Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7.3 released

[Johnny Hughes]

On 11/04/2016 07:59 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 11/04/2016 04:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> As a heads up RHEL 7.3 is released:
> 
> 
> 
> I will try to tweet updates (@JohnnyCentOS) and post updates here
> throughout the build period.
> 

Latest Update Tweet is:
http://bit.ly/2eLVO3i

First pass through on CentOS7 (1611) build: 559 SRPMs, 419 good, 140
need work. Build results as we progress: http://bit.ly/2fsB95Q

Getting back at it.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] FireFox and Plugins

[Alice Wonder]

On 11/04/2016 06:00 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:

On 11/04/2016 05:09 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:10:20AM +, James Pearson wrote:


It shows up when I run Firefox - in both about:plugins and
about:addons ->
Plugins

If you use a central Mozilla autoconfig file setup - see, for example:





then you can use the following line to disable this plug-in:

 lockPref("plugin.state.librhythmbox-itms-detection-plugin", 0);

(and similar lines to disable any other plug-in)

James Pearson


With all the talk about deleting a packaged file or rebuilding a base
package, I'm surprised no one has noticed this solution.  The above is
most likely the best solution. Easy to deploy through CM, won't be
overwritten with package updates, and is the best for "Enterprise"
customers (who deploy to hundreds or thousands of computers).

I'm already using something similar to change the default home page.



Thank you, that looks like what I originally was seeking - a way to
blacklist the plugin.


Even with the plugin disabled, it still shows up in browser fingerprinting.

Effing firefox, that's just dumb.

Time to rebuild the RPM without it. Er, well, I'll wait for CentOS 7.3. 
Er, um, I mean branch 1611 :P


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] FireFox and Plugins

[Leon Fauster]

Am 06.11.2016 um 18:37 schrieb Alice Wonder :
> On 11/04/2016 06:00 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:
>> On 11/04/2016 05:09 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:10:20AM +, James Pearson wrote:
>>> 
>>> With all the talk about deleting a packaged file or rebuilding a base
>>> package, I'm surprised no one has noticed this solution.  The above is
>>> most likely the best solution. Easy to deploy through CM, won't be
>>> overwritten with package updates, and is the best for "Enterprise"
>>> customers (who deploy to hundreds or thousands of computers).
>>> 
>>> I'm already using something similar to change the default home page.
>>> 
>> 
>> Thank you, that looks like what I originally was seeking - a way to
>> blacklist the plugin.
> 
> Even with the plugin disabled, it still shows up in browser fingerprinting.
> 
> Effing firefox, that's just dumb.
> 
> Time to rebuild the RPM without it. Er, well, I'll wait for CentOS 7.3. Er, 
> um, I mean branch 1611 :P


as already suggested - build your own meta package with trigger scripts, to 
address future updates.

--
LF

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] FireFox and Plugins

[Alice Wonder]

On 11/06/2016 03:39 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:

Am 06.11.2016 um 18:37 schrieb Alice Wonder :

On 11/04/2016 06:00 AM, Alice Wonder wrote:

On 11/04/2016 05:09 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:10:20AM +, James Pearson wrote:

With all the talk about deleting a packaged file or rebuilding a base
package, I'm surprised no one has noticed this solution.  The above is
most likely the best solution. Easy to deploy through CM, won't be
overwritten with package updates, and is the best for "Enterprise"
customers (who deploy to hundreds or thousands of computers).

I'm already using something similar to change the default home page.



Thank you, that looks like what I originally was seeking - a way to
blacklist the plugin.


Even with the plugin disabled, it still shows up in browser fingerprinting.

Effing firefox, that's just dumb.

Time to rebuild the RPM without it. Er, well, I'll wait for CentOS 7.3. Er, um, 
I mean branch 1611 :P



as already suggested - build your own meta package with trigger scripts, to 
address future updates.



Actually kind of just thinking of putting something in cron.hourly to 
remove it. Easier to debug if it doesn't work. KISS.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Need help getting two NICs to work on CentOS 7

[Sean Son]

Hello all

Here is the scenario:  We have a mail server VM which currently has two
virtual NICs attached to it. One NIC is has an IP on a subnet with a
default gateway defined and the other NIC has an IP on a different subnet
with a different gateway on a different VLAN defined. Now when I activate
both NICs, and run an ifconfig -a, I see that both IP addresses are
showing. Now here is the problem. When I ping the VM, the first NIC's IP is
not pingable at all, but the second NIC's IP is pingable. How do I
configure the networking so that both IPs are pingable and the VM is
reachable via both IPs? Please let me know what I may be doing wrong!


Thank you!

Sean
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Need help getting two NICs to work on CentOS 7

[Digimer]

On 07/11/16 02:00 AM, Sean Son wrote:
> Hello all
> 
> Here is the scenario:  We have a mail server VM which currently has two
> virtual NICs attached to it. One NIC is has an IP on a subnet with a
> default gateway defined and the other NIC has an IP on a different subnet
> with a different gateway on a different VLAN defined. Now when I activate
> both NICs, and run an ifconfig -a, I see that both IP addresses are
> showing. Now here is the problem. When I ping the VM, the first NIC's IP is
> not pingable at all, but the second NIC's IP is pingable. How do I
> configure the networking so that both IPs are pingable and the VM is
> reachable via both IPs? Please let me know what I may be doing wrong!

We're missing a lot of details, but to speak generally, I'd look at the
bridging on the host if you're confident that the interfaces are
configured properly inside the host.

Also, have you looked at iptables?

-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Need help getting two NICs to work on CentOS 7

[Frank Cox]

On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 02:00:24 -0500
Sean Son wrote:

>  When I ping the VM, the first NIC's IP is
> not pingable at all, but the second NIC's IP is pingable. How do I
> configure the networking so that both IPs are pingable and the VM is
> reachable via both IPs? 

The last time I did that I did it on Centos 5.  Here are my notes from back 
then.

First, add two lines to /etc/iproute2/rt_tables, so it looks like this:

#
# reserved values
#
255 local
254 main
253 default
0   unspec
#
# local
#
#1  inr.ruhep
50  access1
60  access2

Then add the following routes:

ip route add 1.2.3.0/24 dev eth1 table access1
ip route add default via 1.2.3.1 dev eth1 table access1
ip rule add from 1.2.3.178/32 lookup access1

ip route add 1.2.3.0/24 dev eth2 table access2
ip route add default via 1.2.3.1 dev eth2 table access2
ip rule add from 1.2.3.180/32 lookup access2

Of course, in this example 1.2.3.178 is the IP address of the first nic and 
1.2.3.180 is the address of the second nic.


-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos