Re: [CentOS] GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??
On 02/16/2017 09:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/16/2017 04:45 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: >> The source RPMs for devtoolset don't appear to be there, but I did find >> them here: >> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHSCL/SRPMS/ > > > Possibly a result of an unspecified "accident" > > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2017-February/015676.html > indeed .. but everything that ends up released for devtoolset (or any other scl items) are built in the Community Build System. Here are where all the builds for EL6 devtoolset live: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=tag&terms=*devtoolset*el6* signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??
On 02/17/2017 06:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/16/2017 09:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 04:45 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: >>> The source RPMs for devtoolset don't appear to be there, but I did find >>> them here: >>> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHSCL/SRPMS/ >> >> >> Possibly a result of an unspecified "accident" >> >> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2017-February/015676.html >> > > indeed .. but everything that ends up released for devtoolset (or any > other scl items) are built in the Community Build System. > > Here are where all the builds for EL6 devtoolset live: > > http://cbs.centos.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=tag&terms=*devtoolset*el6* Not only are all the devtoolset SRPMS there, so are all of the build requirements that are not in the other location .. and if you want, every build log (and build root log) for any built SRPM so you can see the exact packages in the build root, etc. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] IPv6 broken on Linode
--On Thursday, February 16, 2017 10:12 AM + Pete Biggs wrote: As I said, you need to look at dhclient configuration and command line options. If you have NetworkManager running then it will be controlling what dhclient does so manual editing the files will not work. Use nmcli to see what's happening and modify the configuration. It's not so much that editing files won't work, but that in many cases editing the files you're used to won't work. They're now generated from new flat files, and you have to dig around to figure out where the new configuration is hidden. It's a learning curve we all hate to climb, of course. Fortunately we have the source code for when the documentation is inadequate! We see the same thing with the new firewalld. iptables didn't go away. It's just hidden behind firewalld configuration, which automatically writes iptables rules. I liken it to going from assembly language to a higher level language to describe my programming problems. And the new systems usually provide back doors that let you drop down to the more detailed implementation layer if absolutely needed. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] USB 2.0 device on a USB 3.0 plug
--On Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:58 PM -0500 Jerry Geis wrote: [495043.100076] usb 5-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 The USB driver uses negative values of the errors from /usr/include/asm-generic/errno.h. 71 is EPROTO, a protocol error. Check the USB driver source code to see what would elicit this error. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] USB 2.0 device on a USB 3.0 plug
On 02/16/2017 11:58 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > When I plug in my device which is USB 2.0 into a 3.0 slot (cause that is > all I have) > [495042.943074] usb 5-2: new low-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd > [495043.100076] usb 5-2: device descriptor read/64, error -71 > > I receive the above error. > > Is there a flag or setting that tells the USB to in a 2.0 mode ? You should be able to use USB2 devices in a USB3 port with no issues, as others have said, they use different pins and both are there. I have never seen anyone have to do anything to use USB2 devices on a USB3 port except plug it in. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] current situation with flash plugins?
Is Adobe the only provider of flash plugins? Is it still a gaping security hole? Do the answers depend on the browser? -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] About the flash-plugin
On Feb 16, 2017 9:11 AM, wrote: Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:39 PM, wrote: > >> Y'all may remember I posted here weeks ago, that flash-plugin was >> crashing. There was an update this morning, which I did on my >> workstation... and it hasn't crashed all day on either of the two radio >> stations who I listen to via streaming media. >> >> That is good news. What station are you listening to? > Same as I was last month: kut.edu, UT at Austin, and wqxr.org, a radio station out of NYC. mark Good to hear you are back in the air ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] current situation with flash plugins?
