56 -0700 >From: info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CDR: MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary=V618S5oJ4P66H9AyTy2j3ny7ZAjOn >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:07:56 -0700 >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Unsubscription-Info: http://einstein.ssz.com/cdr >X-List-Admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >X-Loop: ssz.com >X-Acceptable-Languages: English, Russian, German, French, Spanish
Re: DOJ proposes US data-rentention law.
Steve, Not arguing, but the hardware cost curve for storage has a shorter halving time than the cost curve for CPU (Moore's Law) and the corresponding halving time for bandwidth is shorter still. If that relationship holds up over a period of years, today's tradeoffs between cache, re-computation, and anticipatory transmission would presumably change in the direction the economics dictates. And of course, if I really care that a particular piece of data is non-discoverable I either have to encrypt it, never transmit it, or go on one whopping search mission. Or so I think. Does the world look different from your vantage? --dan
DVD Copy Software
Title: Copy DVD Movies Easily! You do not need to spend hundreds on a DVD burner to copy DVDs! We will show you how to use your CD-R Writer to create backups of your DVDs that will play in your home DVD player. All you need in your computer is a DVD drive that plays DVDs and a CD-R Writer. You can burn movies on CD-R or CD-RW discs.. Learn the secrets the DVD companies don't want you to know! You will NEVER have to buy another DVD again! Trade movies with friends, copy rentals and much more! Copy only 2 DVD movies and this program has paid for itself! This program is BANNED from many download web sites because of the secrets we teach you. Get your copy today! Click Here To Order - Instant Download! Click here to be removed
URGENT cypherpunks9 - Please select your Delphi Forums membership level
Title: URGENT cypherpunks9 - Please select your Delphi Forums membership level If you are unable to view this email in its entirety, click here orcopy and paste this URL in your brows er: http://www.ideasoftheweek.com/mservice/deadline/ Dear cypherpunks9,Effective June 26, 2002Delphi Forums Three Tier Membership System will become active.It is important for you to select a membership level before our system change takes effect at approximately 7:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday, June 26th. To avoid interruption of your current Delphi service, please select one of the following subscription levels. If you have already chosen DelphiPlus, or DelphiAdvanced, you don't need to do a thing.CHOOSE ONE All Basic and Advanced features, plus: Advertising Free Service(No 3rd-party pop-ups or banner ads) DelphiCast: Broadcast Live Voice talk shows! (Watch for launch this summer!) Unlimited DelphiCast listening FREE eGems award winning software FREE DelphiUniversity Quick Courses(Coming soon!) Participate, create and host forums in the PlusZone Customize your forums (colors) Earn revenue on activity in your forums(Coming soon!) WYSIWYG editing capability 3 MB of attachment space Spell check Filter out signatures Custom email account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 5 MB of personal web space Personal icon No 3rd party email marketing This is the service you have enjoyed, and more! All Basic features, plus: Advertising Free Service(No 3rd-party pop-ups or banner ads) DelphiUniversity participation Unlimited DelphiCast listening(Watch for launch this summer!) HTML Posting 1 MB of attachment space Personalized Signature Forum creation and moderation Activate DelphiPlus Just $4.95 per month! Activate DelphiAdvancedJust $1.29 per month! This free member level will be offered to DelphiForums members who choose not to upgrade or maintain their current subscriber level. DelphiBasic members will receive: Unlimited posting in Basic View Live Text Chat Advertising on all pages No HTML posting No Attachments No Personalized Signatures No forum creation or control panel access No access to Plus forums For more information on Delphi Forums Three Tier Membership Systemclick here. This message has been sent to registered members of Delphi Forums (www.delphiforums.com). If you have received this message in error, simply reply to this message with the word REMOVE as the subject.
Re: DOJ proposes US data-rentention law.
At 17:37 22/06/2002 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Not arguing, but the hardware cost curve for storage has a shorter >halving time than the cost curve for CPU (Moore's Law) and the >corresponding halving time for bandwidth is shorter still. You've got a point. Storage is becoming less and less expensive per gigabyte, especially for IDE drives. If you're using a RAID set up, IDE doesn't cut it, SCSI is the way to go (for now). SCSI is a lot cheaper than it used to be, but it's still over $1000 for a single 70gig drive in Canada. For maximum redundancy in one rack-mount server, RAID 10 is the way to go. That means for every 1 drive, there must be an an exact duplicate. Costs can increase exponentially. That said, storage isn't the only expense when creating a large, fast and redundant file server (especially for caching). The fastest way to get data from a computer to the file server is via fibre channel. And fibre channel hardware isn't cheap. Last time I looked, a DIY RAID 10 system with 15 drives (1 hot-standby), case and fibre channel capability was ~ $30-35k. For each workstation that connects to it, there is a ~1k charge for the fibre channel client card. Don't even go near a fibre channel switch, they run $10-15k apiece, and don't handle more than 10-15 connections. Plus cabling. See, it adds up -- and that's just for one unit. To do the kind of data retention proposed in th EU, that is the kind of hardware that would be necessary. Plus a rack of tape backup drives running 24x7. Perhaps this sounds extreme, and it very well could be. My concern isn't so much based on what the law says must be retained, the penalties if the data isn't retained are what worry me. Could a system or network administrator be charged if the data is unavailable? What if their is a plausible reason (ie. hardware failed a year ago, fire)? What if the company cannot afford it? What charges are brought against the company? These questions are the reality for sysadmins in the EU. If Canada implemented a data retention law, I would be extremely concerned about my personal liability as well as corporate -- Canada already can charge a network administrator who the police believe is negligent in blocking (and removing) copyrighted software from computers he/she is responsible. It has happened. My understanding it has to do with an RCMP settlement over the PROMIS software scandal, but that's another topic. -- Steve
Re: DOJ proposes US data-rentention law.
I appreciate what an honorable ISP admin will do to abide customer rights over intrusive snoopers and perhaps cooperative administrators above the pay grade of a sysadmin. Know that a decent sysadmin is on for about 1/3 of a weekday for 24x7 systems is a small comfort but leaves unanswered what can happen: 1. During that time when a hero is elsewhere. 2. Upstream of the ISP, the router of the ISP and the nodes serving routers, as well as at a variety of cache systems serving there various levels. 3. At major providers serving a slew of smaller ISPs. In this case I reported a while back of a sysadmin telling what my ISP, NTT/Verio, is doing at its major node in Dallas: allowing the FBI to freely scan everything that passes through the Verio system under an agreement reached with NTT when it bought Verio. No matter what a local sysadmin does with data, it remains very possible that data is scanned, stored and fucked with in nasty ways coming and going such that no single sysadmin can catch it. End to end crypt certainly could help but there is still a fair abount of TA that can be done unless packets are truly disintegrated and/or camouflaged at the source before data leaves the originating box. Pumping through anonymizers, inserting within onions, subdermal pigging back on innocuous wireless packets of the financial advisor door, multiple partial sends, stego-ing, data static and traffic salting, bouncing off the moon or windowpane, what else can you do when an eager beaver industry is racing to do whatever it takes to build markets among the data controllers breathing hot about threats to national security and handing out life-saving contracts to hard-up peddlers shocked out of their skivvies with digital downturn. No patriotic act is too sleazy these days that cannot be justified by terror of red ink and looming layoffs.
Re: CP meet at H2K2?
Several people said yes... You're hereby designated as the "Official San Francisco Bay Area Cpunks-Meeting-in-Exile" :-) At 07:07 PM 06/20/2002 -0400, Greg Newby wrote: >H2K2, 2600's conference, is at Hotel Penn in New York >July 12-14. http://www.h2k2.net > >CP contributors who are scheduled include >John Young and yours truly. Maybe others I >didn't recognize or see yet. I heard of a few other >tentatives. > >The full conference schedule should be online within >the next couple of days. I'm thinking of a CP >meet Saturday night July 12. Anyone else gonna be there? > -- Greg
Ross's TCPA paper
I recently had a chance to read Ross Anderson's paper on the activities of the TCPA at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/ftp/users/rja14/.temp/toulouse.pdf I must confess that after reading the paper I am quite relieved to finally have solid confirmation that at least one other person has realized (outside the authors and proponents of the bill) that the Hollings bill, while failing to mention TCPA anywhere in the text of the bill, was written with the specific technology provided by the TCPA in mind for the purpose of mandating the inclusion of this technology in all future general-purpose computing platforms, now that the technology has been tested, is ready to ship, and the BIOS vendors are on side. Perhaps the Hollings "Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act" bill would be more accurately termed the "TCPA Enablement Act". BTW, the module that Ross calls a "Fritz" in his paper after the author of the bill, long had a name: it is called a Trusted Platform Module (TPM). Granted, in the context of the TCPA and the Hollings bill, the term "trusted" is used somewhat differently than the customers of future motherboards, which are all slated to include a TPM, might expect: "trusted" here means that the members of the TCPA trust that the TPM will make it near impossible for the owner of that motherboard to access supervisor mode on the CPU without their knowledge, they trust that the TPM will enable them to determine remotely if the customer has a kernel-level debugger loaded, and they trust that the TPM will prevent a user from bypassing OS protections by installing custom PCI cards to read out memory directly via DMA without going through the CPU. The public and the media now need to somehow, preferably soon, arrive at the next stage of realization: the involvement in the TCPA by many companies who's CEO's wrote the widely distributed open letter to the movie studios, telling the studios, or more precisely -- given that it was an open letter -- telling the public, that mandating DRM's in general-purpose computing platforms may not be a good idea, is indicative of one of two possible scenarios: 1) the CEO's of said computer companies are utterly unaware of a major strategic initiative their staff has been diligently executing for about 3 years, in the case of the principals in the TCPA, such as Intel, Compaq, HP, and Microsoft, several years longer. 2) the CEO's wrote this open letter as part of a deliberate "good cop, bad cop" ploy, feigning opposition to DRM in general computing platforms to pull the wool over the public's eye for hopefully long enough to achieve widespread deployment of the mother of all DRM solution in the market place. I do not know which of the two potential scenarios holds true. However, I believe public debate regarding the massive change in the way users will interact with their future computers due to the efforts of the TCPA and the Hollings bill would be greatly aided by attempts to establish which of the two scenarios is the fact the case. --Lucky Green
