Re: [CentOS] rpc.idmapd error after upgrade to 5.1
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:10:59AM +0100, Olaf Mueller wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > Olaf Mueller wrote: > >> after upgrade from CentOS 5 to 5.1 I see the following error > >> in /var/log/messages: > >> 'rpc.idmapd[2330]: main: open(/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs/nfs): No such > >> file or directory' > >> The directory exists [...] > > Are you running the latest kernel from 5.1 updates or the 5.1 kernel > > from the ISO. > Yes, I am running 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 #1 SMP Fri Nov 30 00:45:16 EST 2007 > i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux. > You probably have some permissions issue: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 #1 SMP Fri Nov 30 00:45:55 EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ grep -v '^#' /etc/sysconfig/nfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -ld /var/lib/nfs/ drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Dec 4 01:32 /var/lib/nfs/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -ld /var/lib/nfs/* -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 0 Nov 12 07:38 /var/lib/nfs/etab -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 0 Nov 12 07:38 /var/lib/nfs/rmtab drwxr-xr-x 7 rootroot 0 Dec 8 14:56 /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs drwx-- 4 rpcuser rpcuser 4096 Nov 12 07:38 /var/lib/nfs/statd -rw--- 1 rootroot 0 Nov 12 07:38 /var/lib/nfs/state drwxr-xr-x 2 rootroot4096 Nov 12 07:38 /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery -rw-r--r-- 1 rootroot 0 Nov 12 07:38 /var/lib/nfs/xtab [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /var/lib/nfs/ nfs-utils-1.0.9-24.el5.x86_64 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm --verify -q nfs-utils ..?. c /var/lib/nfs/state [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qf /var/lib/nfs/* nfs-utils-1.0.9-24.el5.x86_64 nfs-utils-1.0.9-24.el5.x86_64 nfs-utils-1.0.9-24.el5.x86_64 nfs-utils-1.0.9-24.el5.x86_64 nfs-utils-1.0.9-24.el5.x86_64 nfs-utils-1.0.9-24.el5.x86_64 nfs-utils-1.0.9-24.el5.x86_64 Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpQr39KudZj6.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 sysreport
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:00:05PM -0500, Alfred von Campe wrote: > > Well, care to elaborate? > Well, sysreport has been deprecated by sos in 5.1 :) Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpqx2qElAEED.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ntpd
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:24:23AM -0500, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > > > I am running a server inside of VMWare, and the clock gains > > ~30 seconds > > every 1000 seconds or 1.03X. > > ... What CentOS, kernel version? Maybe a better followup to the centos-virt mailing list... > > > Ideas? If I cannot get ntpd working, then I will have to > > resort to a cron * > > * * * * rdate -s time.intranet.pdinc.us > > > > > ntpdc -p > > remote local st poll reach delay offsetdisp > === > =time0.0.0.0 3 641 0.00046 -34.34546 7.93799 > =LOCAL(0)127.0.0.1 10 641 0.0 0.00 7.93752 > =time2 0.0.0.0 3 641 0.00040 -34.33556 7.93799 > =time3 0.0.0.0 3 641 0.00050 -34.33738 7.93799 > why don't you configure ntpd to an external server? > ntpdc -c sysinfo > > system peer: 0.0.0.0 > system peer mode: unspec > leap indicator: 11 > stratum: 16 > precision:-16 > root distance:0.0 s > root dispersion: 0.00099 s > reference ID: [0.0.0.0] > reference time: . Thu, Feb 7 2036 1:28:16.000 > system flags: auth monitor ntp kernel stats > jitter: 0.15 s > stability:0.000 ppm > broadcastdelay: 0.007996 s > authdelay:0.00 s > > > But still no clock setting... > > > By the time I wrote the above: > > st poll reach delay offsetdisp > === > 3 64 37 0.00058 -52.85483 0.43922 > 10 64 37 0.0 0.00 0.43831 > 3 64 37 0.00034 -52.79517 0.43925 > 3 64 37 0.00055 -52.80582 0.43925 > > no issue here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ date Wed Dec 12 10:46:02 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo ntpdc -p remote local st poll reach delay offsetdisp === =LOCAL(0)127.0.0.1 10 641 0.0 0.00 2.81735 =ntp.pasteur.fr 157.99.90.56 1 641 0.00131 0.004765 2.81740 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ntpdc -p remote local st poll reach delay offsetdisp === =LOCAL(0)127.0.0.1 10 641 0.0 0.00 2.81735 =ntp.pasteur.fr 157.99.90.56 1 641 0.00131 0.004765 2.81740 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ntpdc -c sysinfo system peer: 0.0.0.0 system peer mode: unspec leap indicator: 11 stratum: 16 precision:-20 root distance:0.0 s root dispersion: 0.00055 s reference ID: [73.78.73.84] reference time: . Thu, Feb 7 2036 7:28:16.000 system flags: auth monitor ntp kernel stats jitter: 0.00 s stability:0.000 ppm broadcastdelay: 0.003998 s authdelay:0.00 s [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux centos5-i386-vm.bis.pasteur.fr 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5vm #1 SMP Thu Dec 6 11:09:34 EST 2007 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ntpdc -p remote local st poll reach delay offsetdisp === =LOCAL(0)127.0.0.1 10 64 17 0.0 0.00 0.96858 *ntp.pasteur.fr 157.99.90.56 1 64 17 0.00131 0.004765 0.96953 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp1GVCHhb17d.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: Dual-booting two Linux dists
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:03:39PM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Jan 9, 2008 2:49 PM, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Why dual boot at all? Why not just run a Xen instance? > > I knew someone was going to ask that ... > > I'm only planning to dual-boot while I determine which operating > system to leave on the machine permanently. I don't want Xen masking > interactions with the hardware in a way that might give different > results from the actual behavior of each OS on the raw machine. I am multibooting my laptop with the following setup: * I keep a standalone small /boot (primary partition) with grub which is booted by the MBR. * one primary goes for NetBSD * one primary goes for XP * all the other linux distributions (FC8/C5) are on their own logical partition (one single 8GB slice for / including the distribution's own /boot and /home) the distribution bootloader goes to the logical partition. * a swap partion and a "/shared" ext3 partition are shared for all the linux distribution Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpxMTXnDkv09.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FYI: CentOS mailserver on nixspam RBL
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:14:50PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > In case someone's using the nixspam RBL and wondering why the influx from > the CentOS mailing lists has stopped today: > > http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?language=en&value=72.21.40.12 > Hi Kai, Thanks for the heads up. It's now fixed :) http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?language=en&value=72.21.40.12 The entry 72.21.40.12 is not listed. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpD0jSa2UddG.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Urgent: Major bug in latest X.Org Update for CentOs 5
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 11:04:30PM +0200, Ioannis Vranos wrote: > OS: CentOS 5.1 x86. ... > > and it says: > > "[Updated 18th January 2008] > The original packages distributed with this errata had a bug which could > cause some X applications to fail on 32-bit platforms. We have updated > the packages to correct this bug". > xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.26.el5_1.5.src.rpm has been released upstream without being announced :( it will be rebuilt and pushed/announced as usual. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpVjhxkqQThU.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Memory for crash kernel
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:17:35PM +, Anne Wilson wrote: > During the bootup I see a message that the memory for crash kernel is not > within permissible range. What does it mean, and what should be done about > it? > what about reading the release notes? ;) http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1 ... During the boot process you may see the message "Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible range" appear. This message comes from the new kdump infrastructure. It is a harmless message and can be safely ignored. r ... Regards, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpFabhjUlGBP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] system gets suspended automatically!
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0900, Chandra wrote: > Hello! > > I am running CentOS-5 with latest kernel available by deault (2.6.23). NO! You are no longer running CentOS-5 if you change your kernel for your own version... Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpCEMfQU8Ps9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] system gets suspended automatically!
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:50:52PM +0900, Chandra wrote: > > > I am running CentOS-5 with latest kernel available by deault (2.6.23). > > NO! > > You are no longer running CentOS-5 if you change your kernel for > > your own version... > > > > Dear Tru, Thank you for your mail. I didn't change anything at all. It > is just the default installation. The person who installed it for you lied. > However, I AM running CentOS-5. Infact, when I did "#rpm -q kernel", > it didnt give me any result. I didn't went into details of it assuming > that there may be something missing at the trailing end i.e. > kernel- in my command. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q kernel kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q centos-release centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux blackwilson.xxx 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 11:28:47 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux That what you should have for a current CentOS-5 x86_64 machine. There is no kernel 2.6.23 from CentOS. try to install the default kernel with: # yum install kernel And report any error once you have rebooted with the CentOS kernel. > > Anyway, I would appreciate if you can help me to get my problem solved. There is no support for non CentOS kernel, sorry. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpQh3X67p9nq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: system gets suspended automatically!
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:48:35PM +0900, Chandra wrote: > > Do you have any power saving settings turned on in the bios? > This is a dell computer and it has a power managment option in BIOS. > However, I changed it to not-to-save energy mode. After this, I found > that the computer restarts rather than hanging. Looks like some hardware crash to me, otherwise you would have some logs for oops/hangs. Can you make available somewhere your /var/log/messages (don't send a few MB file to the list) and the /proc/cmdline content ? You said you used "acpi=off" and acpid disabled is it still the case? ~> chkconfig --list cpuspeed cpuspeed0:off 1:on2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off Try a burnout test with tools like prime95: ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/mprime2414.tar.gz ref: http://www.playtool.com/pages/prime95/prime95.html http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgptTT5HGZhSY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] looking for kernel sources
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:21:04AM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all > > I'm looking for the linux source files for CentOS 5.1 2.6.18-53.el5. ... Please search a little on the wiki page before asking questions. http://wiki.centos.org/ There is a little Search box... http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source?action=fullsearch&context=180&value=kernel+source&titlesearch=Titles -> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source?highlight=%28kernel%29%7C%28source%29 Caveat: if you make your own kernel, you keep the pieces if you break your system. Don't expect support here. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpRxw0Pjy9ps.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FTP aborting
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 01:21:00PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > ftp ftp.ietf.org > cd rfc > prompt > mget *index* > > gets part way through then. > ... > any help? > What about some context information (http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html) CentOS version? arch? glibc version? ftp (or lftp?)... How reproducible? could be a network driver glitch NIC, make and model, driver (modinfo) ... Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpT2K7Ea3NIv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FTP aborting
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:04:21PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > thanks. Now I know some info to supply! :D > > Centos 5.1, everything current as of yesterday. > > ftp-0.17-33.fc6.i386.rpm > glibc-2.5-18.el5_1.1.i686.rpm > glibc-common-2.5-18.el5_1.1.i386.rpm > glibc-devel-2.5-18.el5_1.1.i386.rpm > glibc-headers-2.5-18.el5_1.1.i386.rpm > > >How reproducible? could be a network driver glitch > > > Keeps happening, I switched to wget and not having problems. are you using the latest kernel? (uname -a) 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 > > >NIC, make and model, driver (modinfo) ... > > > using dkms ipw3945. > > dkms-2.0.17.6-1.el5.rf.noarch.rpm > dkms-ipw3945-1.2.1-1.nodist.rf.noarch.rpm > ipw3945-firmware-1.14.2-1.nodist.rf.noarch.rpm > ipw3945d-1.7.22-4.nodist.rf.i386.rpm I could not reproduce it on my 32 and 64 bits machines but they are both using plain wired ethernet (not wifi) on a local disk. local or NFS/remote storage? is lftp showing the same issue? Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpawXjfH35by.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] FTP aborting
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:36:34PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: ... I have tried from home CentOS-5.1 x86_64 current 06:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection (rev 02) same versions as yours for the ipw3945 drivers and no issue. "ftp -v -d" might shed some light or tcpdump the transfer between your laptop and ftp.ietf.org Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgptSeC7ykBnV.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how to check the version of centos
Hi, On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:25:00PM +0300, Mail Administrator wrote: > > > Dear All, > > I had a server running centos 5 and have recently upgraded with centos 5.1 > dvd you don't need to "upgrade" with the dvd between point release of CentOS-5 (ie from 5.0 to 5.1 to 5.2 ) it's being taken care by yum. > how do i check the version of my new installated OS see the FAQ: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5#head-51ce9db5abbde6b4dbe39b0531d01b34f80fb606 Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpSRkmGUPoFC.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Gnome Terminal and xterm problems
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:46:00AM -0400, Matt Shields wrote: > I've noticed this in CentOS 4 & 5 and Fedora 5 & 6. If I'm in Gnome > desktop and using any of the terminal programs and I ssh into any > server, the connection just hangs. Not drops, it just hangs and > doesn't recover. > ssh -vvv might give a glue selinux enforced on your client machines? Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpv1ehSBWyXj.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RPM build environment -- was: query on sendmail issues
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:57:01PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > It will be great if all of these are put together as a CentOS wiki > article. [hint, hint] from upstream http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/Callaway-RPMBestPractices-Summit2006.pdf http://people.redhat.com/tcallawa/Callaway-RPM-spec-examples.txt Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp9bJl9tDFd4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] About firefox 64 bit version
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:10:28AM +0200, devel wrote: > Is available new version of Firefox? > This version have problems of stability and with java script > > > firefox-1.5.0.9-10.el5.centos > > firefox-1.5.0.9-10.el5.centos > > If you keep your machine up to date, you would be using firefox-1.5.0.12-1.el5.centos.i386 firefox-1.5.0.12-1.el5.centos.x86_64 # yum update Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp9GUMCZSjB7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] drive to standby after idle timeout?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:35:07AM -0400, Brian wrote: > I'd like to to put the hard drives in standby mode during periods of > no activity. I'm just running a file server plus a couple small > things on a Qube 3 from home, although the web stuff will increase > it's still minimal. > > On my NetBSD systems I can use atactl to do this via: > > mount -u -o async,noatime,nodevmtime / > mount -u -o async,noatime /usr > atactl wd0 setidle 5 > > [wait a time] > # atactl wd0 checkpower > Current power status: Standby mode > > I looked at smartctl but it doesn't look like I can set idle time > with it, just readout status and perform self-tests. Is there a way? if it's some IDE drive then hdparm(8) might help: Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpsZEr0kfBbl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why was gnome-bluetooth-manager pulled and how to get it back
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:07:31PM -0700, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I found at: http://lwn.net/Articles/212852/ > > * Thu Nov 23 2006 Harald Hoyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 0.7.0-11 > - fixed gnome-obex-send > - removed gnome-bluetooth-manager > > And there is a 0.9 floating around that has it and more. > > And I really want to get a bluetooth manager http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216659 see comment #8 Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpczWdvxzdkz.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GFS/LVM/RAID1 recovery question
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:07:57PM +0100, James Fidell wrote: ... > > lvcreate -m 1 ... /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd or use pvreate /dev/md0 (md raid1 mirror of sda/sdb/sdc)? > > where sd[bc] are the mirrored (iSCSI) PVs in the VG and sdd is the log. > I have this working and can write data to the filesystem on one machine > in the cluster and see it appear elsewhere etc. > > What I now want to do is to test what happens when I disable one > of the mirrors and then restore it with clean disks. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/docs/4.5/SAC_Cluster_Logical_Volume_Manager/mirrorrecover.html .02 cents Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpxrwnO5VfSg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] drive to standby after idle timeout?
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:36:44AM -0400, Brian wrote: > > > hdparm -y /dev/hdd > > hmm.. still doesn't seem to stick: > You may have opened files being continuously written to (syslog, audit, sar, ...). chkconfig(8)/losf(8) might tell you if any daemons/programs are involved. Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpfWG3OIYUtb.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 3.9's up2date missing sources???
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 07:16:00PM -0400, Lawrence Houston wrote: > CentOS3.9 Users: > > After applying all Updates to Upgrade from CentOS 3.8 CentOS 3.9 I find > up2date no longer works "correctly" (or shall I say NOT as before)... > Missing is the "sources" File!!! Is this how V 4.5.5-7 is supposed to be > or is the "sources" File omission an "error"??? My bad, sorry. The current up2date version is missing: - a definition for newly installed up2date - a config(noreplace) tag for /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources I am pushing now a corrected version on the mirror. i386: up2date-gnome-4.5.5-7.centos.2.i386.rpm up2date-4.5.5-7.centos.2.i386.rpm x86_64: up2date-gnome-4.5.5-7.centos.2.x86_64.rpm up2date-4.5.5-7.centos.2.x86_64.rpm howto fix: -- If it's update from 3.8, you should have a /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources.rpmsave file just copy it to /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources to fix up2date. Or use yum instead of up2date ;). If up2date is broken due to the missing sources file, you can still use yum to update up2date: # yum update up2date Last resort, I have attached the default /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources, just copy it there. Once again, sorry for the error, and thanks for reporting it. :) Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B ### This describes the various package repositories (repos) that up2date will ### query for packages. It currently supports apt-rpm, yum, and "dir" repos. ### Format is one repository (repo) entry per line, # starts comments, the ### first word on each line is the type of repo. ### The default RHN (using "default" as the url means use the one in the ### up2date config file). This is required. #up2date default ### Note: when a channel label is required for the non up2date repos, ### the label is solely used as an internal identifier and is not ### based on the url or any other info from the repos. ### An apt style repo (the example is arjan's 2.6 kernel repo). ### The format is: ### type channel-label service:server pathrepo name #apt arjan-2.6-kernel-i386 http://people.redhat.com ~arjanv/2.5/ kernel ### Note: for apt repos, there can be multiple repo names specified (space ### seperated). ### A yum style repo. The format is: ### type channel-label url #yum fedora-9-i386-stable http://download.fedora.us/fedora/redhat/9/i386/yum/stable yum centos-3-base http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/os/i386/ yum centos-3-addons http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/addons/i386/ yum centos-3-updates http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/updates/i386/ yum centos-3-extras http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/extras/i386/ #yum centos-3-extras http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/testing/i386/ #yum centos-3-centos+ http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/centosplus/i386/ ### A local directory full of packages (a "dir" repo). For example: #dir my-favorite-rpms-i386-9 /var/spool/RPMS/ # Multiple versions of all repos except "up2date" can be used. Dependencies # can be resolved "cross-repo" if need be. pgpU2HUlQjMQR.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reading ufs2 filesystems with centosplus kernel
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 04:21:34AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On 8/30/07, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm running centos5 with the centosplus kernel v2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 and i'm > > trying to read a drive that has a ufs2 partition on it. It was originally in > > a FreeBSD machine and has some data i'd like to get at. Googling indicated > > this should work with the command: > > > > mount -r -t ufs -o ufstype=ufs2 > > > > device is /dev/hdb5 and mountpoint is /mnt. I'm getting an error unknown > > filesystem type ufs. I'm assuming i have to load a module of some kind. Any > > help appreciated. > > Thanks. > > Dave. > > ufs is not enabled in the centosplus kernel (or the standard kernel). > It will be necessary to rebuild the kernel. The kernel module should be enough: http://dev.centos.org/~tru/kernel-modules/centos-5/ufs.tgz (ufs sources from 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5) You need to have installed the kernel-devel rpm from your running kernel. run the runme.sh script and install the module :) Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpM9dcX1RQCu.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reading ufs2 filesystems with centosplus kernel
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:08:34AM -0400, Dave wrote: > Hello, Hi, don't put me in CC: I am subscribed to the mailing list ;) >Thanks for your reply. I downloaded the ufs module, and ran run.sh, i > had kernel-devel installed. However when i again tried: > > mount -t ufs -o ufs2 /dev/hdb5 /mnt have you actually installed the module? (as root: make -C /lib/modules/... modules_install) You might also need a "depmod -a" after installing it. Then "modinfo ufs" should reply: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/ufs-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5-from-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5]$ modinfo ufs filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.8.el5/extra/ufs.ko license:GPL srcversion: 28C144D2C43C6B79635A5AA depends: vermagic: 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 SMP mod_unload 686 REGPARM 4KSTACKS gcc-4.1 Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpv9IGJTTVPz.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vmware 1.0.4 lock up on install
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:29:52PM -0400, Von Landfried wrote: > <http://dev.centos.org/~tru/vmware/centos-4/> > > <http://dev.centos.org/~tru/vmware/centos-5/> > > Thanks again for the links, these will be useful. > Hi, I am currently uploading the latest versions. I had to delete the former ones (disk space issue on the server). Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpeLHuHHsizu.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vmware 1.0.4 lock up on install
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:05:09AM +0200, Tru Huynh wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently uploading the latest versions. done Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpVV8mBNXywG.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Supermicro X7DVL-E and Xeon L5320 installation problems
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 12:29:26PM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote: > Tearing our hair out on this one. Trying to install CentOS 5 x86_64 > on a Supermicro X7DVL-E with 2 Xeon L5320 quad core CPUs, 3Ware SATA > RAID controller in a mirrored setup and 4 GB of memory. Installation > crashes at random places while copying the files. We've run > memtest86 for 24 hours without any errors, replaced the RAID > controller, motherboard and disks, but still no luck. We have X7DBR-3 with 2x X5355 8 GB of RAM, nothing fancy but work fine here. How do you install? network/cdrom ? how does your kickstart looks like? Try to add a serial console to log the output or syslog=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx to remote syslog. Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpho6IVCce2h.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only for CentOS 2?
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:21:55AM -0400, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: > I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is: > > "Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when > upstream has released it for all the versions?" > It has been released to CentOS-3 on Oct 7th, in the updates repository. The other maintainers have their own schedule/priorities. Making CentOS a reality is not our daily job/duty, remember? > The guys from X/OS have released it for 5.0 along with the other updates (on > Oct. 9). No one prevents you for switching distribution. > Are the "enhancements"... "not important" as long as they're not "security > updates"? Speaking for CentOS-3, the enhancements used to go to the fasttrack repo, ie pending updates for the next point release. Since CentOS-3.9 is the last respin, all the RHEA are now in updates. > > True, the guys from SL have only released tzdata-2007h in "fastbugs" -- which > is something you should not use --, but I am asking in a single place: why? Ask on the SL mailing list, we can't speak for them! Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp92GaOagNpj.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] xen in production servers
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:48:45AM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > centos-virt list? Can't find any such list here: > http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16 it's here: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt All the mailing lists are: http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpac9wgHD32z.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bind-9.3.3-9.0.1 RPM BUILD error
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:33:16PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > Hi, > > Centos 4.4 comes with bind 9.2.x. I want to upgrade it to bind Make yourself a favor and 'yum update' instead of trying to break your CentOS-4 by adding CentOS-5 packages. Current CentOS-4 is 4.5 with bind-libs-9.2.4-27.0.1.el4.i386 Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgplug1mQjdnP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Samba Upgrade on Centos 3
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:00:57AM -0800, Ben Mohilef wrote: > After today's samba update, Centos 3 boxes can not use samba to > communicate with each other, although Windows and the Centos 3 boxes > see each other correctly as do RHEL5 and the Centos3 boxes. The du > command works well, but ls, cp, cat ,etc produces the error: > PANIC: push_ascii - dest_len == -1 > in the server log and > smb_trans2_request: result=-5, setting invalid > in the client. > You mean samba-3.0.9-1.3E.13.2 -> samba-3.0.9-1.3E.14.1 ? The changelog only reads: * Wed Oct 17 2007 Simo Sorce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3.0.9-1.3E.14 - Security fix for CVE-2007-4572 and CVE-2007-5398 resolves: #350731 resolves: #359101 Are all your CentOS-3 machines running the same samba version? (smb restarted ?) > A similar (but more serious) set of problems was reported in Ubuntu early > this morning after their update. > > Is any one else experiencing this problem with samba and Centos 3 after > the update? You are the first reporting it, I don't really use samba ;) According to the diff from the 2 above versions, the possible culprit is samba-3.0.9-CVE-2007-4572.patch Cheers, and keep up posted! Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpbCnueJAozE.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] About md5sum
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:52:43AM -0500, Ray Leventhal wrote: > Fajar Priyanto wrote: > > Hi all, > > A friend of mine gives me a copy of Centos5 DVD. > > I then make an iso of it using dd if=/dev/cdrom of=centos5.iso command. > > I then check it using sha1sum. > > But the result is different than of listed in Centos website. > > Should it the same? Or we simply cannot compare sha1sum from burned DVD to > > that of 'unburned' iso file? > > Thanks. > > > an afterthought - > > the subject of your mail was md5sum...the body speaks about sha1sum. > They're different mechanisms; comparing a sha hash to an md5 will > always be different, I believe. definitely! this and the relevant links might help: http://www.g-loaded.eu/2006/10/07/verify-a-burned-cddvd-image-on-linux/#more-291 Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpeq4CshkRwy.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] About md5sum
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 04:15:53PM +0100, Alain Spineux wrote: > When booting on the DVD it will ask you if you want to test it! > You know where every body is always selecting SKIP! > You can check it this way that check will only tell you is the embedded checksum is ok (correct/complete transfer/burn from iso -> dvd), not if the dvd is a "genuine" CentOS version (unmodified). AFAIK, you have to check against the md5sums... my .02 cents Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpshZ66ETRhB.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: manipulating files and directories with spaces
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:45:12AM +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
...
>
> Maybe, but unless it works on CentOS 5, it is irrelevant to this list.
it works on CentOS-5 (findutils-4.2.27-4.1)
> It certainly is not available in the "find" on CentOS 4:
The request was specific on CentOS-5. What's you point?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# find /home/user/ -type f -exec echo {} + \:
> find: missing argument to `-exec'
you would have the syntax wrong:
find /home/user/ -type f -exec echo {} +
but it's not available on CentOS-4 (findutils-4.1.20-7.el4.3)
nor CentOS-3 (findutils-4.1.7-9.).
Cheers.
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
pgpTzJQdEUt2Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1
Hi, On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:34:33AM +0100, Francesco Camisa wrote: > YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW. definitely not: 46965 Dec 04 Heitor A. M. Ca ( 23) [CentOS] Outdated packages on 5.1 46966 Dec 04 Francesco Camis ( 43) ##>[CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1 46967 s Dec 04 Ralph Angenendt ( 49) ##> 46968 Dec 04 Francesco Camis ( 38) ##> > Next time maybe you should point that out nicely. Can we stop that now? Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgptmDZjE2J5w.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Latest firefox upgrade crashes
Hi, On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 06:47:54PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote: .. > Yes I do see the same issue after upgrading to firefox-115.6.0-1.el7.centos. > > It's just unusable now, don't understand how this got released :( It is working fine for us (firefox-115.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64). Maybe you can try with a fresh profile? $ firefox --ProfileManager Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpWfcfmK5SrM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:38:43PM -0700, Terry Hickey wrote: > > > Well. > # php -v > PHP 5.1.6 (cli) (built: Jul 31 2008 00:08:07) > Copyright (c) 1997-2006 The PHP Group > Zend Engine v2.1.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2006 Zend Technologies > > rpm -qa |grep php > php-cli-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 > php-ldap-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 > php-pear-1.4.11-1.el4s1.1 > php-mysql-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 > php-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 > php-pdo-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 > php-common-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 > php-gd-5.1.6-3.el4s1.10 > afaik, that's from centosplus and there is no other version since upstream has EOL'ed it a long time ago https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-appstk-as-errata.html If you are upgrading from another repository, you should ask them! Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpCiTDV3x3zd.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is there a Centos 3 around ?
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 01:06:56PM -0500, Nicolas Ross wrote: > Hi ! > > I think one of my machine got hacked, but I can figure out from where... > > I found some suspicious file in /bin and /usr/bin directories that are owned > by user id 122, where this machine doesn't a userid 122. > > So, does anyone hav a centos 3.9 install arround that can send me the info > about (filesize, md5, modification date) these file : 3.9 is still available on all the mirrors, you can rpm2cpio and compare (watch out for prelinked files) or try the rpm --verify flag (if the rpm database is not modified). Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpR28h5XHgxD.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 08:19:22PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > > Considering you follow the "it's released when it's ready" mantra, what [ ... ] > I no longer expect any change. Then why are you always coming back here to voice your concerns if you don't expect any change? Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp6Tp7xFYTx9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:03:05PM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote: > > I for one am glad about it as it is obvious that it needs to be > addressed. we all agree that it can be done better/faster/... > The constant retorts against anyone asking is just > unbelievable. Maybe if the questions can be read as: > > I know you release when ready, so how can I help it be ready faster? 1) what about "stop breathing over my neck?" I would not like a "helping hand" stabbing me everyday to remind me that things could be better, but ymmv. 2) 4.9 is out, 5.6 is nearly released (SRPMS still being pushed), work on 6 will resume... 3) Releasing is one goal, keep thing running is another. C4 csgfs needs testing, who is helping? http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4754 4) back to your genuine inquiry "how can I help it be ready faster?" Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report back what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? [... anything usefull for your CentOS community ...] Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpFl8EMkwFgP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:48:18PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > 4) back to your genuine inquiry "how can I help it be ready faster?" > > > > Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report > > back > > what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? > > > > [... anything usefull for your CentOS community ...] > > Yes, let's all do the same thing, and stumble over the same problems, > while they may already have fixed in the closed QA builds. > > Sounds like one crazy plan ! right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere. Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the person who find the exit. We don't have the solution at the moment, You get the QA builds once we find the exit. If you finish before us let us know how you did it. -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpsjJpBXWiDm.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:44:03PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/11/2011 2:33 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > > Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report > > back > > what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? > > So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your > idea of doing things faster? who is everyone? > I guess parallel computing really is a hard problem. I guess so. -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpdlmrqWXD4G.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > right: you are locked inside a maze, there is one exit somewhere. > > Everyone start from the same place, eveyone benefit from the > > person who find the exit. We don't have the solution at the moment, > > You get the QA builds once we find the exit. If you finish before us > > let us know how you did it. > > No, you have 2500 mazes, and you have to finish each of them before you > can start the next one. In the meantime, other people (including the > CentOS people) are getting lost in that same (but copied) maze, so you > cannot help each other find the exit, until you do. My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS), What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes? Feel free to coordinate, we will all profit from your coordination skills. > > Let's waste time together fixing something that someone may already have > fixed, who wouldn't be excited about that ! Is this kind of useless discussion better? [free troll feeding is over for me] -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpArYd0pdkKc.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:20:59PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Tru Huynh wrote: ... > > My maze is the build order (ie dependancy order of the SRPMS), > > What are yours? how do you get to that number of mazes? > > The build order is not what took 86 days, was it ? it's too easy to answer my question by yet another stab. So where are these thousands of mazes? -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpbvGAKS0TYq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:37:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/11/2011 2:59 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > > >>> Make your own experiment (i.e rebuild your own clone) and document/report > >>> back > >>> what you find out as the proper order of rebuild of the upstream SRPMS ? > >> > >> So having everyone repeat the same mistakes with no coordination is your > >> idea of doing things faster? > > who is everyone? > > I might throw some time and equipment at it if I knew I wasn't > re-inventing square wheels (or even round ones for that matter). And I > suspect that others smarter than I am would do the same and maybe even > improve the approach by coming up with ways to predict the build > environment needed to reproduce a given binary to reduce the > trial-and-error time. Same answer for you than I made for Dag, volonteer to coordinate, build, write scripts, publish *your* work and you will be helping your fellows. > But I don't see this happening if the process > stays closed any more than I think there would be a useful Linux today - > or most of the packages comprising Red Hat's product - if development > had not been open and shared. I only see wasted time talking, no actions. I will be happy to be proven wrong. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpkjIWRtMyiU.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 broken?
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:38:50PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > *I* found a new X client that I *guess* is affected: xrdb (which I > suspect almost no one actually uses anymore). I get this error from > xrdb: > > sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"' > sh: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file > > I upgraded my (32-bit) laptop to CentOS 5.6 and now my .Xdefaults file > is no longer being loaded. Everything else seems to be working just > fine. Once I get to a high speed WiFi hot spot, I'll download the temp > fix glibc files and install them and see if that fixes things. the fixed xorg-x11-server-utils is already pushed. http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4819 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695603 Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpQfktM926ik.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Valgrind/Callgrind 3.6.1 does not appear to work on Centos Linux 5.5
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 03:50:25PM -0400, Frank Chang wrote: > >Hi, For the last day or two I having been trying to get >Valgrind/Callgrind 3.6.1 to work on Centos Linux 5.5 using a simple >Fibonacci C++ program(shown below). After compiling the program using g++ >-g -o MatchUpAccurate MatchUpAccurate.cpp, we run: >/home/frankc/DQTTest/valgrind-3.6.1/coregrind/valgrind --tool=callgrind >--dump-instr=yes --simulate-cache=yes --collect-jumps=yes >./MatchUpAccurate.exe. Then we get an error message from callgrind(shown >below). ... works for me x86_64 with compiled from source valgrind 3.6.1 [tru@liberte ~]$ g++ -g -o f f.cpp [tru@liberte ~]$ module load valgrind [tru@liberte ~]$ valgrind --tool=callgrind --dump-instr=yes --simulate-cache=yes --collect-jumps=yes ./f ==10998== Callgrind, a call-graph generating cache profiler ==10998== Copyright (C) 2002-2010, and GNU GPL'd, by Josef Weidendorfer et al. ==10998== Using Valgrind-3.6.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==10998== Command: ./f ==10998== ==10998== For interactive control, run 'callgrind_control -h'. ==10998== ==10998== Events: Ir Dr Dw I1mr D1mr D1mw ILmr DLmr DLmw ==10998== Collected : 1320456 328293 116346 1012 6964 1177 995 4029 894 ==10998== ==10998== I refs: 1,320,456 ==10998== I1 misses:1,012 ==10998== LLi misses: 995 ==10998== I1 miss rate: 0.7% ==10998== LLi miss rate: 0.7% ==10998== ==10998== D refs:444,639 (328,293 rd + 116,346 wr) ==10998== D1 misses:8,141 ( 6,964 rd + 1,177 wr) ==10998== LLd misses:4,923 ( 4,029 rd + 894 wr) ==10998== D1 miss rate: 1.8% (2.1% + 1.0% ) ==10998== LLd miss rate: 1.1% (1.2% + 0.7% ) ==10998== ==10998== LL refs: 9,153 ( 7,976 rd + 1,177 wr) ==10998== LL misses: 5,918 ( 5,024 rd + 894 wr) ==10998== LL miss rate:0.3% (0.3% + 0.7% ) [tru@liberte ~]$ rpm -q glibc glibc-devel glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.x86_64 glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i686 glibc-devel-2.5-58.el5_6.2.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.5-58.el5_6.2.i386 -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpBVInn0iQ46.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:17:46PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > On 28.4.2011 18.58, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > > like anaconda not seeing the "dvd" > > (mounted ISO specified using --location) that it just booted from. > > That's ok, once you know that... But I agree, it is frustrating, because > of lack of documentation. How much time wasted! > does that mean that you volonteer to add some pages to wiki.centos.org (-> centos-docs mailing list for more) ? ;P Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpvf0Bu8gmt4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-mirror] 76.79.76.39
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:59:58AM +0700, Raistlin wrote: > Look at this link: http://76.79.76.39/centos/ > thanks, stuck rsync, fixed now Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpd21j3slgLC.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Updating microcode_ctl froze Centos7
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 09:20:34AM +0200, Robin Lee wrote: > Today when I ran yum update two packages came up microcode_ctl > and unbound-libs. The updating process went fine until it outputted > > Running transaction > Updating : 2:microcode_ctl-2.1-61.6.el7_8.x86_64 > > then it just froze. I could no longer ssh to the machine and the > console was just blank. I had to shut down it hard. Maybe related to https://www.hivelocity.net/blog/centos-update-advisory/ (discarding the blame game) it might be a bad combination of kernel/microcode/bios... my 2 cents, Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpUucMSBLvVm.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS fails with latest C8 kernel
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 01:43:00AM -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > As if last weekend's UEFI debacle wasn't bad enough, it now seems the > latest C8 kernel (4.18.0-193.14.2) is incompatible with the current > ZFSOnLinux packages (0.8.4-1). When booted to the latest kernel, ZFS is > inaccessible on my C8 storage server. When I back off to the prior > kernel (4.18.0-193.6.3), all is well. please open an issue on zfsonlinux github: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues and provide them a reproducible testcase. > > If a local ZFS system is unavailable to the C8 kernel support folks, > I'll be happy to assist them by volunteering my system as a lab rat. Imho, that's out of CentOS scope, unless some people are willing to work on it with zfsonlinux people. Cheers Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp8sY4n_WBW8.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Have lost access to ZFS pools with latest CentOS 8 kernels
Hi they are working on it (https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11307 and https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/11322), and they might CI stream too (https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11320). -> 0.8.6 should fix it -> or use openzfs-2.0.0 Tru (not taking for openzfs dev) On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:03:05AM -0600, Robert G. (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > With the release of the vmlinuz-4.18.0-240.x and vmlinuz- > 4.18.0.193.19.x kernels, ZoL cannot connect with a ZFS pool. I'm not > 100% sure, but I believe the last CentOS 8 kernel to work with ZFS > 0.8.5 was 4.18.0.6.x. > > Obviously CentOS does not support ZFS, so this means the ZoL folks must > find and fix the problem. Otherwise, I think Fedora 33 is the only > choice we have for hosting ZFS. > > --Doc Savage > Fairview Heights, IL > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpRSYy8cpX_d.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7. Does the latest version work?
hi On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:23:58PM +0100, Phil Perry wrote: > On 13/07/2021 13:02, Toralf Lund wrote: > >Does anyone else run Microsoft Teams on CentOS 7? > > <...> > > > >The release that doesn't work is 1.4.00.13653. The one that does > >is 1.4.00.7556. > > > >- Toralf > > > > My wife has been using it on el7, but for the last month or two yum > has been complaining about broken dependencies when trying to update > it, so I'd disabled the Teams repo from yum updating. > > I can check what version I'm running later for you, if that would be > helpful. AFAIK, the latest rpm version for c7 is teams-1.4.00.7556-1.x86_64 after that they only support CentOS-8 for rpm or snap based for c7 (but one needs to have $HOME under /home). Cheers Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpGiu8_ip_NY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] post install freezes
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:37:30PM -0400, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > I'm doing an unattended CentOS 5.3 install in a virtual machine > vmware. I'm redirecting output to a serial console because production > boxes won't have monitors. I'm getting to the point of doing the post > installation then the box freezes. The only command i have in %post is > yum -y update. that's expected: 1) your chrooted post-install does not have any network information 2) nor the ability to acknowledge the import of the GPG key... > I'm not getting no output. Suggestions appreciated. the kickstart mailing list archives are full of info on how to do that. Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpZkJ0m0ZxLG.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] post install freezes
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:21:01PM -0400, David Mehler wrote: > Hi, > Just the standard keys that come with centos. Please, stop top posting and trim your replies... Show your ks.cfg, your statement don't match your error report... (%post with only 'yum -y update' then GPG key import, ... what else didn't you tell us? ) -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpSpCaJLe8QP.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] the ongoing wait for centos 5.4
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 09:48:46PM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am burning the DVD ISO image to disk right now. It is available from > some mirrors. which are mostly incomplete... maybe some isos are ok but even the centos.org machines are not yet in sync... I would strongly suggest that you wait for the actual announcements, but ymmv. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpm9OuruMnst.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.4 docs
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:33:04AM -0400, Ron Loftin wrote: > > First off, I'm glad that 5.4 is now available, and a big "Thank you" to > the development team for all of their hard work. > > I have noticed that the docs for 5.4 appear to be accessible on the > CentOS Web site, but some of them seem to have some issues. In the > "Technical Notes", everything after the first page of Chapter 1 gives a > 404 error. I've tried to send in a report with the contact form on the > Web site, but so far this situation has not changed. Don't ;) please use the bug reporting tool -> http://bugs.centos.org Thanks Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpiXs6ftS1Yp.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem YUM Centos 5
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 02:35:23PM -0600, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > I literally figured that out yesterday - I'm rolling out the 5.3->5.4 > upgrades. One thing though - on some servers that still had 5.2, yum > crashed on sfpio I then did yum update yum, and it stopped > dying; though it still failed. *Then* I did yum clean all, and then yum -y > update worked like a charm. http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.3 you should really read the release notes... especially the recommended procedure. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpSvH8dtPKPm.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Install libnet-server-perl on Centos
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:20:20PM +0530, Dhiraj Chatpar wrote: > Please help me as i am not able to find any way to install Libnet Perl > Server > > I used to install this on debian using > apt-get install libnet-server-perl > Command > > I just cannot figure out how to install this on Centos. Please help http://wiki.centos.org/irc_centos_request see 3) so that we can at least know which version you are running. see 5) for perl modules and 6) about basic management commands Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpBYwZZ80rkl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Supsend/hibernate on Samsung NC10
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:17:07PM +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot have suspend and hibernate working on a Samsung NC10
> (netbook) running CentOS 5.4 i386.
>
> When I try suspending/hibernating the screen becomes black (with a few
> logs, like "shrinking memory" for hibernate) and then the computer
> hangs and I have to force a shutdown with the power button.
>
> This wiki page seems to say that it should work out of the box:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Samsung/NC10
>
...
> - [mbaud...@localhost ~]$ lshal | grep suspen
> org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.SystemPowerManagement.method_execpaths =
> {'hal-system-power-suspend', 'hal-system-power-suspend-clear-error',
> 'hal-system-power-hibernate',
> 'hal-system-power-hibernate-clear-error', 'hal-system-power-shutdown',
> 'hal-system-power-reboot', 'hal-system-power-set-power-save'} (string
> list)
> power_management.can_suspend_to_disk = true (bool)
> power_management.can_suspend_to_ram = true (bool)
> power_management.can_suspend = true (bool)
>
[...@snoopy ~]$ lshal | grep suspen
org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.SystemPowerManagement.method_execpaths =
{'hal-system-power-suspend', 'hal-system-power-suspend-clear-error',
'hal-system-power-hibernate', 'hal-system-power-hibernate-clear-error',
'hal-system-power-shutdown', 'hal-system-power-reboot',
'hal-system-power-set-power-save'} (string list)
power_management.can_suspend_to_disk = true (bool)
power_management.can_suspend_to_ram = true (bool)
power_management.can_suspend = true (bool)
I am using my own sky2 ethernet driver(since 5.3)/ath_pci wifi driver:
[...@snoopy ~]$ modinfo sky2
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.9.1.el5/weak-updates/sky2/sky2.ko
version:1.18
license:GPL
author: Stephen Hemminger
description:Marvell Yukon 2 Gigabit Ethernet driver
srcversion: 4D063BC8FAD26BE4B493E77
...
[...@snoopy ~]$ modinfo ath_pci
filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.9.1.el5/net/ath_pci.ko
license:Dual BSD/GPL
version:svn r3879
description:Support for Atheros 802.11 wireless LAN cards.
author: Errno Consulting, Sam Leffler
srcversion: 53828DCE2B2CEC52C9E9103
...
Which requires a small hack in the pm config file:
[...@snoopy ~]$ cat /etc/pm/config.d/ath_pci
SUSPEND_MODULES=ath_pci
RESUME_MODULES=ath_pci
Maybe you need to add the sky2 driver to the list.
I haven't tried the newer sky2 driver from the 5.4 kernel serie, ymmv.
Cheers,
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
pgp2Gvrj3r5B7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:49:30PM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > Warren Young wrote: > > On 1/7/2010 6:01 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: ... zfs on *solaris *bsd is getting off topic, if you need to fight, please take that somewhere else. Thanks, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpqkQKnWWrV5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote: > Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS... > > I did a "yum update" and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola... You seem to enjoy living dangerously ? Don't you ever use a testing machine before rolling the updates on a production server? We appreciate your trust in our project, but you should always test on your own setup. > Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and > hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found. That is the 1st time I hear such a story: if the xfs module is not installed for your new kernel, the only thing that should happen is the inability to mount the XFS filesystem. > > I am using CentOS because I have to (for cPanel). That's trolling, CPanel is NOT CentOS... Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpoqJrT1KNlf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:20:46PM -0500, Doug Tucker wrote: > Tru, > Hi Doug, > I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test > environments :). Sure, but they could probably understand if it's 'critical' ;) > Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated > at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded CentOS can't rebuild if upstream hasn't released the corresponding src.rpm. Upstream's GFS is often released later than the kernel RHSA... > with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled > against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs > and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that > matter) and be lucky enough it would work? No idea. Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpBkO33c4XUl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] broken GFS
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:40:22AM +0300, Linux wrote: > What a coincidence. That is the 1st time I live such a thing. Well, > show me a way to prove. /var/log/messages ? > This log is after update & reboot: > "May 11 16:06:03 x kernel: XFS: failed to read root inode" nothing more? > Apr 02 23:41:30 Installed: kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-1.2.6.18_53.1.14.el5 kmod-xfs for 2.6.18_53.1.14.el5 > May 11 00:35:36 Installed: kernel.x86_64 2.6.18-53.1.19.el5 >... > May 11 17:13:03 Installed: kmod-xfs.x86_64 0.4-1.2.6.18_53.1.19.el5 and the corresponding kmod-xfs module (2.6.18-53.1.19.el5) > > According to this, there is a mystery in "May 11 16:06:03" because > there WAS a kmod_xfs but it was 53.1.14, not 53.1.19 as updated > kernel. too bad you rebooted 1 hour before the kernel-xfs module update. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp33QZqvymE7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: Top Posting
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:00:59AM -0700, Carol Anne Ogdin wrote: > I actually DO subscribe to this list via gmail. However, I seldom bother ... Hi Carol (and all the other top posters), if you keep top posting, please could you at least DELETE the mail you are replying to? Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpsy0SwXKLhx.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How is this possible?
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 01:12:30PM -0700, MHR wrote: > As an experiment, I am attempting to build a more recent version of > GNOME than 2.16.0 on CentOS 5.1. I've tried both garnome and jhbuild, ... just my 1st and last warning: if you break your setup don't come complaining here :) > ... > gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align > -Wfloat-equal -Wsign-compare -o .libs/dbus-binding-tool > dbus-binding-tool-glib.o dbus-glib-tool.o ./.libs/libdbus-gtool.a > -L/lib64 ./.libs/libdbus-glib-1.so -ldbus-1 -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 > /usr/lib/libexpat.so -lnsl > /usr/lib/libexpat.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The error message is quite clear. > ... > $ file /lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0 > /lib/libexpat.so.0.5.0: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, > version 1 (SYSV), stripped you are running a 64 bits CentOS-5 machine and you are trying to link a 64 bits objects with a 32 bits shared lib. > What did I miss here? good luck. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgplIU91HCpDN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos on ebox
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > > I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit. http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ? you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM... is the cpu i686 compatible? Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgprqR9PtzGOa.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: centos on ebox
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:38:38PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: ... > > yes this is the box I am trying to install on... > > I dont know if its i686, either way I thought i386 should work. I am I > wrong? yes, the i686 has some additionnal instructions that a i586 does not have. I have no idea about the cpu listed there. Try C4 with the i586 or i686 (default) version. You will be fixed. C5 does not support i586 class cpu. There was a thread about it some days/weeks ago. Not much volonteer to do/support it and the CentOS team has other priorities ;). > Is it the 128M memory issue? I thought I used to install with that much > - especially in text mode. it's below the minimal recommended size (256MB). It may work, I haven't tried. Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgptfHYg3tW8t.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centosplus vmware kernels....???
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 05:19:44PM -0500, Tom Bishop wrote: > Thanks Tru and Johnny, one more question. Can I just use the > centos5-testing repo, ie, yum enablerepoxxx install kernel-vm? I ask > because I tried and while it worked it loaded an older kernel. Should I > just go to tru's directory and install the RPM directly? Also, ok more than > one question, are the open-vm-tools in the same repo or only found in > Johnny's testing directory. Thanks again... Hi Les, Everything under http://people.centos.org/tru/ is signed for testing and feedback before it can be built by the CentOS build systems and enter either the regular testing repository or their final destination. You can look at it as alpha release ;). Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp8HwnEAaJ0t.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] firewalled NFS
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 08:54:05AM +0200, Jordi Prats wrote: > of course... please delete the unneeded lines when you reply as a courtesy to the other subscribers. Thanks, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpjGfHGYHWuK.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] vsftp 553 Could not create file
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 02:54:53PM +0530, lingu wrote: > HI ian, > > No its been the new file and directory i am trying to upload.And also i > checked with send and put command from linux client it is overwriting > properly if the file is already existing on the ftp users directory.I DONT > KNOW WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH WINDOWS.For your information there is no > firewall or selinux runnig on that ftp server. what about - showing the full transcript of your commands as Ian did? - the logs from /var/log/vsftpd.log, /var/log/messages, /var/log/secure ? And respect the mailing list guidelines - TRIM your replies - BOTTOM post Thanks. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpXlLG2ifRm0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 06:30:29PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi all > > I've just installed CentOS 5.1 x64, from the 1st CD (minimal > installation) and then tried to install Apache, but keep on getting this > error: not true, you must have at least added rpmforge in the way since you have: ... > > Dependency Installed: perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5.noarch 0:1.3-1.2.el5.rf .rf file -> rpmforge not CentOS what about showing: rpm --verify centos-release and the files in /etc/yum.repos.d Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgptEJUGBBYoN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] can't install software, "not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet"
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 07:31:37PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm --verify centos-release > S.5T c /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo Not the orignal version. That is the cause of your problem, see below. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -l /etc/yum.repos.d/ > total 32 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2044 Jun 19 08:57 CentOS-Base.repo > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 622 Nov 23 2007 CentOS-Media.repo > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 684 Mar 8 2007 mirrors-rpmforge > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 428 Mar 8 2007 rpmforge.repo > rpmforge has been added but that should not be an issue. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# more /etc/yum.repos.d/* > :: > /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo > :: ... > # If the mirrorlist= does not work for you, as a fall back you can try the > # remarked out baseurl= line instead. you should READ the comment ;) you can't have BOTH lines uncommented ... > > [base] > name=CentOS-$releasever - Base > mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ BOOM! comment either lines mirrorlist or baseurl for all the repositories listed in this file. and follow Akemi's advice :D cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpjwMPoERf2a.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Command line logging program suggestions?