Michael Hennebry wrote: > Is Adobe the only provider of flash plugins? As far as I know. It *is* their product. > Is it still a gaping security hole? noscript is my answer to that. > Do the answers depend on the browser? I don't think so. I'm sure someone here will correct me if I'm wrong. > -- > Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu > "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, > a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." I'm sorry, that password algorithm isn't viable... there's no reliable source of virgins. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
More joy with Centos 7. I am having permission problems with Postfixadmin. I am installing as I have in my notes I did in Centos6 and it is not working. I untar Postfixadmin into /usr/share. The owner is root:root (I even tried root:apache). My postfixadmin.conf file has: alias /mailadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin AllowOverride AuthConfig And I get when I try fqdn/mailadmin You don't have permission to access /mailadmin on this server. When I google this message, I am getting that httpd is not allowing me access. I have even added: allow from all To the above .conf with no change. This is not a SELInux problem as I tried 'setenforce 0' and still get the error. It is as if there is some new security setting in httpd for files not in the www dir (default of /var/www/). Any ideas? thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??
On 02/17/2017 04:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: Here are where all the builds for EL6 devtoolset live: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=tag&terms=*devtoolset*el6* Thanks. Should we report the packages missing from "vault" somewhere? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 12:02 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > More joy with Centos 7. > > I am having permission problems with Postfixadmin. I am installing as > I have in my notes I did in Centos6 and it is not working. > > I untar Postfixadmin into /usr/share. The owner is root:root (I even > tried root:apache). My postfixadmin.conf file has: > > alias /mailadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin > > AllowOverride AuthConfig > > > And I get when I try fqdn/mailadmin > > You don't have permission to access /mailadmin on this server. > > > It is as if there is some new security setting in httpd for files not > in the www dir (default of /var/www/). No, accessing directories outside document root is perfectly acceptable behaviour as far as I can see. > > Any ideas? > Just to check, you did restart/reload apache after making the changes? What do the apache logs say about it? That will tell you if it's a permissions problem or a redirection issue. P. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On Feb 17, 2017 12:03 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: More joy with Centos 7. I am having permission problems with Postfixadmin. I am installing as I have in my notes I did in Centos6 and it is not working. I untar Postfixadmin into /usr/share. The owner is root:root (I even tried root:apache). My postfixadmin.conf file has: alias /mailadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin AllowOverride AuthConfig I What is the setting "allowoveride"? What does it mean? And I get when I try fqdn/mailadmin You don't have permission to access /mailadmin on this server. When I google this message, I am getting that httpd is not allowing me access. I have even added: allow from all To the above .conf with no change. This is not a SELInux problem as I tried 'setenforce 0' and still get the error. It is as if there is some new security setting in httpd for files not in the www dir (default of /var/www/). Any ideas? thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
> > What is the setting "allowoveride"? What does it mean? > > It tells apache to obey .htaccess files in the document directory - in other words it "allows" the .htaccess file to "override" the configured parameters. The arguments to it say what subset of commands can be overridden - AuthConfig allows authorisation configuration. P. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On 02/17/2017 12:42 PM, Istimsak Abdulbasir wrote: On Feb 17, 2017 12:03 PM, "Robert Moskowitz" wrote: More joy with Centos 7. I am having permission problems with Postfixadmin. I am installing as I have in my notes I did in Centos6 and it is not working. I untar Postfixadmin into /usr/share. The owner is root:root (I even tried root:apache). My postfixadmin.conf file has: alias /mailadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin AllowOverride AuthConfig I What is the setting "allowoveride"? What does it mean? https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/core.html#allowoverride This has been in the default postfixadmin.conf for many years. And I get when I try fqdn/mailadmin You don't have permission to access /mailadmin on this server. When I google this message, I am getting that httpd is not allowing me access. I have even added: allow from all To the above .conf with no change. This is not a SELInux problem as I tried 'setenforce 0' and still get the error. It is as if there is some new security setting in httpd for files not in the www dir (default of /var/www/). Any ideas? thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On 02/17/2017 12:42 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 12:02 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: More joy with Centos 7. I am having permission problems with Postfixadmin. I am installing as I have in my notes I did in Centos6 and it is not working. I untar Postfixadmin into /usr/share. The owner is root:root (I even tried root:apache). My postfixadmin.conf file has: alias /mailadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin AllowOverride AuthConfig And I get when I try fqdn/mailadmin You don't have permission to access /mailadmin on this server. It is as if there is some new security setting in httpd for files not in the www dir (default of /var/www/). No, accessing directories outside document root is perfectly acceptable behaviour as far as I can see. Any ideas? Just to check, you did restart/reload apache after making the changes? What do the apache logs say about it? That will tell you if it's a permissions problem or a redirection issue. From error.log: [Fri Feb 17 12:56:33.478024 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5759] [client 192.168.160.12:48290] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin Which is: 4 drwxrwxr-x. 17 root apache 4096 Feb 16 19:33 postfixadmin I originally had ownership of root:root. Same error. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
> > From error.log: > > [Fri Feb 17 12:56:33.478024 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5759] [client > 192.168.160.12:48290] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: > /usr/share/postfixadmin So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change Order allow,deny Allow from all to the apache 2.4 version Require all granted See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html P. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Oracle support 12c
All, I know it might sound a repetitive question although I have not found anything to help me online. Anyone knows if Oracle support will support CentOS with Oracle 12c? I know RHEL 6 & 7 is listed as supported OS, but I want to double check if that includes CentOS 6 & 7. The reason I am asking is because I want to migrate all servers I am receiving from old management to CentOS, currently is a mixed between SLES and RHEL Any insight will be appreciated Thank you, ms Mario Silva IT Systems Administrator New Mexico Department of Public Safety Information Technology Division 4491 Cerrillos Road P.O. Box 1628 Santa Fe NM 87507-1628 Phone: (505) 827-3430 Cell: (505) 670-1824 Email: mario.si...@state.nm.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] getting files from a samsung flip phone
I'm trying to copy file from my samsung flip phone. google has informed me of libmtp and gvfs, but it doesn't seem to be helping. [root@localhost yum.repos.d]# mtp-detect libmtp version: 1.0.1 Listing raw device(s) No raw devices found. [root@localhost yum.repos.d]# In case it helps, I did a diff of ls -R from /dev before and after USB connection: [hennebry@localhost dev]$ diff /tmp/dev[12].txt | tee /tmp/dev.dif 89a90 serial 166a168 ttyACM0 257a260 011 330a334 166:0 336a341 189:138 577a583,592 ./serial: by-id by-path ./serial/by-id: usb-SAMSUNG_Electronics_Bo._Ltd._Samsung_SCH-u365-if00 ./serial/by-path: pci-:00:1d.7-usb-0:2.4:1.0 [hennebry@localhost dev]$ Any ideas? -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On 02/17/2017 01:11 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: From error.log: [Fri Feb 17 12:56:33.478024 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5759] [client 192.168.160.12:48290] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change Order allow,deny Allow from all to the apache 2.4 version Require all granted See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html Thing is, I don't have an .htaccess file ANYWHERE on this system. I checked. I'll make one. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Working on installing mailgraph on Centos7-arm - challenges with rpms
One of the joys with getting a little ahead of where epel-armv7hl is, is trying to install packages where not all the dependencies have been debugged. So I am trying to install mailgraph, that i get the noarch rpm from Centos7-x86_64. But it needs RRD which I actually got from the armv7hl building; it just did not make it to the repo. But it wants libpango and libpangocairo. I can't find what provides those. They are not anywhere available to my Fedora 24 notebook and I don't have any 'normal' Centos7 system these days. thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On 02/17/2017 01:11 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: From error.log: [Fri Feb 17 12:56:33.478024 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5759] [client 192.168.160.12:48290] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change Order allow,deny Allow from all to the apache 2.4 version Require all granted See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html Not there still. In /var/www/html I created .htaccess: # ls -lstra total 12 4 drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Feb 6 16:06 .. 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Feb 17 13:32 . 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root apache 21 Feb 17 13:32 .htaccess # cat .htaccess Require all granted restarted httpd, and still get the error. [Fri Feb 17 13:36:17.366525 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5844] [client 192.168.160.12:48370] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert > Moskowitz > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 1:40 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin > > So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change > > > >Order allow,deny > >Allow from all > > > > to the apache 2.4 version > > > >Require all granted > > > > See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html > > Not there still. In /var/www/html I created .htaccess: > > # ls -lstra > total 12 > 4 drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Feb 6 16:06 .. > 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Feb 17 13:32 . > 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root apache 21 Feb 17 13:32 .htaccess > > # cat .htaccess > Require all granted > > > restarted httpd, and still get the error. > > [Fri Feb 17 13:36:17.366525 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5844] [client > 192.168.160.12:48370] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: > /usr/share/postfixadmin Does the conf file that contains the "/usr/share/postfixadmin" alias also contain a Directory block? Something like this: Alias /postfixadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin ...stuff here... Look for the old style "Order Deny,Allow" and "Deny from All" and remove them if it does, and put the "Require all granted" there. Al McCann ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 02/17/2017 01:11 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: >>> From error.log: >>> >>> [Fri Feb 17 12:56:33.478024 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5759] [client >>> 192.168.160.12:48290] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: >>> /usr/share/postfixadmin >> So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change >> >>Order allow,deny >>Allow from all >> >> to the apache 2.4 version >> >>Require all granted >> >> See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html > > Not there still. In /var/www/html I created .htaccess: > > # ls -lstra > total 12 > 4 drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Feb 6 16:06 .. > 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Feb 17 13:32 . > 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root apache 21 Feb 17 13:32 .htaccess > > # cat .htaccess > Require all granted > > > restarted httpd, and still get the error. > > [Fri Feb 17 13:36:17.366525 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5844] [client > 192.168.160.12:48370] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: > /usr/share/postfixadmin Do you have an authz.conf file? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SOLVED - Re: Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On 02/17/2017 01:52 PM, Albert McCann wrote: -Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert Moskowitz Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 1:40 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change Order allow,deny Allow from all to the apache 2.4 version Require all granted See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html Not there still. In /var/www/html I created .htaccess: # ls -lstra total 12 4 drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Feb 6 16:06 .. 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Feb 17 13:32 . 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root apache 21 Feb 17 13:32 .htaccess # cat .htaccess Require all granted restarted httpd, and still get the error. [Fri Feb 17 13:36:17.366525 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5844] [client 192.168.160.12:48370] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin Does the conf file that contains the "/usr/share/postfixadmin" alias also contain a Directory block? Something like this: Alias /postfixadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin ...stuff here... Look for the old style "Order Deny,Allow" and "Deny from All" and remove them if it does, and put the "Require all granted" there. Pingo. I had a 'allow from all' there. Changed it to: # cat /etc/httpd/conf.d/postfixadmin.conf alias /mailadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin AllowOverride AuthConfig #allow from all Require all granted and it works. THANKS. Going to have to seriously read that upgrading page... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On 02/17/2017 01:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 02/17/2017 01:11 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: From error.log: [Fri Feb 17 12:56:33.478024 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5759] [client 192.168.160.12:48290] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change Order allow,deny Allow from all to the apache 2.4 version Require all granted See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html Not there still. In /var/www/html I created .htaccess: # ls -lstra total 12 4 drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Feb 6 16:06 .. 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Feb 17 13:32 . 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root apache 21 Feb 17 13:32 .htaccess # cat .htaccess Require all granted restarted httpd, and still get the error. [Fri Feb 17 13:36:17.366525 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5844] [client 192.168.160.12:48370] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin Do you have an authz.conf file? No authz.conf anywhere on the system. Thanks for the advice, but I got it now. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] current situation with flash plugins?
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:13:15AM -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote > Is Adobe the only provider of flash plugins? Yes. > Is it still a gaping security hole? If not kept up-to-date, yes. Adobe changed their minds a few months ago, and now provide up-to-date Flash 24.X for linux, complete with security patches as required. Of course, "zero-day exploits" can still happen. > Do the answers depend on the browser? Most browsers nowadays have the option to set one of 3 values... 1) Never activate 2) Ask-to-Activate (like the old NoFlash plugin) 3) Always activate The settings can be different for each profile. If you often visit a site that requires flash, you can set up a separate profile for it, and select option 3. For other profiles, you can use options 1 and/or 2. -- Walter Dnes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
My memory may be flawed, but I think the .htaccess is a hidden file just change its properties. john On 2/17/2017 1:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 02/17/2017 01:11 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: From error.log: [Fri Feb 17 12:56:33.478024 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5759] [client 192.168.160.12:48290] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change Order allow,deny Allow from all to the apache 2.4 version Require all granted See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html Thing is, I don't have an .htaccess file ANYWHERE on this system. I checked. I'll make one. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
On 02/17/2017 02:15 PM, John Plemons wrote: My memory may be flawed, but I think the .htaccess is a hidden file just change its properties. Yes, it is hidden, but 'ls -lsa' will show it. And mlocate's updatedb finds them as in: # locate .bash_history /home/rgm/.bash_history /root/.bash_history which is another hidden file. I use locate a lot. 'Where did I put the that write up on xyz?' Locate with grep are my friends. john On 2/17/2017 1:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 02/17/2017 01:11 PM, Pete Biggs wrote: From error.log: [Fri Feb 17 12:56:33.478024 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5759] [client 192.168.160.12:48290] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: /usr/share/postfixadmin So it's an authorisation issue. In your .htaccess file change Order allow,deny Allow from all to the apache 2.4 version Require all granted See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/upgrading.html Thing is, I don't have an .htaccess file ANYWHERE on this system. I checked. I'll make one. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RAID questions
On 02/16/2017 09:18 PM, Keith Keller wrote: Doesn't mdraid support changing RAID levels? It supports a small number of conversions. See the "GROW MODE" section of mdadm for details. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] getting files from a samsung flip phone
> [root@localhost yum.repos.d]# mtp-detect > libmtp version: 1.0.1 > > Listing raw device(s) > No raw devices found. Does your phone have a usb setting for phone versus mtp mode? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
> > Not there still. In /var/www/html I created .htaccess: > > # ls -lstra > total 12 > 4 drwxr-xr-x. 4 root root 4096 Feb 6 16:06 .. > 4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Feb 17 13:32 . > 4 -rw-r--r--. 1 root apache 21 Feb 17 13:32 .htaccess > > # cat .htaccess > Require all granted > > > restarted httpd, and still get the error. > > [Fri Feb 17 13:36:17.366525 2017] [authz_core:error] [pid 5844] [client > 192.168.160.12:48370] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: > /usr/share/postfixadmin > That's not how the .htaccess file works. It needs to be in the directory specified in the postfixadmin.conf file - i.e. the configuration AllowOverride AuthConfig means to look in the .htaccess file in /usr/share/postfixadmin when accessing any file in that directory (and below) for authorisation information. Putting it in /var/www/html will have no effect. P. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
> > Thing is, I don't have an .htaccess file ANYWHERE on this system. I > checked. > If you don't have a .htaccess file, then why have the AllowOverride directive in the .conf file? Putting AllowOverride in means that every time apache retrieves a file from that directory, *and every directory below*, it will look for a .htaccess file in the current directory, and every directory above (until it reaches the original directory). It doesn't cache the information (because it can change), so it means a significant increase in the amount of disk activity for each page. It also provides another attack surface for naughty people. So in general if you don't use, or intend to use, .htaccess files, then don't put in the AllowOverride directive. P. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SOLVED - Re: Centos 7 httpd Permission problems with Postfixadmin
> > Changed it to: > > # cat /etc/httpd/conf.d/postfixadmin.conf > alias /mailadmin /usr/share/postfixadmin > > AllowOverride AuthConfig > #allow from all > Require all granted > Yes, all directories need to have 'Require all granted' on them somewhere - if you look in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf there is the definition of the default document root and in that it has the Require line - that is inherited by all subdirectories so you don't need to explicitly state it. But if you use a directory outside document root, then you need to put it into the definition. And again if you don't intend to use .htaccess files, then remove the AllowOverride line. P. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle support 12c
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:17:40PM +, Silva-Borrego, Mario, DPS wrote: > All, > > I know it might sound a repetitive question although I have not found > anything to help me online. > > Anyone knows if Oracle support will support CentOS with Oracle 12c? I know > RHEL 6 & 7 is listed as supported OS, but I want to double check if that > includes CentOS 6 & 7. > > The reason I am asking is because I want to migrate all servers I am > receiving from old management to CentOS, currently is a mixed between SLES > and RHEL > > Any insight will be appreciated > > Thank you, > > ms I don't think Oracle ever mentions CentOS in their compatibility matrices. They would be compatible with Oracle Linux 6 and 7, of course, which should by itself infer compatibility with EL6, EL7, and Centos 6 and 7. But "compatibility" may not translate to "support". -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord is like a strong tower. Those who do what is right can run to him for safety. --- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Oracle support 12c
In business world this kind of thing is always negotiable. Every situation is different, and it ultimately depends on how much leverage you have, like how many instances and what level of support you have and are buying, and your relationship with Oracle sales rep. I don't know your situation, but I'll likely stay with RHEL (or Unbreakable) if I need Oracle support. The cost of RHEL won't add too much to the opex, but having someone to call in case of a meltdown is critical for your CIO's career. Yan > On Feb 17, 2017, at 2:35 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:17:40PM +, Silva-Borrego, Mario, DPS wrote: >> All, >> >> I know it might sound a repetitive question although I have not found >> anything to help me online. >> >> Anyone knows if Oracle support will support CentOS with Oracle 12c? I know >> RHEL 6 & 7 is listed as supported OS, but I want to double check if that >> includes CentOS 6 & 7. >> >> The reason I am asking is because I want to migrate all servers I am >> receiving from old management to CentOS, currently is a mixed between SLES >> and RHEL >> >> Any insight will be appreciated >> >> Thank you, >> >> ms > > I don't think Oracle ever mentions CentOS in their compatibility matrices. > They would be compatible with Oracle Linux 6 and 7, of course, which should > by itself infer compatibility with EL6, EL7, and Centos 6 and 7. But > "compatibility" may not translate to "support". > > -- > Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - >The Lord is like a strong tower. > Those who do what is right can run to him for safety. > --- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) - > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos 7: .tons of messages logs (systemd-logind[663]: Got message type....)
On my Centos 7 update, into "journalctl -f" I have tons of this kind of message > feb 17 23:52:09 s-ispc.local systemd-logind[663]: Got message type=signal > sender=:1.0 destination=n/a > object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/php_2dfpm_2eservice > interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties member=PropertiesChanged > cookie=17152 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a > feb 17 23:52:09 s-ispc.local systemd-logind[663]: Got message type=signal > sender=:1.0 destination=n/a > object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/php_2dfpm_2eservice > interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties member=PropertiesChanged > cookie=17153 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a > feb 17 23:52:11 s-ispc.local systemd-logind[663]: Got message type=signal > sender=:1.0 destination=n/a > object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/httpd_2eservice > interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties member=PropertiesChanged > cookie=17154 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a > feb 17 23:52:11 s-ispc.local systemd-logind[663]: Got message type=signal > sender=:1.0 destination=n/a > object=/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/httpd_2eservice > interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties member=PropertiesChanged > cookie=17155 reply_cookie=0 error=n/a And into /var/log/messages I have this warning message: > rsyslogd-2177: imjournal: begin to drop messages due to rate-limiting What is happening? It is possible to stop this message? Many thanks -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 25 Workstation) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] getting files from a samsung flip phone
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Joseph L. Casale wrote: [root@localhost yum.repos.d]# mtp-detect libmtp version: 1.0.1 Listing raw device(s) No raw devices found. Does your phone have a usb setting for phone versus mtp mode? I think it doesn't. From dmesg: usb 2-2.4: USB disconnect, device number 10 usb 2-2.4: new full speed USB device number 11 using ehci_hcd usb 2-2.4: New USB device found, idVendor=04e8, idProduct=6640 usb 2-2.4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 usb 2-2.4: Product: Samsung SCH-u365 usb 2-2.4: Manufacturer: SAMSUNG Electronics Bo.,Ltd. usb 2-2.4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice cdc_acm 2-2.4:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device usb 2-2.4: USB disconnect, device number 11 [hennebry@localhost dev]$ googling SCH-u365 got me to http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SCH-U365HAAVZW-specs : Connectivity FeaturesBluetooth®; Bluetooth® Profiles, HFP, HSP, OPP, PBAP, SPP No mtp unless it's going by an alias or I'm looking in the wrong place. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RAID questions
On 2017-02-17, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/16/2017 9:18 PM, Keith Keller wrote: >>> Only some systems support that sort of restriping, and its a dangerous >>> activity (if the power fails or system crashes midway through the >>> restriping operation, its probably not restartable, you quite likely >>> will lose the whole volume) >> Doesn't mdraid support changing RAID levels? I think it will even do it >> reasonably safely (though still better not to have a power failure!). I >> have a vague memory of adding a drive to a RAID5 and converting it to a >> RAID6 but I could be misremembering. > > any such operation requires the entire raid to be re-slivered, stripe by > stripe, as ALL the data moves around. on a large raid made from > multi-terabyte drives, this would take DAYS. Yes, it would take a long time, but the man page for mdadm implies that it's reasonably safe (sorry for long lines): Changing the number of active devices in a RAID5 or RAID6 is much more effort. Every block in the array will need to be read and written back to a new location. From 2.6.17, the Linux Ker- nel is able to increase the number of devices in a RAID5 safely, including restarting an inter- rupted "reshape". From 2.6.31, the Linux Kernel is able to increase or decrease the number of devices in a RAID5 or RAID6. [...] When relocating the first few stripes on a RAID5 or RAID6, it is not possible to keep the data on disk completely consistent and crash-proof. To provide the required safety, mdadm disables writes to the array while this "critical section" is reshaped, and takes a backup of the data that is in that section. For grows, this backup may be stored in any spare devices that the array has, however it can also be stored in a separate file specified with the --backup-file option, and is required to be specified for shrinks, RAID level changes and layout changes. If this option is used, and the system does crash during the critical period, the same file must be passed to --assemble to restore the backup and reassemble the array. When shrinking rather than growing the array, the reshape is done from the end towards the beginning, so the "critical sec- tion" is at the end of the reshape. (Thanks to Gordon for the pointer to the GROW section of the mdam man page.) It's been a long time since I did this, but I seem to remember resizing an md array of ~10 2TB drives in a RAID5 by adding one drive and reshaping to RAID6, and it took 2-3 days. The old 3ware controllers claimed to be able to support this sort of reshaping, but I only tried once and it failed. I don't know if LSI or Areca supports it. --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] getting files from a samsung flip phone
On 02/17/2017 06:01 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Joseph L. Casale wrote: [root@localhost yum.repos.d]# mtp-detect libmtp version: 1.0.1 Listing raw device(s) No raw devices found. Does your phone have a usb setting for phone versus mtp mode? I think it doesn't. From dmesg: usb 2-2.4: USB disconnect, device number 10 usb 2-2.4: new full speed USB device number 11 using ehci_hcd usb 2-2.4: New USB device found, idVendor=04e8, idProduct=6640 usb 2-2.4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 usb 2-2.4: Product: Samsung SCH-u365 usb 2-2.4: Manufacturer: SAMSUNG Electronics Bo.,Ltd. usb 2-2.4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice cdc_acm 2-2.4:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device usb 2-2.4: USB disconnect, device number 11 [hennebry@localhost dev]$ googling SCH-u365 got me to http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SCH-U365HAAVZW-specs : Connectivity Features Bluetooth®; Bluetooth® Profiles, HFP, HSP, OPP, PBAP, SPP No mtp unless it's going by an alias or I'm looking in the wrong place. It has very limited bluetooth and basically, it thinks it's a modem ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
