Re: [CentOS] logrotate failed ... (CentOS 6.9)
Walter H. wrote: > > I found your hint several time ago, this didn't solve it ... > > I don't understand this > > -killall -HUP clamd. 2>/dev/null || : > +killall -HUP clamd. > /dev/null 2>&1 || true > > in the patch > > as the file has this > pkill -SIGHUP -f clamd.clamsmtp >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > > in comparison /etc/logrotate.d/clamav has this > > killall -HUP clamd >/dev/null 2>&1 || : Sorry, I have no other suggestions - logrotate will only 'error' in that way if the postrotate commands return something other than zero - and in the examples you've given, it will always return 0 ... James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SPAM?] Re: CentOS 7 on HP DL160 G6
On 05/02/17 21:49, H wrote: On 05/02/2017 08:01 AM, mark wrote: On 05/02/17 06:56, Steven Tardy wrote: On May 1, 2017, at 8:49 PM, H wrote: the computer locks up at random intervals Anything in /var/log/mcelog? Is the "edac" module running? Does that model support bundle include any Intel MCA files? systemctl start ipmi ipmitool sel list 'Failed to start ipmi.service: Unit not found' yum install OpenIPMI ipmitool Then systemctl enable ipmi and systemctl start ipmi, then run ipmitool sel list. Um... I just had a thought - this is a server, right, not a desktop? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 7 cloned VM cannot boot
Hello, I'm struggling to make a cloned CentOS 7 VM (under KVM) to work. The VM was cloned using mondorestore. Restore appears successful but the VM won't boot; see: http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/supergrub2-scratchvm-20170503-04.png I booted with CentOS 7 disk in troubleshooting mode (where the virtual disk was automatically mounted without issues) and I tried to repair: http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/el7-rescue-scratchvm-20170502-01.png Also: # grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg ... /usr/sbin/grub2-probe: error: unknown filesystem. I then tried to repair using: https://sourceforge.net/p/boot-repair-cd/home/Home/ but it didn't manage to solve the problem. (It reported success but the VM still won't boot.) More interesting was the effort with the supergrub2 disk: http://www.supergrubdisk.org/super-grub2-disk/ This managed to identify the available "boot methods" and allowed me to boot correctly. See screenshots: http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/supergrub2-scratchvm-20170503-00.png http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/supergrub2-scratchvm-20170503-01.png http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/supergrub2-scratchvm-20170503-02.png Once I logged in, I checked /etc/fstab and /boot/grub2/grub.cfg but I didn't see any obvious problem. The are here as well: http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/fstab http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/grub.cfg However, I also followed these directions: https://www.techbrown.com/reinstall-grub2-boot-loader-centos-7-rhel-7.shtml to rebuild grub2.conf. The commands were completed successfully. Unfortunately, the OS still won't boot: same issue, see: http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/supergrub2-scratchvm-20170503-04.png I again tried to boot using the supergrub2 disk; this time the boot method detection produced the (slightly different) list you see in image: http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/supergrub2-scratchvm-20170503-05.png Using the supergrub2 disk I can boot and login successfully. Otherwise (i.e. directly) the box won't boot. As I know little about grub2 (and low-level linux) to troubleshoot the issue, can you please help identify and correct the problem? Why the VM always refuses to boot? Which is the reported device (on image -04) that remains unrecognized? I looked into /boot/grub/grub2.cfg but I didn't see any such UUID there. Where may it be referenced to be used during the boot process? Note: I never have such issues when restoring (using mondorestore) CentOS 5 or CentOS 6 mondoarchive backups (even on dissimilar virtual hardware). Can you please help me identify the problem, based on the above info, and make the VM normally bootable? Many thanks, Nick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] package internet-browser?
On 05/02/2017 09:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Kay Schenk wrote: On 05/01/2017 06:10 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On May 1, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: What can anyone tell me about package internet-browser? Through the gnome package app, there seems to be NO meta info I can’t find any packages called 'internet-browser’ for CentOS6 or 7, in either the base repos or EPEL. pkgs.org doesn’t know about it either. Do you have any extra repositories added? Yes, but...this ONLY shows up through the gnome package kit app -- gpk-application. It does NPT show up either through the yum repos or rpm. Is it some kind of system alias? It's 128.9 MB. Yesterday, when I was having so much trouble with the latest FF 52, I uninstalled internet-browser thing which also uninstalled FF 52. OK, all good. I cleared my yum cache, then re-installed FF 45. This item came back through gpk-application. Rather confused at this point. I'm on CentOS 6.9, 32 bit. Silly thought: if you *have* that package installed, and want to upgrade it... what repo does rpm -qi internet-browser tell you it's from. See my previous reply -- it DOES not show up in an rpm query. I am not using konqueror. I will try to track this down further. It MUST be an alias that's set up in gnome. I don't suppose there's any chance that it could be the konqueror browswer? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -- MzK "Since each of us is blessed with only one life, why not live it with a cat?" -- Robert Stearns ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] package internet-browser?
On Wed, 3 May 2017, Kay Schenk wrote: On 05/02/2017 09:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Kay Schenk wrote: > On 05/01/2017 06:10 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On May 1, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > What can anyone tell me about package internet-browser? > > > > > > Through the gnome package app, there seems to be NO meta info > > > > I can’t find any packages called 'internet-browser’ for CentOS6 or 7, > > in > > either the base repos or EPEL. pkgs.org doesn’t know about it either. > > > > Do you have any extra repositories added? > > Yes, but...this ONLY shows up through the gnome package kit app -- > gpk-application. It does NPT show up either through the yum repos or > rpm. Is it some kind of system alias? It's 128.9 MB. > > Yesterday, when I was having so much trouble with the latest FF 52, I > uninstalled internet-browser thing which also uninstalled FF 52. OK, all > good. I cleared my yum cache, then re-installed FF 45. This item came > back through gpk-application. Rather confused at this point. > > I'm on CentOS 6.9, 32 bit. > Silly thought: if you *have* that package installed, and want to upgrade it... what repo does rpm -qi internet-browser tell you it's from. See my previous reply -- it DOES not show up in an rpm query. I am not using konqueror. I will try to track this down further. It MUST be an alias that's set up in gnome. I don't suppose there's any chance that it could be the konqueror browswer? Surely this isn't anything complicated? # yum groupinfo internet-browser Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security, versionlock Setting up Group Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Group: Internet Browser Description: Firefox web browser Default Packages: firefox nspluginwrapper totem-mozplugin jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox for CentOS
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:12:17 +0200 wwp wrote: > Hello James, > > > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:06:59 + James Pearson > wrote: > > > wwp wrote: > > >>> > > >>> They obviously felt more comfortable instead released the older one on > > >>> EL6 this cycle, but I suspect that the newer 52.x ESR version will be > > >>> released during the next cycle. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Indeed, the latest RHEL 6 update for firefox is the 52.1.0 ESR release: > > >> > > >> This update upgrades Firefox to version 52.1.0 ESR. > > > > > > Sorry for jumping into this topic from nowhere.. does this mean that we > > > could get a Firefox v52 running on a CentOS 6? > > > > Yes, not 'could' but 'will' ... > > Hah. Good news! In fact, not really good news. Firefox 52 is damn slow compared to 45. Every major upgrade shows a slower Firefox, what's wrong w/ it? Regards, -- wwp pgp875Z1641It.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 cloned VM cannot boot
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm struggling to make a cloned CentOS 7 VM (under KVM) to work. > > The VM was cloned using mondorestore. Restore appears successful but the VM > won't boot; see: > > http://iweb.noa.gr/files/centos7/supergrub2-scratchvm-20170503-04.png Does the UUID of root filesystem in /etc/fstab match the actual UUID as reported by blkid? And remove /etc/lvm/cache/.cache if it exists Marcelo "¿No será acaso que esta vida moderna está teniendo más de moderna que de vida?" (Mafalda) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 cloned VM cannot boot
On 3/5/2017 10:41 μμ, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote: Does the UUID of root filesystem in /etc/fstab match the actual UUID as reported by blkid? And remove/etc/lvm/cache/.cache if it exists Thank you Marcelo for replying, The directory /etc/lvm/cache/ is empty. And, yes, the UUID matches: # blkid /dev/vda1: UUID="297e2939-d6f5-431a-9813-9848368ee306" TYPE="xfs" /dev/vda2: UUID="OR1eUA-1hhb-PCff-qybQ-rLt4-JuTN-EcWX61" TYPE="LVM2_member" /dev/sr0: UUID="2017-03-16-21-15-06-00" LABEL="ISOIMAGE" TYPE="iso9660" PTTYPE="PMBR" /dev/mapper/centos-root: UUID="fcee6215-e97a-4a4f-9473-5115f8559683" TYPE="xfs" /dev/mapper/centos-swap: UUID="b220b45f-ae22-4393-a74d-90b03d37c41b" TYPE="swap" # cat /etc/fstab # # /etc/fstab # Created by anaconda on Thu Dec 8 13:40:06 2016 # # Accessible filesystems, by reference, are maintained under '/dev/disk' # See man pages fstab(5), findfs(8), mount(8) and/or blkid(8) for more info # /dev/mapper/centos-root / xfs defaults0 0 UUID=297e2939-d6f5-431a-9813-9848368ee306 /boot xfs defaults0 0 /dev/mapper/centos-swap swapswap defaults0 0 10.201.40.34:/data/col1/noc-bkups-1 /mnt/dd2500-1 nfs auto,noatime,nolock,bg,nfsvers=3,intr,tcp,actimeo=1800 0 0 Any other ideas? Thanks, Nick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] package internet-browser?
On 05/03/2017 08:15 AM, John Hodrien wrote: On Wed, 3 May 2017, Kay Schenk wrote: On 05/02/2017 09:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Kay Schenk wrote: > On 05/01/2017 06:10 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On May 1, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > What can anyone tell me about package internet-browser? > > > > > > Through the gnome package app, there seems to be NO meta info > > > > I can’t find any packages called 'internet-browser’ for CentOS6 or 7, > > in > > either the base repos or EPEL. pkgs.org doesn’t know about it either. > > > > Do you have any extra repositories added? > > Yes, but...this ONLY shows up through the gnome package kit app -- > gpk-application. It does NPT show up either through the yum repos or > rpm. Is it some kind of system alias? It's 128.9 MB. > > Yesterday, when I was having so much trouble with the latest FF 52, I > uninstalled internet-browser thing which also uninstalled FF 52. OK, all > good. I cleared my yum cache, then re-installed FF 45. This item came > back through gpk-application. Rather confused at this point. > > I'm on CentOS 6.9, 32 bit. > Silly thought: if you *have* that package installed, and want to upgrade it... what repo does rpm -qi internet-browser tell you it's from. See my previous reply -- it DOES not show up in an rpm query. I am not using konqueror. I will try to track this down further. It MUST be an alias that's set up in gnome. I don't suppose there's any chance that it could be the konqueror browswer? Surely this isn't anything complicated? # yum groupinfo internet-browser Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security, versionlock Setting up Group Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Group: Internet Browser Description: Firefox web browser Default Packages: firefox nspluginwrapper totem-mozplugin jh HA! I did do "yum info internet-browser" but did not use the groupinfo option. So thanks. Mystery solved! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -- MzK "Since each of us is blessed with only one life, why not live it with a cat?" -- Robert Stearns ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] External drive, BackupPC service, and booting
I'm using an external drive with BackupPC on CentOS 7. I currently have a mount entry like this in fstab: /dev/disk/by-label/backuppc4 /var/lib/BackupPC ext4 noauto,rw 0 0 This means I must manually mount the drive and then start the backuppc service. Is there a way to set up hotplugging so that the drive is mounted if present at boot time but doesn't stop the boot if it's not present or otherwise fails? I see the fstab nofail option. Will that do what I want? Is there a way to set up the backuppc service (through systemd) so that it starts if and only if the drive is present, or starts if the drive is plugged in later? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
