[CentOS] Basic authentication - maybe off topoc

2017-05-11 Thread Jerry Geis
Hi - I am using CentOS 7.3 and trying to receive basic authentication.

I run a command liked: curl -X POST -u jerry:pw
http://192.168.1.8/inbound.cgi

When I use printenv in the cgi I do not see the user and password anywhere.
Isn't it supposed to be there in an environment variable like REMOTE_USER ?

How do I receive the basic authentication ?

Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread Leon Fauster
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel

shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about

Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake

has the current EL6 variant support for it?

Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
LF



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster :
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel
> 
> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about
> 
> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake
> 
> has the current EL6 variant support for it?
> 
> Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated.


I found this

linux-2.6.32-696.1.1.el6/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c

 796 if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) &&
 797 ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6))) {
 798 switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
 799 case 94: /* Skylake-S */
 800 case 86: /* Broadwell-DE SoC */
 801 case 85: /* Purley */
 802 case 79: /* Broadwell-EP and EX */
 803 case 78: /* Skylake-Y */
 804 case 77: /* Atom Avoton */
 805 case 71: /* Broadwell-H */
 806 case 70: /* Crystal Well */
 807 break;
 808 default:
 809 if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model > 63) {
 810 printk(KERN_CRIT
 811"Detected CPU family %d model %d\n",
 812boot_cpu_data.x86,
 813boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
 814 mark_hardware_unsupported("Intel CPU model");
 815 }
 816 break;
 817 }
 818 }

not sure if "case 94: /* Skylake-S */" means support for Intel Core i7-6700 
Quad-Core Skylake ...

--
LF




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster :
> 
>> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster :
>> 
>> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel
>> 
>> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about
>> 
>> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake
>> 
>> has the current EL6 variant support for it?
>> 
>> Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> 
> I found this
> 
> linux-2.6.32-696.1.1.el6/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> 
> 796 if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) &&
> 797 ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6))) {
> 798 switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
> 799 case 94: /* Skylake-S */
> 800 case 86: /* Broadwell-DE SoC */
> 801 case 85: /* Purley */
> 802 case 79: /* Broadwell-EP and EX */
> 803 case 78: /* Skylake-Y */
> 804 case 77: /* Atom Avoton */
> 805 case 71: /* Broadwell-H */
> 806 case 70: /* Crystal Well */
> 807 break;
> 808 default:
> 809 if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model > 63) {
> 810 printk(KERN_CRIT
> 811"Detected CPU family %d model %d\n",
> 812boot_cpu_data.x86,
> 813boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
> 814 mark_hardware_unsupported("Intel CPU model");
> 815 }
> 816 break;
> 817 }
> 818 }
> 
> not sure if "case 94: /* Skylake-S */" means support for Intel Core i7-6700 
> Quad-Core Skylake ...


for the record:

model 94 seems to be supported since EL6.7. 

A quick install could be booted without issues.


# cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -26 ; uname -a
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 94
model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz
stepping: 3
microcode   : 85
cpu MHz : 3408.025
cache size  : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 8
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 4
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 22
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb 
rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc 
aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 
xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave 
avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dtherm 
hwp hwp_noitfy hwp_act_window hwp_epp tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid 
fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed adx
bogomips: 6816.05
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Linux srv-s01.ccds.de 2.6.32-696.1.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 11 17:13:24 UTC 
2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

--
LF

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Basic authentication - maybe off topoc

2017-05-11 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 07:56:00AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi - I am using CentOS 7.3 and trying to receive basic authentication.
> 
> I run a command liked: curl -X POST -u jerry:pw
> http://192.168.1.8/inbound.cgi
> 
> When I use printenv in the cgi I do not see the user and password anywhere.
> Isn't it supposed to be there in an environment variable like REMOTE_USER ?

Is this a 'curl' question, a 'How do you write CGI?' question or a
general question about how HTTP works?

