Re: [PATCH] D12047: test/SemaObjC: Remove cruft in unused getter test

2015-08-15 Thread Alexey Denisov via cfe-commits
AlexDenisov added a subscriber: AlexDenisov.
AlexDenisov added a comment.

Why do you think it's a cruft? Seems it's a bit more verbose than it should be, 
but what is missing in your test is inheritance, which is important.

P.S. I think the code for the initial test was just extracted from a real 
project.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D12047



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


Re: [PATCH] D12047: test/SemaObjC: Remove cruft in unused getter test

2015-08-15 Thread Alexey Denisov via cfe-commits
AlexDenisov added a comment.

s/which is important/which is might be important'/ 
;)

IMHO, the purpose of the test is not just prove that functionality is working 
as expected, but also prevent from regression, I completely agree that this 
test can be cleaned up a bit, but I'd cover at least two cases: a property of a 
class itself and a property of a superclass.
Though, it's better to ask somebody with a proper understanding of internals :)


http://reviews.llvm.org/D12047



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


Re: [PATCH] D12047: test/SemaObjC: Remove cruft in unused getter test

2015-08-21 Thread Alexey Denisov via cfe-commits
AlexDenisov accepted this revision.
AlexDenisov added a reviewer: AlexDenisov.
AlexDenisov added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Committed, r245731.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D12047



___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits