Re: [CentOS] Misterious hang

2011-11-10 Thread Aditya Hilman 



On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Fajar Priyanto  wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25 PM,   wrote:
>>> Any clue where to look for the cause?
>> 
>> Two questions: is there anything on the console screen? Does it just hang,
>> or reboot?
>> 
>> If the latter, and there's nothing in the logs, it's possible activating
>> openLDAP was just coincidental with the problem, and I'd start worrying
>> about hardware problems.
> 
> 1. It's a VM, the console looks black. Typing something on keyboard
> doesn't bring back the console to alive.
> It's also unresponsive to ping.
> 
> 2. It's just hang. Not reboot. I have to power off the VM and power on.
> The ESXi host has many VM in it and only my that VM has problem.
> 
> No specific time of hang.
> 
> Only thing I can try is to deactivate auditd. Let's see if it survives
> more than one day without hang.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Misterious hang

2011-11-10 Thread Aditya Hilman 


On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Fajar Priyanto  wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:25 PM,   wrote:
>>> Any clue where to look for the cause?
>> 
>> Two questions: is there anything on the console screen? Does it just hang,
>> or reboot?
>> 
>> If the latter, and there's nothing in the logs, it's possible activating
>> openLDAP was just coincidental with the problem, and I'd start worrying
>> about hardware problems.
> 
> 1. It's a VM, the console looks black. Typing something on keyboard
> doesn't bring back the console to alive.
> It's also unresponsive to ping.
> 
> 2. It's just hang. Not reboot. I have to power off the VM and power on.
> The ESXi host has many VM in it and only my that VM has problem.
> 
> No specific time of hang.
> 
> Only thing I can try is to deactivate auditd. Let's see if it survives
> more than one day without hang.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Try to using kdump for more information about your problem.
I've experience with some problem which is I can't see in /var/log/messages. So 
I use kdump for what truly happening in my machine.

Regards,
Adit
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel BUG

2010-04-05 Thread aditya hilman 
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Gilberto Nunes <
gilberto.nu...@selbetti.com.br> wrote:

>  Hi
>
>
> I get this messages from kernel:
>
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel: BUG: warning at lib/kref.c:32/kref_get() (Not
> tainted)
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel: Call Trace:
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] kref_get+0x38/0x3d
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] kobject_get+0x12/0x17
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] blk_get_queue+0x1f/0x26
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  []
> :blkbk:dispatch_rw_block_io+0x4db/0x5a2
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] __next_cpu+0x19/0x28
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] error_exit+0x0/0x6e
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  []
> find_busiest_group+0x1db/0x44d
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  []
> thread_return+0x6c/0x113
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] error_exit+0x0/0x6e
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  []
> kobject_cleanup+0x39/0x7e
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  []
> :blkbk:blkif_schedule+0x36e/0x456
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  []
> :blkbk:blkif_schedule+0x0/0x456
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  []
> keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0xc4
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] kthread+0xfe/0x132
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] child_rip+0xa/0x12
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  []
> keventd_create_kthread+0x0/0xc4
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] kthread+0x0/0x132
> Apr  5 09:19:03 zebra kernel:  [] child_rip+0x0/0x12
>
> What is this and how to fix it??
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
> *Suporte T.I.*
> *Selbetti Gestão de Documentos*
> *(47) 3441-6004 / (47) 8861-6672*
> *Fax (47) 3441-6021*
> *gilberto.nu...@selbetti.com.br*
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>

this is in VM right?
on my machine, i just upgrade the memory and cpu.

-- 
Regards,
Adit
<>___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Redhat Exams.

