Re: [I] Using WithConsumeGoroutineNums in pushconsumer may not work as expected. [rocketmq-client-go]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


cserwen commented on issue #1135:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/issues/1135#issuecomment-2033738710

   How to determine that 8 coroutines for consumption are generated @bogerv 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] Using WithConsumeGoroutineNums in pushconsumer may not work as expected. [rocketmq-client-go]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


bogerv commented on issue #1135:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/issues/1135#issuecomment-2033827068

   `
   func OrderPersistListDealing(_accountType string, _b string, _q string) {
   err := rocketmq.RMQ().Consumer(rocketmq.ConsumerGroupPersist).Subscribe(
rocketmq.GetTopicPersist(_b, _q),
consumer.MessageSelector{Type: consumer.TAG, Expression: 
util.FormatSymbol(_b, _q)},
func(ctx context.Context, msgs ...*primitive.MessageExt) 
(consumer.ConsumeResult, error) {
   wg := &sync.WaitGroup{}
bulkInsertESOrder(orders, wg, &esErr)
   })
   }`
   Inside the bulkInsertESOrder function, print logs after sleep 5 seconds. The 
result is that every 5 seconds, 8 logs will be printed at the same time.
   
   The scenario is an application process that starts multiple 
goroutine(OrderPersistListDealing is started multiple goroutine with different 
_b and _q), with each goroutine using the same consumer to subscribe multiple 
topics, and use MessageSelector to distinguish different data.
   
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] Using WithConsumeGoroutineNums in pushconsumer may not work as expected. [rocketmq-client-go]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


cserwen commented on issue #1135:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/issues/1135#issuecomment-2033836761

   > ` func OrderPersistListDealing(_accountType string, _b string, _q string) 
{ err := rocketmq.RMQ().Consumer(rocketmq.ConsumerGroupPersist).Subscribe( 
rocketmq.GetTopicPersist(_b, _q), consumer.MessageSelector{Type: consumer.TAG, 
Expression: util.FormatSymbol(_b, _q)}, func(ctx context.Context, msgs 
...*primitive.MessageExt) (consumer.ConsumeResult, error) { wg := 
&sync.WaitGroup{} bulkInsertESOrder(orders, wg, &esErr) }) }` Inside the 
bulkInsertESOrder function, print logs after sleep 5 seconds. The result is 
that every 5 seconds, 8 logs will be printed at the same time.
   > 
   > The scenario is an application process that starts multiple 
goroutine(OrderPersistListDealing is started multiple goroutine with different 
_b and _q), with each goroutine using the same consumer to subscribe multiple 
topics, and use MessageSelector to distinguish different data.
   
   Cosume orderly ? Can you show the init code of rmq-consumer?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] Using WithConsumeGoroutineNums in pushconsumer may not work as expected. [rocketmq-client-go]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


bogerv commented on issue #1135:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/issues/1135#issuecomment-2033849433

   > > ` func OrderPersistListDealing(_accountType string, _b string, _q 
string) { err := 
rocketmq.RMQ().Consumer(rocketmq.ConsumerGroupPersist).Subscribe( 
rocketmq.GetTopicPersist(_b, _q), consumer.MessageSelector{Type: consumer.TAG, 
Expression: util.FormatSymbol(_b, _q)}, func(ctx context.Context, msgs 
...*primitive.MessageExt) (consumer.ConsumeResult, error) { wg := 
&sync.WaitGroup{} bulkInsertESOrder(orders, wg, &esErr) }) }` Inside the 
bulkInsertESOrder function, print logs after sleep 5 seconds. The result is 
that every 5 seconds, 8 logs will be printed at the same time.
   > > The scenario is an application process that starts multiple 
goroutine(OrderPersistListDealing is started multiple goroutine with different 
_b and _q), with each goroutine using the same consumer to subscribe multiple 
topics, and use MessageSelector to distinguish different data.
   > 
   > Cosume orderly ? Can you show the init code of rmq-consumer?
   
   c, err = rocketmq.NewPushConsumer(
consumer.WithNameServer(config.Config.NameServers),
consumer.WithGroupName(group),
consumer.WithConsumerOrder(true),
consumer.WithConsumerModel(consumer.Clustering),
consumer.WithConsumeMessageBatchMaxSize(config.ConsumeMaxSize),
   )


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] Using WithConsumeGoroutineNums in pushconsumer may not work as expected. [rocketmq-client-go]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


cserwen commented on issue #1135:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/issues/1135#issuecomment-2033860392

   This para only takes effect for concurrent consumption. For order 
consumption, each queue has one and only one coroutine to consume.  @bogerv 
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] Using WithConsumeGoroutineNums in pushconsumer may not work as expected. [rocketmq-client-go]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


bogerv commented on issue #1135:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-go/issues/1135#issuecomment-2033901185

   > This param only takes effect for concurrent consumption. For 
order-consumption, each queue has one and only one coroutine to consume.
   
   So does this mean that if we need to consume bulk data in sequence, each 
consumer will need to subscribe to a separate topic?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Remove Synchronized Lock [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


cserwen commented on PR #7912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/7912#issuecomment-2033927528

   > It has been fixed in `develop` branch. 4.9.x only provides security 
patches or critical fixes, so this pr should be closed.
   
   Closed because of this @Tcytw 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [PR] Remove Synchronized Lock [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


cserwen closed pull request #7912: Remove Synchronized Lock
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/pull/7912


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[GH] (rocketmq): Workflow run "Build and Run Tests by Bazel" failed!

2024-04-03 Thread GitBox


The GitHub Actions job "Build and Run Tests by Bazel" on rocketmq.git has 
failed.
Run started by GitHub user leizhiyuan (triggered by cserwen).

Head commit for run:
23cede907dffcda98b3c7314e58fea94136fcb20 / leizhiyuan 
chore: revert some wrong code style

Report URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/actions/runs/8133527939

With regards,
GitHub Actions via GitBox



[GH] (rocketmq): Workflow run "Build and Run Tests by Bazel" failed!

2024-04-03 Thread GitBox


The GitHub Actions job "Build and Run Tests by Bazel" on rocketmq.git has 
failed.
Run started by GitHub user leizhiyuan (triggered by cserwen).

Head commit for run:
23cede907dffcda98b3c7314e58fea94136fcb20 / leizhiyuan 
chore: revert some wrong code style

Report URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/actions/runs/8133527939

With regards,
GitHub Actions via GitBox



[I] [Bug] Unable to consume messages in order while using RocketMQ 5 client [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


CodingOX opened a new issue, #7999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/7999

   ### Before Creating the Bug Report
   
   - [X] I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in 
[GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions).
   
   - [X] I have searched the [GitHub 
Issues](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues) and [GitHub 
Discussions](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions)  of this 
repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
   
   - [X] I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not 
other repositories of RocketMQ.
   
   
   ### Runtime platform environment
   
   Unbuntu 20.04
   
   
   ### RocketMQ version
   
   RocketMQ 5.2
   
   ### JDK Version
   
   JDK 21
   
   ### Describe the Bug
   
   When attempting to consume messages in order using the RocketMQ 5 client 
with a 2 master no any slaves, it is observed that the consumer is unable to 
consume messages sequentially.
   
   ### Steps to Reproduce
   
   Producer Code, Write in Kotlin
   ```
   
   import cn.hutool.core.lang.generator.SnowflakeGenerator
   import org.apache.rocketmq.client.apis.ClientConfiguration
   import org.apache.rocketmq.client.apis.ClientServiceProvider
   import org.slf4j.Logger
   import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory
   import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong
   
   fun main() {
   
   val log: Logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger("OCP")
   val provider = ClientServiceProvider.loadService()
   
   val endpoints = "rmq5-broker-1.middle:8081;rmq5-broker-2.middle:8081"
   val clientConfiguration = ClientConfiguration.newBuilder()
   .setEndpoints(endpoints)
   .build()
   
   val topic = "FIFOTopic"
   val tag = "tag-2"
   
   val producer = 
provider.newProducerBuilder().setTopics(topic).setClientConfiguration(clientConfiguration).build()
   
   val atomicLong = AtomicLong()
   val snowflakeGenerator = SnowflakeGenerator()
   val messageGroup = "OrderedGroup-1"
   try {
   val ts = System.currentTimeMillis()
// 
   repeat(30) {
   val id = snowflakeGenerator.next()
   val curIndex = atomicLong.incrementAndGet()
   val message = provider
   .newMessageBuilder()
   .setTag(tag)
   .setKeys(id.toString())
   .setTopic(topic)
   .setMessageGroup(messageGroup) // Set MessageGroup For FIFO
   .setBody(("$ts - $curIndex").toByteArray())
   .build()
   
   val receipt = producer.send(message)
   
   log.info("Send message: $curIndex - $id - ${receipt.messageId}")
   }
   } catch (ex: Exception) {
   log.error("Send message error", ex)
   }
   }
   ```
  - The producer side seems to be correctly setting the message group for 
ensuring ordered message delivery.
  - Messages are being sent to the specified topic with message group 
`OrderedGroup-1`.
   
   
   Consumer Code
   ```
   
   import cn.hutool.core.thread.ThreadUtil
   import org.apache.rocketmq.client.apis.ClientConfiguration
   import org.apache.rocketmq.client.apis.ClientServiceProvider
   import org.apache.rocketmq.client.apis.consumer.ConsumeResult
   import org.apache.rocketmq.client.apis.consumer.FilterExpression
   import org.apache.rocketmq.client.apis.consumer.FilterExpressionType
   import org.slf4j.Logger
   import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory
   import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets
   import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue
   import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
   
   
   fun main() {
   val log: Logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger("ORC")
   
   val provider = ClientServiceProvider.loadService()
   val endpoints = "rmq5-broker-1.middle:8081;rmq5-broker-2.middle:8081"
   val clientConfiguration = ClientConfiguration.newBuilder()
   .setEndpoints(endpoints)
   .build()
   
   val topic = "FIFOTopic"
   val tag = "tag-2"
   val topicToTag = mapOf(topic to FilterExpression(tag, 
FilterExpressionType.TAG))

// 
   val cq = ConcurrentLinkedQueue()
   
   provider.newPushConsumerBuilder()
   .setClientConfiguration(clientConfiguration)
   .setSubscriptionExpressions(topicToTag)
   .setConsumerGroup("OrderConsumerGroupV3")
   .setMessageListener {
   val msg = StandardCharsets.UTF_8.decode(it!!.body)
   cq.offer(msg.toString())
   ConsumeResult.SUCCESS
   }.build()
   
   ThreadUtil.sleep(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
   
   log.info(cq.joinToString("\n"))
   
   ThreadUtil.sleep(1, TimeUnit.HOURS)
   }
   
   ```
  - The consumer side is using a `ConcurrentLinkedQueue` to store received 
messages temporarily for logging purposes.
  - Messages are being consumed from the topic `FIFOTopic` with tag `tag-2`.
  

[I] add some info log in transactional messsage check [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


wangjiao01 opened a new issue, #8000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/8000

   ### Before Creating the Enhancement Request
   
   - [X] I have confirmed that this should be classified as an enhancement 
rather than a bug/feature.
   
   
   ### Summary
   
   In order to know explicitly what trigger the transactional message check 
method, I want to add some info log in 
org.apache.rocketmq.broker.transaction.queue.TransactionalMessageServiceImpl#check
 method.
   
   ### Motivation
   
   In broker version 4.3.2, I encounter a problem that transactional message 
will execute checkLocalTransaction method, even I return 
LocalTransactionState.COMMIT_MESSAGE in executeLocalTransaction method, but 
there is no log info to demonstrate why.
   
   ### Describe the Solution You'd Like
   
   add some log info for three boolean variable in check method.
   
   ### Describe Alternatives You've Considered
   
   add some log info for three boolean variable in check method.
   
   ### Additional Context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[I] add some info log in transactional messsage check [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


wangjiao01 opened a new issue, #8001:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/8001

   ### Before Creating the Enhancement Request
   
   - [X] I have confirmed that this should be classified as an enhancement 
rather than a bug/feature.
   
   
   ### Summary
   
   In order to know explicitly what trigger the transactional message check 
method, I want to add some info log in 
org.apache.rocketmq.broker.transaction.queue.TransactionalMessageServiceImpl#check
 method.
   
   
   ### Motivation
   
   In broker version 4.3.2, I encounter a problem that transactional message 
will execute checkLocalTransaction method, even I return 
LocalTransactionState.COMMIT_MESSAGE in executeLocalTransaction method, but 
there is no log info 
   
   
   ### Describe the Solution You'd Like
   
   add some log info for three boolean variable in check method.
   
   
   ### Describe Alternatives You've Considered
   
   add some log info for three boolean variable in check method.
   
   
   ### Additional Context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[GH] (rocketmq): Workflow run "Build and Run Tests by Maven" is working again!

2024-04-03 Thread GitBox


The GitHub Actions job "Build and Run Tests by Maven" on rocketmq.git has 
succeeded.
Run started by GitHub user leizhiyuan (triggered by cserwen).

Head commit for run:
9f316429b4189018fce0570e918735f82970af1e / leizhiyuan 
fix: use skip to fix the findAny always first

Report URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/actions/runs/8399725323

With regards,
GitHub Actions via GitBox



Re: [I] [Bug] Unable to consume messages orderly for ordered message while using RocketMQ 5 client [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


3424672656 commented on issue #7999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/7999#issuecomment-2034898876

   rocketmq currently only supports sequential consumption for a single queue


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] The incorrect incremental epoch when autoswitch ha. [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


github-actions[bot] commented on issue #6505:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6505#issuecomment-2035832917

   This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 3 days since being 
marked as stale.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] MappedFile#warmMappedFile there may be code that doesn't work [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


github-actions[bot] closed issue #5571: MappedFile#warmMappedFile there may be 
code that doesn't work
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/5571


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] The incorrect incremental epoch when autoswitch ha. [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


github-actions[bot] closed issue #6505: The  incorrect incremental epoch when 
autoswitch ha.
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6505


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



Re: [I] MappedFile#warmMappedFile there may be code that doesn't work [rocketmq]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


github-actions[bot] commented on issue #5571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/5571#issuecomment-2035832969

   This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 3 days since being 
marked as stale.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[I] [Feature Request] Add `imagePullSecrets` to service account in operator helm chart [rocketmq-operator]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


DavidSonoda opened a new issue, #221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-operator/issues/221

   **FEATURE REQUEST**
   
   1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.
   
   Allow the operator helm chart to specify `imagePullSecrets` in the 
serviceAccount.
   
   2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
   
   When building operator image with different rocketmq version and pushed to 
private registry that requires auth, `imagePullSecrets` are needed.
   
   2. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, 
should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address 
this issue?
   
   - importance: should-have
   - workaround now: manually modify the 
`charts/rocketmq-operator/templates/serviceaccount.yaml` manifest to add 
`imagePullSecrets`
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



[PR] [ISSUE #221] Add `imagePullSecrets` to operator helm chart SA [rocketmq-operator]

2024-04-03 Thread via GitHub


DavidSonoda opened a new pull request, #222:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-operator/pull/222

   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   Close #221.
   *Why*: When building operator image with different rocketmq version and 
pushed to private registry that requires auth, imagePullSecrets are needed.
   
   *How*: Added configurable `imagePullSecrets` to `values.yaml` and 
corresponding template to `serviceaccount.yaml`
   
   ## Brief changelog
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   **Please go through this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution 
quickly and easily.**
   
   Notice: `It would be helpful if you could finish the following checklist 
(the last one is not necessary) before request the community to review your PR`.
   
   - [x] Make sure there is a [Github 
issue](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-operator/issues) filed for the change 
(usually before you start working on it). Trivial changes like typos do not 
require a Github issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, 
without pulling in other changes - one PR resolves one issue. 
   - [x] Format the pull request title like `[ISSUE #123] Fix UnknownException 
when host config not exist`. Each commit in the pull request should have a 
meaningful subject line and body.
   - [x] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand 
what the pull request does, how, and why.
   - [ ] Check RBAC rights for Kubernetes roles.
   - [ ] Write necessary unit-test to verify your logic correction, more mock a 
little better when cross module dependency exist. 
   - [ ] Run `make docker-build` to build docker image for operator, try your 
changes from Pod inside your Kubernetes cluster, **not just locally**. Also 
provide screenshots to show that the RocketMQ cluster is healthy after the 
changes. 
   - [ ] Before committing your changes, remember to run `make manifests` to 
make sure the CRD files are updated. 
   - [ ] Update documentation if necessary.
   - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an [Apache Individual 
Contributor License Agreement](http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org