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:24:52AM -0400, Rob Lines wrote: ... > > I will take a look at screen though it will probably take some getting used > to with how it seems to handle . The main goal was to help keep better > track of changes made while troubleshooting issues without having to write > down each command and change by hand. my 2 cents tips: screen -x (see http://meinit.nl/share-screens-with-gnu-screen) + ctrl-A H for logging Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpxvGp1OxXxN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is it possible to login to a switch via RS232 / serial port from the shell?
Hi Rudi, 1) please TRIM the replies. 2) don't let people try to guess your setup - your initial email does not event state your CentOS version/arch - your should have told that you were using xen at the very beginning - post the relevant lines of /var/log/messages and/or the config files of the program(s) you are using: it will avoid typos such as tty0/ttyS0 ... just like you did with: :D > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# grep tty /var/log/dmesg > Xen virtual console successfully installed as ttyS0 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# setserial /dev/ttyS0 > Cannot get serial info: Invalid argument > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# > > It may seem that Xen uses ttyS0 for itself, but how do I get around it? > show the grub.conf entry of your kernels (dom0/domU) and/or /proc/cmdline content. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpDre40EjIZD.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] is it possible to login to a switch via RS232 / serial port from the shell? - SOLVED
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:26:22PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > Hi Tru Hi Rudi, > > Sorry for the inconvenience, since this is a CentOS list, I didn't think > it's necessary to say I'm using CentOS. We have 4 version of CentOS at the moment and a few arches for each. It's the minimum requirement to state the version and architecture. I am running CentOS too, which information does that provide? If I say I am running CentOS-3.9 on i386/x86_64 that reduce the search scope for everyone reading your help request. :P > And to be honest with you, I didn't think there's a problem on the server, > but more that I didn't know how to use minicom - which was the case. I don't imply it has to be a problem on your server, but the more details you provide, the better. ;) .. > Anyway, it's working now. I had to change the Xen config in > /boot/grub/menu and tell Xen not to use ttyS0 as a serial console for > itself. > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/InstallationNotes#head-b915c65538e3d0cb29da04e05cb278e44624a522 Great :) Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpfbcHkxdgFM.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] can't burn CD RW
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:58:59PM +0200, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Rachid,
Gentle quidelines reminder:
- don't hijack threads, create a new one.
> I'm using Centos 2.4.21-37.ELsmp.
Under CentOS 3, you should be running 2.4.21-57.ELsmp...
> Under root user I can erase and burn a CDRW with succes.
permissions issues, probably.
>
> But under normal user it's impossible and the following error message appeared
> this is on the same machine.
What are the permissions of your /dev/{cdrom/cdwriter}?
you could probably make a specific cdrecoed entry in /etc/sudoers
and use sudo(8).
Cheers,
Tru
> __
>
> Ce message (et toutes ses pièces jointes éventuelles) est confidentiel et
> établi à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation de ce
> message non conforme à sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication,
> totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'IFP décline
> toute responsabilité au titre de ce message.
>
> This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended
> solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is
> prohibited. IFP should not be liable for this message.
>
> Visitez notre site Web / Visit our web site : http://www.ifp.fr
> __
>
very funny on a public mailing list ;)
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
pgp1BkafvtXCh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 09:09:36AM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > I am trying to install perl-Digest-Perl-MD5 from rf and it is failing > suggesting it ^^^ > needs /usr/bin/false. #yum whatprovides "/usr/bin/false" yields nothing. false in /bin/false on CentOS-5 This is the wrong list for the bug report, even if rpmforge's people are around ;) It's a rpmforge issue, not CentOS. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpfZOQmviJsW.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bind update overwrites named.conf
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:42:12AM -0700, Chris Miller wrote: > > I just had a customer's bind server lose all of it's local DNS records. > Yum updated the bind packages this morning at ~6am, and replaced the > original /etc/named.conf file, saving the old as named.conf.rpmsave. This > seems like the opposite of what it should have done (i.e. save the new > file as named.conf.rpmnew). If you have the caching-nameserver package, it's the expected behaviour: /etc/named.conf is "owned" and labelled as "config file" for caching-nameserver. The regular bind/bind-chroot don't provide named.conf. You should not install the caching-nameserver package if you are indeed providing DNS services with bind... Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpWw0B7zuoFY.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Memory for crash kernel
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 02:33:30PM +0200, Mad Unix wrote: > when I run dmesg PE2950 Dell Server I see the following line > > Linux version 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc ... > Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible range > ^^^ http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.1 ... During the boot process you may see the message "Memory for crash kernel (0x0 to 0x0) notwithin permissible range" appear. This message comes from the new kdump infrastructure. It is a harmless message and can be safely ignored. Please search at least the wiki before posting questions... and bottom post ;) Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpRRl2QZApod.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] where is printconf-tui on CENTOS 5.2 (migrate printer configuration)????
Hi (maybe?) On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 01:35:12AM +0800, mcclnx mcc wrote: > we are migrated CENTOS from 4.X to 5.2 on seperate DELL servers. For printer > definition migrate on CENTOS 4.X , we can use following command: > > printconf-tui --Ximport < printers.xml > > I can not find "printconf-tui" command on CENTOS 5.2. Does anyone know how > to migrate printer configuration on CENTOS 5.2? > Waking up late? ;D https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-list/2007-October/msg00187.html Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpWJUS3ipyNR.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bug Policy [was Re: Does sprof work on CentOS5?]
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Hywel Richards wrote: > Given that I can get this to work well on a CentOS4 machine, and I have ... where did you generate your libmy.so? On a C3/4/5 box? What gives (on c4 and c5): ldd libmy.so You may miss some compat libs. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgptuhlVcU7gv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bug Policy [was Re: Does sprof work on CentOS5?]
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Hywel Richards wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> http://lists4.suse.de/opensuse-bugs/2007-09/msg10980.html >> > > This looks like it might well be the same problem. yes http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2007-09/msg00477.html https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327040#c3 Could you please fill a bug at http://bugs.centos.org and to upstream http://bugzilla.redhat.com with these 2 links. > It's a little bit discouraging that the bug was entered so long ago and > is still open. There is no match when I search "sprof" on http://bugzilla.redhat.com How would they fix it if it's not reported there ;) Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp1Bgc0fd6gG.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VSFTPD passive mode is not working
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:37:37AM -0700, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote: > I have Centos 5.7 64bit; I have installed vsftpd as standalone service and > using it for two years now with no problem. Suddenly; only it works with > active mode. The passive mode stops working and gives time out. Firewall is > disabled and SELinux is set to permissive. > > I ran tcpdump and I noticed that only first three packets reached the FTP for > passive mode and no more packets on other ports > > # lsmod | grep conntrack > > ip_conntrack_ftp 41361 1 ip_nat_ftp > ip_conntrack_netbios_ns 36033 0 > ip_conntrack 91621 5 > ip_nat_ftp,ip_nat,ip_conntrack_ftp,ip_conntrack_netbios_ns,xt_state > nfnetlink 40457 2 ip_nat,ip_conntrack > > Any suggestion? possibly: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740399 Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgppZWYorLGsI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update fails / problem
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:10:01AM +0100, Götz Reinicke wrote: > Hi, > > may be someone has an idea what's broken on one of our RH EL 6.1 server. #rhel or rhel6 mailing list at https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-list > > Thanks for any suggestion . best Regards . Götz ... > __repr__ > "The message was:\n") + self.errmsg > UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 6: > ordinal not in range(128) http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4153 ? http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4025 ? Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpB5XnfDpyAK.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bind9 zero day bug - CVE-2011-4313 - when will there be an update in Centos 5+6 ?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 09:47:45AM +, Morgan Cox wrote: > Hi. > > http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2347 > > There is updated packages for Debian (and Ubuntu) already. > > Do you know how long until Centos release an update to bind ? they are already released 4/5 in updates and 6/CR but the announces are just not sent yet. We also need time to sleep ;) Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpdhU1edQZh2.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] serial console oddities with CentOS Linux release 6.0 (Final)
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:13:13PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > However I can not actually see the GRUB menu at boot time. I see nothing > until the server begins to boot and then I can see everything. However the > grub menu is absent entirely. > > My config looks like so : > .. > serial --unit=0 --speed=9600 --word=8 --parity=no --stop=1 > terminal -timeout=30 serial console put these two lines at the beginning and fix the --timeout typo :) This config works for me: serial --unit=0 --speed=38400 terminal --timeout=10 serial console default=0 timeout=5 title CentOS Linux (2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64 ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_c6-lv_root rd_LVM_LV=vg_c6/lv_root rd_LVM_LV=vg_c6/lv_swap rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_MD rd_NO_DM LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us nomodeset crashkernel=auto rhgb quiet console=tty0 console=ttyS0,38400n initrd /initramfs-2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64.img Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp4zTpN0vC25.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Seeing rlimits on CentOS 4
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:08:32PM -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: > This is probably something any SA should know... but I don't! > ... > > % uname -a ; cat /etc/redhat-release > Linux c4 2.6.20.7 #3 Sun May 2 16:30:15 EDT 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > CentOS release 4.8 (Final) > > (yes, I know this machine should be updated, but...) That's not a CentOS-4 kernel... kernel-2.6.9-101.EL is the latest released Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpMdcG3vmxF0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum warning...
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:01:33PM +, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > On Thursday 05 January 2012 06:17:17 John Doe wrote: > > # yum update > > ... ... > > Running Transaction Test > > Transaction Test Succeeded > > Running Transaction > > Warning: RPMDB altered outside of yum. ... > > How come a simple update of a a single package from CentOS update > > would "alter RPMDB outside of yum"...? > > The warning is generated by yum, saying that its own database of installed > packages does not match the rpm database. This basically means that sometime > back you have used rpm directly to install/remove some package, circumventing > yum. You are not supposed to install rpm packages behind yum's back. :-) you can but then you need to resync yum and rpm databases: [tru@centos6 ~]$ yum history sync will "fix" your warnings Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp0WFmfwRJcs.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GUI login issues over NFS
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:39:35AM -0500, Weiner, Michael wrote: > On Behalf Of Lucian > > > Check /var/log/audit/audit.log, maybe it's a Selinux related problem. > > Were you using Selinux on those Centos/Fedora installations > > previously? Maybe the contexts haven't been migrated over (properly). > > Thank you for your reply. I normally disable selinux, but its worth > checking out :) no issue here on CentOS-6.2 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 selinux enforced (but I have setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs=1) ibrix:/ibfs1/tru mounted as /home/ibrix (newly created ibrix user) Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpn5zezJnKd0.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GUI login issues over NFS
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:48:14PM -0500, Michael Weiner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > no issue here on CentOS-6.2 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 > > selinux enforced (but I have setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs=1) > > > > ibrix:/ibfs1/tru mounted as /home/ibrix (newly created ibrix user) > > Tru - > > Thank you for your response. When you created the NFS export on the > IBRIX system, what options did you use? I am currently using its > defaults of RW, NO_ROOT_SQUASH [root@xxx ~]# ibrix_version -l Fusion Manager version: 6.0.326 === Segment Servers === HOST_NAME FILE_SYSTEM IAD/IAS IAD/FS OS KERNEL_VERSION ARCH - -- --- --- - -- 1 6.0.326(X9000_6_0) 6.0.326 6.0.326 GNU/Linux 2.6.18-194.el5 x86_64 2 6.0.326(X9000_6_0) 6.0.326 6.0.326 GNU/Linux 2.6.18-194.el5 x86_64 > - l'export et les options que tu as utilisé? > > [root@hummer-s2 ~]# ibrix_exportfs -l HOSTNAME FSNAME PATH OPTIONS - -- - --- 1 ibfs1 centos6:/ibfs1/tru rw,no_root_squash 1 ibfs1 centos5:/ibfs1/tru rw,no_root_squash 2 ibfs1 centos6:/ibfs1/tru rw,no_root_squash 2 ibfs1 centos5:/ibfs1/tru rw,no_root_squash In the CentOS-5 and CentOS-6 machines, mount reports: ibrix:/ibfs1/tru on /home/ibrix type nfs (rw,addr=) I would check if your problematic user is created both locally and in your NIS/LDAP/... setup with different uid, restart the gdm daemon (caching? issue), stop nscd (+ flush the local cached data, before restarting it). Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpOVKrnuxrWJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GUI login issues over NFS
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:17:38AM -0500, Michael Weiner wrote: ... > > On workstation, mount shows: > > lri-brix:/ibrix/testing on /bme/home type nfs (rw,addr=10.66.200.11) ... try mounting to /home/username instead of /bme/home/username (and fixing /etc/passwd) no other idea for the moment. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpVEbSLTNiqz.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GUI login issues over NFS
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:10:15PM -0500, Michael Weiner wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > no other idea for the moment. > > Tru - > > I think i *MAY* have this figured out. When you do 'ibrix_fs -i' is > compatibility set to no? If so, are you a 64-bit client only shop? I > am wondering if our having the 64-bit mode set is causing the > problems. I did my tests on c5/c6 x86_64 only. > > [root@lri-brix01 temp]# ibrix_fs -i > FileSystem: ibrix > = > Total Segments: 24 > STATE : Mounted > Mirrored? : No > Compatible? : No > [root@xx2 ~]# ibrix_fs -i FileSystem: ibfs1 = Total Segments: 4 STATE : Mounted Mirrored? : No Compatible? : Yes,MaxSegments=63 I don't have account on the ibrix machine. imho: this should be fixed by HP/ibrix support team. Good luck, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpc9ZU06zpco.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] System reboots automatically more or less every two days
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:35:43PM +0100, fabio.pugna...@tiscali.it wrote: > Good Evening, > ... > reboot system boot 2.6.32-71.el6.x8 Wed Feb 22 22:53 - 17:10 always rebooting at 17:10 ? Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgp7aGpDNhksw.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.2 software raid 10 with LVM - Need help with degraded drive and only one MBR
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 09:03:44AM -0500, Jonathan Vomacka wrote: > CentOS Community, > > I have a dedicated server with 4 hard drives in a RAID 10 software > configuration running LVM. My OS is CentOS 6.2. Earlier today, I > rebooted my system and my system did not come back online. I opened a > ticket with my datacenter who informed me that one of my hard drives is > no longer recognized by the bios and has failed. I was told that an OS > reinstall was needed. how was your disks partitions? and how was the lvm setup? was /boot made of a mdadm raid1 array? there is a dracut issue on raid1 array (fixed by now, if you updated to the latest dracut release and rebuild your initramfs): http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5400 Btw the anaconda installer does install grub on the MBR of both raid1 members. No idea if it does so for lvm over raid10 array. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpgSg4yizR0l.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > If you are running CentOS-4, the last 2 kernels do not (yet) have > corresponding kmod-xfs. You need to wait for CentOS devs to build > those kmods or to supply a kernel version independent kmod. I have just pushed the latest .22 kernel... for extras. I completely missed the .17 kernel. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpQgv5dWWSpD.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Tru Huynh wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > >> If you are running CentOS-4, the last 2 kernels do not (yet) have > >> corresponding kmod-xfs. You need to wait for CentOS devs to build > >> those kmods or to supply a kernel version independent kmod. > > > > I have just pushed the latest .22 kernel... for extras. > > The one for the .22 centosplus kernel will be nice to have as well. grr, I keep forgetting that one :( Thanks for the reminder :) The CentOS-4 centosplus kmod-xfs are being pushed now to the mirrors. Btw I have rebuild the kmod-xfs independant version for the .22 kernel (regular and centosplus). I am not sure if the rebuild was really required. Nevertheless they are available at: ttp://people.centos.org/tru/kABI/ The previous kernel version independent kmod for xfs (built for the .13 version) are still on the testing repo. We can push either version in the next weeks, say June 15th? to their final repositories. Does that sound good? Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpbUMY6j4mG7.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Preventing hour-long fsck on ext3-filesystem
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:42AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > Here is the updated version: > > http://centos.toracat.org/kmods/CentOS-4/xfs/SRPMS/ > > Please discard the obsoleted ones (I did not bump the version/release > number). Let me know when your binaries are ready for testing. > rebuilds and uploaded. C4 testing files removed. Thanks, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpc0JwrBRmvn.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Yum update failure
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 05:30:37PM -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > Hi, > > I have 5.3 and am trying to do the latest update: > > sudo yum update > ... > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 from installed has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime is needed by package > httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 (installed) > Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime is needed by package > httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 (installed) > > I haven't heard of anybody complaining, so I must be doing something wrong. yum clean all && yum update should fix it. Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B pgpQCzHGh0LUt.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
