[CentOS] Update to libstdc+++ causes problems.
Hi. New to this list. If this has been answered/resolved already, please point me to the solution. In a very recent update to CentOS 7 libstdc++ has been altered in a way that has removed CXXABI_1.3.8 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20. I've noticed that this has broken a number of executables linked on other systems that used to run on CentOS 7. Is there any fix for this short of backing off the update? Ubuntu seems to still allow these broken images to run. But I want the solid reliability CentOS has. If somebody can give me examples of Ubuntu up and running actual programs for a year plus then I'll gladly switch. I've never heard of Ubuntu dong that. I have had CentOS do that for me. Thank you. -- Chris Johnson rchristopherjohn...@gmail.com Ex SysAdmin, now, writer /War does not determine who is right – only who is left./ (Bertand Russell) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Update to libstdc+++ causes problems.
On 11/13/2018 12:50 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:10:22PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote: In a very recent update to CentOS 7 libstdc++ has been altered in a way that has removed CXXABI_1.3.8 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20. I've noticed that this has broken a number of executables linked on other systems that used to run on CentOS 7. Is there any fix for this short of backing off the update? I don't see any evidence that the libstdc++ in CentOS 7 ever had version definitions for CXXABI_1.3.8 or GLIBCXX_3.4.20. Both seem to only go up to CXXABI_1.3.7 and GLIBCXX_3.4.19, at least with the libstdc++ package. Perhaps you built your binaries on a system with newer version definitions? I believe most of the images were originally built for Ubuntu. -- Chris Johnson rchristopherjohn...@gmail.com Ex SysAdmin, now, writer/I believe in God, only I spell it Nature. /(Frank Lloyd Wright) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
