[CentOS] Centos 6.4 - doesnt power off with shutdown/poweroff cmd
Hello, I'm looking for help figuring out why I am having problems with shutting down a machine. I have tested the machine using Fedora 19 and Ubuntu 12 Live CD's and both power down without issues. I added acpi.debug_level=1 to the grub boot as it was suggested to see more info about ACPI in the logs I found the following ACPI Errors in the /var/log/messages Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [ECEN] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\] (Node 81fdbeb0), AE_NOT_FOUND Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI: resource piix4_smbus [io 0x0b00-0x0b07] conflicts with ACPI region SOR1 [io 0xb00-0xb0f] Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver I used the Centos 6.4 Live CD last night with no hard drive in the system. I photo'd the shutdown, here is the type up: Sending all processes the TERM signal... Sendng all processes the KILL signal... Saving random seed: Syncing hardware clock to system time Turning off quotas: umount2: Device or resource busy umount: /dev/.initramfs/live: device is busy. (In some cases useful info about processes that use the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(11)) init: Re-executing /sbin/init Halting System... r8169 :02:00.0: PME# enabled ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5 ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [PPTS] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EPTS] (Node fff88019dbc8c68), AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\PTS_] (Node 88019d043560), AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PTS] (Node 88019dbcf9e8), AE_NOT_FOUND Disabling non-boot CPUS... SMP alternatives: switching to UP code Power Down. acpi_power_off called The system doesn't power off, it just sits there. I have to hold the power button in for it to shut down. The same still occurs with a completed a fresh minimum install of Centos 6.4, installed the EPEL repo and did yum update. I'm running the latest bios for the motherboard, and even tried going back one version. MB: 785GM-E51 (MS-7596 1.2) CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 945 3ghz 1TB HD, 6 Gig Mem Any ideas? (Besides using a baseball bat - I am considering it) Here is some hardware info from the getinfo.sh script listed the forums. == BEGIN uname -rmi == 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 == END uname -rmi == == BEGIN rpm -qa \*-release\* == centos-release-6-4.el6.centos.10.x86_64 epel-release-6-8.noarch == END rpm -qa \*-release\* == == BEGIN cat /etc/redhat-release == CentOS release 6.4 (Final) == END cat /etc/redhat-release == == BEGIN getenforce == Enforcing == END getenforce == == BEGIN rpm -qa kernel\* | sort == kernel-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 kernel-2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 kernel-firmware-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.noarch == END rpm -qa kernel\* | sort == == BEGIN lspci -nn == 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS880 Host Bridge [1022:9601] 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780/RS880 PCI to PCI bridge (int gfx) [1022:9602] 00:05.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780/RS880 PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 1) [1022:9605] 00:11.0 SATA controller [0106]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [1002:4391] 00:12.0 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller [1002:4397] 00:12.1 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0 USB OHCI1 Controller [1002:4398] 00:12.2 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller [1002:4396] 00:13.0 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller [1002:4397] 00:13.1 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0 USB OHCI1 Controller [1002:4398] 00:13.2 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller [1002:4396] 00:14.0 SMBus [0c05]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SBx00 SMBus Controller [1002:4385] (rev 3c) 00:14.1 IDE interface [0101]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 IDE Controller [1002:439c] 00:14.2 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) [1002:4383] 00:14.3 ISA bridge [0601]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 LPC host controller [1002:439d] 00:14.4 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge [1002:4384] 00:14.5 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI2 Controller [1002:4399] 00:18.0 Host bridge
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.4 - doesnt power off with shutdown/poweroff cmd
Same result, doesn't turn off. Any other ideas? -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Wyatt Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 4:41 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.4 - doesnt power off with shutdown/poweroff cmd Try using the reboot=pci grub parameter. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Terre Porter wrote: > Hello, > > > > I'm looking for help figuring out why I am having problems with > shutting down a machine. > > > > I have tested the machine using Fedora 19 and Ubuntu 12 Live CD's and > both power down without issues. > > > > I added acpi.debug_level=1 to the grub boot as it was suggested to see > more info about ACPI in the logs > > > > I found the following ACPI Errors in the /var/log/messages > > > > Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [ECEN] > Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND > > Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method > parse/execution failed [\] (Node 81fdbeb0), AE_NOT_FOUND > > > > Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI: resource piix4_smbus [io > 0x0b00-0x0b07] conflicts with ACPI region SOR1 [io 0xb00-0xb0f] > > Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for > this device, you should use it instead of the native driver > > > > I used the Centos 6.4 Live CD last night with no hard drive in the system. > > > > I photo'd the shutdown, here is the type up: > > > > Sending all processes the TERM signal... > > Sendng all processes the KILL signal... > > Saving random seed: > > Syncing hardware clock to system time > > Turning off quotas: > > umount2: Device or resource busy > > umount: /dev/.initramfs/live: device is busy. > > (In some cases useful info about processes that use > > the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(11)) > > init: Re-executing /sbin/init > > Halting System... > > r8169 :02:00.0: PME# enabled > > ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5 > > ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [PPTS] Namespace lookup failure, > AE_NOT_FOUND > > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed > [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EPTS] (Node fff88019dbc8c68), AE_NOT_FOUND > > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\PTS_] (Node > 88019d043560), AE_NOT_FOUND > > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PTS] (Node > 88019dbcf9e8), AE_NOT_FOUND > > Disabling non-boot CPUS... > > SMP alternatives: switching to UP code > > Power Down. > > acpi_power_off called > > > > The system doesn't power off, it just sits there. I have to hold the > power button in for it to shut down. > > > > The same still occurs with a completed a fresh minimum install of > Centos 6.4, installed the EPEL repo and did yum update. > > > > I'm running the latest bios for the motherboard, and even tried going > back one version. > > > > MB: 785GM-E51 (MS-7596 1.2) > > CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 945 3ghz > > 1TB HD, 6 Gig Mem > > > > Any ideas? > > > > (Besides using a baseball bat - I am considering it) > > > > Here is some hardware info from the getinfo.sh script listed the forums. > > > > == BEGIN uname -rmi == > > 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 > > == END uname -rmi == > > > > == BEGIN rpm -qa \*-release\* == > > centos-release-6-4.el6.centos.10.x86_64 > > epel-release-6-8.noarch > > == END rpm -qa \*-release\* == > > > > == BEGIN cat /etc/redhat-release == > > CentOS release 6.4 (Final) > > == END cat /etc/redhat-release == > > > > == BEGIN getenforce == > > Enforcing > > == END getenforce == > > > > == BEGIN rpm -qa kernel\* | sort == > > kernel-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 > > kernel-2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 > > kernel-firmware-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.noarch > > == END rpm -qa kernel\* | sort == > > > > == BEGIN lspci -nn == > > 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS880 Host > Bridge [1022:9601] > > 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780/RS880 > PCI to PCI bridge (int gfx) [1022:9602] > > 00:05.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780/RS880 > PCI to PCI bridge (PCIE port 1) [1022:9605] > > 00:11.0 SATA controller [0106]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI > SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [AHCI mode] [1002:4391] > > 00:12.0 USB controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI > SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0
Re: [CentOS] VNC
Try this, iptables dump from my fresh install, with ssh allow and the vnc you referenced. Terre # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Fri Oct 11 17:39:52 2013 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [45:7091] -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT # Completed on Fri Oct 11 17:39:52 2013 -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Larry Martell Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 5:36 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Earl Ramirez wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 15:18 -0600, Larry Martell wrote: > > I'm trying to set up a VNC server using the instructions at > > > http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/linux-and-open-source/linux-101-easy- > vnc-server-setup/ > > . > > > > I am up to step 6: > > > > Step 6: Edit iptables > > > > In order for the VNC connections to get through, you must allow them > > with iptables. To do this, open up the file /etc/sysconfig/iptables > > and add > the > > line: > > > > -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports > > 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT > > > > Save the file and restart iptables with the command: > > > > service iptables restart > > > > When I issue the restart command I get: > > > > iptables: Applying firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 1 failed > >[FAILED] > > > > Note that I did not have an iptables file before but there is an > > iptables-config file. > > > > Can someone help me complete this configuration. > > Can you post the content of the file, I just edit the config file and > I didn't get any errors when I issue the command > > $ sudo /sbin/service iptables restart > > As I wrote, there was no iptables file. I created one with just that one line: -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VNC
The instructions out linked to has a type-o at the end says to connect to ip:5801 should be 5901. If your using a vnc client uvnc, tightvnc.. try using just the ip without the :port part or :1 for the 5901. Try lsof -i -P | grep -i "listen" To see what ports are listening... Terre -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Larry Martell Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 6:05 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > Try this, iptables dump from my fresh install, with ssh allow and the > vnc you referenced. > > Terre > > # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Fri Oct 11 17:39:52 2013 > *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT > [45:7091] -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A > INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m > state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state > --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports > 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT > -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -j > REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT # Completed on Fri > Oct 11 17:39:52 2013 > > OK, with this file I'm getting connection timed out - before I was getting connection refused so I guess that's some progress. > > > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Larry Martell > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 5:36 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Earl Ramirez >wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 15:18 -0600, Larry Martell wrote: > > > I'm trying to set up a VNC server using the instructions at > > > > > http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/linux-and-open-source/linux-101-eas > > y- > > vnc-server-setup/ > > > . > > > > > > I am up to step 6: > > > > > > Step 6: Edit iptables > > > > > > In order for the VNC connections to get through, you must allow > > > them with iptables. To do this, open up the file > > > /etc/sysconfig/iptables and add > > the > > > line: > > > > > > -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports > > > 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT > > > > > > Save the file and restart iptables with the command: > > > > > > service iptables restart > > > > > > When I issue the restart command I get: > > > > > > iptables: Applying firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 1 failed > > > > > > [FAILED] > > > > > > Note that I did not have an iptables file before but there is an > > > iptables-config file. > > > > > > Can someone help me complete this configuration. > > > > Can you post the content of the file, I just edit the config file > > and I didn't get any errors when I issue the command > > > > $ sudo /sbin/service iptables restart > > > > > As I wrote, there was no iptables file. I created one with just that > one > line: > > -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports > 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VNC
You can specify the port with the IP by using the colon with the ip. x.x.x.x:5901 or x.x.x.x:5902 -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Larry Martell Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 6:35 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > The instructions out linked to has a type-o at the end says to connect > to > ip:5801 should be 5901. > > If your using a vnc client uvnc, tightvnc.. try using just the ip > without the :port part or :1 for the 5901. > I am unfortunately connecting from a windows box that I do not have admin rights on. I have to use the client provided, which is RealVNC Viewer. All I can do is give the ip. > Try lsof -i -P | grep -i "listen" > > To see what ports are listening... > [root@10 sysconfig]# lsof -i -P | grep -i "listen" | grep vnc Xvnc 22052 motor4u IPv4 527366 0t0 TCP localhost.localdomain:5901 (LISTEN) Xvnc 22286 motor4u IPv4 530145 0t0 TCP localhost.localdomain:5902 (LISTEN) > > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Larry Martell > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 6:05 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Terre Porter > wrote: > > > Try this, iptables dump from my fresh install, with ssh allow and > > the vnc you referenced. > > > > Terre > > > > # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Fri Oct 11 17:39:52 2013 > > *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT > > [45:7091] -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A > > INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m > > state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state > > --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports > > 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT > > -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -j > > REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT # Completed on Fri > > Oct 11 17:39:52 2013 > > > > > OK, with this file I'm getting connection timed out - before I was > getting connection refused so I guess that's some progress. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] > > On Behalf Of Larry Martell > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 5:36 PM > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Earl Ramirez > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 15:18 -0600, Larry Martell wrote: > > > > I'm trying to set up a VNC server using the instructions at > > > > > > > http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/linux-and-open-source/linux-101-e > > > as > > > y- > > > vnc-server-setup/ > > > > . > > > > > > > > I am up to step 6: > > > > > > > > Step 6: Edit iptables > > > > > > > > In order for the VNC connections to get through, you must allow > > > > them with iptables. To do this, open up the file > > > > /etc/sysconfig/iptables and add > > > the > > > > line: > > > > > > > > -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport > > > > --dports > > > > 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT > > > > > > > > Save the file and restart iptables with the command: > > > > > > > > service iptables restart > > > > > > > > When I issue the restart command I get: > > > > > > > > iptables: Applying firewall rules: iptables-restore: line 1 > > > > failed > > > > > > > > [FAILED] > > > > > > > > Note that I did not have an iptables file before but there is an > > > > iptables-config file. > > > > > > > > Can someone help me complete this configuration. > > > > > > Can you post the content of the file, I just edit the config file > > > and I didn't get any errors when I issue the command > > > > > > $ sudo /sbin/service iptables restart > > > > > > > > As I wrote, there was no iptables file. I created one with just that > > one > > line: > > > > -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports > > 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.4 - doesnt power off with shutdown/poweroff cmd
I have the latest bios installed - DMI: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD MS-7596/785GM-E51 (MS-7596), BIOS V2.12 02/18/2011 However, I just used the ELRepo to install kernel-ml (Linux version 3.11.4-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64) and it shuts down fine,.. Of course, it has other errors - lol So I'm leaning toward it’s a kernel bug with these kernel-2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 and kernel-2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 (the two installed by default) Now I'm going to try to locate the kernel version list so I can see if I can get a smaller jump in version up to test with. kernel-ml-3.11.4-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 worked as expected on the shutdown, but has some other issues. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James A. Peltier Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 6:58 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.4 - doesnt power off with shutdown/poweroff cmd Update your BIOS if there is one. I've found that to often be the cause. - Original Message - | Same result, doesn't turn off. | | Any other ideas? | | -Original Message- | From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On | Behalf Of Andrew Wyatt | Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 4:41 PM | To: CentOS mailing list | Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6.4 - doesnt power off with | shutdown/poweroff cmd | | Try using the reboot=pci grub parameter. | | | On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Terre Porter | wrote: | | > Hello, | > | > | > | > I'm looking for help figuring out why I am having problems with | > shutting down a machine. | > | > | > | > I have tested the machine using Fedora 19 and Ubuntu 12 Live CD's | > and both power down without issues. | > | > | > | > I added acpi.debug_level=1 to the grub boot as it was suggested to | > see more info about ACPI in the logs | > | > | > | > I found the following ACPI Errors in the /var/log/messages | > | > | > | > Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [ECEN] | > Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND | > | > Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method | > parse/execution failed [\] (Node 81fdbeb0), AE_NOT_FOUND | > | > | > | > Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI: resource piix4_smbus [io | > 0x0b00-0x0b07] conflicts with ACPI region SOR1 [io 0xb00-0xb0f] | > | > Oct 11 11:51:36 plum kernel: ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available | > for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver | > | > | > | > I used the Centos 6.4 Live CD last night with no hard drive in the | > system. | > | > | > | > I photo'd the shutdown, here is the type up: | > | > | > | > Sending all processes the TERM signal... | > | > Sendng all processes the KILL signal... | > | > Saving random seed: | > | > Syncing hardware clock to system time | > | > Turning off quotas: | > | > umount2: Device or resource busy | > | > umount: /dev/.initramfs/live: device is busy. | > | > (In some cases useful info about processes that use | > | > the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(11)) | > | > init: Re-executing /sbin/init | > | > Halting System... | > | > r8169 :02:00.0: PME# enabled | > | > ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5 | > | > ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [PPTS] Namespace lookup failure, | > AE_NOT_FOUND | > | > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed | > [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EPTS] (Node fff88019dbc8c68), AE_NOT_FOUND | > | > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\PTS_] | > (Node 88019d043560), AE_NOT_FOUND | > | > ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PTS] | > (Node 88019dbcf9e8), AE_NOT_FOUND | > | > Disabling non-boot CPUS... | > | > SMP alternatives: switching to UP code | > | > Power Down. | > | > acpi_power_off called | > | > | > | > The system doesn't power off, it just sits there. I have to hold the | > power button in for it to shut down. | > | > | > | > The same still occurs with a completed a fresh minimum install of | > Centos 6.4, installed the EPEL repo and did yum update. | > | > | > | > I'm running the latest bios for the motherboard, and even tried | > going back one version. | > | > | > | > MB: 785GM-E51 (MS-7596 1.2) | > | > CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 945 3ghz | > | > 1TB HD, 6 Gig Mem | > | > | > | > Any ideas? | > | > | > | > (Besides using a baseball bat - I am considering it) | > | > | > | > Here is some hardware info from the getinfo.sh script listed the | > forums. | > | > | > | > == BEGIN uname -
Re: [CentOS] VNC
Humm, Could windows machine be blocking the port going out? If your using putty as a ssh client you could try to port forward (5901, 5901) through the ssh session and then try to connect using localhost:5901 or localhost:5902 on the windows machine and see if you can connect. It can be done with other ssh clients but I've only used putty, so I know it can be done with it. You might also compare some of the settings to this page http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/VNC-Server You could try stopping the servers and running the vncserver in the console to see if there are connections or errors - but I'm not sure with the configuration your using if that is possible. I'm not sure what else to offer. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Larry Martell Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 7:13 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > You can specify the port with the IP by using the colon with the ip. > > x.x.x.x:5901 or x.x.x.x:5902 > Those both give me connection refused (as opposed to without the port, where I get connection timed out) > > > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Larry Martell > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 6:35 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Terre Porter > wrote: > > > The instructions out linked to has a type-o at the end says to > > connect to > > ip:5801 should be 5901. > > > > If your using a vnc client uvnc, tightvnc.. try using just the ip > > without the :port part or :1 for the 5901. > > > > I am unfortunately connecting from a windows box that I do not have > admin rights on. I have to use the client provided, which is RealVNC > Viewer. All I can do is give the ip. > > > > Try lsof -i -P | grep -i "listen" > > > > To see what ports are listening... > > > > > [root@10 sysconfig]# lsof -i -P | grep -i "listen" | grep vnc > Xvnc 22052 motor4u IPv4 527366 0t0 TCP > localhost.localdomain:5901 (LISTEN) > Xvnc 22286 motor4u IPv4 530145 0t0 TCP > localhost.localdomain:5902 (LISTEN) > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] > > On Behalf Of Larry Martell > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 6:05 PM > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Terre Porter > > wrote: > > > > > Try this, iptables dump from my fresh install, with ssh allow and > > > the vnc you referenced. > > > > > > Terre > > > > > > # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.7 on Fri Oct 11 17:39:52 2013 > > > *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT > > > [45:7091] -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT > > > -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p > > > tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m > > > state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -m multiport --dports > > > 5901:5903,6001:6003 -j ACCEPT > > > -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD > > > -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT # Completed on > > > Fri Oct 11 17:39:52 2013 > > > > > > > > OK, with this file I'm getting connection timed out - before I was > > getting connection refused so I guess that's some progress. > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] > > > On Behalf Of Larry Martell > > > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 5:36 PM > > > To: CentOS mailing list > > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] VNC > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Earl Ramirez > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 15:18 -0600, Larry Martell wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to set up a VNC server using the instructions at > > > > > > > > > http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/linux-and-open-source/linux-101 > > > > -e > > > > as > > > > y- > > > > vnc-server-setup/ > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > I am up to step 6: > > > > > > > > > > Step 6: Edit iptables > > > > > > > > > &
[CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile
Hey all, I have just compiled the 3.11.5 kernel from kernel.org to fix the ACPI wont shutdown issue, but I have a couple errors in dmesg I am trying to figure out. Can anyone point me in the right direction? The errors are: 1: dm_mod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel 2: [drm] VGACON disable radeon kernel modesetting. [drm:radeon_init] *ERROR* No UMS support in radeon module! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile
Humm, since I'm not using a desktop I'm not really wanting to install the full graphics driver. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Stueck Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:24 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile I believe that you need to use the ATI Radeon beta drivers for the 3.11 kernel branch, I had to anyways. *__* *Patrick Stueck* *Systems Engineer *(636) 448-5886 RedHat Certified System Administrator | Microsoft Certified Professional Amateur Radio: KDØIGO | LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pstueck *Confidentiality Notice: *This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, is confidential and may contain confidential and privledged materials, legally privileged and protected from disclosure. This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it and any and all copies of it. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > Hey all, > > > > I have just compiled the 3.11.5 kernel from kernel.org to fix the ACPI > wont shutdown issue, but I have a couple errors in dmesg I am trying > to figure out. > > > > Can anyone point me in the right direction? > > > > The errors are: > > > > 1: > > dm_mod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key > missing - tainting kernel > > > > 2: > > [drm] VGACON disable radeon kernel modesetting. > > [drm:radeon_init] *ERROR* No UMS support in radeon module! > > > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile
Akemi, I installed the ELRepo's kernel-ml and I don't get the dm_mod error, so that leans toward it likely being something in my kernel build config... I started with that kernel, but was unsure about running it in production, but then again I'm unsure about running the one I built in production - lol. I do get the Radeon error though. And I noticed something else I get on both kernels, "FATAL: Module scsi_wait_scan not found." Ugh, getting closer to just buying a new MB. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Akemi Yagi Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 2:58 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Terre Porter wrote: > I have just compiled the 3.11.5 kernel from kernel.org to fix the ACPI > wont shutdown issue, but I have a couple errors in dmesg I am trying > to figure out. > Can anyone point me in the right direction? Can you give ELRepo's kernel-ml [1] a try to see if you get the same error? It is currently at 3.11.4 but I'm sure 3.11.5 will be released real soon now. Akemi [1] http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile
I tried the reboot=pci, same result ... The system doesn't power off, it just sits there. I have to hold the power button in for it to shut down. It works in Fedora, Ubuntu, and the new kernel. However, I hate the changes in Fedora (all the init.d stuff changes) and Ubuntu I haven't used enough to be comfortable to use in a firewall machine. I'd be willing to try anything if you have some ideas. Here is the shutdown text I receive; this was when I had the acpi debug flags enabled. Sending all processes the TERM signal... Sendng all processes the KILL signal... Saving random seed: Syncing hardware clock to system time Turning off quotas: umount2: Device or resource busy umount: /dev/.initramfs/live: device is busy. (In some cases useful info about processes that use the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(11)) init: Re-executing /sbin/init Halting System... r8169 :02:00.0: PME# enabled ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5 ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [PPTS] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EPTS] (Node fff88019dbc8c68), AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\PTS_] (Node 88019d043560), AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PTS] (Node 88019dbcf9e8), AE_NOT_FOUND Disabling non-boot CPUS... SMP alternatives: switching to UP code Power Down. acpi_power_off called -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 4:08 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile On 10/14/2013 12:53 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > I have just compiled the 3.11.5 kernel from kernel.org to fix the ACPI > wont shutdown issue, but I have a couple errors in dmesg I am trying > to figure out. Out of curiosity, what shutdown issue? There are several options for shutdown/reboot that can be passed to the standard kernel which fix issues like this. (reboot=pci in grub.conf for example) -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile
That is good info; I'll give them a try. Thanks -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 4:38 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 3.11.5 kernel compile On 10/14/2013 03:22 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > > I tried the reboot=pci, same result ... > > The system doesn't power off, it just sits there. I have to hold the > power button in for it to shut down. > > It works in Fedora, Ubuntu, and the new kernel. However, I hate the > changes in Fedora (all the init.d stuff changes) and Ubuntu I haven't > used enough to be comfortable to use in a firewall machine. > > I'd be willing to try anything if you have some ideas. > There are several reboot options you could try. They're defined in /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.32/Documentation/x86/x86_64/boot-options.txt so you could have reboot=bios, reboot=triple, reboot=kbd, reboot=acpi, etc. Supposedly you can stack them as well, but I prefer cycling through them to find the one that works, and using it. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question
I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at building a new one. The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients). I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am unsure if this will work. I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ? Any thoughts? Thanks, Terre ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question
I've not worked with Atom processors but I'll look in to it. Thanks for the info. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of SilverTip257 Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:36 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at > building a new one. > > The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with > Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients). > > I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am > unsure if this will work. > You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to run simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web. > > I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core > Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ? > Seems like overkill to me. I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system. One of those mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts. Just my two cents. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > Terre > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question
Interesting looking hardware... thanks for the info -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of S.Tindall Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:29 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 18:05 -0400, SilverTip257 wrote: > @Steve: > Based on your statement, I figure you do not have a crypto accelerator > and the CPU is handling all the crypto. Correct? > @Terre: > I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in > terms of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors. > And there's the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine. > AMD Geode CPUs like those in PC Engines ALIX [1] hardware have an > integrated crypto accelerator [2]. If it wasn't for your web proxy > requirements, etc an ALIX might fit the bill (with the right embedded > OS - think Voyage Linux). You're better off with the hardware you're > researching right now though. > > [0] http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp > [1] http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm > [2] > http://www.twam.info/hardware/alix/using-geodes-aes-engine-on-alix3d3 You should look at the single board computers sold by Soekris Engineering. http://soekris.com Specifically the net6501 series: http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html Specifications: • 600 Mhz to 1.6 Ghz Intel Atom E6xx single chip processor with EG20T companion chip • 512 to 2048 Mbyte DDR2-SDRAM, soldered on board • 2x SATA 3 Gbit interfaces with +5V and +12V power header • 4x Intel 82574L Gigabit Ethernet ports, Auto-MDIX RJ-45, protected to 700W/40A Surge • 2x Serial ports, DB9 and 10 pins internal header • USB 2.0 interface, 2x internal, 1x external port, bootable • 1 Full Mini-PCI Express shared with mSATA socket. • 1 USB only Mini-PCI Express shared with mSATA socket • 2x PCI Express Slots, right angle • 16 bit general purpose I/O, 24 pins header, connected to FPGA ...in either a tiny or a rackable box. The number of lan slots can be increased above 4 by using expansion cards. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question
I have must have been in a hardware vacuum, have a clue any of that hardware you mentioned. Added it to the research list - haha! Thanks -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of SilverTip257 Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 6:05 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > Hi, > > we are running 51 ipsec vpns on an Atom D510 at 1.66ghz and the load > average is .07. > @Steve: Based on your statement, I figure you do not have a crypto accelerator and the CPU is handling all the crypto. Correct? @Terre: I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in terms of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors. And there's the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine. AMD Geode CPUs like those in PC Engines ALIX [1] hardware have an integrated crypto accelerator [2]. If it wasn't for your web proxy requirements, etc an ALIX might fit the bill (with the right embedded OS - think Voyage Linux). You're better off with the hardware you're researching right now though. [0] http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp [1] http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm [2] http://www.twam.info/hardware/alix/using-geodes-aes-engine-on-alix3d3 > > HTH, > Steve > > On 10/15/2013 02:13 PM, Terre Porter wrote: > > I've not worked with Atom processors but I'll look in to it. > > > > Thanks for the info. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] > > On > Behalf > > Of SilverTip257 > > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:36 PM > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter < > tpor...@webpage-builders.com > >> wrote: > >> I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking > >> at building a new one. > >> > >> The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with > >> Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients). > >> > >> I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I > >> am unsure if this will work. > >> > > You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to > > run simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web. > > > > > >> I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W > Eight-Core > >> Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ? > >> > > Seems like overkill to me. > > > > I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system. One > > of > those > > mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts. > > > > Just my two cents. > > > > > >> Any thoughts? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Terre > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> CentOS mailing list > >> CentOS@centos.org > >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >> > > > > > > > -- > Stephen Clark > *NetWolves* > Director of Technology > Phone: 813-579-3200 > Fax: 813-882-0209 > Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com > http://www.netwolves.com > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