2010-07-14 Thread aditya hilman 
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Christopher Chan
 wrote:
> On Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:52 AM, Ru-Benz Cáceres wrote:
>>
>> I want to take the exams of redhat.. I´m starting now..
>> What advices I can get from you list?
>
> Nothing. All RH certificate holders are sworn to secrecy about the
> content but not the format.
>
> When I did it, there were three parts. MC, Troubleshooting, Setup.
>
> They've dispensed with the MC now so you only have practical tests. All
> I can say is, whatever you see on the curriculum, try to do as much as
> you can in implementing the stuff. If you run into problems even better
> because you will want to have experience looking for clues to the
> problem, identifying it and then correcting it.
>
> But I guess you knew this already didn't you. You won't be getting any
> 'tips'. If you want something like that, go get any of them RHCE cram books.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

now just 3.5 hours for RHCE exam without troubleshooting.
if you have any experience with redhat, take RH300 course before exam
-- 
Regards,
Adit
http://simplyaddo.web.id
ym : science2rule
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] KVM iptables rules

2010-07-24 Thread aditya hilman 
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Silviu Hutanu  wrote:
> After I installed kvm I noticed that some rules are appended automatically
> by some tools that come with kvm packages(I installed all KVM group with
> yum) .
> The problem is that after I appended my rules I and used the
> /etc/init.d/iptables script to save changes in /etc/sysconfig/iptables I saw
> that after restarted the machine that tool appended the rules once again ...
> so now I have double entries for kvm rules.
> Does anyone know how can I block this mysterious tool to append rules in my
> tables ?
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Silviu Hutanu
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>

virsh net-destroy default
virsh net-undefine default

-- 
Regards,
Adit
http://simplyaddo.web.id
ym : science2rule
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-17 Thread aditya hilman 
Hi folks,

I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view. Also
already configured the master - slave dns.
But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip, which is
not accessible by master to transfering the zone over public ip.
Is it possible to transfer zone over local ip for external-view ?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Adit
http://a dityahilman.com
http://id.linkedin.com/in/adityahilman
ym : science2rule
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-18 Thread aditya hilman 
On Feb 18, 2015 7:43 PM, "Tris Hoar"  wrote:
>
> On 18/02/2015 07:17, aditya hilman wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view.
Also
>> already configured the master - slave dns.
>> But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
>> Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip, which
is
>> not accessible by master to transfering the zone over public ip.
>> Is it possible to transfer zone over local ip for external-view ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Hi Adit,
>
> If you are not already using TSIG's in your views I suggest you look at
this guide
>
http://blog.hudecof.net/posts/2014/02/07/bind9-with-views-and-tsig-axfr.html
> It shows how to use TSIG's to identify the views so you can slave both of
them to the secondary.
>
> also you want to add to the options section on the master
> also-notify { slaves-IP; };
> This make it tell the slave to update its zone.
>
> Tris
>
>
> *
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
postmas...@bgfl.org
>
> The views expressed within this email are those of the individual, and
not necessarily those of the organisation
> *
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Thanks all for the suggestions.
I'll check it.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-19 Thread aditya hilman 
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:47 PM, aditya hilman 
wrote:

>
> On Feb 18, 2015 7:43 PM, "Tris Hoar"  wrote:
> >
> > On 18/02/2015 07:17, aditya hilman wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> I've already configured split DNS for internal-view and external-view.
> Also
> >> already configured the master - slave dns.
> >> But i've problem with external-view zone transfer.
> >> Based on the logs, the master notify to slave using the public ip,
> which is
> >> not accessible by master to transfering the zone over public ip.
> >> Is it possible to transfer zone over local ip for external-view ?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Adit,
> >
> > If you are not already using TSIG's in your views I suggest you look at
> this guide
> >
> http://blog.hudecof.net/posts/2014/02/07/bind9-with-views-and-tsig-axfr.html
> > It shows how to use TSIG's to identify the views so you can slave both
> of them to the secondary.
> >
> > also you want to add to the options section on the master
> > also-notify { slaves-IP; };
> > This make it tell the slave to update its zone.
> >
> > Tris
> >
> >
> > *
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> > and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> postmas...@bgfl.org
> >
> > The views expressed within this email are those of the individual, and
> not necessarily those of the organisation
> > *
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Thanks all for the suggestions.
> I'll check it.
>


