[CentOS] RHEL changes
See: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-for-up-to-16-production-servers/ and https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/new-year-new-red-hat-enterprise-linux-programs-easier-ways-access-rhel -- J Martin Rushton MBCS ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes
De Profundis Il giorno mer 20 gen 2021 alle ore 16:02 J Martin Rushton via CentOS ha scritto: > > See: > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-for-up-to-16-production-servers/ > and > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/new-year-new-red-hat-enterprise-linux-programs-easier-ways-access-rhel > -- > J Martin Rushton MBCS > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes
finalmente! era ora! On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 22:40 +0100, paride desimone wrote: > De Profundis > Il giorno mer 20 gen 2021 alle ore 16:02 J Martin Rushton via CentOS< > centos@centos.org> ha scritto: > > See: > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-for-up-to-16-production-servers/andhttps://www.redhat.com/en/blog/new-year-new-red-hat-enterprise-linux-programs-easier-ways-access-rhel--J > Martin Rushton > MBCS___CentOS mailing > listcen...@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos___CentOS > mailing listcen...@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes
Thanks for the info! I will pass it along! On 1/20/21 7:02 AM, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: See: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-for-up-to-16-production-servers/ and https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/new-year-new-red-hat-enterprise-linux-programs-easier-ways-access-rhel -- - "Don't let anyone dull your sparkle." MzK ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Compiling Qt applications in docker
I am working on compiling an application using Qt and am a newbie. I already have Qt on my CentOS 7 system but this application requires a later version of Qt not available for C 7. It also requires postgreSQL libraries and I am using the latest version of that, ie pgsql 13. I have successfully compiled it in a docker environment and I can launch it on the desktop. I have, however, not tested it against postgreSQL on my computer - yet. I do not want to run it in docker though but on my "regular" computer outside docker, as well as be able to move it to other computers I have. I am only using docker as a sandbox while working on compiling etc. I am not sure how I should set it up - outside docker - so that the Qt libraries it needs do not foul up the rest of my system but are only seen by this particular application. Can anyone offer a suggestion? Should the compiled application eventually reside in its own directory under /usr/local/bin and where should the Qt libraries be? In the same directory as the app? If not, where should they be placed? I tried to compile it to use the Qt libraries statically linked but the app does not run that way in docker but crashes with a segmentation fault. Suggestions/best practices appreciated! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
