Re: Recall: CloudStack vs CloudPlatform
To be fair, it never really works inside the office either :) On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012, at 05:21 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > > Radhika Puthiyetath would like to recall the message, "CloudStack vs > > CloudPlatform". > > That doesn't so much work with messages sent to public mailing lists. > ;-) > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >
RE: are all tables InnoDB?
Nice. Are you using MySQL proxy or HAProxy for fronting the cluster? On a non CS related implementation of Galera we front our cluster with our A10 HLBs, works pretty well. On Feb 10, 2013 5:16 PM, "Tariq Iqbal" wrote: > Hi Nux, > > The tables in the CS database are of the type InnoDB. > > We have successfully implemented both Galera clustering and Mysql > replication. > > Kind Regards, > > Tariq Iqbal > Senior Consultant > > > > S: +44(0)20 3603 0540 | M: +44(0)790 9911600 > > tariq.iq...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeBlue > > ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS > > > > From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 10 February 2013 19:23 > To: Nux! > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: are all tables InnoDB? > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:03:30PM +, Nux! wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Are all the tables in the cloudstack databases of the type InnoDB? > > I'd like to know so I can decide on a replication strategy (either > > Gallera or regular mysql replication). > > > > Thanks, > > Lucian > > They should be. All of the tables in setup/db/create_schema.sql specify > the InnoDB storage engine. > > -chip > ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and > implementation services to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises to > build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue’s expertise, combined with > CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises to > deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user. > > > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of > this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor > copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you > have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated > in England & Wales. >
Re: CentOS System VM?
TBH Hyper-V synthetic drivers(modules) is supported in the mainline kernel. So the argument that CentOS 6.x has better support is moot. This assumes that the kernel version on the SSVM is at least 2.6.32. I ran Ubuntu Server 11.x and Centos 6.x on Hyper-V natively and just needed to load the kernel modules for the synthetic stuffs to work. Ancient example of getting the Hyper-V modules built/working on Debian 6.0 http://virtualisationandmanagement.wordpress.com/2010/11/02/debian-on-hyper-v-with-4-vcpu-support-and-syntetic-network/ On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote: > I'm very interested in this. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:10 AM, Donal Lafferty > wrote: > > > Has anyone looked into building a system VM that runs on a CentOS distro? >
Re: New committer: Kelcey Damage
woot! On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > (Apologies for sending this late, we were working on this over the > Holidays and the announcement didn't go out) > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Kelcey Damage to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that they have accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the > project since there is no need to go via the patch > submission process. This should enable better productivity. > > Please join me in congratulating Kelcey! > > --John > on behalf of the CloudStack PPMC > > >
Re: [jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-105) /tmp/stream-unix.####.###### stale sockets causing inodes to run out on Xenserver
Bumping this thread. Adding in users to see if anyone else has seen this. I am running into the exact same issue. XenServer 6.0.2, Basic networking with bridging with CSP installed. However I am using CS 4.0.1. My issues arised after I rebooted my XS host outside of CS (I believe this was due to inode exhaustion although i didn't realize this until later) Upon start CS seemingly connects to the host for an indefinite amount of time. Unfortunately nothing in logs explains why its behaving like this (CS management-server.log) So far I've tried setting the networking from bridge->ovs->bridge and reinstalling the CSP with no success. On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Jason Bausewein (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510950#comment-13510950] > > Jason Bausewein edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-105 at 12/6/12 12:07 AM: > -- > > I am able to reproduce this issue consistently. I have a single xen host > in a basic zone. I tracked it down to the following process creating the > stream-unix.. files about every 10 seconds. > > root 8237 8223 0 09:59 ?00:00:00 ovs-vsctl add-br xapi0 > > Dec 5 09:59:15 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: 1|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl > add-br xapi0 > Dec 5 09:59:15 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 2|stream_unix|ERR|/tmp/stream-unix.8237.0: connection to > /var/run/openvswitch/db.sock failed: No such file or directory > Dec 5 09:59:15 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 3|reconnect|WARN|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connection attempt > failed (No such file or directory) > Dec 5 09:59:16 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 4|stream_unix|ERR|/tmp/stream-unix.8237.1: connection to > /var/run/openvswitch/db.sock failed: No such file or directory > Dec 5 09:59:16 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 5|reconnect|WARN|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connection attempt > failed (No such file or directory) > Dec 5 09:59:18 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 6|stream_unix|ERR|/tmp/stream-unix.8237.2: connection to > /var/run/openvswitch/db.sock failed: No such file or directory > Dec 5 09:59:18 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 7|reconnect|WARN|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connection attempt > failed (No such file or directory) > > These messages start immediately on boot. I attached my messages log file. > > I am not using openvswitch. Is there something I need to turn off? > > > was (Author: jbausewein): > I am able to reproduce this issue consistently. I have a single xen > host in a basic zone. I tracked it down to the following process creating > the stream-unix.. files about every 10 seconds. > > root 8237 8223 0 09:59 ?00:00:00 ovs-vsctl add-br xapi0 > > Dec 5 09:59:15 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: 1|vsctl|INFO|Called as ovs-vsctl > add-br xapi0 > Dec 5 09:59:15 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 2|stream_unix|ERR|/tmp/stream-unix.8237.0: connection to > /var/run/openvswitch/db.sock failed: No such file or directory > Dec 5 09:59:15 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 3|reconnect|WARN|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connection attempt > failed (No such file or directory) > Dec 5 09:59:16 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 4|stream_unix|ERR|/tmp/stream-unix.8237.1: connection to > /var/run/openvswitch/db.sock failed: No such file or directory > Dec 5 09:59:16 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 5|reconnect|WARN|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connection attempt > failed (No such file or directory) > Dec 5 09:59:18 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 6|stream_unix|ERR|/tmp/stream-unix.8237.2: connection to > /var/run/openvswitch/db.sock failed: No such file or directory > Dec 5 09:59:18 xenserver1 ovs-vsctl: > 7|reconnect|WARN|unix:/var/run/openvswitch/db.sock: connection attempt > failed (No such file or directory) > > I am not using openvswitch. Is there something I need to turn off? > > > > /tmp/stream-unix..## stale sockets causing inodes to run out on > Xenserver > > > - > > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-105 > > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105 > > Project: CloudStack > > Issue Type: Bug > > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > > Components: XenServer > >Affects Versions: pre-4.0.0 > > Environment: Xenserver 6.0.2 > > Cloudstack 3.0.2 > >Reporter: Caleb Call > >Assignee: Devdeep Singh > > Fix For: 4.1.0 > > > > Attachments: messages > > > > > > We came across an interesting issue in one of our clusters. We ran out > of inodes on all of our cluster members (since when does this happen in > 2012?). When this happened, it in turn made the / filesystem a read-only > filesystem which in turn made all the hosts go in t
Re: Devcloud default credentials
Are you speaking of the CloudStack web interface or the access to CLI? On Jul 18, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi, > > I'm unable to login using username admin and password password (with Xen > i386) using the image suggested on the wiki page: > http://download.cloud.com/templates/devcloud/DevCloud.ova > > Please check, thanks. > > Best regards, > Rohit Yadav
Re: netinstall OS not working
Should work although it's not really a condition of CloudStack per say, it's the hypervisior you are using. Do you have specifics of the error you are encountering? What hypervisor are you using? On Jun 17, 2012 11:14 AM, "Lu Heng" wrote: > Hi > > We tried to boot centos 5.8 netinstall ISO, it shows an error in the > instance, please advice if the netinstall is not working with > cloudstack. > > -- > -- > Kind regards. > Lu > > This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. > It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use > of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the > intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and > e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this > message and including the text of the transmission received. >
Re: netinstall OS not working
What version of XS? What OS version is set for your ISO template? On Jun 17, 2012 12:34 PM, "Lu Heng" wrote: > Hi > > Xenserver. > > didn't really see any interesting error log > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Jason Davis wrote: > > Should work although it's not really a condition of CloudStack per say, > > it's the hypervisior you are using. Do you have specifics of the error > you > > are encountering? What hypervisor are you using? > > On Jun 17, 2012 11:14 AM, "Lu Heng" wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> We tried to boot centos 5.8 netinstall ISO, it shows an error in the > >> instance, please advice if the netinstall is not working with > >> cloudstack. > >> > >> -- > >> -- > >> Kind regards. > >> Lu > >> > >> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. > >> It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > >> otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use > >> of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the > >> intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received > >> this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and > >> e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this > >> message and including the text of the transmission received. > >> > > > > -- > -- > Kind regards. > Lu > > This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. > It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use > of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the > intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and > e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this > message and including the text of the transmission received. >
Re: missing centos 5.8 and centos 6.2 options
Depends on which version of XS you are running for compute. I used Redhat 6.0 for CentOS 6.x and Redhat 5.5 for CentOS 5.x On Jun 17, 2012 6:21 PM, "Lu Heng" wrote: > Hi > > We didn't see centos 5.8 and centos 6.2 options if we are adding an > ISO.(xenserver as Host, cloudstack version 3.0.1). > > And almost every public mirror for centOS don't have other version > than 5.8 and 6.2, anyone has idea which one should we choice while > adding ISO? > > Just to avoid any problems. > > -- > -- > Kind regards. > Lu > > This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. > It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use > of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the > intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and > e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this > message and including the text of the transmission received. >
