Re: [PATCH] D9237: Update block formatting to behave like Xcode

2016-02-28 Thread Tony Arnold via cfe-commits
tonyarnold added a comment.

@djasper so was the decision here to not merge these options?

I think it's fair that you require a documented style guide somewhere (which 
Apple don't currently publish), however it would be good to at least have 
generic options in clang-format that allow us to replicate the unpublished 
style, even without official support in the tool.

What do we need to do to get support for options like 
`ObjCAvoidLineBreaksForInlineBlocks` and `ObjCLeftAlignMultipleBlocks` into 
clang-format? There are potentially one or two more options around 
dictionary/array literal alignment/newlines that I'd like to add — but I'm not 
going to spend any time drawing up PRs if there's no way they'll ever be merged.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D9237



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


Re: [PATCH] D17700: [clang-format] Proposal for changes to Objective-C block formatting

2016-02-28 Thread Tony Arnold via cfe-commits
tonyarnold added a comment.

Aside from the lack of tests, and `AllowNewlineBeforeBlockParameter` being 
outside of `BraceWrapping`, this is good! Much closer to how Apple's 
documentation and Xcode format blocks! 👍



Comment at: include/clang/Format/Format.h:421
@@ +420,3 @@
+  /// \brief If true, allow newlines before block parameters when ColumnLimit 
is 0.
+  bool AllowNewlineBeforeBlockParameter;
+

Perhaps this would be better placed within the custom `BraceWrapping` options? 
Something simpler like `BeforeBlockParameter`.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17700



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


Re: [PATCH] D17700: [clang-format] Proposal for changes to Objective-C block formatting

2016-02-28 Thread Tony Arnold via cfe-commits
tonyarnold added a comment.

I did find one bug though — if there's any parameters in between the two 
blocks, they'll end up forcing a newline:

  objective-c
  @implementation SomeClass
  
  - (void)test
  {
  [sharedController passingTest:^BOOL(id application) {
  return application.thing;
  } withTimeout:kTimeout completionHandler:^(BOOL success, NSError 
*error) {
  if (success == NO && error != nil)
  {
// Do the thing
  }
  }];
  }
  }
  
  @end

Wrongly becomes:

  objective-c
  @implementation SomeClass
  
  - (void)test
  {
  [sharedController passingTest:^BOOL(id application) {
  return application.thing;
  } withTimeout:kTimeout
  completionHandler:^(BOOL success, NSError *error) {
  if (success == NO && error != nil)
  {
  // Do the thing
  }
  }];
  }
  }
  
  @end


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17700



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


Re: [PATCH] D17700: [clang-format] Proposal for changes to Objective-C block formatting

2016-03-07 Thread Tony Arnold via cfe-commits
tonyarnold added a comment.

> Blocks aren't the same as braces


Yeah, good point. I guess I was just seeing the brace in the block, but that's 
the wrong way to think about it.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D17700



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits