Re: [cfe-users] clang frontend command failed due to signal
On 8/01/2018 11:36 PM, 01_Tyro_10 via cfe-users wrote: But it failed with the following error, and I can not understand why. 1.libcxx/include/__config:1028:3: current parser token 'if' 2.libcxx/include/__config:448:1: parsing namespace 'std' clang: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault (core dumped) clang: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) Make sure you're not running out of memory. Chris ___ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
Re: [cfe-users] How to use clang-apply-replacements with clang-tidy fixit file
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 07:20, Robert Ankeney via cfe-users wrote: > > I used clang-tidy to generate some replacements for a code base into a yaml > file using the -export-fixits=file option. After editing the file to remove > some unwanted changes, I would like to apply those fixes. The documentation > says to use clang-apply-replacements, but I don't see how do use it to do > that. It looks more like it's designed to work with clang-format. Any > suggestions? > If you don't care about formatting the post-replacement code with clang format, just run "clang-apply-replacements /path/to/source/dir'. It will scan for '.yml' files, and apply all replacements. Chris > Many thanks, > Robert > > ___ > cfe-users mailing list > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users ___ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
Re: [cfe-users] How to use clang-apply-replacements with clang-tidy fixit file
Back on the ML., let's keep the discussion public and archived. On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 09:11, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 09:01, Robert Ankeney wrote: > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > Thanks for the fast response! As it turns out, I was doing that, but found > > that there must be some edit in my .yaml file it doesn't like, as it simply > > returned without doing anything. Making a short subset of the file worked > > fine, so I'm looking at breaking it into pieces to see if I can narrow it > > down. On the first cut, it at least did warn me about some duplicate > > replacements and exited. > > > > Feel free to submit bug report and/or suggestion: > https://llvm.org/docs/HowToSubmitABug.html > > What program do you use to generate the replacement files? > > Chris ___ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
Re: [cfe-users] thinlto and c++ static initialization analysis
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 21:15, Jerry Scharf via cfe-users wrote: > > I am looking at trying out thinlto on our large c++ programs. We have > had to do a bunch of careful things to make sure things get linked in > the right order to get the static initialization to work right. > > Two questions: > > Will thinlto honor the command line ordering of files that we set? You're relying on undefined behaviour. If thinlto honor the command line ordering *today*, there's no guarantee that it will in the future. Best to fix the code instead of relying on compiler implementation. You could use the "undefined" sanitizer to detect so called "static initialisation 'fiasco' (problem)" (https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/ctors#static-init-order) My 2 cents. ___ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
