Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.4 apparent rpm problem
Le 15/09/2017 à 14:44, Mark Haney a écrit : > Please ignore this, some ignorant cretin here excluded sudo from being > updated. Never in my life will I understand anyone's reason for > excluded THAT particular package. On a side note: it looks like a majority of CentOS users refers to CentOS 1708 as "CentOS 6.4". Maybe a hint to go back to the original versioning scheme, following upstream? Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement
I have been using KeePassXC (though mostly on Debian) for quite a while now and am happy to report it works well. Nothing springs to mind that annoys me and it's a decent drop in replacement. My setup sounds pretty similar to your own (also use keepass2android, though not KeePass on Windows). I would be inclined to compile from source yourself rather than use an unofficial repo you have no reason to trust for such a sensitive application. I'm not trying to besmirch the good name of copr.fedorainfracloud.org/bugzy but I've never heard of them and if you hadn't either that would give me pause for thought before I let their binaries at my passwords. On Fri 15 Sep 2017 @ 21:43, H wrote: I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I also sync the database between several machines, including Android units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is thus required. KeePassX, however, does not seem to be maintained any more, the last update was just a bit less than a year ago. It also has some annoying bugs, including where switching keyboards on the computer corrupts the username and the password if they include any character outside the ASCII range. There seems to be a community fork called KeePassXC and I would like to ask if anyone is using this password manager? It is not in EPEL, nor in any other standard repository, only through an unofficial repository at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bugzy/keepassxc/, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Tom Longfield e: tomlongfi...@gmail.com | t: 07507916719 PGP: 374C 705A 0CB4 783A 2692 A978 88A0 D5FC 5301 63FA signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] waitstates
Hi, are there other things than disk I/O that may cause waitstates (as shown by top, for example)? What about network traffic? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement
On 2017-09-16 12:55, Tom Longfield wrote: > I have been using KeePassXC (though mostly on Debian) for quite a > while now and am happy to report it works well. Nothing springs to > mind that annoys me and it's a decent drop in replacement. > My setup sounds pretty similar to your own (also use keepass2android, > though not KeePass on Windows). > > I would be inclined to compile from source yourself rather than use an > unofficial repo you have no reason to trust for such a sensitive > application. > > I'm not trying to besmirch the good name of > copr.fedorainfracloud.org/bugzy but I've never heard of them and if > you hadn't either that would give me pause for thought before I let > their binaries at my passwords. > > On Fri 15 Sep 2017 @ 21:43, H wrote: >> I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for >> some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use >> KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I >> also sync the database between several machines, including Android >> units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is thus >> required. >> >> KeePassX, however, does not seem to be maintained any more, the last >> update was just a bit less than a year ago. It also has some annoying >> bugs, including where switching keyboards on the computer corrupts >> the username and the password if they include any character outside >> the ASCII range. >> >> There seems to be a community fork called KeePassXC and I would like >> to ask if anyone is using this password manager? It is not in EPEL, >> nor in any other standard repository, only through an unofficial >> repository at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bugzy/keepassxc/, >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos AFAIK the KeePassXC is a package in Fedora, so it could be trusted. I replaced KeePassX 1.x with this with a extra step of upgrading to KeePassX 2.x first. //Zdenek ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement
On 16/09/17 11:55, Tom Longfield wrote: I have been using KeePassXC (though mostly on Debian) for quite a while now and am happy to report it works well. Nothing springs to mind that annoys me and it's a decent drop in replacement. My setup sounds pretty similar to your own (also use keepass2android, though not KeePass on Windows). I would be inclined to compile from source yourself rather than use an unofficial repo you have no reason to trust for such a sensitive application. I'm not trying to besmirch the good name of copr.fedorainfracloud.org/bugzy but I've never heard of them and if you hadn't either that would give me pause for thought before I let their binaries at my passwords. I'm in a similar position presently, evaluating at password manager apps and had also come across that KeePassXC build. I briefly installed the above package to evaluate and also intend to rebuild it for my own use. Another concern for me was the use of the 'centos' dist tag when the package clearly isn't a 'centos' package. I've got as far as confirming the validity of the source tarball in the SRPM and checking the SPEC file. Everything looks fine, but as previously mentioned I would still rebuild such a sensitive package for my own use. The only other potential issue I see is that the latest KeePassXC requires a newer version of libgcrypt, which the repo above packages as libgcrypt16 (libgcrypt version 1.6.6) on el7. The release of 1.6 broke ABI compatibility with version 1.5 in el7. I have not tried building KeePassXC against libgcrypt-1.5 in el7 to know if that is viable. On Fri 15 Sep 2017 @ 21:43, H wrote: I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I also sync the database between several machines, including Android units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is thus required. KeePassX, however, does not seem to be maintained any more, the last update was just a bit less than a year ago. It also has some annoying bugs, including where switching keyboards on the computer corrupts the username and the password if they include any character outside the ASCII range. There seems to be a community fork called KeePassXC and I would like to ask if anyone is using this password manager? It is not in EPEL, nor in any other standard repository, only through an unofficial repository at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bugzy/keepassxc/, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement
On 16/09/17 16:05, Phil Perry wrote: The only other potential issue I see is that the latest KeePassXC requires a newer version of libgcrypt, which the repo above packages as libgcrypt16 (libgcrypt version 1.6.6) on el7. The release of 1.6 broke ABI compatibility with version 1.5 in el7. I have not tried building KeePassXC against libgcrypt-1.5 in el7 to know if that is viable. I've just looked at the ABI changes, and can confirm that the latest version of KeePassXC uses the GCRY_CIPHER_SALSA20 cipher function added in libgcrypt-1.6, so users will also need to install a newer version of libgcrypt alongside version 1.5 in el7. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement
H wrote: > I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for > some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use > KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I > also sync the database between several machines, including Android > units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is thus > required. Are you aware that KeePass 2 works under Linux, with mono? There are also ports for Android, but I've never tried them. You may have reasons to prefer KeePassX over KeePass 2, though. -- Yves Bellefeuille ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] waitstates
On 16.09.2017 13:02, hw wrote: > are there other things than disk I/O that may cause waitstates (as shown > by top, for example)? only disk i/o. > What about network traffic? only if you have network shares mounted. best regards Ulf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement
Sent from IBM Verse Yves Bellefeuille --- Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement --- From:"Yves Bellefeuille" To:"CentOS mailing list" Date:Sat, Sep 16, 2017 1:45 PMSubject:Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement H wrote:> I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for> some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use> KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I> also sync the database between several machines, including Android> units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is thus> required.Are you aware that KeePass 2 works under Linux, with mono? There arealso ports for Android, but I've never tried them.You may have reasons to prefer KeePassX over KeePass 2, though.-- Yves Bellefeuille___CentOS mailing listCentOS@centos.orghttps://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement
Sent from IBM Verse Yves Bellefeuille --- Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement --- From:"Yves Bellefeuille" To:"CentOS mailing list" Date:Sat, Sep 16, 2017 1:45 PMSubject:Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement H wrote:> I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for> some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use> KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I> also sync the database between several machines, including Android> units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is thus> required.Are you aware that KeePass 2 works under Linux, with mono? There arealso ports for Android, but I've never tried them.You may have reasons to prefer KeePassX over KeePass 2, though.-- Yves Bellefeuille___CentOS mailing listCentOS@centos.orghttps://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement
G Sent from IBM Verse Yves Bellefeuille --- Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement --- From:"Yves Bellefeuille" To:"CentOS mailing list" Date:Sat, Sep 16, 2017 1:45 PMSubject:Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement H wrote:> I have been using the KeePassX password manager on CentOS 6 and 7 for> some time and it works pretty well. On my Windows machine I use> KeePass which offers a number of features missing from KeePassX, I> also sync the database between several machines, including Android> units where I use keepass2android. Database compatibility is thus> required.Are you aware that KeePass 2 works under Linux, with mono? There arealso ports for Android, but I've never tried them.You may have reasons to prefer KeePassX over KeePass 2, though.-- Yves Bellefeuille___CentOS mailing listCentOS@centos.orghttps://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 7.4.1708 dependency problems
Everyone, I had four Centos 7.4 machines of which I did a manual yum update and ended up having the same problems on each machine. It looks like the packages below have dependency problems with the recent update to : CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) Packages skipped because of dependency problems: gvfs-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-afc-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-afp-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-archive-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-client-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-devel-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-fuse-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-goa-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-gphoto2-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-mtp-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base gvfs-smb-1.30.4-3.el7.x86_64 from base libimobiledevice-1.2.0-1.el7.x86_64 from base libplist-1.12-3.el7.x86_64 from base libusbmuxd-1.0.10-5.el7.x86_64 from base upower-0.99.4-2.el7.x86_64 from base usbmuxd-1.1.0-1.el7.x86_64 from base Greg Ennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7.4.1708 dependency problems
Greg, according to the release notes "Known Issues" section ( https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7?action=show&redirect=Manuals%2FReleaseNotes%2FCentOS7.1708#head-281c090cc4fbc6bb5c7d4cd82a266fce807eee7c ) you need to run "yum downgrade libgpod" first. I have updated a dozen or so machines to 7.4.1708, and several needed this. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] sysconf and _SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE returns 0?
Hi Everyone, I'm working on GCC112, which is POWER System S822 (Power8) machine running CentOS 7 machine (https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm): $ cat /etc/centos-release CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (AltArch) I'm trying to determine L1 data cache size. When the following code runs it returns 0. The man pages state -1 is an error, so I think its claiming to succeed. cacheLineSize = sysconf(_SC_LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE); GCC119, which is also a S822 Power8 running AIX, returns 128. Does anyone know what I might be doing wrong under Cent? Or maybe, how can I retrieve the L1 data cache line size? Thanks in advance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
