Re: [CentOS] Update of cloud-init in CentOS 7 Extras

2017-09-14 Thread Pierre Riteau
> On 4 Aug 2017, at 16:41, Pierre Riteau  wrote:
> 
>> On 13 Jul 2017, at 11:07, Pierre Riteau  wrote:
>> 
>>> On 13 Jul 2017, at 01:55, Johnny Hughes  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 07/12/2017 02:02 PM, Pierre Riteau wrote:
 Hello,
 
 The version of cloud-init packaged in CentOS 7 Extras is rather old 
 (0.7.5, which was released in 2014). It is missing some functionality that 
 we would like to use, as well as important bug fixes.
 Before I tackle rebuilding the package myself, I would like to know if 
 there is a plan to update extras to a newer cloud-init version, or if has 
 anyone has already updated cloud-init and would be happy to share the spec?
 
>>> 
>>> I have just created a newer one for testing .. it is here:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-extras/cloud-init/20170705233059/0.7.9-3.el7.centos.x86_64/
>>> 
>>> See if that one works for you and provide us some feedback .. it is
>>> version 0.7.9-3.el7.centos
>>> 
>>> Once we get some positive feedback and work out any bugs, this one will
>>> get released.
>> 
>> Thanks a lot Johnny! We will test and report our findings :-)
> 
> We’ve tested this package and haven’t noticed any issue.
> 
> The functionality that we wanted from this new version (specifying uid for 
> users created by cloud-init) works fine.

We were happy to discover yesterday that cloud-init 0.7.9 is now included in 
base/7/x86_64. Thanks to everyone who made it possible!

Pierre Riteau
Chameleon Lead DevOps Engineer
https://www.chameleoncloud.org 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

2017-09-14 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi Johnny

Thanks for the commands I think something was messed up as the yum
group install "Gnome Desktop" seems to do the trick.
I had all the other items setup, for disable nouveu and all that.for the
binary NVIDIA.

Anyway - my desktop is back up and running, thanks.

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

2017-09-14 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Lamar Owen  wrote:

> On 09/13/2017 04:40 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> I am running the propriatry NVIDIA driver 384.69 for GT 720 support.
>>
> The ELrepo driver works very well for me with CentOS 7.4.1708 on a Dell
> Precision M6700.  Here's what I have:
> ++
> [lowen@localhost ~]$ nvidia-detect -v
> Probing for supported NVIDIA devices...
> [10de:11be] NVIDIA Corporation GK104GLM [Quadro K3000M]
> This device requires the current 384.59 NVIDIA driver kmod-nvidia
> [lowen@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa|grep nvidia
> nvidia-x11-drv-384.69-2.el7.elrepo.x86_64
> nvidia-detect-384.59-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
> yum-plugin-nvidia-1.0.2-1.el7.elrepo.noarch
> pcp-pmda-nvidia-gpu-3.11.8-7.el7.x86_64
> kmod-nvidia-384.69-1.el7_4.elrepo.x86_64
> [lowen@localhost ~]$
>
> (nvidia-detect hasn't yet been updated to .69..)  The ELrepo team does
> a great job with this driver; unless you have a compelling need to rebuild
> it yourself (I hesitate to say 'recompile' as, well, there's very little to
> actually compile) you should investigate using the ELrepo.org modules that
> make these sorts of updates much easier.  Thanks ELrepo for the modules;
> thanks CentOS project for the rebuilt OS.
>
> The ELrepo nvidia driver handles the nouveau disabling as well; it's
> seamless, and works.  The only caveat is when your card goes to the legacy
> driver, at which time you'll have to install the legacy version; ELrepo
> builds those too.


​Right, and one other aspect of ELRepo's kmod package is that it survives
kernel updates silently. With Nvidia's script, you need to run it upon
every kernel update.​


​Akemi​
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 151, Issue 3

2017-09-14 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1708) on x86_64 (Karanbir Singh)
   2. Release for CentOS 7.4.1708 for AArch64/ARM64 (Jim Perrin)
   3. Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1708) on armhfp (Fabian Arrotin)
   4. CESA-2017:2685 Moderate CentOS 7 bluez Security   Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   5. CESA-2017:2679 Important CentOS 7 kernel Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   6. Updates for CentOS Linux 7 (1708) through 9/11/2017
  (Johnny Hughes)
   7. Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1708) on ppc64le (James O'Connor)
   8. Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1708) on ppc64 (James O'Connor)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 20:48:27 +0100
From: Karanbir Singh 
To: CentOS Announcements List 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1708) on x86_64
Message-ID: <93441a2b-09f1-3577-6f02-76cace36b...@centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"


I am pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7
(1708) for 64 bit x86 compatible machines. Effectively immediately, this
is the current release for CentOS Linux 7 and is tagged as 1708, derived
from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4

As always, read through the Release Notes at :
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 - these notes
contain important information about the release and details about some
of the content inside the release from the CentOS QA team. These notes
are updated constantly to include issues and incorporate feedback from
the users.

--
Updates, Sources, and DebugInfos

Updates released since we froze the iso and install media content are
posted in the updates repo along with the release. This will include
content from late Aug 2017 and Sept 2017, therefore anyone
running a new install is highly encouraged to run a 'yum update'
operation immediate on install completion.  You can apply all updates,
including the content released today, on your existing CentOS Linux
7/x86_64 machine by just running 'yum update'.

