Re: Thnx for clojureconj videos !!
+1. I couldn't make it either (coming from the UK just wasn't feasible) and it is just fantastic to be able to catch up. "Clojure Gazette" (http://us4.campaign-archive2.com/?u=a33b5228d1b5bf2e0c68a83f4&id=a358c38217&e=0ebb9aee00) is also really useful as a guide. On Saturday, 22 November 2014 13:09:04 UTC, Geraldo Lopes de Souza wrote: > > Thank you very much for clojureconj videos !! > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] freactive - high performance, pure Clojurescript, declarative DOM library
If you want something artistic though exotic enough to be not used on github before, you can try 'nerikomi' (see google or http://nerikomi.blogspot.com/ for samples) — beautiful Japanese art of pottery where every layer of clay customized with different chemical reactions to produce beautiful patterns. Saying about ui-spec, I really like it, but I think it should be developed in communication with one of concrete realizations — e.g. freactive for DOM. This way we will see real drawbacks and advantages of this model being used for real applications, and will have chance to advance it and refactor accordingly. But, may be it is only my approach to go up of the abstraction ladder — somebody prefer to think about ideal abstraction in advance and then implement it carefully. At the moment I can't say if my problems with using freactive are problems of implementation or spec. Need more time to play with. понедельник, 24 ноября 2014 г., 6:45:12 UTC+3 пользователь Aaron написал: > > Glad to see all the enthusiasm about names :) If you think of others, you > can let me know. Probably leaning towards something artistic sounding like > "fresco" so far... > > But anyway, more importantly did anyone check out the docs I just posted? > In particular the UI spec one: > https://github.com/aaronc/freactive.core/blob/master/UI-SPEC.md. What do > people think about the idea of trying to generalize conventions for writing > reactive UI's? Decomplecting state management from the underlying UI > renderer, common semantics, etc... > > On Sunday, November 23, 2014 2:44:49 PM UTC-5, Henrik wrote: > > Hacker News has sort of noticed: > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8648491 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, November 23, 2014 8:32:11 PM UTC+1, Jason Lewis wrote: > > Furthermore (it occurs to me) cesium is used to drive atomic clocks... > so if you're using an atom to maintain state... even more relevance. > Relevance? Wait, it's Cognitect now :) > > > > > > > > > > Jason Lewis > > > > > > vox 410.428.0253 > > twitter @canweriotnow > > blog http://decomplecting.org > > else http://about.me/jason.lewis > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Jason Lewis > wrote: > > > > Cesium is the most reactive element of all... and the name isn't taken > on Clojars. > > > > > > Cesium will react explosively even with ice. > > > > > > > > > > Jason Lewis > > > > > > vox 410.428.0253 > > twitter @canweriotnow > > blog http://decomplecting.org > > else http://about.me/jason.lewis > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Gary Trakhman > wrote: > > > > The two best ones I can think of right now > > > > > > Halogen: they're known as highly reactive elements. > > Precipitate: both a noun and a verb, the solid that falls out of a > solution, or to bring about such a reaction. > > > > > > Other chemical-ish names considered > > Enantiopure - Containing compounds of only a single chirality > > Fullerene - Bucky-Balls, they're just cool > > Recycle - 'Save the trees', and also 'recycle streams' from chemical > engineering. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Aaron Craelius > wrote: > > > > Fresco isn't bad. I think it's better than "freactive" at least. Seems > to be relatively popular for a name, but no big projects: > https://github.com/search?o=desc&p=1&q=fresco&s=stars&type=Repositories&utf8=✓ > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Olli Piepponen > wrote: > > > > If you are open to name suggestions, how about Fresco? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > > > > --- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. > > > > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojurescript/99myJ9vLeKQ/unsubscribe. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > clojurescrip...@googlegroups.com. > > > > To post to this group, send email to clojur...@googlegroups.com. > > > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > > > > --- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "ClojureScript" group. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to clojurescrip...@googlegroups.com. > > > > To post to this group, send email to clojur...@googlegroups.com. > > > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > >
Google Clojure REPL
Hello to all; So, the Clojure REPL for Lollipop doesn't Work. Why? Why won't it install? When will you migrate to 1.6 or 1.7? Hope to hear something soon. Lorentzz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Google Clojure REPL
Lorentzz: It might help to provide more information with your question. For example, what file did you download, and from where, if any? What steps did you try? What did you see? Also, who you are referring to by "you" is not clear. Please realize that a relatively small fraction of people who use Clojure do so on Android. Andy On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Lorentzz00 wrote: > Hello to all; > > So, the Clojure REPL for Lollipop doesn't > Work. Why? Why won't it install? When will you migrate to 1.6 or 1.7? > > Hope to hear something soon. > Lorentzz > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Why doe floor and ceil accept clojure.lang.Ratio but round not
Floor works: (Math/floor (/ (* 12 100) 71)) 16.0 Ceil works: (Math/ceil (/ (* 12 100) 71)) 17.0 But round gives an error: (Math/round (/ (* 12 100) 71)) IllegalArgumentException No matching method found: round clojure.lang.Reflector.invokeMatchingMethod (Reflector.java:80) Why? -- Cecil Westerhof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Why doe floor and ceil accept clojure.lang.Ratio but round not
On Monday, November 24, 2014 7:37:20 AM UTC-5, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > > Floor works: > (Math/floor (/ (* 12 100) 71)) > 16.0 > > Ceil works: > (Math/ceil (/ (* 12 100) 71)) > 17.0 > > But round gives an error: > (Math/round (/ (* 12 100) 71)) > IllegalArgumentException No matching method found: round > clojure.lang.Reflector.invokeMatchingMethod (Reflector.java:80) > > Why? > Seems buggy to me. It might be being provoked by the fact that Math/round has an overload for float as well as double, but floor and ceil do not. A workaround for now is to wrap the argument to round in (double...). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Why doe floor and ceil accept clojure.lang.Ratio but round not
Hi, Cecil Because java.lang.Math#round supports only two types: float and double. Java won't find the equivalent signature with Ratio or Number. https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/Math.html#round(double) https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/Math.html#round(float) Regards Plínio On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > Floor works: > (Math/floor (/ (* 12 100) 71)) > 16.0 > > Ceil works: > (Math/ceil (/ (* 12 100) 71)) > 17.0 > > But round gives an error: > (Math/round (/ (* 12 100) 71)) > IllegalArgumentException No matching method found: round > clojure.lang.Reflector.invokeMatchingMethod (Reflector.java:80) > > Why? > > -- > Cecil Westerhof > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How do you refer to a previous value of a var, within a loop/recur?
Hi Dan Please accept my two cents. "I prefer the indentation; it makes more sense to me." No, he didn't misunderstand, sorry. Anyway, Batsov's Style Guide is an awesome resource, even though you won't follow the items ipsis literis, is good to understand how to work and think in the 'Clojure Way'. For example, when one is new to Ruby, it's normal to find the for statement there. Once one gets used to 'Ruby Style', the each method becomes the standard. An example that I used with my team some days ago: In Portuguese (our native language) we use nouns before adjective. "Um dia quente". In English we use nouns after adjective. "A hot day". Even if you swap the order in Portuguese (um quente dia) or in English (a day hot), a native speaker will understand with more or less effort. Syntactically it's not wrong, semantically is OK, but the construction it's not in the 'Portuguese way' or in the 'English way'. So unless you don't mind to speak with yourself all the time, please try to understand and follow the rules and the way of your new environment. After all you don't want to be seen as an arrogant guy or as someone who doesn't want to learn just because your way makes more sense to you. Please don't understand I'm judging you. I have a very bad impression of LISPs communities in general, but the Clojure community is highly newcomer-friendly and the other guys who tried to help you, for example, are high skilled and very busy professionals. In any other community (I'm cofounder of JS, Clojure and Ruby communities) you woudn't find that good will to help, unfortunately. Sorry for the completely off-topic, best regards and welcome to community. Plínio On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Dan Campbell wrote: > "As long as you’re prepared to be told this every time you show your code > to people, that’s up to you." > > I think you misunderstood the response. > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > >> On Nov 23, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Dan Campbell wrote: >> >> Sorry man, but I'm not willing to change my personal coding style. It's >> not a matter of getting used to Clojure. I'm not an expert on it yet, but >> I've been studying and working with it, for a little over a year. I prefer >> the indentation; it makes more sense to me. >> >> >> As long as you’re prepared to be told this every time you show your code >> to people, that’s up to you. >> >> Your image, though, doesn't reflect my intended indentation style for >> lisp code. It looks like some reformatting took place. >> >> >> Of course - I reformatted it to match the Clojure community style. The >> image was to show rainbow parentheses, specifically. >> >> If there are other styles out there, that you know about, I'm willing to >> take a look at them. Although the traditional lisp style with multiple >> adjacent parentheses doesn't work for me, there might be other styles worth >> looking at. >> >> >> All the style guides will follow that style - that’s how Lisp is written >> :) >> >> Here’s the most "standard" Clojure style guide, based on the style in >> Clojure books, and Clojure/core’s own library style guide: >> >> https://github.com/bbatsov/clojure-style-guide >> >> Thanks for pointing out the error in the if statement. You're correct. >> >> >> Glad I was able to help. >> >> Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN >> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ >> >> "Perfection is the enemy of the good." >> -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/GFOXhZKooyI/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+u
Re: How do you refer to a previous value of a var, within a loop/recur?
Thanks for the input, Plinio. If the community jumps to the conclusion that I'm arrogant, because I like to work in style that's clear & works for me, then I won't be surprised if they don't offer assistance in the future. >From my point of view, as long as they receive my contributions or requests for assistance in a form that's palatable to them, it's not anyone's business how I code on a daily basis. On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Plínio Balduino wrote: > Hi Dan > > Please accept my two cents. > > "I prefer the indentation; it makes more sense to me." > > No, he didn't misunderstand, sorry. > > Anyway, Batsov's Style Guide is an awesome resource, even though you won't > follow the items ipsis literis, is good to understand how to work and think > in the 'Clojure Way'. > > For example, when one is new to Ruby, it's normal to find the for > statement there. Once one gets used to 'Ruby Style', the each method > becomes the standard. > > An example that I used with my team some days ago: > > In Portuguese (our native language) we use nouns before adjective. "Um > dia quente". > > In English we use nouns after adjective. "A hot day". > > Even if you swap the order in Portuguese (um quente dia) or in English (a > day hot), a native speaker will understand with more or less > effort. Syntactically it's not wrong, semantically is OK, but the > construction it's not in the 'Portuguese way' or in the 'English way'. > > So unless you don't mind to speak with yourself all the time, please try > to understand and follow the rules and the way of your new environment. > After all you don't want to be seen as an arrogant guy or as someone who > doesn't want to learn just because your way makes more sense to you. > > Please don't understand I'm judging you. I have a very bad impression of > LISPs communities in general, but the Clojure community is highly > newcomer-friendly and the other guys who tried to help you, for example, > are high skilled and very busy professionals. In any other community (I'm > cofounder of JS, Clojure and Ruby communities) you woudn't find that good > will to help, unfortunately. > > Sorry for the completely off-topic, best regards and welcome to community. > > Plínio > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Dan Campbell wrote: > >> "As long as you’re prepared to be told this every time you show your code >> to people, that’s up to you." >> >> I think you misunderstood the response. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: >> >>> On Nov 23, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Dan Campbell wrote: >>> >>> Sorry man, but I'm not willing to change my personal coding style. It's >>> not a matter of getting used to Clojure. I'm not an expert on it yet, but >>> I've been studying and working with it, for a little over a year. I prefer >>> the indentation; it makes more sense to me. >>> >>> >>> As long as you’re prepared to be told this every time you show your code >>> to people, that’s up to you. >>> >>> Your image, though, doesn't reflect my intended indentation style for >>> lisp code. It looks like some reformatting took place. >>> >>> >>> Of course - I reformatted it to match the Clojure community style. The >>> image was to show rainbow parentheses, specifically. >>> >>> If there are other styles out there, that you know about, I'm willing to >>> take a look at them. Although the traditional lisp style with multiple >>> adjacent parentheses doesn't work for me, there might be other styles worth >>> looking at. >>> >>> >>> All the style guides will follow that style - that’s how Lisp is written >>> :) >>> >>> Here’s the most "standard" Clojure style guide, based on the style in >>> Clojure books, and Clojure/core’s own library style guide: >>> >>> https://github.com/bbatsov/clojure-style-guide >>> >>> Thanks for pointing out the error in the if statement. You're correct. >>> >>> >>> Glad I was able to help. >>> >>> Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN >>> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ >>> >>> "Perfection is the enemy of the good." >>> -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >>> Google Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/GFOXhZKooyI/unsubscribe. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> --
Re: How do you refer to a previous value of a var, within a loop/recur?
Yeah, I think the "I'll transliterate everything before anyone else sees it" part of your message was maybe not clear enough. Of course we don't care what you do when you're working alone and just for yourself. On Monday, 24 November 2014, Dan Campbell wrote: > Thanks for the input, Plinio. > > If the community jumps to the conclusion that I'm arrogant, because I like > to work in style that's clear & works for me, then I won't be surprised if > they don't offer assistance in the future. > > From my point of view, as long as they receive my contributions or > requests for assistance in a form that's palatable to them, it's not > anyone's business how I code on a daily basis. > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Plínio Balduino > wrote: > >> Hi Dan >> >> Please accept my two cents. >> >> "I prefer the indentation; it makes more sense to me." >> >> No, he didn't misunderstand, sorry. >> >> Anyway, Batsov's Style Guide is an awesome resource, even though you >> won't follow the items ipsis literis, is good to understand how to work and >> think in the 'Clojure Way'. >> >> For example, when one is new to Ruby, it's normal to find the for >> statement there. Once one gets used to 'Ruby Style', the each method >> becomes the standard. >> >> An example that I used with my team some days ago: >> >> In Portuguese (our native language) we use nouns before adjective. "Um >> dia quente". >> >> In English we use nouns after adjective. "A hot day". >> >> Even if you swap the order in Portuguese (um quente dia) or in English (a >> day hot), a native speaker will understand with more or less >> effort. Syntactically it's not wrong, semantically is OK, but the >> construction it's not in the 'Portuguese way' or in the 'English way'. >> >> So unless you don't mind to speak with yourself all the time, please try >> to understand and follow the rules and the way of your new environment. >> After all you don't want to be seen as an arrogant guy or as someone who >> doesn't want to learn just because your way makes more sense to you. >> >> Please don't understand I'm judging you. I have a very bad impression of >> LISPs communities in general, but the Clojure community is highly >> newcomer-friendly and the other guys who tried to help you, for example, >> are high skilled and very busy professionals. In any other community (I'm >> cofounder of JS, Clojure and Ruby communities) you woudn't find that good >> will to help, unfortunately. >> >> Sorry for the completely off-topic, best regards and welcome to >> community. >> >> Plínio >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Dan Campbell > > wrote: >> >>> "As long as you’re prepared to be told this every time you show your >>> code to people, that’s up to you." >>> >>> I think you misunderstood the response. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Sean Corfield >> > wrote: >>> On Nov 23, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Dan Campbell >>> > wrote: Sorry man, but I'm not willing to change my personal coding style. It's not a matter of getting used to Clojure. I'm not an expert on it yet, but I've been studying and working with it, for a little over a year. I prefer the indentation; it makes more sense to me. As long as you’re prepared to be told this every time you show your code to people, that’s up to you. Your image, though, doesn't reflect my intended indentation style for lisp code. It looks like some reformatting took place. Of course - I reformatted it to match the Clojure community style. The image was to show rainbow parentheses, specifically. If there are other styles out there, that you know about, I'm willing to take a look at them. Although the traditional lisp style with multiple adjacent parentheses doesn't work for me, there might be other styles worth looking at. All the style guides will follow that style - that’s how Lisp is written :) Here’s the most "standard" Clojure style guide, based on the style in Clojure books, and Clojure/core’s own library style guide: https://github.com/bbatsov/clojure-style-guide Thanks for pointing out the error in the if statement. You're correct. Glad I was able to help. Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
Re: Google Clojure REPL
I believe there are still issues with ART that need to be resolved before Clojure apps run on Lillipop. You may want to ask this on the clojure-android list instead: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/clojure-android On Sunday, November 23, 2014 5:39:08 PM UTC-5, Lorentzz00 wrote: > > Hello to all; > > So, the Clojure REPL for Lollipop doesn't > Work. Why? Why won't it install? When will you migrate to 1.6 or 1.7? > > Hope to hear something soon. > Lorentzz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
New Functional Programming Job Opportunities
Here are some functional programming job opportunities that were posted recently: Functional Software Developer at OpinionLab http://functionaljobs.com/jobs/8763-functional-software-developer-at-opinionlab Cheers, Sean Murphy FunctionalJobs.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] freactive - high performance, pure Clojurescript, declarative DOM library
So, yes I agree - it is best to take something like this and see how it works in concrete implementations before determining whether it is good enough to subscribe to. In this case, there are actually two concrete implementations - freactive and fx-clj (which I'll formally announce once I get to update the docs). In my case, I actually thought of this abstraction first - because I was trying to think of API would work equally well for JavaFX as well as the DOM and other things. I wasn't even going to write the DOM version (freactive) but then after using the existing reactive DOM libs I found some things missing - especially in terms of easy, built-in animation support which I needed for my projects. So, let's see how this model works for people as they use it. Please keep in mind that this is a very young library so this implementation is bound to have its kinks. Thanks for all those who are patient enough to play with it now and help improve it. On Monday, November 24, 2014 4:35:11 AM UTC-5, Ruslan Prokopchuk wrote: > > If you want something artistic though exotic enough to be not used on > github before, you can try 'nerikomi' (see google or > http://nerikomi.blogspot.com/ for samples) — beautiful Japanese art of > pottery where every layer of clay customized with different chemical > reactions to produce beautiful patterns. > > Saying about ui-spec, I really like it, but I think it should be developed > in communication with one of concrete realizations — e.g. freactive for > DOM. This way we will see real drawbacks and advantages of this model being > used for real applications, and will have chance to advance it and refactor > accordingly. But, may be it is only my approach to go up of the abstraction > ladder — somebody prefer to think about ideal abstraction in advance and > then implement it carefully. > > At the moment I can't say if my problems with using freactive are problems > of implementation or spec. Need more time to play with. > > понедельник, 24 ноября 2014 г., 6:45:12 UTC+3 пользователь Aaron написал: >> >> Glad to see all the enthusiasm about names :) If you think of others, you >> can let me know. Probably leaning towards something artistic sounding like >> "fresco" so far... >> >> But anyway, more importantly did anyone check out the docs I just posted? >> In particular the UI spec one: >> https://github.com/aaronc/freactive.core/blob/master/UI-SPEC.md. What do >> people think about the idea of trying to generalize conventions for writing >> reactive UI's? Decomplecting state management from the underlying UI >> renderer, common semantics, etc... >> >> On Sunday, November 23, 2014 2:44:49 PM UTC-5, Henrik wrote: >> > Hacker News has sort of noticed: >> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8648491 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sunday, November 23, 2014 8:32:11 PM UTC+1, Jason Lewis wrote: >> > Furthermore (it occurs to me) cesium is used to drive atomic clocks... >> so if you're using an atom to maintain state... even more relevance. >> Relevance? Wait, it's Cognitect now :) >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Jason Lewis >> > >> > >> > vox 410.428.0253 >> > twitter @canweriotnow >> > blog http://decomplecting.org >> > else http://about.me/jason.lewis >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Jason Lewis >> wrote: >> > >> > Cesium is the most reactive element of all... and the name isn't taken >> on Clojars. >> > >> > >> > Cesium will react explosively even with ice. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Jason Lewis >> > >> > >> > vox 410.428.0253 >> > twitter @canweriotnow >> > blog http://decomplecting.org >> > else http://about.me/jason.lewis >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Gary Trakhman >> wrote: >> > >> > The two best ones I can think of right now >> > >> > >> > Halogen: they're known as highly reactive elements. >> > Precipitate: both a noun and a verb, the solid that falls out of a >> solution, or to bring about such a reaction. >> > >> > >> > Other chemical-ish names considered >> > Enantiopure - Containing compounds of only a single chirality >> > Fullerene - Bucky-Balls, they're just cool >> > Recycle - 'Save the trees', and also 'recycle streams' from chemical >> engineering. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Aaron Craelius >> wrote: >> > >> > Fresco isn't bad. I think it's better than "freactive" at least. Seems >> to be relatively popular for a name, but no big projects: >> https://github.com/search?o=desc&p=1&q=fresco&s=stars&type=Repositories&utf8=✓ >> >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Olli Piepponen >> wrote: >> > >> > If you are open to name suggestions, how about Fresco? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> > >> > --- >> > >> > You received this me
Re: Thnx for clojureconj videos !!
Seconding the recommendation for the Clojure Gazette. If you aren't subscribed already, just do it. It's a fantastic resource, and I am very grateful for Eric Normand and the tireless effort he puts into it. On a side note, I had the pleasure of meeting Eric at the Conj, and he is one of the nicest people you could ever meet. He does the Gazette and all his videos in his free time while holding down a day job and supporting a family. That requires a tremendous level of commitment and personal sacrifice, and it's people like him that makes this community so special. We need to support these efforts any way we can - subscribe to the Gazette, sponsor it if you are in a position to do so, or buy his videos, if not for yourself maybe for that friend you drive crazy by going on and on about Clojure. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How do you refer to a previous value of a var, within a loop/recur?
Yep, I think that's what happened. Sorry for the confusion, nuff said, back to Clojure. On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Gary Verhaegen wrote: > Yeah, I think the "I'll transliterate everything before anyone else sees > it" part of your message was maybe not clear enough. Of course we don't > care what you do when you're working alone and just for yourself. > > On Monday, 24 November 2014, Dan Campbell wrote: > >> Thanks for the input, Plinio. >> >> If the community jumps to the conclusion that I'm arrogant, because I >> like to work in style that's clear & works for me, then I won't be >> surprised if they don't offer assistance in the future. >> >> From my point of view, as long as they receive my contributions or >> requests for assistance in a form that's palatable to them, it's not >> anyone's business how I code on a daily basis. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Plínio Balduino >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dan >>> >>> Please accept my two cents. >>> >>> "I prefer the indentation; it makes more sense to me." >>> >>> No, he didn't misunderstand, sorry. >>> >>> Anyway, Batsov's Style Guide is an awesome resource, even though you >>> won't follow the items ipsis literis, is good to understand how to work and >>> think in the 'Clojure Way'. >>> >>> For example, when one is new to Ruby, it's normal to find the for >>> statement there. Once one gets used to 'Ruby Style', the each method >>> becomes the standard. >>> >>> An example that I used with my team some days ago: >>> >>> In Portuguese (our native language) we use nouns before adjective. "Um >>> dia quente". >>> >>> In English we use nouns after adjective. "A hot day". >>> >>> Even if you swap the order in Portuguese (um quente dia) or in English >>> (a day hot), a native speaker will understand with more or less >>> effort. Syntactically it's not wrong, semantically is OK, but the >>> construction it's not in the 'Portuguese way' or in the 'English way'. >>> >>> So unless you don't mind to speak with yourself all the time, please try >>> to understand and follow the rules and the way of your new environment. >>> After all you don't want to be seen as an arrogant guy or as someone who >>> doesn't want to learn just because your way makes more sense to you. >>> >>> Please don't understand I'm judging you. I have a very bad impression of >>> LISPs communities in general, but the Clojure community is highly >>> newcomer-friendly and the other guys who tried to help you, for example, >>> are high skilled and very busy professionals. In any other community (I'm >>> cofounder of JS, Clojure and Ruby communities) you woudn't find that good >>> will to help, unfortunately. >>> >>> Sorry for the completely off-topic, best regards and welcome to >>> community. >>> >>> Plínio >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Dan Campbell >>> wrote: >>> "As long as you’re prepared to be told this every time you show your code to people, that’s up to you." I think you misunderstood the response. On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Sean Corfield wrote: > On Nov 23, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Dan Campbell wrote: > > Sorry man, but I'm not willing to change my personal coding style. > It's not a matter of getting used to Clojure. I'm not an expert on it > yet, > but I've been studying and working with it, for a little over a year. I > prefer the indentation; it makes more sense to me. > > > As long as you’re prepared to be told this every time you show your > code to people, that’s up to you. > > Your image, though, doesn't reflect my intended indentation style for > lisp code. It looks like some reformatting took place. > > > Of course - I reformatted it to match the Clojure community style. The > image was to show rainbow parentheses, specifically. > > If there are other styles out there, that you know about, I'm willing > to take a look at them. Although the traditional lisp style with multiple > adjacent parentheses doesn't work for me, there might be other styles > worth > looking at. > > > All the style guides will follow that style - that’s how Lisp is > written :) > > Here’s the most "standard" Clojure style guide, based on the style in > Clojure books, and Clojure/core’s own library style guide: > > https://github.com/bbatsov/clojure-style-guide > > Thanks for pointing out the error in the if statement. You're correct. > > > Glad I was able to help. > > Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >
Why doe floor and ceil accept clojure.lang.Ratio but round not
If you want math operations that are guaranteed to work with all clojure numeric types, be sure to use clojure.math.numeric-tower -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Thnx for clojureconj videos !!
+100 Mike, great feedback that I agree with. Maybe we should ask our significant others for training video’s for Christmas! ;-) On Nov 24, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Mike Haney wrote: > Seconding the recommendation for the Clojure Gazette. If you aren't > subscribed already, just do it. It's a fantastic resource, and I am very > grateful for Eric Normand and the tireless effort he puts into it. > > On a side note, I had the pleasure of meeting Eric at the Conj, and he is one > of the nicest people you could ever meet. He does the Gazette and all his > videos in his free time while holding down a day job and supporting a family. > That requires a tremendous level of commitment and personal sacrifice, and > it's people like him that makes this community so special. We need to > support these efforts any way we can - subscribe to the Gazette, sponsor it > if you are in a position to do so, or buy his videos, if not for yourself > maybe for that friend you drive crazy by going on and on about Clojure. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. Best, Marcus Marcus Blankenship \\\ Problem Solver, Linear Thinker \\\ 541.805.2736 \ @justzeros \ skype:marcuscreo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Google Clojure REPL
There are a number of issues with clojure on lollipop, the ART compiler doesn't like the bytecode generated by closure for various reasons. I have just today opened a dialogue with the ART developers at Google and at least some of the issues have been fixed for the next release of Android. Others might require changes to clojure though. Be reassured that there is some movement in this area though. If you are referring to the app store clojure REPL, that is probably suffering from the same issues. I'm not sure who publishes that though, so don't know whether it would be updated once this is resolved. On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 4:14 pm Zach Oakes wrote: > I believe there are still issues with ART that need to be resolved before > Clojure apps run on Lillipop. You may want to ask this on the > clojure-android list instead: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/clojure-android > > > On Sunday, November 23, 2014 5:39:08 PM UTC-5, Lorentzz00 wrote: >> >> Hello to all; >> >> So, the Clojure REPL for Lollipop doesn't >> Work. Why? Why won't it install? When will you migrate to 1.6 or 1.7? >> >> Hope to hear something soon. >> Lorentzz > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [ClojureScript] Re: [ANN] freactive - high performance, pure Clojurescript, declarative DOM library
Aaron, Still need to study the more detailed docs, but from what I read from UI-SPEC the only thing I get confused about was the event/lifecycle. Just a suggestion about the name, if there is time for that: despite of the chosen one, IMO will be a good thing unify all (potential) libraries under single name. So you'll end up with .core, .dom, .fx, .wpf. This way will be much more easy to follow the related libraries - after all, even with diferencies they will be tied by major common idioms. Just my 2c -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: lein repl timeout
Success! I checked the modification times on my hosts files. Apparently some process must have truncated my hosts file a couple days ago. There was a hosts~orig file, which I copied over, and all is well again :-) Cheers, Neil On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:49:43 PM UTC, Neil Laurance wrote: > > Thanks Colin. I'll post back here if I make any progress. Cheers Neil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
