Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Centos 7.6 and Aeskulap]
On 12/28/18 6:38 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > > I tried to compile aeskulap on Centos 7.6 by using the commands ./configure > > followed by > > make which resulted in the following errors : > > Attempting to build this way is next to pointless and will likely show > you errors completely unrelated to why the package won't properly build. > > > make[4]: *** [dimoimg.o] Error 1 > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2- > > beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle/libsrc' > > make[3]: *** [libsrc-all] Error 2 > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk/dcmimgle' > > make[2]: *** [dcmimgle-libsrc-all] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory > > `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1/dcmtk' > > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/aeskulap-0.2.2-beta1' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > ...and even if you were building it correctly you completely skipped the > actual errors here. What you've shown can't be used in any significant > way to help. > > > I downloaded the source files from : > > > > http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/dextop/el7/SRPMS/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.17beta1.el7.nux.src.rpm > > As you've already stated and shown here this is a package from a > 3rd-party repo, and as such is not supported by the CentOS project. If > Nux can't help you then I suggest you look for the package elsewhere or > try to (properly) build it yourself. Unfortunately neither of these > options is supported here. I was going to give it a shot but there are three build dependencies not part of CentOS 7 / EPEL 7 dcmtk-devel gconfmm26-devel libglademm24-devel When that starts to happen, it often results in needing additional dependencies to build those, etc. Alice, Thanks much for trying. Your observation was the same as mine. I installed the above dependencies without a problem, they were all in the repops. After I installed them it still failed to compile with the final result being the errors that I posted earlier. I am not wanting to convert these desktops to Fedora 29, but at least I have a path for what is needed. If any of the other users on the list have ideas of what has happened to Centos 7.6 I would surely appreciate a solution. Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [Fwd: Centos 7.6 and Aeskulap]
On 12/30/18 8:42 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: After I installed them it still failed to compile with the final result being the errors that I posted earlier. You haven't posted the errors, per se. What you sent simply said "there was an error". The error text should have been immediately above that. Post more of the build output, possibly to: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Slider bars...
On 12/28/18 1:52 PM, mark wrote: Anyone have a clue how to add back the buttons at the top and bottom of the slider bars, or at least change how the sliders work? Most of the time, I want to scroll up faster, *NOT* got 500 emails back, or to the top of the page cat > ~/.config/gtk-3.0/gtk.css
Re: [CentOS] openiam or freeipa ?
On 12/28/18 1:36 AM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote: What is the best OpenIAM or FreeIPA ? I haven't worked with OpenIAM, but looking at the feature matrix I'd say that there's an awful lot of stuff that FreeIPA users take for granted that you don't get in OpenIAM versions other than "Enterprise." ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upg. CentOS 7.5 to 7.6: unable to mount smb shares - samba NT domain member using ldap
On 12/21/18 12:15 PM, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote: Thanks for tip, Kenneth. Please find proper formatted logs here: https://pastebin.com/eXfNWBLu This looks like a discussion of a similar problem. There are two suggested solutions: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/454004/smbclient-not-able-to-connect-to-after-upgrade-to-rhel7 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): link is not ready after upgrading to 7.6
On 12/25/18 11:54 PM, Luigi Rosa wrote: Hi, after upgrading to 7.6, kernel 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64, at boot instead of the GUI login screen I got two lines like this: The output you see is probably unrelated to the problem. Check the output of "systemctl status gdm" and /var/log/Xorg.0.log ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] openiam or freeipa ?
Thanks Ilyass KAOUAM SysAdmin Le dim. 30 déc. 2018 à 20:54, Gordon Messmer a écrit : > On 12/28/18 1:36 AM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote: > > What is the best OpenIAM or FreeIPA ? > > > I haven't worked with OpenIAM, but looking at the feature matrix I'd say > that there's an awful lot of stuff that FreeIPA users take for granted > that you don't get in OpenIAM versions other than "Enterprise." > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] upgrading 7.5 ==> 7.6
On 12/25/18 12:33 PM, Fred Smith wrote: I just took a look at the md devices in my raid1, and it seems pretty weird. they were all created by the installer (Anaconda) when I first installed C7, yet 3 of them are 1.2 and one is 1.0. 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 are the same, except for where in the volume they are located. 1.0 is at the end of the volume, which makes it compatible with software that is ignorant of md RAID (such as UEFI), so it will be used for the /boot/efi system partition. Generally, 1.2 is preferred (since the volume can be resized without affecting the metadata location) and will be used for all other volumes. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] daemon core dump
On 12/21/18 10:35 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Is that the best way (obviously with debug packages installed) to get the core dump or is there a better way? It looks reasonable to me. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