As with all CentOS Linux 7 components, this release was built from
sources hosted at git.centos.org. In addition, SRPMs that are a
byproduct of the build (and also considered critical in the code and
buildsys process) are being published to match every binary RPM we
release. Sources will be available from vault.centos.org in their own
dedicated directories to match the corresponding binary RPMs. Since
there is far less traffic to the CentOS source RPMs compared with the
binary RPMs, we are not putting this content on the main mirror
network. If users wish to mirror this content they can do so using the
reposync command available in the yum-utils package. All CentOS source
RPMs are signed with the same key used to sign their binary
counterparts. Developers and end users looking at inspecting and
contributing patches to the CentOS Linux distro will find the code
hosted at git.centos.org far simpler to work against. Details on how
to best consume those are documented along with a quick start at :
http://wiki.centos.org/Sources

Debuginfo packages are also being signed and pushed. Yum configs
shipped in the new release file will have all the context required for
debuginfo to be available on every CentOS Linux install.

This release supersedes all previously released content for CentOS
Linux 7, and therefore we highly encourage all users to upgrade their
machines. Information on different upgrade strategies and how to
handle stale content is included in the Release Notes.

Note that older content, obsoleted by newer versions of the same
applications are trim'd off from repos like Extras/ and Plus/ However
this time we have also extended this to the sIG content hosted at
mirror.centos.org, and some older End of Life content has been dropped.
Everything we ever release, is always available on the vault service for
people still looking for and have a real need for it.

--
Download

In order to conserve donor bandwidth, and to make it possible to get
the mirror content sync'd out as soon as possible, we recommend using
torrents to get your initial installer images:

Details on the images are available on the mirrors at
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/isos/x86_64/0_README.txt - that file
clearly highlights the difference in the images, and when one might be
more suitable than the others.

The sizes, sha256 sums for the ISO files:

ec7500d4b006702af6af023b1f8f1b890b6c7ee54400bb98cef968b883cd6546
 Cent

[CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. If I go
to 
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-2133155.html
and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone know
where I can get 8.1?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Yves Bellefeuille
Larry Martell  wrote:

> I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. If I go
> to
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-2133155.html
> and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone know
> where I can get 8.1?

The latest JRE is JRE 8u144 (version 8, update 144). There's no such
thing as JRE 8.1.

A search for "JRE 8.1 or higher" had no hits at all.

-- 
Yves Bellefeuille



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Darr247


> I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.

That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 is/was 1.7;
JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).

> If I go to
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-21331
55.html
> and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone know where
I can get 8.1?

http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_090f390dda5
b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed the latest
version.

What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
>
>
>> I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
>
> That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 is/was 1.7;
> JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
>
>> If I go to
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downloads-21331
> 55.html
>> and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone know where
> I can get 8.1?
>
> http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_090f390dda5
> b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
> should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed the latest
> version.
>
> What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?

Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM system.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Rich Huff
On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
> > 
> > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7
> > is/was 1.7;
> > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
> > 
> > > If I go to
> > 
> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downlo
> > ads-21331
> > 55.html
> > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone
> > > know where
> > 
> > I can get 8.1?
> > 
> > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_09
> > 0f390dda5
> > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
> > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed
> > the latest
> > version.
> > 
> > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?
> 
> Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
> still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM
> system.

Do you have a lower version Java installed?  
What does command 'java -version' say?

IBM has their own flavor of Java.  Is it looking for that?


> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] vmware player 12.5.7 with CentOS 7.4

2017-09-14 Thread Jerry Geis
hi all - anyone find a way to get vmware player 12.5.7 working with 7.4?

Thanks - everything good with the upgrade except that.

Great job CentOS team!

Jerry


starting vmplayer I get the following:
Note: adwaita is installed.
canberra is installed
No idea what pk is ?

vmplayer

(vmware-modconfig:12595): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in
module_path: "adwaita",
/usr/share/themes/Adwaita/gtk-2.0/main.rc:733: error: unexpected identifier
`direction', expected character `}'

(vmware-modconfig:12595): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in
module_path: "adwaita",
/usr/share/themes/Adwaita/gtk-2.0/hacks.rc:28: error: invalid string
constant "normal_entry", expected valid string constant
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module": libpk-gtk-module.so:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
libcanberra-gtk-module.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
Stopping vmware (via systemctl):   [  OK  ]
Using kernel build system.
make: Entering directory `/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only'
/usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64/build/include/..
SUBDIRS=$PWD SRCROOT=$PWD/. \
  MODULEBUILDDIR= modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64'
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/driver.o
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/hub.o
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/userif.o
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.o
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/bridge.o
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/procfs.o
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/smac.o
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/smac_compat.o
  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vnetEvent.o
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:35:0,
 from
/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/compat_netdevice.h:27,
 from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c:43:
include/linux/pci_ids.h:2251:0: warning: "PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE" redefined
[enabled by default]
 #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE  0x15ad
 ^
In file included from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/net.h:38:0,
 from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vnetInt.h:26,
 from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c:42:
/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vm_device_version.h:56:0: note: this is
the location of the previous definition
 #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE0x15AD
 ^
In file included from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c:43:0:
/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c: In function ‘VNetNetifStartXmit’:
/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/compat_netdevice.h:343:46: error: ‘struct
net_device’ has no member named ‘trans_start’
 #define compat_netif_trans_update(d) do { (d)->trans_start = jiffies; }
while (0)
  ^
/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c:468:4: note: in expansion of macro
‘compat_netif_trans_update’
compat_netif_trans_update(dev);
^
make[2]: *** [/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
In file included from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/net.h:38:0,
 from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vnetInt.h:26,
 from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/bridge.c:52:
/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vm_device_version.h:56:0: warning:
"PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE" redefined [enabled by default]
 #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE0x15AD
 ^
In file included from include/linux/pci.h:35:0,
 from
/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/compat_netdevice.h:27,
 from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/bridge.c:51:
include/linux/pci_ids.h:2251:0: note: this is the location of the previous
definition
 #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE  0x15ad
 ^
make[1]: *** [_module_/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64'
make: *** [vmnet.ko] Error 2
make: Leaving directory `/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only'
Starting vmware (via systemctl):  Job for vmware.service failed because the
control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status
vmware.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
   [FAILED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff  wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
>> >
>> > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7
>> > is/was 1.7;
>> > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
>> >
>> > > If I go to
>> >
>> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downlo
>> > ads-21331
>> > 55.html
>> > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone
>> > > know where
>> >
>> > I can get 8.1?
>> >
>> > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_09
>> > 0f390dda5
>> > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
>> > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed
>> > the latest
>> > version.
>> >
>> > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?
>>
>> Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
>> still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM
>> system.
>
> Do you have a lower version Java installed?
> What does command 'java -version' say?

openJDK version "1.8.0_101"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode)


> IBM has their own flavor of Java.  Is it looking for that?

I don't know. I am running CentOS6 and then trying to run their remote
control SW throught FF. Maybe I have to restart FF ... going to try
that ... no joy, same errors. Contacting IBM now.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell  wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff  wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
>>> >
>>> > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7
>>> > is/was 1.7;
>>> > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
>>> >
>>> > > If I go to
>>> >
>>> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downlo
>>> > ads-21331
>>> > 55.html
>>> > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone
>>> > > know where
>>> >
>>> > I can get 8.1?
>>> >
>>> > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_09
>>> > 0f390dda5
>>> > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
>>> > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed
>>> > the latest
>>> > version.
>>> >
>>> > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?
>>>
>>> Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
>>> still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM
>>> system.
>>
>> Do you have a lower version Java installed?
>> What does command 'java -version' say?
>
> openJDK version "1.8.0_101"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode)
>
>
>> IBM has their own flavor of Java.  Is it looking for that?
>
> I don't know. I am running CentOS6 and then trying to run their remote
> control SW throught FF. Maybe I have to restart FF ... going to try
> that ... no joy, same errors. Contacting IBM now.

For some of the IBM hardware I have had to use a new Java but an old
copy of Firefox. The best explanation I have is probably flawed but it
was that the hardware wanted SSL1/SSL2 type stuff which the new
Firefox and items blocked. There is probably a better way to fix it.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Darr247
> Contacting IBM now.


In case they don't suggest it, try connecting with http instead of https to
see if it's actually an SSL certificate problem.
 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server

2017-09-14 Thread Mark (Netbook)
Hello,

I have a pre-production Intel Skylake server using dual 8176 processors (28 
core @2.1Ghz)

I have loaded from the DVD distribution CentOS 7.3 and RHEL 7.4 with no 
problems.

When I try and load CentOS 6.9 the boot process hangs just as the Anaconda 
graphics is started for CentOS configuration.

If I use a secondary graphics card then the process completes with no problems 
and CentOS boots from the system disk error free.

The server uses AST2500 graphics as standard. This seems to be the problem.

What I need is an iso file that I can load during the initial boot process.

I have tried various grub options and they don’t work.

The reason that I am trying CentOS 6.9 is that many people have applications 
which will only run on CentOS 6.*.

Regards,
Mark Woolfson
MW Consultancy Ltd
Leeds
LS18 4LY
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 113 259 1204
Mob: +44 786 065 2778


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:
> On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell  wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff  wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
 >
 >
 > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
 >
 > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7
 > is/was 1.7;
 > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
 >
 > > If I go to
 >
 > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downlo
 > ads-21331
 > 55.html
 > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone
 > > know where
 >
 > I can get 8.1?
 >
 > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_09
 > 0f390dda5
 > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
 > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed
 > the latest
 > version.
 >
 > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?

 Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
 still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM
 system.
>>>
>>> Do you have a lower version Java installed?
>>> What does command 'java -version' say?
>>
>> openJDK version "1.8.0_101"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13)
>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode)
>>
>>
>>> IBM has their own flavor of Java.  Is it looking for that?
>>
>> I don't know. I am running CentOS6 and then trying to run their remote
>> control SW throught FF. Maybe I have to restart FF ... going to try
>> that ... no joy, same errors. Contacting IBM now.
>
> For some of the IBM hardware I have had to use a new Java but an old
> copy of Firefox. The best explanation I have is probably flawed but it
> was that the hardware wanted SSL1/SSL2 type stuff which the new
> Firefox and items blocked. There is probably a better way to fix it.

I have FF version 24.6.0 - probably very old. This is a locked down
machine, not on the internet, so installing anything is a pain.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Darr247  wrote:
>> Contacting IBM now.
>
>
> In case they don't suggest it, try connecting with http instead of https to
> see if it's actually an SSL certificate problem.

When I put in http it changes it back to https
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 14 September 2017 at 12:10, Larry Martell  wrote:

> I have FF version 24.6.0 - probably very old. This is a locked down
> machine, not on the internet, so installing anything is a pain.

In my case, that was the working version I needed for the IBM
hardware. However I just realized the opposite might be also possible.
The hardware is wanting to talk a newer version of TLS that your old
browser can't use. In either case talking with the hardware vendor to
find exactly what they are expecting in both TLS, Java and other parts
is needed.


> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread ejm
> When I put in http it changes it back to https

That's common now that everyone puts re-directs in to force everyone to use 
https.

Can you get to the Apache logs on the remote machine? They may have more info.

The error about Java 1.8 might be a red-herring.

If the remote machine uses Perl on the backend, you might try setting the shell 
env variable OPENSSL_PREFIX to point on your local CentOS6 box to a newer 
version of openssl that handles the TLS handshake. The CPAN module Net::SSLeay 
uses that variable (if set) to use the specified OpenSSL library.

--Ed
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] lighttpd and cgi error reporting

2017-09-14 Thread hw


Hi,

is there a way to get error messages created by CGI perl programs (not fastCGI)
logged with lighttpd?  Apache used to put all errors into its error log and
lighttpd does not.  That makes debugging rather difficult.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:26 PM, ejm  wrote:
>> When I put in http it changes it back to https
>
> That's common now that everyone puts re-directs in to force everyone to use 
> https.
>
> Can you get to the Apache logs on the remote machine? They may have more info.
>
> The error about Java 1.8 might be a red-herring.
>
> If the remote machine uses Perl on the backend, you might try setting the 
> shell env variable OPENSSL_PREFIX to point on your local CentOS6 box to a 
> newer version of openssl that handles the TLS handshake. The CPAN module 
> Net::SSLeay uses that variable (if set) to use the specified OpenSSL library.

The remote machine is an IMM (Integrated Management Module). I can
connect to that from a browser and then use a remote contol function
to control the machine that is attached to the IMM. That machine will
not boot so I want to see the console, which I usually can via this RC
software. It worked before but yesterday I updated the firmware to fix
another issue and that changed java requirements and now RC does not
work.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server

2017-09-14 Thread Earl A Ramirez
>
>
>
> When I try and load CentOS 6.9 the boot process hangs just as the Anaconda
> graphics is started for CentOS configuration.
>

CentOS 6.9 kernel does not have support for Skylake processors, I believe
that there is an alternate arch SIG that "may" be able to compile 6.9 with
a newer kernel or you may have to compile something using the kernel that
is available from ELRepo.

Or use another graphic card that is compatible with the kernel that comes
with CentOS 6.9.

-- 
Kind Regards
Earl Ramirez
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Rob DeSanno
I used to have issues with Java and our IBM IMM's but seem to have it working 
on my MAC using java 8 build 144 and Safari. You *may* need to add the host imm 
ip address to your exception site list under the java security tab, if you 
haven’t already.


> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Larry Martell  wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:26 PM, ejm  wrote:
>>> When I put in http it changes it back to https
>> 
>> That's common now that everyone puts re-directs in to force everyone to use 
>> https.
>> 
>> Can you get to the Apache logs on the remote machine? They may have more 
>> info.
>> 
>> The error about Java 1.8 might be a red-herring.
>> 
>> If the remote machine uses Perl on the backend, you might try setting the 
>> shell env variable OPENSSL_PREFIX to point on your local CentOS6 box to a 
>> newer version of openssl that handles the TLS handshake. The CPAN module 
>> Net::SSLeay uses that variable (if set) to use the specified OpenSSL library.
> 
> The remote machine is an IMM (Integrated Management Module). I can
> connect to that from a browser and then use a remote contol function
> to control the machine that is attached to the IMM. That machine will
> not boot so I want to see the console, which I usually can via this RC
> software. It worked before but yesterday I updated the firmware to fix
> another issue and that changed java requirements and now RC does not
> work.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Jose
Hello,
Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you can
see.
Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again.
Kind regards

El 14 sept. 2017 5:55 p. m., "Larry Martell" 
escribió:

> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff  wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
> >> >
> >> > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7
> >> > is/was 1.7;
> >> > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
> >> >
> >> > > If I go to
> >> >
> >> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downlo
> >> > ads-21331
> >> > 55.html
> >> > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone
> >> > > know where
> >> >
> >> > I can get 8.1?
> >> >
> >> > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_09
> >> > 0f390dda5
> >> > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
> >> > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed
> >> > the latest
> >> > version.
> >> >
> >> > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?
> >>
> >> Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
> >> still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM
> >> system.
> >
> > Do you have a lower version Java installed?
> > What does command 'java -version' say?
>
> openJDK version "1.8.0_101"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode)
>
>
> > IBM has their own flavor of Java.  Is it looking for that?
>
> I don't know. I am running CentOS6 and then trying to run their remote
> control SW throught FF. Maybe I have to restart FF ... going to try
> that ... no joy, same errors. Contacting IBM now.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] vmware player 12.5.7 with CentOS 7.4

2017-09-14 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hello Jerry,

This message is typical. No Problem same on other linux distros.

Sincerely

Andy

> Am 14.09.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Jerry Geis :
> 
> hi all - anyone find a way to get vmware player 12.5.7 working with 7.4?
> 
> Thanks - everything good with the upgrade except that.
> 
> Great job CentOS team!
> 
> Jerry
> 
> 
> starting vmplayer I get the following:
> Note: adwaita is installed.
> canberra is installed
> No idea what pk is ?
> 
> vmplayer
> 
> (vmware-modconfig:12595): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in
> module_path: "adwaita",
> /usr/share/themes/Adwaita/gtk-2.0/main.rc:733: error: unexpected identifier
> `direction', expected character `}'
> 
> (vmware-modconfig:12595): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in
> module_path: "adwaita",
> /usr/share/themes/Adwaita/gtk-2.0/hacks.rc:28: error: invalid string
> constant "normal_entry", expected valid string constant
> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "pk-gtk-module": libpk-gtk-module.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module":
> libcanberra-gtk-module.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
> Stopping vmware (via systemctl):   [  OK  ]
> Using kernel build system.
> make: Entering directory `/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only'
> /usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64/build/include/..
> SUBDIRS=$PWD SRCROOT=$PWD/. \
>  MODULEBUILDDIR= modules
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64'
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/driver.o
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/hub.o
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/userif.o
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.o
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/bridge.o
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/procfs.o
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/smac.o
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/smac_compat.o
>  CC [M]  /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vnetEvent.o
> In file included from include/linux/pci.h:35:0,
> from
> /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/compat_netdevice.h:27,
> from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c:43:
> include/linux/pci_ids.h:2251:0: warning: "PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE" redefined
> [enabled by default]
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE  0x15ad
> ^
> In file included from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/net.h:38:0,
> from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vnetInt.h:26,
> from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c:42:
> /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vm_device_version.h:56:0: note: this is
> the location of the previous definition
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE0x15AD
> ^
> In file included from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c:43:0:
> /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c: In function ‘VNetNetifStartXmit’:
> /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/compat_netdevice.h:343:46: error: ‘struct
> net_device’ has no member named ‘trans_start’
> #define compat_netif_trans_update(d) do { (d)->trans_start = jiffies; }
> while (0)
>  ^
> /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.c:468:4: note: in expansion of macro
> ‘compat_netif_trans_update’
>compat_netif_trans_update(dev);
>^
> make[2]: *** [/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/netif.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> In file included from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/net.h:38:0,
> from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vnetInt.h:26,
> from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/bridge.c:52:
> /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/vm_device_version.h:56:0: warning:
> "PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE" redefined [enabled by default]
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE0x15AD
> ^
> In file included from include/linux/pci.h:35:0,
> from
> /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/compat_netdevice.h:27,
> from /tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only/bridge.c:51:
> include/linux/pci_ids.h:2251:0: note: this is the location of the previous
> definition
> #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE  0x15ad
> ^
> make[1]: *** [_module_/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64'
> make: *** [vmnet.ko] Error 2
> make: Leaving directory `/tmp/modconfig-piDjEW/vmnet-only'
> Starting vmware (via systemctl):  Job for vmware.service failed because the
> control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status
> vmware.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
>   [FAILED]
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread m . roth
Jose wrote:
> Hello,
> Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you
> can see.
> Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again.

Or change alternatives, or set JAVA_HOME.

  mark

> Kind regards
>
> El 14 sept. 2017 5:55 p. m., "Larry Martell" 
> escribió:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff  wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
>> >> >
>> >> > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7
>> >> > is/was 1.7;
>> >> > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
>> >> >
>> >> > > If I go to
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downlo
>> >> > ads-21331
>> >> > 55.html
>> >> > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone
>> >> > > know where
>> >> >
>> >> > I can get 8.1?
>> >> >
>> >> > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_09
>> >> > 0f390dda5
>> >> > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
>> >> > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed
>> >> > the latest
>> >> > version.
>> >> >
>> >> > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?
>> >>
>> >> Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
>> >> still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM
>> >> system.
>> >
>> > Do you have a lower version Java installed?
>> > What does command 'java -version' say?
>>
>> openJDK version "1.8.0_101"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13)
>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode)
>>
>>
>> > IBM has their own flavor of Java.  Is it looking for that?
>>
>> I don't know. I am running CentOS6 and then trying to run their remote
>> control SW throught FF. Maybe I have to restart FF ... going to try
>> that ... no joy, same errors. Contacting IBM now.
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread John R Pierce

On 9/14/2017 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

Jose wrote:

Hello,
Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you
can see.
Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again.

Or change alternatives, or set JAVA_HOME.



Or, change the path.  the java command sets java_home internally based 
on where its invoked from.



--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 1:51 PM, John R Pierce  wrote:
> On 9/14/2017 10:43 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>> Jose wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you
>>> can see.
>>> Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again.
>>
>> Or change alternatives, or set JAVA_HOME.
>
>
>
> Or, change the path.  the java command sets java_home internally based on
> where its invoked from.

Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread John R Pierce

On 9/14/2017 10:54 AM, Larry Martell wrote:

Or, change the path.  the java command sets java_home internally based on
where its invoked from.

Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser.


I'm not sure how the browser plugin determines which java to run.


--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Jose  wrote:
> Hello,
> Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you can
> see.
> Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again.

How can I run yum remove without it trying to access the net? This
machine has no internet connection and yum remove has been running for
an hour trying to hit mirrors and repos.

> Kind regards
>
> El 14 sept. 2017 5:55 p. m., "Larry Martell" 
> escribió:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff  wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
>> >> >
>> >> > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7
>> >> > is/was 1.7;
>> >> > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
>> >> >
>> >> > > If I go to
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downlo
>> >> > ads-21331
>> >> > 55.html
>> >> > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone
>> >> > > know where
>> >> >
>> >> > I can get 8.1?
>> >> >
>> >> > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_09
>> >> > 0f390dda5
>> >> > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
>> >> > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed
>> >> > the latest
>> >> > version.
>> >> >
>> >> > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?
>> >>
>> >> Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
>> >> still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM
>> >> system.
>> >
>> > Do you have a lower version Java installed?
>> > What does command 'java -version' say?
>>
>> openJDK version "1.8.0_101"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13)
>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode)
>>
>>
>> > IBM has their own flavor of Java.  Is it looking for that?
>>
>> I don't know. I am running CentOS6 and then trying to run their remote
>> control SW throught FF. Maybe I have to restart FF ... going to try
>> that ... no joy, same errors. Contacting IBM now.
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote:

> Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser.

Is the java plugin enabled in your browser? That's not the default nowadays.

if you are running firefox you can check this by opening 'about:plugins'.

here - configured for older HP ILOs -  for example, the plugin is linked
into my firefox profile:

[ulf@bob ~]$ ll .mozilla/firefox/ln5frqem.default/plugins
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 ulf ulf 37 Apr 21  2016 libnpjp2.so ->
/opt/jre1.7.0_51/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so

best regards
Ulf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server

2017-09-14 Thread Mark (Netbook)
CentOS 6.9 has support for the Haswell processor which is a subset of the 
Skylake.


All Skylake server ancillary components work perfectly with CentOS 6.9.

The AST2500 used with the Skylake is very good and will process UHD. However 
this is not backwards compatible with legacy variants.


To make it work an ancillary graphics card is required which is less than 
$100. This will not break the bank.


Regards,
Mark Woolfson
MW Consultancy Ltd
Leeds
LS18 4LY
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 113 259 1204
Mob: +44 786 065 2778
-Original Message- 
From: Earl A Ramirez

Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 5:37 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server





When I try and load CentOS 6.9 the boot process hangs just as the Anaconda
graphics is started for CentOS configuration.



CentOS 6.9 kernel does not have support for Skylake processors, I believe
that there is an alternate arch SIG that "may" be able to compile 6.9 with
a newer kernel or you may have to compile something using the kernel that
is available from ELRepo.

Or use another graphic card that is compatible with the kernel that comes
with CentOS 6.9.

--
Kind Regards
Earl Ramirez
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Intel Skylake Server

2017-09-14 Thread Mason Loring Bliss
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 07:38:58PM +0100, Mark (Netbook) wrote:

> CentOS 6.9 has support for the Haswell processor which is a subset of the
> Skylake.
> 
> All Skylake server ancillary components work perfectly with CentOS 6.9.

Note that there can be issues. My desktop is:

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1225 v5 @ 3.30GHz

...and it wasn't until 7.4 that it'd run without crashing when using anything
attached to xHCI.

For a server, USB probably isn't an issue, but this seemed worth noting.

-- 
 Mason Loring Bliss ma...@blisses.orghttp://blisses.org/  
"I am a brother of jackals, and a companion of ostriches."  (Job 30 : 29)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:
> On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote:
>
>> Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser.
>
> Is the java plugin enabled in your browser? That's not the default nowadays.
>
> if you are running firefox you can check this by opening 'about:plugins'.
>
> here - configured for older HP ILOs -  for example, the plugin is linked
> into my firefox profile:
>
> [ulf@bob ~]$ ll .mozilla/firefox/ln5frqem.default/plugins
> total 0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 ulf ulf 37 Apr 21  2016 libnpjp2.so ->
> /opt/jre1.7.0_51/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so

I am running a very old versiond of FF, 24.6.0, and the menus and
files are different. But I do not have a java plugin. But please note
that this used to work until today when I upgraded the firmware in the
IMM. That changed the java version required, so I updated that. But
the FF version and config has not changed.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 14 September 2017 at 14:51, Larry Martell  wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:
>> On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote:
>>
>>> Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser.
>>
>> Is the java plugin enabled in your browser? That's not the default nowadays.
>>
>> if you are running firefox you can check this by opening 'about:plugins'.
>>
>> here - configured for older HP ILOs -  for example, the plugin is linked
>> into my firefox profile:
>>
>> [ulf@bob ~]$ ll .mozilla/firefox/ln5frqem.default/plugins
>> total 0
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 ulf ulf 37 Apr 21  2016 libnpjp2.so ->
>> /opt/jre1.7.0_51/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so
>
> I am running a very old versiond of FF, 24.6.0, and the menus and
> files are different. But I do not have a java plugin. But please note
> that this used to work until today when I upgraded the firmware in the
> IMM. That changed the java version required, so I updated that. But
> the FF version and config has not changed.

So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not
configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the
openjdk with the system and some pointing the one you tried to
install. I don't know how you installed this new jdk so it may be for
many different reasons.

> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:
> On 14 September 2017 at 14:51, Larry Martell  wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:
>>> On 14.09.2017 19:54, Larry Martell wrote:
>>>
 Where would I do that? This is something running from a browser.
>>>
>>> Is the java plugin enabled in your browser? That's not the default nowadays.
>>>
>>> if you are running firefox you can check this by opening 'about:plugins'.
>>>
>>> here - configured for older HP ILOs -  for example, the plugin is linked
>>> into my firefox profile:
>>>
>>> [ulf@bob ~]$ ll .mozilla/firefox/ln5frqem.default/plugins
>>> total 0
>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 ulf ulf 37 Apr 21  2016 libnpjp2.so ->
>>> /opt/jre1.7.0_51/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so
>>
>> I am running a very old versiond of FF, 24.6.0, and the menus and
>> files are different. But I do not have a java plugin. But please note
>> that this used to work until today when I upgraded the firmware in the
>> IMM. That changed the java version required, so I updated that. But
>> the FF version and config has not changed.
>
> So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not
> configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the
> openjdk with the system and some pointing the one you tried to
> install. I don't know how you installed this new jdk so it may be for
> many different reasons.

I installed it by downloading the rpm and installing that. IBM said on
my older FF the app/plugin is called JNLP and I should change the
setting for that to 'always ask' and then when it asks use javaws - I
did that but it still fails.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Running COS 7.1708 on VirtualBox 5.1.28

2017-09-14 Thread Ken Gramm
Anyone else having issues getting the VB drivers to load on 1708?


I keep gettting an "Error: unable to find the sources of your current Linux 
kernel..." message.


I do have kernel-devel installed and I had no issues running 1611 on the same 
host.


Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Running COS 7.1708 on VirtualBox 5.1.28

2017-09-14 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 14/09/2017 à 21:32, Ken Gramm a écrit :
> Anyone else having issues getting the VB drivers to load on 1708?
> 
> 
> I keep gettting an "Error: unable to find the sources of your current Linux 
> kernel..." message.
> 
> 
> I do have kernel-devel installed and I had no issues running 1611 on the same 
> host.

I think you mean VirtualBox 5.1.26. And yes, there's some trouble with
it with the latest update. Check out the CentOS 1708 release notes.

Workaround is to use VirtualBox 5.1.26 with the 5.1.27
VBoxGuestAdditions.iso. Tried this out here, works perfectly.

https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds

Cheers,

Niki

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

2017-09-14 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 14/09/2017 à 03:02, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
> I have a test machine with an NVIDIA card .. let me see if the
> proprietary NVIDIA driver works on this for 7.4.

I have an NVidia GeForce GT218 card on my workstation, with a twin
monitor. Updated everything to CentOS 1708, and the kmod-nvidia-340xx
driver works perfectly.

Cheers,

Niki

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Jose
if not needed...

El 14 sept. 2017 7:49 p. m.,  escribió:

> Jose wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Although you've instaled Oracle JRE 1.8, OpenJDK is the default, as you
> > can see.
> > Remove OpenJDK and execute java -version again.
>
> Or change alternatives, or set JAVA_HOME.
>
>   mark
>
> > Kind regards
> >
> > El 14 sept. 2017 5:55 p. m., "Larry Martell" 
> > escribió:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff  wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247  wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7
> >> >> > is/was 1.7;
> >> >> > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > If I go to
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/
> downloads/jre8-downlo
> >> >> > ads-21331
> >> >> > 55.html
> >> >> > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone
> >> >> > > know where
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I can get 8.1?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?
> BundleId=225344_09
> >> >> > 0f390dda5
> >> >> > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135
> >> >> > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed
> >> >> > the latest
> >> >> > version.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1?
> >> >>
> >> >> Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I
> >> >> still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM
> >> >> system.
> >> >
> >> > Do you have a lower version Java installed?
> >> > What does command 'java -version' say?
> >>
> >> openJDK version "1.8.0_101"
> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13)
> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode)
> >>
> >>
> >> > IBM has their own flavor of Java.  Is it looking for that?
> >>
> >> I don't know. I am running CentOS6 and then trying to run their remote
> >> control SW throught FF. Maybe I have to restart FF ... going to try
> >> that ... no joy, same errors. Contacting IBM now.
> >> ___
> >> CentOS mailing list
> >> CentOS@centos.org
> >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >>
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Running COS 7.1708 on VirtualBox 5.1.28

2017-09-14 Thread Ken Gramm


> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas
> Kovacs
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:34 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Running COS 7.1708 on VirtualBox 5.1.28
> 
> Le 14/09/2017 à 21:32, Ken Gramm a écrit :
> > Anyone else having issues getting the VB drivers to load on 1708?
> >
> >
> > I keep gettting an "Error: unable to find the sources of your current Linux
> kernel..." message.
> >
> >
> > I do have kernel-devel installed and I had no issues running 1611 on the
> same host.
> 
> I think you mean VirtualBox 5.1.26. And yes, there's some trouble with it with
> the latest update. Check out the CentOS 1708 release notes.
> 
> Workaround is to use VirtualBox 5.1.26 with the 5.1.27
> VBoxGuestAdditions.iso. Tried this out here, works perfectly.
> 
> https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Niki
> 
> --
> Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730
> Montpezat Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. :
> 04 66 63 10 32 ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



No, I really did mean VirtualBox 5.1.28.  Not sure if they released it today, 
but I downloaded it today :-)



 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 14.09.2017 21:26, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen  
> wrote:

>> So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not
>> configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the
>> openjdk with the system and some pointing the one you tried to
>> install. I don't know how you installed this new jdk so it may be for
>> many different reasons.
> 
> I installed it by downloading the rpm and installing that. IBM said on
> my older FF the app/plugin is called JNLP and I should change the
> setting for that to 'always ask' and then when it asks use javaws - I
> did that but it still fails.

Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser
to make sure, that the right java version is activated.

But normally javaws is a different topic. As far as i remember, there
should be an option to let firefox ask, which javaws should be executed.
As i understand, you have different version installed.

And at last, please check the security options with jcontrol. Newer java
version are more restricted about security settings.

best regards
Ulf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:
> On 14.09.2017 21:26, Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen  
>> wrote:
>
>>> So it sounds like the links needed for the plugin to work are not
>>> configured on the system. So you have some symlinks pointing to the
>>> openjdk with the system and some pointing the one you tried to
>>> install. I don't know how you installed this new jdk so it may be for
>>> many different reasons.
>>
>> I installed it by downloading the rpm and installing that. IBM said on
>> my older FF the app/plugin is called JNLP and I should change the
>> setting for that to 'always ask' and then when it asks use javaws - I
>> did that but it still fails.
>
> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser
> to make sure, that the right java version is activated.

This is what I get from that:

application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.3 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.3 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.3.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.5 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.6 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.7 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;version=1.8 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.8.0_50 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.3 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.3 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.3.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.1 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.2 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.5 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.6 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.7 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;version=1.8 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-bean;jpi-version=1.8.0_50 IcedTea class,jar
application/x-java-vm-npruntime IcedTea

> But normally javaws is a different topic. As far as i remember, there
> should be an option to let firefox ask, which javaws should be executed.
> As i understand, you have different version installed.

When this was working before the firmware update the RC software
invoked IcedTea. As one of the attempted fixes IBM suggested using
javaws instead. Intially I did not have javaws but I did have
javaws.itweb. I tried that and it failed in the same way.

Then they asked me to run this:

alternatives --config java

There are 2 programs which provide 'java'.

  SelectionCommand
---
*+ 1   /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java
   2   /usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jav


And switch to the second one. When I did that it still failed with
IcedTea, but then there was a javaws. I ran that and it did completely
different things and finally failed with "Login error". They they had
me go into ControlPanel and put the IP address of the IMM in the
excpetion site list. I did that and then I get: KVM Java: Duplicate
exists. Then they gave up and said they don't know.

> And at last, please check the security options with jcontrol. Newer java
> version are more restricted about security settings.

I don't seem to have jcontrol
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 14.09.2017 23:56, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:

>> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser
>> to make sure, that the right java version is activated.
> 
> This is what I get from that:
> 
> application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar

That's OpenJDK instead of Oracle.


> Then they asked me to run this:
> 
> alternatives --config java
> 
> There are 2 programs which provide 'java'.
> 
>   SelectionCommand
> ---
> *+ 1   /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java
>2   /usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jav
>

Maybe you should also try 'alternatives --config javaws' to switch to
the Oracle java webstart. But i'm not sure that this is possible for javaws.

>> And at last, please check the security options with jcontrol. Newer java
>> version are more restricted about security settings.
> 
> I don't seem to have jcontrol

Should be part of your JRE installation:

[ulf@x1 ~]$ rpm -qlp Downloads/jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm |grep bin/jcontrol
/usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jcontrol

best regards
Ulf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Larry Martell
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:
> On 14.09.2017 23:56, Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:
>
>>> Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser
>>> to make sure, that the right java version is activated.
>>
>> This is what I get from that:
>>
>> application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar
>
> That's OpenJDK instead of Oracle.