Hi folks,

Below the named.conf and logs when transfer zone the external-view.
Transfer zone for the internal-view is working properly.

named.conf
view "internal-view" {
match-clients { internal; };

zone "." IN {
type hint;
file "named.ca";
};

# domain zone
zone "domain.com" {
type master;
file "domain.com.internal";
allow-transfer { 10.xx.xx.xx; 10.xx.xx.xx; };
notify yes;
also-notify { 10.xx.xx.xx; 10.xx.xx.xx; };
};
}

view "external-view" {
match-clients { any; };

zone "." IN {
type hint;
file "named.ca";
};

# domain zone
zone "domain.com" {
type master;
file "domain.com.external";
allow-transfer { 10.xx.xx.xx; 10.xx.xx.xx; };
notify yes;
also-notify { 10.xx.xx.xx; 10.xx.xx.xx; };
};
}


18-Feb-2015 09:00:59.176 notify: debug 2: zone domain.com/IN/external-view:
notify to 202.xx.xx.xx#53 failed: timed out

Can i redirect transfer zone the external-view using the local ip
10.xx.xx.xx ?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Adit
http://a <http://simplyaddo.web.id>dityahilman.com
http://id.linkedin.com/in/adityahilman
ym : science2rule
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Master - Slave Split DNS

2015-02-23 Thread aditya hilman 
Hi folks,

After configure the iptables for masquerade the zone transfer traffic.
I've found new issue, below the log on slave :

zone domain.com/IN/external-view: serial number (2015022302) received from
master 10.xx.xx.xx#53 < ours (2015022303)

The zone on the slave doesn't update.

Thanks.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Alexander Dalloz 
wrote:

> Am 20.02.2015 um 05:07 schrieb aditya hilman:
>
>
>  18-Feb-2015 09:00:59.176 notify: debug 2: zone
>> domain.com/IN/external-view:
>> notify to 202.xx.xx.xx#53 failed: timed out
>>
>> Can i redirect transfer zone the external-view using the local ip
>> 10.xx.xx.xx ?
>>
>
> That's just normal network handling: NATting / masquerading the RFC1918
> address space for routing in the public address space. Nothing bind does
> itself.
>
>  Thanks.
>>
>
> Alexander
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
Regards,
Adit
http://a <http://simplyaddo.web.id>dityahilman.com
http://id.linkedin.com/in/adityahilman
ym : science2rule
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS 6.5 RHCS fence loops

2014-10-29 Thread aditya hilman 
Hi Guys,

I'm using centos 6.5 as guest on RHEV and rhcs for cluster web environment.
The environtment :
web1.example.com
web2.example.com

When cluster being quorum, the web1 reboots by web2. When web2 is going up,
web2 reboots by web1.
Does anybody know how to solving this "fence loop" ?
master_wins="1" is not working properly, qdisk also.
Below the cluster.conf, I re-create "fresh" cluster, but the fence loop is
still exist.


























Log : /var/log/messages
Oct 29 07:34:04 web2 corosync[1182]:   [QUORUM] Members[1]: 1
Oct 29 07:34:04 web2 corosync[1182]:   [QUORUM] Members[1]: 1
Oct 29 07:34:08 web2 fenced[1242]: fence web3.cluster dev 0.0 agent
fence_rhevm result: error from agent
Oct 29 07:34:08 web2 fenced[1242]: fence web3.cluster dev 0.0 agent
fence_rhevm result: error from agent
Oct 29 07:34:08 web2 fenced[1242]: fence web3.cluster failed
Oct 29 07:34:08 web2 fenced[1242]: fence web3.cluster failed
Oct 29 07:34:12 web2 fenced[1242]: fence web3.cluster success
Oct 29 07:34:12 web2 fenced[1242]: fence web3.cluster success
Oct 29 07:34:12 web2 clvmd: Cluster LVM daemon started - connected to CMAN
Oct 29 07:34:12 web2 clvmd: Cluster LVM daemon started - connected to CMAN
Oct 29 07:34:12 web2 rgmanager[1790]: I am node #1
Oct 29 07:34:12 web2 rgmanager[1790]: I am node #1
Oct 29 07:34:12 web2 rgmanager[1790]: Resource Group Manager Starting
Oct 29 07:34:12 web2 rgmanager[1790]: Resource Group Manager Starting


Thanks
-- 
Regards,
Adit
http://a dityahilman.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 RHCS fence loops

2014-10-29 Thread aditya hilman 
Hello Dominic,

Thanks for the response.

when I start cman manually, web3 fenced by web2. Here the logs :
web2 : /var/log/messages/

Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Corosync Cluster Engine
('1.4.1'): started and ready to provide service.
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Corosync Cluster Engine
('1.4.1'): started and ready to provide service.
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Corosync built-in features:
nss dbus rdma snmp
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Corosync built-in features:
nss dbus rdma snmp
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Successfully read config
from /etc/cluster/cluster.conf
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Successfully read config
from /etc/cluster/cluster.conf
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Successfully parsed cman
config
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Successfully parsed cman
config
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [TOTEM ] Initializing transport
(UDP/IP Multicast).
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [TOTEM ] Initializing transport
(UDP/IP Multicast).
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [TOTEM ] Initializing
transmit/receive security: libtomcrypt SOBER128/SHA1HMAC (mode 0).
Oct 29 13:15:25 web2 corosync[1493]:   [TOTEM ] Initializing
transmit/receive security: libtomcrypt SOBER128/SHA1HMAC (mode 0).
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [TOTEM ] The network interface
[10.32.6.153] is now up.
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [TOTEM ] The network interface
[10.32.6.153] is now up.
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [QUORUM] Using quorum provider
quorum_cman
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [QUORUM] Using quorum provider
quorum_cman
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync cluster quorum service v0.1
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync cluster quorum service v0.1
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [CMAN  ] CMAN 3.0.12.1 (built Sep 25
2014 15:07:47) started
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [CMAN  ] CMAN 3.0.12.1 (built Sep 25
2014 15:07:47) started
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync CMAN membership service 2.90
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync CMAN membership service 2.90
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
openais checkpoint service B.01.01
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
openais checkpoint service B.01.01
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync extended virtual synchrony service
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync extended virtual synchrony service
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync configuration service
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync configuration service
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync cluster closed process group service v1.01
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync cluster closed process group service v1.01
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync cluster config database access v1.01
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync cluster config database access v1.01
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync profile loading service
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync profile loading service
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [QUORUM] Using quorum provider
quorum_cman
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [QUORUM] Using quorum provider
quorum_cman
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync cluster quorum service v0.1
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [SERV  ] Service engine loaded:
corosync cluster quorum service v0.1
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Compatibility mode set to
whitetank.  Using V1 and V2 of the synchronization engine.
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [MAIN  ] Compatibility mode set to
whitetank.  Using V1 and V2 of the synchronization engine.
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [TOTEM ] A processor joined or left
the membership and a new membership was formed.
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [TOTEM ] A processor joined or left
the membership and a new membership was formed.
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [CMAN  ] quorum regained, resuming
activity
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [CMAN  ] quorum regained, resuming
activity
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [QUORUM] This node is within the
primary component and will provide service.
Oct 29 13:15:26 web2 corosync[1493]:   [QUORUM] This node is within the
primary component and will provide service.
Oct 29 13:15:26 w

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 RHCS fence loops

2014-10-29 Thread aditya hilman 
6.153}
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU member
{10.32.6.153}
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU member
{10.32.6.194}
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [TOTEM ] adding new UDPU member
{10.32.6.194}
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [TOTEM ] A processor joined or left
the membership and a new membership was formed.
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [TOTEM ] A processor joined or left
the membership and a new membership was formed.
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [CMAN  ] quorum regained, resuming
activity
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [CMAN  ] quorum regained, resuming
activity
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [QUORUM] This node is within the
primary component and will provide service.
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [QUORUM] This node is within the
primary component and will provide service.
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [QUORUM] Members[1]: 2
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [QUORUM] Members[1]: 2
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [QUORUM] Members[1]: 2
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [QUORUM] Members[1]: 2
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [CPG   ] chosen downlist: sender
r(0) ip(10.32.6.194) ; members(old:0 left:0)
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [CPG   ] chosen downlist: sender
r(0) ip(10.32.6.194) ; members(old:0 left:0)
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [MAIN  ] Completed service
synchronization, ready to provide service.
Oct 29 14:39:05 web3 corosync[2651]:   [MAIN  ] Completed service
synchronization, ready to provide service.
Oct 29 14:39:09 web3 fenced[2708]: fenced 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 14:39:09 web3 fenced[2708]: fenced 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 14:39:09 web3 dlm_controld[2734]: dlm_controld 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 14:39:09 web3 dlm_controld[2734]: dlm_controld 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 14:39:09 web3 gfs_controld[2781]: gfs_controld 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 14:39:09 web3 gfs_controld[2781]: gfs_controld 3.0.12.1 started
Oct 29 14:40:24 web3 fenced[2708]: fencing node web2.cluster
Oct 29 14:40:24 web3 fenced[2708]: fencing node web2.cluster
Oct 29 14:40:29 web3 fenced[2708]: fence web2.cluster success
Oct 29 14:40:29 web3 fenced[2708]: fence web2.cluster success


I'm not configure corosync.conf
cluster.conf :


























Thanks

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Digimer  wrote:

> On 29/10/14 09:33 AM, aditya hilman wrote:
>
>> Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 fenced[1548]: fenced 3.0.12.1 started
>> Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 fenced[1548]: fenced 3.0.12.1 started
>> Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 dlm_controld[1568]: dlm_controld 3.0.12.1 started
>> Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 dlm_controld[1568]: dlm_controld 3.0.12.1 started
>> Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 gfs_controld[1621]: gfs_controld 3.0.12.1 started
>> Oct 29 13:15:30 web2 gfs_controld[1621]: gfs_controld 3.0.12.1 started
>> Oct 29 13:16:21 web2 fenced[1548]: fencing node web3.cluster
>> Oct 29 13:16:21 web2 fenced[1548]: fencing node web3.cluster
>> Oct 29 13:16:24 web2 fenced[1548]: fence web3.cluster dev 0.0 agent
>> fence_rhevm result: error from agent
>> Oct 29 13:16:24 web2 fenced[1548]: fence web3.cluster dev 0.0 agent
>> fence_rhevm result: error from agent
>> Oct 29 13:16:24 web2 fenced[1548]: fence web3.cluster failed
>> Oct 29 13:16:24 web2 fenced[1548]: fence web3.cluster failed
>> Oct 29 13:16:27 web2 fenced[1548]: fencing node web3.cluster
>> Oct 29 13:16:27 web2 fenced[1548]: fencing node web3.cluster
>> Oct 29 13:16:29 web2 fenced[1548]: fence web3.cluster success
>> Oct 29 13:16:29 web2 fenced[1548]: fence web3.cluster success
>>
>
> It didn't see the other node on boot, gave up and fenced the peer, it
> seems. The fence call failed before it succeeded, another sign of a general
> network issue.
>
> As an aside, did you configure corosync.conf? If so, don't. Let cman
> handle everything.
>
> Are you starting cman on both nodes at (close to) exactly the same time?
>
> --
> Digimer
> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
> What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
> access to education?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
Regards,
Adit
http://a <http://simplyaddo.web.id>dityahilman.com
http://id.linkedin.com/in/adityahilman
ym : science2rule
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos