Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager constantly overwriting /etc/resolve.conf - how to disable?
Hi, On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 00:55 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Tosh wrote: > > Add to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX > > The following 2 lines : > > PEERDNS=no > > NM_CONTROLLED=no > > Line 1 tells the the if commands not to override /etc/resolv.conf > > Line 2 tells NetworkManager that it doens't have control over that > > ethernet controller > As matter of interest, since I don't see those options on our other > servers (which doesn't have this behaviour and they're also on CentOS > 5.4), are these settings new? OR do I have something else installed > that is causing this? They are rather old config options. See /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt. It's explain all options using in most of the /etc/sysconfig files. -- Szabo Akos Fatav Bt. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum update error this morning
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 09:40 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> I did a yum clean all as well, but it didn't help. Uninstalling the file > >> package, as mentioned in my previous mail, resolved the issue for me. > YMMV > >> of course. > > > >The issue with the "file" package was a completely different one than > >the issue with the unsubscriptable object - although yum clean metadata > >has solved that one for most people as well. > > I did a yum update and got the update list, then installed the packages one > by one. When I got to file, I got the problem described previously. Removing > file package solved it for me. YMMV as said before. > > What was the problem with file package anyway?? I just donwload file package, and installed by hand, without problem: yumdownloader file.x86_64 rpm -Uvh file-4.17-15.el5_3.1.x86_64.rpm rm file-4.17-15.el5_3.1.x86_64.rpm Of course I use x86-64 :) -- Szabo Akos Fatav Bt. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how many folks are *seriously* using ACLs?
Hi! On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:45 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i'm just curious -- how many people here are using ACLs as a regular > and significant part of their sys admin? For samba, with more then five users... Indispensable! :) -- Szabo Akos signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available
On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:07 -0400, H wrote: > On 08/28/2021 07:51 PM, H wrote: > > On August 28, 2021 7:27:13 PM EDT, isdtor wrote: > > > H writes: > > > > > Thanks for your quick response! I'll try building from the > > > > > sourceswhile I'm stuck with C7 :-). > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > I have an interest in the latest version of Mate for CentOS 7 > > > > as > > > > > > well. > > > Versions newer than 1.20 don't build on 7. Or, rather, they build > > > butdon't result in a stable system. > > > A newer gcc might work, but I've never tried that as I also moved > > > on to8. > > > Rocky, that is. > > > ___CentOS mailing > > > listcen...@centos.org > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > I believe there is a Developer Toolset-9 available for C7. Do you > > remember what you > > used?___CentOS mailing > > listcen...@centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > On another note, the version that is available for C7, Mate 1.16.2, > does not save all sessions when it crashes, nor does it save > positions or session order arrangement on the bar. This means that > every time the computer is restarted you have to spend time arranging > your desktop working environment... I have not found any utility to > do this for me either. > Quite annoying, particularly since I remember that even OS/2 saved > the desktop perfectly upon shutdown. > Does Mate 1.20 do better in this regards? Hi, I have been using it for about a week and I have not found any problems, but only one: when I use 3 monitor /a notebook, and two lcd/, sometimes the display was frozen. I think, it is better, then 1.16, but I didn’t find a huge difference in use, maybe it more responsive, and look likes better ☺ --Fonya signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MATE 1.20 test build for CentOS 7 available
> > > On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 14:06 -0400, H wrote: > > > > On 09/03/2021 02:36 AM, Szabo Akos via CentOS wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2021-09-02 at 16:07 -0400, H wrote: > > > > > > On 08/28/2021 07:51 PM, H wrote: > > > > > > > On August 28, 2021 7:27:13 PM EDT, isdtor < > > > > > > > isd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > H writes: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your quick response! I'll try building > > > > > > > > > > from thesourceswhile I'm stuck with C7 :-). > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an interest in the latest version of Mate for > > > > > > > > > CentOS 7as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well.Versions newer than 1.20 don't build on 7. Or, > > > > > > > > rather, they buildbutdon't result in a stable system.A > > > > > > > > newer gcc might work, but I've never tried that as I > > > > > > > > also movedon to8.Rocky, that > > > > > > > > is.___CentO > > > > > > > > S mailing listcen...@centos.org > > > > > > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe there is a Developer Toolset-9 available for > > > > > > > C7. Do youremember what > > > > > > > youused?___Ce > > > > > > > ntOS mailing listcen...@centos.org > > > > > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > On another note, the version that is available for C7, Mate > > > 1.16.2,does not save all sessions when it crashes, nor does it > > > savepositions or session order arrangement on the bar. This means > > > thatevery time the computer is restarted you have to spend time > > > arrangingyour desktop working environment... I have not found any > > > utility todo this for me either.Quite annoying, particularly > > > since I remember that even OS/2 savedthe desktop perfectly upon > > > shutdown.Does Mate 1.20 do better in this regards? > > > > Hi,I have been using it for about a week and I have not found > > anyproblems, but only one: when I use 3 monitor /a notebook, and > > two lcd/,sometimes the display was frozen.I think, it is better, > > then 1.16, but I didn’t find a huge differencein use, maybe it more > > responsive, and look likes better ☺ > > --Fonya > > Couple of questions: > - Which exact version of Mate are you running? mate-desktop-1.20.4-2.el7.x86_64 > - Do you have a HiDPI display? That is one of the reasons I am > interested in a version later than 1.16 which has lots of issues on > such a laptop display? How can I exactly recognise hidp display? I had used multiple monitor with docking station /I have a Dell Latitude 7480, with thunderbolt docking station, audio, video, and network connections/ > - You say it is better (apart from freezing your display which is not > good), how so? With subjective feeling, and usage. Smoother display, better response, I can resize windows more than one pixel border. Bigger version number ☺ I had no particular reason to upgrade, I just wanted to it. > - Did you download Mate 1.20? If so, from where? I compiled by hand, using the know-how, and scripts from https://github.com/gebailey/mate-rpms > - Or, did you compile it yourself? Yes, I compile it myself. The libs, and build environment a little bit updated by hand, I try to compile mate 1.24 first, from fedora packageges, but I'm stuck with some libs, and tetex version, and I had give up. -- Fonya signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
