Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1
Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and see what it's doing? Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not executable, which should be easy to fix. Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > All > > I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker > staff have been helpful but no cigar. > > At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine > so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received > the same error. > > One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called > eula which fails. > > ./eula: cannot execute binary file > > The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use > Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation. > > I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be > listening to this list and could give me a hand. > > Thanks much!!! > > Greg Ennis > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] You can't get there from here -- SOLVED
Yeah, I resolved that problem when I switched ISPs recently by using something like this: > submission inet n - n - - smtpd > -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject > -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes > -o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings > -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Miark wrote on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:55:32 -0500: > > >> The winning solution >> > > Nevertheless, Bowie's solution is the correct one. > > Kai > > -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Securing SSH
Tim, The important ones, imho -- 1. disallow root login 2. disallow password authentication (use keys, as someone else has described) 3. prevent multiple failed attempts using iptables: # Log and block repeated attempts to access SSH # See /proc/net/ipt_recent file for low-level data # Block attempts to access SSH if 4 or more attempts made in the last 60 secs -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport 22 -m recent --name sshattack --set -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 --syn -m recent --name sshattack --rcheck --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 -j LOG --log-prefix "SSH REJECT: " -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 --syn -m recent --name sshattack --rcheck --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 -j REJECT 4. if possible, limit ssh access to your static ip. That all seems reasonably secure to me! Liam Tim Alberts wrote: > So I setup ssh on a server so I could do some work from home and I > think the second I opened it every sorry monkey from around the world > has been trying every account name imaginable to get into the system. > > What's a good way to deal with this? > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trying to understand Remote desktops
It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel. Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative? Les Mikesell wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >>> I don't know about a minimum X install, but I've been very happy >>> with freenx on centos 5, connecting as easily from mac, PC, or >>> linux. in my lab (human brain imaging), we do remote graphics >>> display all the time, openoffice definitely works. I wanted to be >>> able to work from home and X was just crawling along, unusable. with >>> freenx, its almost like sitting at the console. I have my gnome >>> desktop (KDE is also fine) and all the visual goodness that comes >>> with it. my favorite story is an undergrad working in my lab was >>> able to connect over wireless from Argentina to my server in CT USA, >>> pull up images, and do some real work--the point being that its fast >>> and secure. >>> >>> moreover, there is a very helpful FAQ, >>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX >> Do you run the server in init 5? Or can it run in init 3? >> >> Trying to save memory on the server >> >> But wait, the client has even LESS memory :( > > Freenx/NX will use more memory at both ends than a plain remote X > session because it gets most of its performance gain and the ability > to suspend a running session by caching things at both ends. On a > fast local LAN you might just use X, but for remote access it is worth > buying more RAM if you need it. > -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trying to understand Remote desktops
Well, that's concise. Thanks. Scott Moseman wrote: > On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel. >> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative? >> >> > > # uname -srmpio > Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > # nxserver --status > NX> 100 NXSERVER - Version 1.5.0-60 OS (GPL) > NX> 110 NX Server is running > NX> 999 Bye > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Trying to understand Remote desktops
Okay, thanks for the tip! Do the freenx rpm distributions for 64-bit contain the 32-bit ones (seems like they should if they are required) or do I have to install the 32-bit rpms separately? I'm sure I can figure this one out, but if you happen to know, do tell! Timothy Selivanow wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:31 -0700, Liam Kirsher wrote: > >> Well, that's concise. Thanks. >> >> Scott Moseman wrote: >> >>> On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel. >>>> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> # uname -srmpio >>> Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >>> # nxserver --status >>> NX> 100 NXSERVER - Version 1.5.0-60 OS (GPL) >>> NX> 110 NX Server is running >>> NX> 999 Bye >>> ___ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS@centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >>> >>> >>> > > FreeNX might be 32bit only, but 64bit Red Hat systems are multi-lib. > Both 32bit and 64bit libraries should be installed on your system. > > -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix+MySQL - how to create DB
I used postfixadmin and it has been fine. (CentOS 5) I suggest redirecting (in the http server) all postfixadmin access to https for security. I found the db schema satisfactory for my needs. The point with postfixadmin is the PHP interface to the database. You /could/ just create whatever tables you needed and edit them with phpMyAdmin, but postfixadmin gives you a simple interface that users and domain admins can use. kalinix wrote: On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 22:31 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: Hi All, I'm toying around with Postfix and MySQL on a CentOS 4 server (no longer using stock postfix and mysql rpms, obviously). I've read several "How-TOs", and it all looks fairly easy to do. The one thing that puzzles me is the table structure for the postfix mysql database: where is everyone getting it? Also, I've noticed that some people create more tables than others. But, this looks like it's just based on which bits of postfix people want to put into the database. I can just copy the SQL people have posted to create the tables I want. I'd much rather know if there is an official source for this, though. So far I haven't found it. Regards, Ranbir Maybe postfixadmin (http://postfixadmin.sourceforge.net/) would help? at least as a starting point... Just my 2c Calin = Education is learning what you didn't even know you didn't know. -- Daniel J. Boorstin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Help -- LVM snapshot full -- how do I recover?
Hi -- I forgot to remove an LVM snapshot after making a backup. Now neither the snapshot nor the original volume are available. How do I recover and get the original volume back online? Currently, the output of lvs looks like LV VG Attr LSize OriginSnap% Move Log Copy% .. dom5_dataVolGroup01 -wi-ao 10.00G domTemplate_data VolGroup01 -wi-a- 2.00G dom6_dataVolGroup02 owi-i- 24.00G dom6_snapVolGroup02 swi-d- 1.00G dom6_data 100.00 Any help very much appreciated! Liam This is on a Dell 2950 with CentOS 5.0 running Xen -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