Do you know how I can associate IcedTea with Oracle's JRE?

>> Then they asked me to run this:
>>
>> alternatives --config java
>>
>> There are 2 programs which provide 'java'.
>>
>>   SelectionCommand
>> ---
>> *+ 1   /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java
>>2   /usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jav
>>
>
> Maybe you should also try 'alternatives --config javaws' to switch to
> the Oracle java webstart. But i'm not sure that this is possible for javaws.

No, that gave no output.

>>> And at last, please check the security options with jcontrol. Newer java
>>> version are more restricted about security settings.
>>
>> I don't seem to have jcontrol
>
> Should be part of your JRE installation:
>
> [ulf@x1 ~]$ rpm -qlp Downloads/jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm |grep bin/jcontrol
> /usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jcontrol

Ah, yes, I do have that. It's the same as running ControlPanel - that
is where they had me try puttin the IP address of the IMM in the
exception site list.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 15.09.2017 00:59, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:

>>> This is what I get from that:
>>>
>>> application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar
>>
>> That's OpenJDK instead of Oracle.
> 
> Do you know how I can associate IcedTea with Oracle's JRE?

You can try to replace the icedtea plugin with the one from Oracle.
As i wrote in my first mail. Try to locate the plugin folder of your
firefox installation (maybe in your ff profile or system wide in the
firefox folder), backup the old plugin and place there a symlink to the
oracle plugin (/usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so).

>> /usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jcontrol
> 
> Ah, yes, I do have that. It's the same as running ControlPanel - that
> is where they had me try puttin the IP address of the IMM in the
> exception site list.

OK and did your set the security setting to the lowest one?

best regards
Ulf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6

2017-09-14 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 14 September 2017 at 18:59, Larry Martell  wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:
>> On 14.09.2017 23:56, Larry Martell wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Ulf Volmer  wrote:
>>
 Again, please enter 'about:plugins' in the address bar of your browser
 to make sure, that the right java version is activated.
>>>
>>> This is what I get from that:
>>>
>>> application/x-java-vm IcedTea class,jar
>>
>> That's OpenJDK instead of Oracle.
>
> Do you know how I can associate IcedTea with Oracle's JRE?
>

Iced Tea is a tool which Firefox calls to get the java.

[root@el6 ~]# yum info icedtea-web
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirrors.centos.webair.com
 * epel: mirror.cogentco.com
 * epel-testing: mirror.cogentco.com
 * extras: mirrors.centos.webair.com
 * updates: mirrors.centos.webair.com
Available Packages
Name: icedtea-web
Arch: x86_64
Version : 1.6.2
Release : 1.el6
Size: 1.6 M
Repo: base
Summary : Additional Java components for OpenJDK - Java browser
plug-in and Web Start implementation
URL : http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea-Web
License : LGPLv2+ and GPLv2 with exceptions
Description : The IcedTea-Web project provides a Java web browser
plugin, an implementation
: of Java Web Start (originally based on the Netx project)
and a settings tool to
: manage deployment settings for the aforementioned plugin
and Web Start
: implementations.

What does alternatives --config java and alternatives --config javaws
give as options?



>>> Then they asked me to run this:
>>>
>>> alternatives --config java
>>>
>>> There are 2 programs which provide 'java'.
>>>
>>>   SelectionCommand
>>> ---
>>> *+ 1   /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64/bin/java
>>>2   /usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jav
>>>
>>
>> Maybe you should also try 'alternatives --config javaws' to switch to
>> the Oracle java webstart. But i'm not sure that this is possible for javaws.
>
> No, that gave no output.
>
 And at last, please check the security options with jcontrol. Newer java
 version are more restricted about security settings.
>>>
>>> I don't seem to have jcontrol
>>
>> Should be part of your JRE installation:
>>
>> [ulf@x1 ~]$ rpm -qlp Downloads/jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm |grep bin/jcontrol
>> /usr/java/jre1.8.0_144/bin/jcontrol
>
> Ah, yes, I do have that. It's the same as running ControlPanel - that
> is where they had me try puttin the IP address of the IMM in the
> exception site list.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Running COS 7.1708 on VirtualBox 5.1.28

2017-09-14 Thread Ken Gramm
Can confirm that you can build the graphics drivers for CentOS 1708 on 
VirtualBox 5.1.28 with the 5.2.0 Beta 2 Additions


> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ken
> Gramm
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 4:24 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list 
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Running COS 7.1708 on VirtualBox 5.1.28
> 
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas
> > Kovacs
> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:34 PM
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Running COS 7.1708 on VirtualBox 5.1.28
> >
> > Le 14/09/2017 à 21:32, Ken Gramm a écrit :
> > > Anyone else having issues getting the VB drivers to load on 1708?
> > >
> > >
> > > I keep gettting an "Error: unable to find the sources of your
> > > current Linux
> > kernel..." message.
> > >
> > >
> > > I do have kernel-devel installed and I had no issues running 1611 on
> > > the
> > same host.
> >
> > I think you mean VirtualBox 5.1.26. And yes, there's some trouble with
> > it with the latest update. Check out the CentOS 1708 release notes.
> >
> > Workaround is to use VirtualBox 5.1.26 with the 5.1.27
> > VBoxGuestAdditions.iso. Tried this out here, works perfectly.
> >
> > https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Testbuilds
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Niki
> >
> > --
> > Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église -
> > 30730 Montpezat Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail :
> i...@microlinux.fr Tél. :
> > 04 66 63 10 32
> ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> 
> 
> No, I really did mean VirtualBox 5.1.28.  Not sure if they released it today, 
> but
> I downloaded it today :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos