[CentOS] installer and os-prober not finding Windows XP installation

2014-07-19 Thread Eric Smith
I installed CentOS 7 on a Shuttle X27D box (dual-core Atom 330), and
so far it seems to work fine, but it didn't set up a Grub2 entry for
the existing Windows XP installation in the first partition (MBR).
Running os-prober generates no output.

fdisk shows that the NTFS partition is still present as /dev/sda1, and
still has the bootable flag set.

I added a menuentry for Windows to the end of /etc/grub.d/40_custom:

menuentry "Windows" {
set root=(hd0,1)
chainloader +1
}

and ran:

grub2-mkconfig >/boot/grub2/grub.cfg

and that lets me boot Windows, but I thought this was supposed to be
taken care of automatically.  Is there any known problem that prevents
the installer or Grub2 from finding Windows XP?

I don't normally set up dual-boot on production machines, but I use it
a lot for testing.

Thanks,
Eric
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] abrt relevance?

2014-07-20 Thread Eric Smith
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Johnny Hughes  wrote:
> On 07/20/2014 02:11 PM, Ted Miller wrote:
>> I am trying to understand the relevance of the abrt program.  It pops up
>> automatically when somethings acts up, but I can't submit anything to RH,
>> because I haven't paid their fees.  It is a very bad user experience to go
>> through the whole process of describing what led up to the problem and get
>> to the end of the process and be rejected with an un-fixable error message
>> (because I didn't buy RHEL support).  It seems to me that either:
>>
>> 1. It should be modified so that it points to somewhere that I can file a
>> report (such a place probably doesn't exist).
>>
>> or
>>
>> 2. It not automatically activated (because it is irrelevant to most users).
>>
>> or
>>
>> 3. It should be modified so that it creates a file for submission.
>>
>> Anybody have any reason to have it act the way it does on C6.5?
>>
>> Ted Miller
>> Elkhart, IN
>>
>> P.S. It would be nice if anyone has a hint about why KDE desktop keeps
>> giving me "Process /usr/bin/plasma-desktop was killed by signal 11
>> (SIGSEGV) errors.  My desktop (but not the windows on it) goes black.
>> Usually it comes back in 2-4 seconds, but sometimes it disappears and stays
>> gone.  Then I can switch windows with Alt+Tab, but can't open any new ones,
>> and the only way to log out is Ctl+Alt+Backspace.
>
> The goal of CentOS is to:
>
> "As such, CentOS Linux aims to be functionally compatible with RHEL. We
> mainly change packages to remove upstream vendor branding and artwork."
>
> So, abrt has been modified to remove branding and artwork ... we would
> like to make it more relevant and functional.  This is one of the
> packages where we would certainly like the ability to provide something
> better than we do .. patches from the community are welcomed/encouraged
> to make it better.

If I'm not mistaken, doesn't CentOS remove the facilities for using
the Red Hat Network, e.g., through yum?  If so, removing abrt or not
having it attempt to use Red Hat's abrt server end would be entirely
consistent with that, even though it goes beyond "removing branding
and artwork".
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] abrt relevance?

2014-07-20 Thread Eric Smith
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Johnny Hughes  wrote:
> Yep, we will do it.  Again, patches welcome.

And I'd be happy to submit patches, if I had the first clue about
abrt.  Maybe I can find some time to look at it next week, or maybe
not.  But is there a drawback to just dropping the abrt package until
there's a better solution?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] update repo problem?

2014-08-29 Thread Eric Smith
I'm trying to install the build dependencies for an SRPM using
yum-builddep, and it's telling me that it can't get the repo sqlite
file for updates-source from vault. Any ideas? Something wrong with my
repo configuration?  The only thing I've done that should have touched
the repo configuration is installing epel-release-7-1.noarch.

Thanks!
Eric

[root@localhost SRPMS]# yum-builddep somepackage-3.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Enabling base-source repository
Enabling epel-source repository
Enabling extras-source repository
Enabling updates-source repository
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: dallas.tx.mirror.xygenhosting.com
 * epel: mirror.hmc.edu
 * epel-source: mirror.hmc.edu
 * extras: centos.hostingxtreme.com
 * updates: mirrors.adams.net
updates-source/7/primary_dbFAILED
http://vault.centos.org/centos/7/updates/Source/repodata/fff7caf629c103f81132274
050837a196eafd2082a18d3a390dd288a2376f258-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14] HTTP Er
ror 404 - Not Found
Trying other mirror.
http://vault.centos.org/centos/7/updates/Source/repodata/fff7caf629c103f81132274
050837a196eafd2082a18d3a390dd288a2376f258-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14] HTTP Er
ror 404 - Not Found
Trying other mirror.
failure: repodata/fff7caf629c103f81132274050837a196eafd2082a18d3a390dd288a2376f2
58-primary.sqlite.bz2 from updates-source: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
http://vault.centos.org/centos/7/updates/Source/repodata/fff7caf629c103f81132274
050837a196eafd2082a18d3a390dd288a2376f258-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14] HTTP Er
ror 404 - Not Found
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] update repo problem?

2014-08-31 Thread Eric Smith
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Johnny Hughes  wrote:
> Try 'yum clean all' and do it again .. this just worked fine for me:

Tried it before posting my question, and it didn't help then, but
tried it again now and it works.

Thanks!
Eric
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] USB 3.0 Driver

2014-09-08 Thread Eric Smith
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Matt  wrote:
> Tried it and CentOS 6 did not seem to find it.  Anyone know of a USB
> 3.0 card that does work with Centos 6.x?

I've used a variety of no-name cards with the NEC (now Renesas)
uPD72020x series host adapter chips, and they've all worked fine.

I'd steer clear of the "no additional power connection needed" cards;
in my experience they can't supply the maximum power the ports may
require (5V@900mA per port, i.e., 4.5W per port, 18W total for a
four-port card).  Proper USB 3.0 cards have a disk drive power
connector for the power required.  In principle it's possible for a
PCIe USB host adapter to have a switching regulator to provide
sufficient USB power from the +12V supply rail, but, I have yet to see
one that does.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos