Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
The price we pay.. :) BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact until RH catches up): https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "CentOS mailing list" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out. >> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/ > > The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to > disable a security feature instead of fixing it. > > What makes me feel a bit bad is that everybody has fixed versions by now, > only we enterprise Linux users using the ESR version still don't have > fixed versions available. I don't complain because we usually get very > fast updates, but this time we seem stuck. I can live with it but it's a > bit difficult to explain to our users. > > Did upstream already release new packages? > > Regards, > Simon > >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "CentOS mailing list" >>> To: "CentOS mailing list" >>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 >>> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> >>> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly >>> well know >>> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. >>> >>> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates >>> repository is >>> 60.6.1-1.el7. >>> It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should >>> fix the >>> signing issue. >>> (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/) >>> >>> Would it be possible for someone to pass this message on to someone who >>> can >>> package this, so that users like me can update? >>> ___ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS@centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
> The price we pay.. :) Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages? Regards, Simon > > BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and > will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround > in fact until RH catches up): > https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/ > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "CentOS mailing list" >> To: "CentOS mailing list" >> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57 >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > >>> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out. >>> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/ >> >> The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to >> disable a security feature instead of fixing it. >> >> What makes me feel a bit bad is that everybody has fixed versions by >> now, >> only we enterprise Linux users using the ESR version still don't have >> fixed versions available. I don't complain because we usually get very >> fast updates, but this time we seem stuck. I can live with it but it's a >> bit difficult to explain to our users. >> >> Did upstream already release new packages? >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> >>> >>> -- >>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>> >>> Nux! >>> www.nux.ro >>> >>> - Original Message - From: "CentOS mailing list" To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >>> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/) Would it be possible for someone to pass this message on to someone who can package this, so that users like me can update? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> ___ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS@centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >> >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
No, it's the "price" we "pay" for using EL. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Simon Matter" > To: "Nux!" > Cc: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Thursday, 9 May, 2019 09:09:13 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> The price we pay.. :) > > Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages? > > Regards, > Simon > >> >> BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and >> will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround >> in fact until RH catches up): >> https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/ >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "CentOS mailing list" >>> To: "CentOS mailing list" >>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 17:24:57 >>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/ >>> >>> The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to >>> disable a security feature instead of fixing it. >>> >>> What makes me feel a bit bad is that everybody has fixed versions by >>> now, >>> only we enterprise Linux users using the ESR version still don't have >>> fixed versions available. I don't complain because we usually get very >>> fast updates, but this time we seem stuck. I can live with it but it's a >>> bit difficult to explain to our users. >>> >>> Did upstream already release new packages? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simon >>> -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "CentOS mailing list" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 > Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly > well know > extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates > repository is > 60.6.1-1.el7. > It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which > should > fix the > signing issue. > (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/) > > Would it be possible for someone to pass this message on to someone > who > can > package this, so that users like me can update? > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS@centos.org >>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kickstart compat C7 -> C8
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 17:48, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On 2019-05-08 15:05, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:48, Valeri Galtsev > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 2019-05-08 12:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >>> On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:24, mark wrote: > >> > > >>> Yep. Minimum for that is going to be about the same as your RESCUE. The > >>> other would just be to confirm that the sda has space and nothing still > >> on > >>> it which it was trying to work around. > >>> > >> > >> In CentOS releases 5 --> 6 --> 7 > >> > >> the demand for /boot size doubles if not triples with each release... > >> Otherwise one day you may fill it up before number of kernels will be > >> such that kernel update will remove oldest kernel. And _we_ called > >> Windows 2000 "bloated pig" when it was released... Sigh. > >> > >> > > Software seems to grow to the maximum space it can occupy. > > Of course, this is true. I do remember big upgrade: 40 MB hard drive > replacing 20 MB one. Still, during the same decade an a half covering > CentOS releases I mentioned, on my FreeBSD boxes /boot grew up less than > twice, whereas on my CentOS boxes it grew up at least 5 times. I safely > run CentOS 5 through its whole lifespan with /boot as small as 200MB. On > CentOS 7 I make /boot 3 GB (maybe slight overkill, but boxes with 1 GB > went into /boot size issue after several kernel updates). But what one > can do: Linux kernel has a lot of stuff that, hmm..., one can probably > live without, and what comes with Linux distributions covers widest > variety of hardware it will run on ;-) > > I never know how much of the growth differences is part and parcel of why Linux is seen more often than FreeBSD.. or an unwanted side effect that gets used as an excuse for why it is used more often. I do know that the Linux distributions which focus on smallness usually find themselves only in niche roles because they don't have all the bells and whistles someone expected from a larger version. They then find themselves fighting off an existing base of *BSD systems which have been in that small/tidy base for decades. Back to technical terms.. the vast amount of space being used on a /boot partition is the initial ram disks which contain mostly user space tools. In a 'weird' way you could say you are seeing a 'micro-kernel' approach where various things which would have been in the kernel decades ago are pushed off to user-space.. however because the system needs those to be up very early (aka why they were in the kernel long ago) you push it into the initial ram disk. So the old school Unix people can say that Linux distributions are doing Unix kernel space wrong, and the old school micro-kernel people can say we are doing Micro-kernels wrong. Or they can say we are doing it right.. because it got moved out of the kernel to make sure the kernel only does specific things versus a MULTIX way.. and the microkernel people get to see what user space utilities .. Either way lots of pub-geek fight material. > Valeri > PS Yes, I run and programmed for machines with 4 - 16 Kb of RAM, and now > administer machine with almost 1 TB of RAM. Now you can pretty much > pinpoint my age ;-) > > Oh no no. I am not falling for that trap. Never ask another person on the internet their age.. you will either find out you are much much younger than them and so should have known better or much much older and should have known better. > > I think in 1989 > > we were complaining about BSD not being able to fit on our VAX 750's boot > > drive anymore and we needed to put in a 40MB drive system instead. I > expect > > by the 2040's we will be looking at petabyte drives and wondering how we > > can fit anything on it. > > > > > > > > > >> Valeri > >> > >>> > >>> > mark > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Valeri Galtsev > >> Sr System Administrator > >> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > >> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > >> University of Chicago > >> Phone: 773-702-4247 > >> > >> ___ > >> CentOS mailing list > >> CentOS@centos.org > >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >> > > > > > > -- > > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org h
Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: [Bug 1699331] gssproxy segmentation fault]
On 5/8/19 8:42 AM, mark wrote: > Hi, Johnny, > > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: >>> >>> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as >>> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of >>> servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. >> >> See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can get it >> released into the fasttrack repo: >> >> https://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-fasttrack.x86_64/gssproxy/ >> >> >> Note: This packages are unsigned and if it fixes your issue, I'll sign >> and release them into fasttrack repo >> >> Note2: Here is some info on our new fasttrack repo: >> >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories >> (see CentOS-Fasttrack) >> > Thank you very much. I've d/l the x86_64 rpm, and yum upgraded to it on > one server, so it's soaking now, and we'll see what happens. > > One question: the email I got from RH bugzilla referred to the package as > gssproxy-0.7.0-25, not 21, while I see you've got it as 21.el7.0.1. Will > there be a name change, or will it be 21.whatever? Yes .. when we patch in our fasttrack repo ... we take the current release we are patching (the current version) and name it in a way where no matter the NEXT upstream release, when done .. it will replace the one we put in the fasttrack repo. Fasttrack is us (centos qa team) fixing things temporarily while waiting for them to be fixed officially and are different than base RHEL updates .. that is why it is a separate and optional repo. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: [Bug 1699331] gssproxy segmentation fault]
On 5/8/19 11:23 AM, mark wrote: > Hi, Johnny, > > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: >>> >>> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as >>> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of >>> servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. >> >> See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can get it >> released into the fasttrack repo: >> >> https://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-fasttrack.x86_64/gssproxy/ >> >> Note: This packages are unsigned and if it fixes your issue, I'll sign >> and release them into fasttrack repo >> >> Note2: Here is some info on our new fasttrack repo: >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories >> (see CentOS-Fasttrack) > > Huh. Well, I don't see it SEGVing, but it suddenly started throwing > > May 8 12:21:21 kernel: gssproxy: server localhost not > responding, timed out > > errors. That's the other thing we've been seeing, and I thought the two > were related, but perhaps not Is this release helpful then? If not, if you find the fix for your other issue, and can point us to something concrete that fixes it , we can try to roll that in as well. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 released
On 5/7/19 9:07 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > This morning Red Hat announced the general availability of Red Hat > Enterprise Linux 8. > > More details at > https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-every-enterprise-every-cloud-every-workload?sc_cid=701f201OIIOAA4 > > A summary about this process will be maintained here: https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 We were working with the beta packages (and fedora as necessary) to create the Loop O packages for x86_64, i686, ppc64le, aarch64 arches .. to be used to create our initial set of test packages from the source code released to git.centos.org. We will also have an armhfp arch .. but there is no RHEL 8 Beta for that arch and that initial bootstrap process will be much different than the other RHEL supported arches. As such, it will be done completely differently on a separate build system. And that process will likely include a couple more of the iteration loops and have more bootstrap processes, etc. We obviously can not yet make an educated guess on WHEN this process might or might not be completed .. or WHEN the new version will be available. We are shifting to a new koji build setup for the CentOS Linux 8 process. We are also shifting to a new pungi process for creating images, install media, etc. All of this is new to the project for building distros and it is a learning process for us as well. As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month .. but of course, we really do not have ample information at this time to make a real estimate of time required or obstacles we may encounter .. This is very much an iterative process with each step depending on the step before .. and each step may need to be repeated several time before we can move on. As we continue on with the process, we will update the above link, and as we get closer we will provide a better estimate. Rest assured that we are working on this and other than security updates for CentOS Linux 6 and 7 (which will take priority when they happen) .. this is our top priority. And as usual, our volunteer QA team will be helping us tremendously in completing this process. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 released
Once upon a time, Johnny Hughes said: > We obviously can not yet make an educated guess on WHEN this process > might or might not be completed .. or WHEN the new version will be > available. So, next Tuesday then? :) Thanks for the update, and all the hard work! -- Chris Adams ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 released
On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month .. That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume are far less work to get out than a point-zero. Is this goal realistic? I’d consider any ship date before about September to be “success.” ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 released
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 11:56, Warren Young wrote: > On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month .. > > That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume are far > less work to get out than a point-zero. > > Is this goal realistic? > > It is a soft goal. If everything works out, this would be the earliest it could happen. This is meant for the people wondering why on May 12th it isn't there or May 20th or June 1st. As various parts of reality come up the dates will be updated in the schedule. > I’d consider any ship date before about September to be “success.” > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 released
On 5/9/19 11:03 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 11:56, Warren Young wrote: > >> On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month .. >> >> That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume are far >> less work to get out than a point-zero. >> >> Is this goal realistic? >> >> > It is a soft goal. If everything works out, this would be the earliest it > could happen. This is meant for the people wondering why on May 12th it > isn't there or May 20th or June 1st. As various parts of reality come up > the dates will be updated in the schedule. Right. A very soft .. pulled out the air .. things go perfectly .. goal. At the very earliest type of thing. > > >> I’d consider any ship date before about September to be “success.” We will have to see how it goes. One thing that is very different about this is 'Modularity'. There are Modules repos as well as Source repos: https://git.centos.org/projects/modules/* https://git.centos.org/projects/rpms/* But we are on it :D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: The price we pay.. :) Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages? Regards, Simon No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's a priority for them. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-install workstation - best repo's
use yum plugin protectbase to protect main centos repositories and then you can use whatever other repos you want, without worrying they will overwrite "base" centos packages - this should resolve your problem On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:42 AM Gary Stainburn wrote: > I'm going to rebuild my workstation because maintaining it is now a > nightmare after using "recommended" repo's that now conflict with each > other. Every time I do a yum update I it fails with conflicts. > > I'm looking for new recommendations for which repo's to use to have a > stable Centos 7 workstation. Much like Centos itself, most of the web > pages are very old now. > > I'm looking for a KDE workstation with mp3 support and video editing. I > use simple command line tools such as ffmpeg. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-install workstation - best repo's
El Miércoles 08/05/2019 a las 05:42, Gary Stainburn escribió: > I'm going to rebuild my workstation because maintaining it is now a > nightmare after using "recommended" repo's that now conflict with each > other. Every time I do a yum update I it fails with conflicts. > > I'm looking for new recommendations for which repo's to use to have a > stable Centos 7 workstation. Much like Centos itself, most of the web > pages are very old now. > > I'm looking for a KDE workstation with mp3 support and video editing. I > use simple command line tools such as ffmpeg. I don't know if you're aware of this, but: https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories I don't use CentOS as a workstation, but I do use a mix EPEL, IUS, Remi and ELRepo on several CentOS 5/6/7 servers without much issues. Some packages to consider: yum-plugin-priorities yum-plugin-protectbase yum-plugin-versionlock HTH, -- Ricardo J. Barberis Usuario Linux Nº 250625: http://counter.li.org/ Usuario LFS Nº 5121: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/ Senior SysAdmin / IT Architect - www.DonWeb.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> The price we pay.. :) >> >> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox >> packages? >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> > > No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's > a priority for them. Which makes me believe they don't expect anybody to use RHEL as a desktop system :-( Are there any numbers showing how RHEL is used? That would be interesting. Regards, Simon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
it's used for running HPCs a lot On 5/9/19 10:40 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: The price we pay.. :) Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages? Regards, Simon No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's a priority for them. Which makes me believe they don't expect anybody to use RHEL as a desktop system :-( Are there any numbers showing how RHEL is used? That would be interesting. Regards, Simon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Now that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 has been released...
Good afternoon from Singapore, When will CentOS 8.0 be released? Thank you. -BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming -END EMAIL SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Now that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 has been released...
On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 05:46 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > Good afternoon from Singapore, > > > When will CentOS 8.0 be released? > > > Thank you. > > > -BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE- > > The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): > > [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of > U.S. Embassy Workers > > Link: > https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html > > * > *** > > > Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic > Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 > > [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/ > > [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/ > > [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming > > -END EMAIL SIGNATURE- > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi, It will be released when it is released. ;-) For info on CentOS 8, see: https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games sake. *** IRC: kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Website: https://kathenas.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Now that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 has been released...
On 10/05/2019 06:46, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: Good afternoon from Singapore, When will CentOS 8.0 be released? https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Now that Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.0 has been released...
Hello Turritopsis, On Fri, 10 May 2019 05:46:20 + Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: > Good afternoon from Singapore, > > > When will CentOS 8.0 be released? You've just started yet another thread on this topic, asking the same question. Please search the archives first, you'll get your answers w/o asking. Regards, -- wwp pgpkQJH7GjoF9.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
