Re: [CentOS] Question Mirrors ?
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:31:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Hey, they've gone onto a new and different error. We were getting "not a > valid .xml file. > > Try yum clean all, then try it. This post talks about what happened: http://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2017/06/problems-with-epel-and-fedora-mirroring.html (This is only the Fedora/EPEL repo issues) -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [OT]multi-master DNS
Hello all, We have quite a bit of environment on "cloud". We are using our own domain names. For this purpouse we stood up a BIND9 DNS instance on Centos 7. And, this being the cloud, we enabled key based dynamic DNS for instances to register themselves when they are spun-up. We have a single master and multiple slaves. all is well, untill mater goes down and we need to spin-up additional instances. Single master has become somewhat of a bottleneck I have looked around, not able to find any solution, for a stable Multi-master DNS setup (outside of Windows AD). Does any one have any specific pointers? -Thanks in advance Vijay ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [Solved]Re: Question Mirrors ?
Am Freitag, 23. Juni 2017, 12:22:25 CEST schrieb Günther J. Niederwimmer: > Hello List, > > in the last weeks I have many, many Errors from chron hourly on my systems > :- (. > > Have we broken or not updated mirrors in the yum config ? > > Thanks for a answer, The answer yum clean metadata is helping me ;-) Thanks! -- mit freundlichen Grüssen / best regards Günther J. Niederwimmer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] what is causing this problem ... (yum, fastest mirror)
Hello, what is causing the following, and can someone give the solution which is mentioned at https://access.redhat.com/articles/1320623 by the way: why are the "fastest" mirrors from other continent? [root@host sysconfig]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Cleaning repos: base epel extras updates Cleaning up Everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors [root@host sysconfig]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Cleaning repos: base epel extras updates Cleaning up Everything [root@host sysconfig]# yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Setting up Update Process Determining fastest mirrors epel/metalink | 12 kB 00:00 * base: mirror.genesisadaptive.com * epel: mirror.us.leaseweb.net * extras: mirror.genesisadaptive.com * updates: mirror.genesisadaptive.com base | 3.7 kB 00:00 base/primary_db | 4.7 MB 00:01 epel | 4.3 kB 00:00 http://mirror.us.leaseweb.net/epel/6/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for epel Trying other mirror. epel | 4.3 kB 00:00 https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno -1] repomd.xml does not match metalink for epel Trying other mirror. epel | 4.2 kB 00:00 https://mirror.us-midwest-1.nexcess.net/epel/6/x86_64/repodata/c259ce09172fc535ff3b556ccad8d2a02f128a2da95f0c1389ce9443800e225d-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found" Trying other mirror. To address this issue please refer to the below knowledge base article https://access.redhat.com/articles/1320623 If above article doesn't help to resolve this issue please open a ticket with Red Hat Support. http://ftp.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/epel/6/x86_64/repodata/c259ce09172fc535ff3b556ccad8d2a02f128a2da95f0c1389ce9443800e225d-primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found" Trying other mirror. epel/primary_db | 5.9 MB 00:01 extras | 3.4 kB 00:00 extras/primary_db | 29 kB 00:00 updates | 3.4 kB 00:00 updates/primary_db | 2.0 MB 00:01 No Packages marked for Update ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] web content process and sloooww firefox
Today, for the first time, I noticed a process named "Web Content". I was running top because firefox was once again not allowing me to scroll. Having been down this road before, I would normally have just closed and reopened firefox. I needed to do it fairly often. Web Content was new. Eventually, I discovered "electrolysis" (why that name?) and the schedule: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis#Schedule_and_Status , but I'm not sure how to read it. What the heck is "riding trains"? My firefox is 52.2.0 64-bit. yum.log says it was last updated on the 16th. As is unusual, I had a pretty good idea which tabs were using up the CPU, so getting scrolling back was not too hard, but my usual close and reopen did not work. Is this a new "feature" of firefox? Will close and reopen consistently fail to resolve CPU-burning issues? Will I have to go on a tab-hunt every time? -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT]multi-master DNS
On 06/25/2017 12:22 PM, Vijay Rajah wrote: Hello all, We have quite a bit of environment on "cloud". We are using our own domain names. For this purpouse we stood up a BIND9 DNS instance on Centos 7. And, this being the cloud, we enabled key based dynamic DNS for instances to register themselves when they are spun-up. We have a single master and multiple slaves. all is well, untill mater goes down and we need to spin-up additional instances. Single master has become somewhat of a bottleneck I have looked around, not able to find any solution, for a stable Multi-master DNS setup (outside of Windows AD). Does any one have any specific pointers? I don't know about anyone else, but in no way would I use Bind9 and DDNS for anything, multi-master or not. I've never had any kind of stable success with DDNS and Bind. -- Mark Haney Network Engineer at NeoNova 919-460-3330 option 1 mark.ha...@neonova.net www.neonova.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
Sorry Hughes, got some questions. I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora. In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25 pretransaction & snapper.yp, with the hope of feedback. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject .org/thread/NLFYHW3IEJHSFBUOEAVHDHBVTL7TOHYZ/ Sometimes I don't know where to push the information. on https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/CentOS7Python34/ I release a ticket because snapper gui do not build on there repo. Local with mock or without it never fails. No response. Since yesterday learned how to use snapper against the dbus api. What is the better way in my opinion. After some rest i will do it first on centos and it back into fedora "dnf" later on. It looks to me as if in a Fedora release little movement. If someone wants to upgrade something you simply move it there gladly times on the next release. This generates a high unwilling something at all a working release to submit an improvement. This is a lot better under Centos, although Redhat is very slow with its update cycles. Too bad the feedback is not as good as under Centos. In principal there are to many ways to push errors or improvments on each (centos, redhat, fedora) distros. Or am I doing something wrong. Is there anything I can do better? It is hopefully not that I care 3 various Linux (This time Arch/Manjaro, Fedora, Centos). It helps to get ideas. Thanks for advice. Sincerely Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question Mirrors ?
Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:31:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Hey, they've gone onto a new and different error. We were getting "not a >> valid .xml file. >> >> Try yum clean all, then try it. > > This post talks about what happened: > > http://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2017/06/problems-with-epel-and-fedora-mirroring.html > > (This is only the Fedora/EPEL repo issues) > Um. yum clean all *and* yum clean metadata? Doesn't clean all include metadata? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question Mirrors ?
El 26/6/17 a las 22:13, m.r...@5-cent.us escribió: Um. yum clean all *and* yum clean metadata? Doesn't clean all include metadata? mark Yes, it does. See Table 8.3 here https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/sec-Working_with_Yum_Cache.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question Mirrors ?
Original Message > Date: Monday, June 26, 2017 16:13:02 -0400 > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > > Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:31:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> Hey, they've gone onto a new and different error. We were getting >>> "not a valid .xml file. >>> >>> Try yum clean all, then try it. >> >> This post talks about what happened: >> >> http://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2017/06/problems-with-epel-and-fed >> ora-mirroring.html >> >> (This is only the Fedora/EPEL repo issues) >> > Um. yum clean all *and* yum clean metadata? Doesn't clean all > include metadata? > > mark > ... and the article says: The client side fixes are currently to do *either* one of the following ... acknowledging that point. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [OT]multi-master DNS
Bind does not have a method to do multi-master replication. All updates must be done via an intermediary service (database). In our case, we've used containers and Consul for providing a highly available DNS service. A container will fire up and race for the master lock. It will dump the contents of the database into its named configurations and assuming it has the lock will assume the IP address of the master. Others just come up as slaves. If the master lock is not renewed after a given period of time another container can acquire the lock and become master by assuming the IP address of master (VRRP/VRID/KeepAliveD) - On 25 Jun, 2017, at 09:22, Vijay Rajah m...@rvijay.me wrote: | Hello all, | | We have quite a bit of environment on "cloud". We are using our own | domain names. For this purpouse we stood up a BIND9 DNS instance on | Centos 7. And, this being the cloud, we enabled key based dynamic DNS | for instances to register themselves when they are spun-up. We have a | single master and multiple slaves. all is well, untill mater goes down | and we need to spin-up additional instances. Single master has become | somewhat of a bottleneck | | I have looked around, not able to find any solution, for a stable | Multi-master DNS setup (outside of Windows AD). | | Does any one have any specific pointers? | | | -Thanks in advance | | Vijay | | ___ | CentOS mailing list | CentOS@centos.org | https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- James A. Peltier IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 604-365-6432 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices Twitter : @sfu_rcg Powering Engagement Through Technology ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