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] strange system outage

2017-05-11 Thread Larry Martell
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Larry Martell  wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Billings  
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:40:04PM -0400, Larry Martell wrote:
>>> I have a CentOS 7 system that I run a home grown python daemon on. I
>>> run this same daemon on many other systems without any incident. On
>>> this one system the daemon seems to die or be killed every day around
>>> 3:30am. There is nothing it its log or any system logs that tell me
>>> why it dies. However in /var/log/messages every day I see something
>>> like this:
>>
>> How are you starting this daemon?
>
> I am using code something like this: https://gist.github.com/slor/5946334.
>
>> Can you check the journal?  Perhaps
>> you'll see more useful information than what you see in the syslogs?
>
> Thanks, I will do that.

Thank you for that suggestion. I was able to get someone to run
journalctl and send me the output and it was very interesting.

First, there is logging going on continuously during the time when
logging stops in /var/log/messages.

Second, I see messages like this periodically:

May 10 03:57:46 localhost.localdomain python[40222]: detected
unhandled Python exception in
'/usr/local/motor/motor/core/data/importer.py'
May 10 03:57:46 localhost.localdomain abrt-server[40277]: Only 0MiB is
available on /var/spool/abrt
May 10 03:57:46 localhost.localdomain python[40222]: error sending
data to ABRT daemon:

This happens at various times of the day, and I do not think is
related to the daemon crashing.

But I did see one occurrence of this:

May 09 03:49:35 localhost.localdomain python[14042]: detected
unhandled Python exception in
'/usr/local/motor/motor/core/data/importerd.py'
May 09 03:49:35 localhost.localdomain abrt-server[22714]: Only 0MiB is
available on /var/spool/abrt
May 09 03:49:35 localhost.localdomain python[14042]: error sending
data to ABRT daemon:

And that is the daemon. But I only see that on this one day, and it
crashes every day.

And I see this type of message frequently throughout the day, every day:

May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain CROND[21447]: (motor) CMD
(python /usr/local/motor/motor/scripts/image_mover.py -v1 -d
/usr/local/motor/data > ~/last_image_move_log.txt)
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain abrt-server[21453]: Only 0MiB is
available on /var/spool/abrt
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain python[21402]: error sending
data to ABRT daemon:
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain postfix/postdrop[21456]:
warning: uid=0: No space left on device
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain postfix/sendmail[21455]: fatal:
root(0): queue file write error
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain crond[2630]: postdrop: warning:
uid=0: No space left on device
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain crond[2630]: sendmail: fatal:
root(0): queue file write error
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain CROND[21443]: (root) MAIL
(mailed 67 bytes of output but got status 0x004b)

So it seems there is a space issue.

And finally, coinciding with the time that the logging resumes in
/var/log/messages I see this every day at that time:

May 10 03:57:57 localhost.localdomain
run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[40293]: finished mlocate
May 10 03:57:57 localhost.localdomain anacron[33406]: Job `cron.daily'
terminated (mailing output)
May 10 03:57:57 localhost.localdomain anacron[33406]: Normal exit (1 job run)

I need to get my remote hands to get me more info.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Basic authentication - maybe off topoc

2017-05-11 Thread Jerry Geis
>Is this a 'curl' question, a 'How do you write CGI?' question or a
>general question about how HTTP works?

Hi Jonathan,

This was just a general question on why I'm not seeing what I expected.
I'm using CentOS 7.3, I have written CGI for years (not using user & pass),
I've used http for years - I was just hoping someone might be able to shed
some light
on why I'm not seeing the REMOTE_USER.   I did several searches and did not
find any resolution.

Thanks for any pointers.

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Basic authentication - maybe off topoc

2017-05-11 Thread Richard

> Date: Thursday, May 11, 2017 14:53:28 -0400
> From: Jerry Geis 
>
>> Is this a 'curl' question, a 'How do you write CGI?' question or a
>> general question about how HTTP works?
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> This was just a general question on why I'm not seeing what I
> expected. I'm using CentOS 7.3, I have written CGI for years (not
> using user & pass), I've used http for years - I was just hoping
> someone might be able to shed some light on why I'm not seeing
> the REMOTE_USER. I did several searches and did not find any 
> resolution.
>

I can't tell from your description if this might be the issue, but
you will only see the REMOTE_USER value if the resource being
requested requires basic authentication. You don't see it, even if
passed, on pages where authentication isn't required.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread ken

On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:

Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster :


Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster :

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel

shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about

Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake

has the current EL6 variant support for it?

Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated.


I found this

linux-2.6.32-696.1.1.el6/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c

796 if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) &&
797 ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6))) {
798 switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
799 case 94: /* Skylake-S */
800 case 86: /* Broadwell-DE SoC */
801 case 85: /* Purley */
802 case 79: /* Broadwell-EP and EX */
803 case 78: /* Skylake-Y */
804 case 77: /* Atom Avoton */
805 case 71: /* Broadwell-H */
806 case 70: /* Crystal Well */
807 break;
808 default:
809 if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model > 63) {
810 printk(KERN_CRIT
811"Detected CPU family %d model %d\n",
812boot_cpu_data.x86,
813boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
814 mark_hardware_unsupported("Intel CPU model");
815 }
816 break;
817 }
818 }

not sure if "case 94: /* Skylake-S */" means support for Intel Core i7-6700 
Quad-Core Skylake ...


for the record:

model 94 seems to be supported since EL6.7.

A quick install could be booted without issues.


# cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -26 ; uname -a
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 94
model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz
stepping: 3
microcode   : 85
cpu MHz : 3408.025
cache size  : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 8
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 4
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 22
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov 
pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb 
rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc 
aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 
xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave 
avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dtherm 
hwp hwp_noitfy hwp_act_window hwp_epp tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid 
fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed adx
bogomips: 6816.05
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Linux srv-s01.ccds.de 2.6.32-696.1.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 11 17:13:24 UTC 
2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

--
LF


Here's mine.  Interesting differences:

# cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -26; uname -a
processor: 0
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 94
model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
stepping: 3
microcode: 0x9e
cpu MHz: 899.945
cache size: 6144 KB
physical id: 0
siblings: 8
core id: 0
cpu cores: 4
apicid: 0
initial apicid: 0
fpu: yes
fpu_exception: yes
cpuid level: 22
wp: yes
flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall 
nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good 
nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 
monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 
x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm 
abm 3dnowprefetch ida arat epb pln pts dtherm hwp hwp_noitfy 
hwp_act_window hwp_epp intel_pt tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid 
fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm mpx rdseed 
adx smap clflushopt xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1

bogomips: 5184.00
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment: 64
address sizes: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

Linux null.example.com 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 12 
15:04:24 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] TLSv1.3 support?

2017-05-11 Thread Walter H.

Hello,

will the next update of CentOS 6 (6.10) have TLSv1.3 support?

Thanks,
Walter


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] TLSv1.3 support?

2017-05-11 Thread John R Pierce

On 5/11/2017 1:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:


will the next update of CentOS 6 (6.10) have TLSv1.3 support? 



A) Ask Red Hat, I see no date for RHEL 6 update 10 yet.   update 9 
released 6 or 8 weeks ago, so its likely 3-4 months before update 10 
releases.


B) afaik, TLS v1.3 hasn't even been ratified yet, its still a draft

C) openssl v.1.1.1 which is supposed to support TLS v1.3(draft) isn't 
finished yet, either, its still a -dev release.




--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] get pdftk into (or from) a repo

2017-05-11 Thread ken
pdftk used to be in a repo... or maybe it still is, but I don't know 
which one.  Anyone know?



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] TLSv1.3 support?

2017-05-11 Thread John R Pierce

On 5/11/2017 1:23 PM, John R Pierce wrote:

On 5/11/2017 1:13 PM, Walter H. wrote:


will the next update of CentOS 6 (6.10) have TLSv1.3 support? 



A) Ask Red Hat, I see no date for RHEL 6 update 10 yet.   update 9 
released 6 or 8 weeks ago, so its likely 3-4 months before update 10 
releases.


B) afaik, TLS v1.3 hasn't even been ratified yet, its still a draft

C) openssl v.1.1.1 which is supposed to support TLS v1.3(draft) isn't 
finished yet, either, its still a -dev release. 



D)  RHEL 6 is, as of yesterday, in "production 3" [*], where only 
critical fixes and serious security exposures will be fixed.I see 
this as pretty unlikely they'd upgrade openssl




[*] 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.9_Release_Notes/chap-Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-6.9_Release_Notes-Overview.html



--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread Darr247
> Here's mine.  Interesting differences:

If you disable Intel Speedstep in the BIOS it should lock the CPU to its
fastest speed, but you lose power saving during idle.

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:48 PM, ken  wrote:

> On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
>> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster :
>>>
>>> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster >>> >:

 https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel

 shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about

 Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake

 has the current EL6 variant support for it?

 Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated.

>>>
>>> I found this
>>>
>>> linux-2.6.32-696.1.1.el6/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>>>
>>> 796 if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) &&
>>> 797 ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6))) {
>>> 798 switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
>>> 799 case 94: /* Skylake-S */
>>> 800 case 86: /* Broadwell-DE SoC */
>>> 801 case 85: /* Purley */
>>> 802 case 79: /* Broadwell-EP and EX */
>>> 803 case 78: /* Skylake-Y */
>>> 804 case 77: /* Atom Avoton */
>>> 805 case 71: /* Broadwell-H */
>>> 806 case 70: /* Crystal Well */
>>> 807 break;
>>> 808 default:
>>> 809 if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model > 63) {
>>> 810 printk(KERN_CRIT
>>> 811"Detected CPU family %d model %d\n",
>>> 812boot_cpu_data.x86,
>>> 813boot_cpu_data.x86_model);
>>> 814 mark_hardware_unsupported("Intel CPU model");
>>> 815 }
>>> 816 break;
>>> 817 }
>>> 818 }
>>>
>>> not sure if "case 94: /* Skylake-S */" means support for Intel Core
>>> i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake ...
>>>
>>
>> for the record:
>>
>> model 94 seems to be supported since EL6.7.
>>
>> A quick install could be booted without issues.
>>
>>
>> # cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -26 ; uname -a
>> processor   : 0
>> vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
>> cpu family  : 6
>> model   : 94
>> model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz
>> stepping: 3
>> microcode   : 85
>> cpu MHz : 3408.025
>> cache size  : 8192 KB
>> physical id : 0
>> siblings: 8
>> core id : 0
>> cpu cores   : 4
>> apicid  : 0
>> initial apicid  : 0
>> fpu : yes
>> fpu_exception   : yes
>> cpuid level : 22
>> wp  : yes
>> flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
>> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall
>> nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology
>> nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2
>> ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt
>> tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch ida
>> arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dtherm hwp hwp_noitfy hwp_act_window hwp_epp
>> tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms
>> invpcid rtm rdseed adx
>> bogomips: 6816.05
>> clflush size: 64
>> cache_alignment : 64
>> address sizes   : 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>> power management:
>>
>> Linux srv-s01.ccds.de 2.6.32-696.1.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 11
>> 17:13:24 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> --
>> LF
>>
>
> Here's mine.  Interesting differences:
>
> # cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -26; uname -a
> processor: 0
> vendor_id: GenuineIntel
> cpu family: 6
> model: 94
> model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
> stepping: 3
> microcode: 0x9e
> cpu MHz: 899.945
> cache size: 6144 KB
> physical id: 0
> siblings: 8
> core id: 0
> cpu cores: 4
> apicid: 0
> initial apicid: 0
> fpu: yes
> fpu_exception: yes
> cpuid level: 22
> wp: yes
> flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx
> pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl
> xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf eagerfpu pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor
> ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe
> popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm
> 3dnowprefetch ida arat epb pln pts dtherm hwp hwp_noitfy hwp_act_window
> hwp_epp intel_pt tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust
> bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm mpx rdseed adx smap clflushopt
> xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1
> bogomips: 5184.00
> clflush size: 64
> cache_alignment: 64
> address sizes: 39 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> power management:
>
> Linux null.example.com 3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 12
> 15:04:24 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
> ___
> Cent

Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird Regression

2017-05-11 Thread Yan Li
Maybe this is not very helpful to you, but I run Thunderbird 52 on CentOS 7, 
and it is as good as always. I'm not using RAID on home directory. 

Yan

> On May 10, 2017, at 8:16 PM, Mark LaPierre  wrote:
> 
> Has anyone else noticed a 10X slowing of the time it takes Thunderbird
> to load an email that contains graphics on CentOS 6?  The last
> Thunderbird update moved us from Thunderbird 45 to Thunderbird 52.
> 
> While Thunderbird was loading the images the hard drive was busy
> cranking out seeks.  I have all my local home accounts mounted on a
> software raid.
> 
> I solved the problem with a downgrade to Thunderbird 45, but that's a
> poor solution not keeping Thunderbird up to date with the latest
> security patches.
> 
> -- 
>_
>   °v°
>  /(_)\
>   ^ ^  Mark LaPierre
> Registered Linux user No #267004
> https://linuxcounter.net/
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 speedstep CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread ken

On 05/11/2017 05:38 PM, Darr247 wrote:

Here's mine.  Interesting differences:

If you disable Intel Speedstep in the BIOS it should lock the CPU to its
fastest speed, but you lose power saving during idle.


Thanks for the suggestion.  I still recall that in CentOS 5.x there was 
speedstep control available from gnome... and from the CLI too of 
course.  I don't see it in C7.3.


Currently I don't actually need more speed.  This is already a fairly 
peppy laptop... like right now the load is about 2%.  If it was any 
lower, I could almost turn this machine  off and still run everything.  
:)  Ah but seriously, I'd rather have the speed cranked down and save 
the battery.  That's the one weak spot: this gal can drain a battery 
faster than a dog can down a bag of cookies.  Still, I'd like to have 
control in gnome over cpu speed again.


Thanks again.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] get pdftk into (or from) a repo

2017-05-11 Thread Leon Fauster
> Am 11.05.2017 um 22:26 schrieb ken :
> 
> pdftk used to be in a repo... or maybe it still is, but I don't know which 
> one.  Anyone know?
> 

an old one is in the "dead" rpmforge repo.

--
LF






___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] get pdftk into (or from) a repo

2017-05-11 Thread ken

On 05/11/2017 06:49 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:

Am 11.05.2017 um 22:26 schrieb ken :

pdftk used to be in a repo... or maybe it still is, but I don't know which one. 
 Anyone know?


an old one is in the "dead" rpmforge repo.



At https://www.pdflabs.com/docs/install-pdftk-on-redhat-or-centos/ they 
have version 2.0 in rpm for RH/Cent5 & 6, but not 7, but there's also 
RH-friendly source code.  So it wouldn't be too much head-scratching to 
get rpms on a repo.



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] strange system outage

2017-05-11 Thread Alexander Dalloz

Am 11.05.2017 um 20:30 schrieb Larry Martell:

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Larry Martell  wrote:

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Jonathan Billings  wrote:

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 02:40:04PM -0400, Larry Martell wrote:

I have a CentOS 7 system that I run a home grown python daemon on. I
run this same daemon on many other systems without any incident. On
this one system the daemon seems to die or be killed every day around
3:30am. There is nothing it its log or any system logs that tell me
why it dies. However in /var/log/messages every day I see something
like this:


How are you starting this daemon?


I am using code something like this: https://gist.github.com/slor/5946334.


Can you check the journal?  Perhaps
you'll see more useful information than what you see in the syslogs?


Thanks, I will do that.


Thank you for that suggestion. I was able to get someone to run
journalctl and send me the output and it was very interesting.

First, there is logging going on continuously during the time when
logging stops in /var/log/messages.

Second, I see messages like this periodically:

May 10 03:57:46 localhost.localdomain python[40222]: detected
unhandled Python exception in
'/usr/local/motor/motor/core/data/importer.py'
May 10 03:57:46 localhost.localdomain abrt-server[40277]: Only 0MiB is
available on /var/spool/abrt
May 10 03:57:46 localhost.localdomain python[40222]: error sending
data to ABRT daemon:

This happens at various times of the day, and I do not think is
related to the daemon crashing.

But I did see one occurrence of this:

May 09 03:49:35 localhost.localdomain python[14042]: detected
unhandled Python exception in
'/usr/local/motor/motor/core/data/importerd.py'
May 09 03:49:35 localhost.localdomain abrt-server[22714]: Only 0MiB is
available on /var/spool/abrt
May 09 03:49:35 localhost.localdomain python[14042]: error sending
data to ABRT daemon:

And that is the daemon. But I only see that on this one day, and it
crashes every day.

And I see this type of message frequently throughout the day, every day:

May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain CROND[21447]: (motor) CMD
(python /usr/local/motor/motor/scripts/image_mover.py -v1 -d
/usr/local/motor/data > ~/last_image_move_log.txt)
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain abrt-server[21453]: Only 0MiB is
available on /var/spool/abrt
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain python[21402]: error sending
data to ABRT daemon:
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain postfix/postdrop[21456]:
warning: uid=0: No space left on device
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain postfix/sendmail[21455]: fatal:
root(0): queue file write error
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain crond[2630]: postdrop: warning:
uid=0: No space left on device
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain crond[2630]: sendmail: fatal:
root(0): queue file write error
May 09 03:40:01 localhost.localdomain CROND[21443]: (root) MAIL
(mailed 67 bytes of output but got status 0x004b)

So it seems there is a space issue.

And finally, coinciding with the time that the logging resumes in
/var/log/messages I see this every day at that time:

May 10 03:57:57 localhost.localdomain
run-parts(/etc/cron.daily)[40293]: finished mlocate
May 10 03:57:57 localhost.localdomain anacron[33406]: Job `cron.daily'
terminated (mailing output)
May 10 03:57:57 localhost.localdomain anacron[33406]: Normal exit (1 job run)

I need to get my remote hands to get me more info.


df -hT; df -i

There is no space left on a vital partition / logical volume.

"Only 0MiB is available on /var/spool/abrt"

"postdrop: warning: uid=0: No space left on device"

Alexander




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 speedstep CPU support

2017-05-11 Thread Kahlil Hodgson
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:18 AM, ken  wrote:
> Currently I don't actually need more speed.  This is already a fairly peppy
> laptop... like right now the load is about 2%.  If it was any lower, I could
> almost turn this machine  off and still run everything.  :)  Ah but
> seriously, I'd rather have the speed cranked down and save the battery.
> That's the one weak spot: this gal can drain a battery faster than a dog can
> down a bag of cookies.  Still, I'd like to have control in gnome over cpu
> speed again.

I think all that stuff is controlled by 'tuned' now. There is gtk app
tuned-gtk to help setting and switching profiles.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] get pdftk into (or from) a repo

2017-05-11 Thread ken

On 05/11/2017 07:07 PM, ken wrote:

On 05/11/2017 06:49 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:

Am 11.05.2017 um 22:26 schrieb ken :

pdftk used to be in a repo... or maybe it still is, but I don't know 
which one.  Anyone know?



an old one is in the "dead" rpmforge repo.



At https://www.pdflabs.com/docs/install-pdftk-on-redhat-or-centos/ 
they have version 2.0 in rpm for RH/Cent5 & 6, but not 7, but there's 
also RH-friendly source code.  So it wouldn't be too much 
head-scratching to get rpms on a repo.


It's worth mentioning that this is a really nice utility for 
manipulating PDFs, taking them apart, rearranging them, putting pages 
together, and a whole lot more.  I've used it hundreds of times.  
Probably anyone who has to work with PDFs would have need of it.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos