Re: [CentOS] Zimbra Help

2009-11-02 Thread Neil Muller
On CentOS 5.x you  still need to install zimbra with ./install.sh -- 
platform-override
--
Neil

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?

2009-11-04 Thread Neil Muller
On 03/11/2009, at 8:06 PM, Corey Chandler wrote:

> ML wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is anyone versed in Zimbra?
> Extremely-- and I know that Zimbra is flat out not supported under
> CentOS, by their own decision.  If this is community edition, it's a
> different kettle of fish entirely.

I run Zimbra (commercial) on Centos for my employers and there is no  
problem running Zimbra on Centos or on getting support from Zimbra for  
Zimbra on Centos.  Where did this idea of "no support for  Zimbra on  
Centos"  come from?

Neil
n...@neologix.net

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Zimbra help?

2009-11-04 Thread Neil Muller
On 04/11/2009, at 9:50 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:

> Neil Muller schrieb:
>>
>> I run Zimbra (commercial) on Centos for my employers and there is no
>> problem running Zimbra on Centos or on getting support from Zimbra  
>> for
>> Zimbra on Centos.  Where did this idea of "no support for  Zimbra on
>> Centos"  come from?
>>
>>
>
>
> It comes from the fact that if a problem with Zimbra can be tracked  
> down
> to a problem in RHEL, Zimbra will work with RedHat to get a fix.
> If the problem is in CentOS, you will have to work with this forum
> basically to get it fixed...

That's not exactly the same as saying that Zimbra is not supported on  
Centos which is a much more sweeping statement.

> Depending on the size of your customer-base, it may make sense to  
> spend
> those bucks for a yearly RHEL license

Are you saying that there is a current problem with Zimbra on RHEL and  
Centos and that this problem will only be fixed for RHEL? Won't a RHEL  
fix eventually flow through in to Centos?

Neil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS-DS

2008-05-17 Thread Neil Muller

I think it's a java based app. You can download from 
http://www.sun.com/download/index.jsp?cat=Identity%20Management&tab=3&subcat=Directory%20Server

Neil




On 17/05/2008, at 8:41 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:


Christopher Chan wrote:

There is also Sun Directory Server which is completely free.


I have trouble locating the Sources.

Ralph
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS-DS

2008-05-17 Thread Neil Muller


On 18/05/2008, at 4:25 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:


Neil Muller wrote:

I think it's a java based app. You can download from 
http://www.sun.com/download/index.jsp?cat=Identity%20Management&tab=3&subcat=Directory%20Server


does it work with openjdk as yet ?


I've only installed it on Solaris but I did find this thread http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5145475&messageID=9539925 
 which implies that it does install on RHEL and so probably also  
Centos. Don't know about openjdk.


Neil




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Setting up large (12.5 TB) filesystem howto?

2009-08-28 Thread Neil Muller
On 28/08/2009, at 10:59 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Götz Reinicke -
> IT-Koordinator wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to set up an iscsi 12.5 TB storage for some data backup.
>>
>> Doing so, I had some difficulties to find the right tool, maybe it's
>> also a question of the system settings...
>>
>> The server is a 32Bit CentOS 5.3 with the recent updates. Ths iscsi
>> connection can be establised.
>>
>> fdisk and parted fail to create any information on the device or fail
>> completely.
>>
>> using the lvm tools (pvcreate, vgcreate, lvcreate), I could finaly
>> create a logical volume:
>>
>> lvdisplay /dev/VolGroup02/lvol0
>>  --- Logical volume ---
>>  LV Name/dev/VolGroup02/lvol0
>>  VG NameVolGroup02
>>  LV UUIDh7T6tD-JZw2-UEdb-q1ml-BDqp-9E0u-mAop6x
>>  LV Write Accessread/write
>>  LV Status  available
>>  # open 0
>>  LV Size12,73 TB
>>  Current LE 3337487
>>  Segments   1
>>  Allocation inherit
>>  Read ahead sectors auto
>>  - currently set to 256
>>  Block device   253:4
>>
>>
>> But, I can't create a filesystem on it:
>>
>> mkfs.ext3 -m 2 -j -O dir_index -v -b 4096 -L iscsi2lvol0
>> /dev/mapper/VolGroup02-lvol0
>
> You have to smack mkfs around a bit to get it to work.
> The incantations are listed here, along with the various limitations.
> The long and short of it is that you have to use -F to tell mkfs that
> you're really, REALLY sure.
> http://www.bofh-hunter.com/2008/02/11/large-filesystem-creation/
>


For a 4K block size I think the maximum ext3 filesystem size is 8TB.  
You may need to use an 8K block size which gives a maximum filesystem  
size of 16TB.

Neil




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos