Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
Hi Geleem, Please have a look below of my result. For my system shows like below. df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda2 909G 576G 287G 67% / tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 3.9G 160M 3.5G 5% /boot /dev/sdb1 916G 382G 488G 44% /bkhdd First hard disk /dev/sda Second hard disk /dev/sdb The problem is in first hard disk show above size but my email box folders having below result. du -hs /* 8.0K/backup 7.5M/bin *382G/bkhdd* 89M /boot 4.0K/cgroup 4.0K/command 208K/dev 79M /etc *386G/home* 4.0K/isoqlog.domains 322M/lib 20K /lost+found 4.0K/media 0 /misc 4.0K/mnt 0 /net 64M /root 14M /sbin 4.0K/selinux 4.0K/service 4.0K/srv 680K/tmp 4.3G/usr 1.9G/var Here /bkhdd is mount in /dev/sdb / is mount in /dev/sda But the size is not match in /dev/sda I am running Centos 6.5 32 bit with CLI Mode. How do i check the cache size in this mode. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:29 PM, g wrote: > > > On 04/06/16 22:44, Chandran Manikandan wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I have running Centos 6.5 32 bit machine. > > This machine is running qmailtoaster packages and mailbox size is 385 GB. > > > > if i run the df -h command it show 385 GB out of 1TB > > > ===> > please post results. > > > I have run the same command today suddenly shows 576 GB out of 1 TB. > > > > I didn't update any bulk file and mail transaction is not very high. > > > > How do i check this issue and fix it. > > > ===> > why do you believe that increase is related to gmailtoaster? > > > how do i find out and why suddenly showing this much of increasing the > size > > of hard disk. > > > ===> > > > Could anyone help me > > > ===> > have you at any time run kde? > > ria, i use kde and some time back, found that depending on how a file > or directory is deleted, deletion is saved in cache. > > is it possible that gnome is doing same? > > > -- > peace out. > > If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... > ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! > -+- > in a world with out fences, who needs gates. > > CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 > > tc,hago. > > g > . > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- *Thanks,* *Manikandan.C* *System Administrator* ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > Hi all, > > Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my CentOS 6.7 > x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore by Google Chrome. > > "This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this > Linux system will no longer be supported." > > Doing some google searches I found this; > > http://superuser.com/questions/1011832/this-computer-will-soon-stop-receiving-google-chrome-updates-because-this-linux > > Which in itself wasn't too uplifting... > Following the suggestion about installing Chromium instead worked, but it > seems to be stuck at an ancient version of the browser. > > Recompiling the available Chromium source is of course an option, but not > for > me. > Not unless there are step-by-step guides doing it. > > There was a rather long and somewhat heated discussion regarding Chrome on > CentOS a while ago. > Was there any real conclusion about Google Chrome on CentOS and how to get > around this problem? > Are the views on this matter still infected? > > I'm not looking forward to go back to the sluggish Firefox. 8-/ > > -- > BW, > Sorin > Bump. Please answer the original question (again) CentOS folks. Where are we with getting the RHEL version of Chromium available for CentOS? There should be no technical reason why we can't get a working, up to date, and therefore secure version of chromium running on CentOS 6.7!! -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/16 04:47, Chandran Manikandan wrote: > Hi Geleem, > Please have a look below of my result. > > For my system shows like below. > df -h > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda2 909G 576G 287G 67% / > tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm > /dev/sda1 3.9G 160M 3.5G 5% /boot > /dev/sdb1 916G 382G 488G 44% /bkhdd > > First hard disk /dev/sda > Second hard disk /dev/sdb > ===> ok. look at size from a diff perspective. in a virtual terminal, enter df -H, then df -h, followed by df -k. are you sizes closer with "-k" ? if in wonder, open second v-term, enter man df to get an understanding of how block size and rounding cause interesting results. same applies to du. neither have a -b to see actual bytes, which i believe is because disk usage is by blocks, not bytes. -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 13:14, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Please answer the original question (again) CentOS folks. > > Where are we with getting the RHEL version of Chromium available > for CentOS? > > There should be no technical reason why we can't get a working, up > to date, and therefore secure version of chromium running on CentOS > 6.7!! Happy to host it, is this something you are working on at the moment Matthew ? Regards, - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXFNIDAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtQQ8IAJ25uWYPsJB0nkTsJu7xX5Ep PlzFbzH3mObvgQ1pN8e5OjHycsLDlv+R2Y1mOl3uY3dbBQ9PQ9QmzkugK7fvVj6t fGVdpCA9sWL3xy8wgOlgPZ24sRodrJ82GTANmwrCxGFEHMCIUQ8szA0YS6cnwPbW sshWA3dHV3/KurlyPeecsTT4MqnM0em3pMZkn2Lk0zW3oaboZyD/9ljCEp3th1lV e+aZwCw1P+DGZHL88CoaQFXPu7BZ+iKAK6JE/6u6Qx4UYh4HMt+9Kx0prwWTjDHK X6qTr3UlcP+pGStNTIgb5A59wLGM+EbhtLZMoo9ozXH1Qszc+bkhanLmY/xV3Tc= =qjV7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 18/04/16 13:14, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Please answer the original question (again) CentOS folks. > > > > Where are we with getting the RHEL version of Chromium available > > for CentOS? > > > > There should be no technical reason why we can't get a working, up > > to date, and therefore secure version of chromium running on CentOS > > 6.7!! > > Happy to host it, is this something you are working on at the moment > Matthew ? > > Regards, > > > - -- > Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project > > Unfortunately, I have neither the time, nor expertise to partake in such a project. Since Mr. Hughes had already gotten earlier versions of chromium to build under CentOS 6 (c.f. http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/), and he indicated it was merely a matter of getting RHEL to give permission for him to redistribute it more "formally" to the community, I was hoping progress had been made with that. Have you, as the CentOS project lead ever asked RedHat if they can make their version of Chromium for CentOS 6 available for us? If not, can you please? Since this seems to come up periodically, there is a demand for it out there. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Sorin Srbu >> Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my CentOS 6.7 >> x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore by Google Chrome. >> >> "This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this >> Linux system will no longer be supported." I wouldn't worry too much about this until it actually happens. It pretty much means that Google is not willing to support running Chrome on CentOS, but then they never did to begin with anyways, it just so happens that the statically-built RPM for Fedora runs on CentOS 7 without issue. It's a scary and pretty much meaningless message. Eventually Chrome will likely require some newer version of a library than is available on CentOS 7, this happened in 6 a few years ago, and when that happens hopefully someone can work on a solution to fix it (possibly back-porting the newer version of said library). >> Following the suggestion about installing Chromium instead worked, but it >> seems to be stuck at an ancient version of the browser. Right, Johnny Hughes (I think) used to build it, but IIRC he had to stop for reasons that you can find by searching this mailing list. Note that I'm personally not interested in getting chrome to work for CentOS 6, but I have a vested interest in keeping it working in 7, so when the time comes I'll very likely find a solution myself and share it. Peter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:37:44AM +1200, Peter wrote: > > Right, Johnny Hughes (I think) used to build it, but IIRC he had to stop > for reasons that you can find by searching this mailing list. > > Note that I'm personally not interested in getting chrome to work for > CentOS 6, but I have a vested interest in keeping it working in 7, so > when the time comes I'll very likely find a solution myself and share it. I think Richard Lloyd had (has?) versions that work, but are usually a bit old. At present, CentOS-7 works with the rpm for Fedora on Google's site. I don't think RedHat had their own official rpm for either RHEL-6 or 7, did (do) they? I eventually updated to CentOS-7 on my main home machine, so I haven't kept up. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 13:34, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Unfortunately, I have neither the time, nor expertise to partake in > such a project. is there someone else on here who can help ? I think if we can demonstrate some traction, it would go a long way in both the upstream engagement and the conversation with Red Hat - since we can then demonstrate a communal win. > Since Mr. Hughes had already gotten earlier versions of chromium > to build under CentOS 6 (c.f. > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/), and he indicated it > was merely a matter of getting RHEL to give permission for him to > redistribute it more "formally" to the community, I was hoping > progress had been made with that. Johnny, can you perhaps quantify the effort a bit ? And if you need help what sort of help you might need for this ? I suspect a large part of that is just going to be time in day. > Have you, as the CentOS project lead ever asked RedHat if they can > make their version of Chromium for CentOS 6 available for us? If > not, can you please? I havent, but am more than willing to take the question up. regards, - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXFNjCAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtUMEH/2Mfo+5+hx4cfD9FvVg6nHQQ m+tbd1Ku/ytstZNhNJpHx95HoeJVfdC71y+6SylLWxxJ+1ridbaZ5t7dC1qEL5Rt hJEG1rIhJNTs4W1eIO4XeEQVzwOjzcsLwtNlTWypd6PVp8RVJqjOFk6ohN/gK3VW hLIoli+hwOdUxY81cbSqVJ+DJjvmBUupiZJqFlsRsutFd/LUL0MsOuexhqTeawIu G6qT/xudeq/eBU4TqPvnpO5NgKHjePTQEuDYmnmjG1F5xrw38HYeg6i3a8Fmv5wc NKuXZy4S8D96EBfm/R9g/RBm7umojXwz7MLkRHd3bq+GLHpa10Onb883XOxDqrU= =UErC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:37:44AM +1200, Peter wrote: > > > > > > Right, Johnny Hughes (I think) used to build it, but IIRC he had to stop > > for reasons that you can find by searching this mailing list. > > > > Note that I'm personally not interested in getting chrome to work for > > CentOS 6, but I have a vested interest in keeping it working in 7, so > > when the time comes I'll very likely find a solution myself and share it. > > I think Richard Lloyd had (has?) versions that work, but are usually a bit > old. > This is just a script that pulls some libraries from a Fedora repo. Unfortunately that approach won't hold muster with security auditors . At present, CentOS-7 works with the rpm for Fedora on Google's site. I > don't think RedHat had their own official rpm for either RHEL-6 or 7, did > (do) they? > > They do, in their Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Supplementary repository. c.f. > I eventually updated to CentOS-7 on my main home machine, so I haven't kept > up. > We have over 150 workstations still on CO 6.7 while we are stuck dealing with all the changes to our environment necessary to code and test because of systemd in CO 7. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Phelps, Matthew > Sent: den 18 april 2016 14:34 > To: Karanbir Singh > Cc: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6? > > Have you, as the CentOS project lead ever asked RedHat if they can make > their version of Chromium for CentOS 6 available for us? If not, can you > please? > > Since this seems to come up periodically, there is a demand for it out > there. Hear, hear! -- //Sorin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 18/04/16 13:34, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Unfortunately, I have neither the time, nor expertise to partake in > > such a project. > > is there someone else on here who can help ? I think if we can > demonstrate some traction, it would go a long way in both the upstream > engagement and the conversation with Red Hat - since we can then > demonstrate a communal win. > > > Since Mr. Hughes had already gotten earlier versions of chromium > > to build under CentOS 6 (c.f. > > http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/), and he indicated it > > was merely a matter of getting RHEL to give permission for him to > > redistribute it more "formally" to the community, I was hoping > > progress had been made with that. > > Johnny, can you perhaps quantify the effort a bit ? And if you need > help what sort of help you might need for this ? I suspect a large > part of that is just going to be time in day. > > > Have you, as the CentOS project lead ever asked RedHat if they can > > make their version of Chromium for CentOS 6 available for us? If > > not, can you please? > > I havent, but am more than willing to take the question up. > > regards, > > - -- > Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat continues to push out updates even. E.g. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:55:12AM -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:37:44AM +1200, Peter wrote: > > > > > > > > > At present, CentOS-7 works with the rpm for Fedora on Google's site. I > > don't think RedHat had their own official rpm for either RHEL-6 or 7, did > > (do) they? > > > > > They do, in their Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Supplementary repository. Ah, thank you, I hadn't known that. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get > this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat > continues to push out updates even. E.g. > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html > that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before. what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that might be ? regards - -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXFOdwAAoJEI3Oi2Mx7xbtbnEH/01QLHrK59zUEiOuBCpDIXtX 1R6NwHp+9wDait8fx1nCydtZN+FSaXLeiOZC1JG+cT8ItOOj5c5iD6pIxp2FJkg1 psBl/Ym6MMJkhTH3ZlRdy6+jsJANy04lfQz4mdkcYqMI6x9++pfoCHLEajatZlPm Aq9CbUtvxvb8Vu3vnhdYbS5JvqTN2InIoGh62BJRuPVApMMkQgS1eQOfBnBk34dT 4zJT2t9afMHlr29s5gqWa8jh/LAx7BuNJu64m6k4wraku9sIqb4WlGDCK9Chq3zQ 5zbEHviYRF6N+DEfjsqEN+xxbrvanjEG140TXxmnplNdbLORFL7KsJg4P/U49js= =hGM4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get > > this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat > > continues to push out updates even. E.g. > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html > > > > that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before. > > what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat > where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not > completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that > might be ? > > regards > > - -- > Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project I suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin. Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7
Folks I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any external query, but also let me access my computers inside my home. I already have this working using M$'s PPTP using my home Centos 6 gateway/router as the PoPToP server. However, I am concerned about the privacy/security of such a connection. I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan (and probably others I haven't noted). I'd be interested in hearing from anyone who wishes to comment about which to use, with the following requirements: 1) As noted, it should be secure (anti NSA?) 2) Works on Centos 6 and Centos 7 and Windows 7 (and for the future, Windows 10) 3) Can be set up on the server with command line interfaces only (no GUI) And, should not be a nightmare to set up. Any thoughts? David FOLLOWUP & REPORT I had lots of suggestions, and the most persuasive was to try OpenVPN. I already had a CA working, so issuing certificates was easy. The HOW-TO guides were less helpful than I could hope, but comparing several of them, applying common sense, and trying things out, I arrived at a dead-end. Here's essentially what happened: - None of the HOW-TOs were very clear about the need to add some attributes to a certificate, keyUsage and extendedKeyUsage. They had different values for server and client. OpenSSL documentation was a big vague on how to add them, but I think I did - the print out of the entity certificates showed the values. The attempt to connect failed. The client log is below. I think it's complaining that the CA certificate doesn't have the ke Usage extension, which makes no sense to me. Such an extension should be in the end-entity certificate, not the CA's, unless I'm wrong. I checked the server and really think that the certificates are in the right place. To review the situation: Client: A windows 7 laptop, and it definitely moves around. Server: Centos 6 running in my home. Protocol is TCP Client log, some details replace with X --- Mon Apr 18 05:34:47 2016 OpenVPN 2.3.10 x86_64-w64-mingw32 [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [PKCS11] [IPv6] built on Mar 10 2016 Mon Apr 18 05:34:47 2016 Windows version 6.1 (Windows 7) Mon Apr 18 05:34:47 2016 library versions: OpenSSL 1.0.1s 1 Mar 2016, LZO 2.09 Enter Management Password: Mon Apr 18 05:34:47 2016 MANAGEMENT: TCP Socket listening on [AF_INET]127.0.0.1:25340 Mon Apr 18 05:34:47 2016 Need hold release from management interface, waiting... Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 MANAGEMENT: Client connected from [AF_INET]127.0.0.1:25340 Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 MANAGEMENT: CMD 'state on' Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 MANAGEMENT: CMD 'log all on' Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 MANAGEMENT: CMD 'hold off' Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 MANAGEMENT: CMD 'hold release' Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 Socket Buffers: R=[8192->8192] S=[8192->8192] Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1460982888,RESOLVE,,, Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 Attempting to establish TCP connection with [AF_INET]X.X.X.X:1194 [nonblock] Mon Apr 18 05:34:48 2016 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1460982888,TCP_CONNECT,,, Mon Apr 18 05:34:49 2016 TCP connection established with [AF_INET]X.X.X.X:1194 Mon Apr 18 05:34:49 2016 TCPv4_CLIENT link local: [undef] Mon Apr 18 05:34:49 2016 TCPv4_CLIENT link remote: [AF_INET]X.X.X.X:1194 Mon Apr 18 05:34:49 2016 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1460982889,WAIT,,, Mon Apr 18 05:34:49 2016 MANAGEMENT: >STATE:1460982889,AUTH,,, Mon Apr 18 05:34:49 2016 TLS: Initial packet from [AF_INET]X.X.X.X:1194, sid=63eed44a 8be061de Mon Apr 18 05:34:50 2016 VERIFY OK: depth=1, C=US, ST=California, L=San Francisco, OU=Certificate Authority, O=, CN=X.X.X Mon Apr 18 05:34:50 2016 Certificate does not have key usage extension Mon Apr 18 05:34:50 2016 VERIFY KU ERROR Mon Apr 18 05:34:50 2016 TLS_ERROR: BIO read tls_read_plaintext error: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed Mon Apr 18 05:34:50 2016 TLS Error: TLS object -> incoming plaintext read error Mon Apr 18 05:34:50 2016 TLS Error: TLS handshake failed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:33PM +0800, Chandran Manikandan wrote: > Hi Geleem, > Please have a look below of my result. > > For my system shows like below. > df -h > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sda2 909G 576G 287G 67% / > tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm > /dev/sda1 3.9G 160M 3.5G 5% /boot > /dev/sdb1 916G 382G 488G 44% /bkhdd > > First hard disk /dev/sda > Second hard disk /dev/sdb > > The problem is in first hard disk show above size but my email box folders > having below result. > > du -hs /* Do you have any dot (.XXX) directories or large files under / ? These would not be measured by "du -hs /*". > 8.0K/backup > 7.5M/bin > *382G/bkhdd* > 89M /boot > 4.0K/cgroup > 4.0K/command > 208K/dev > 79M /etc > *386G/home* > 4.0K/isoqlog.domains > 322M/lib > 20K /lost+found > 4.0K/media > 0 /misc > 4.0K/mnt > 0 /net > 64M /root > 14M /sbin > 4.0K/selinux > 4.0K/service > 4.0K/srv > 680K/tmp > 4.3G/usr > 1.9G/var > > Here > > /bkhdd is mount in /dev/sdb > > / is mount in /dev/sda > > But the size is not match in /dev/sda > > I am running Centos 6.5 32 bit with CLI Mode. > How do i check the cache size in this mode. > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:29 PM, g wrote: > > > > > > > On 04/06/16 22:44, Chandran Manikandan wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I have running Centos 6.5 32 bit machine. > > > This machine is running qmailtoaster packages and mailbox size is 385 GB. > > > > > > if i run the df -h command it show 385 GB out of 1TB > > > > > ===> > > please post results. > > > > > I have run the same command today suddenly shows 576 GB out of 1 TB. > > > > > > I didn't update any bulk file and mail transaction is not very high. > > > > > > How do i check this issue and fix it. > > > > > ===> > > why do you believe that increase is related to gmailtoaster? > > > > > how do i find out and why suddenly showing this much of increasing the > > size > > > of hard disk. > > > > > ===> > > > > > Could anyone help me > > > > > ===> > > have you at any time run kde? > > > > ria, i use kde and some time back, found that depending on how a file > > or directory is deleted, deletion is saved in cache. > > > > is it possible that gnome is doing same? > > > > > > -- > > peace out. > > > > If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... > > ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! > > -+- > > in a world with out fences, who needs gates. > > > > CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 > > > > tc,hago. > > > > g > > . > > > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > > -- > *Thanks,* > *Manikandan.C* > *System Administrator* > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> End of included message <<< -- Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how do I use only black ink? success
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Michael Hennebry wrote: I have an HP Photosmart C3180 All-in-one. As I haven't had any need for color lately, when I last replaced ink, I only replaced the black cartridge. It didn't work, even when printing grayscale-only images, even when telling print-set-up grayscale-only. To be precise: Black lines were black, but pale gray areas were an even paler yellow. I've just discoverd that the printer does the right thing with text from a pdf. The black ink cartridge is getting used, just not enough. Much to my surprise, the color option black only grayscale does what I want when printing from a GUI. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VPN suggestions centos 6, 7
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, david wrote: FOLLOWUP & REPORT I had lots of suggestions, and the most persuasive was to try OpenVPN. I already had a CA working, so issuing certificates was easy. The HOW-TO guides were less helpful than I could hope, but comparing several of them, applying common sense, and trying things out, I arrived at a dead-end. Here's essentially what happened: - None of the HOW-TOs were very clear about the need to add some attributes to a certificate, keyUsage and extendedKeyUsage. They had different values for server and client. OpenSSL documentation was a big vague on how to add them, but I think I did - the print out of the entity certificates showed the values. The attempt to connect failed. The client log is below. I think it's complaining that the CA certificate doesn't have the ke Usage extension, which makes no sense to me. Such an extension should be in the end-entity certificate, not the CA's, unless I'm wrong. I checked the server and really think that the certificates are in the right place. Here's how I managed that in my openssl.cnf file. Lots of bits ellided for clarity's sake: ### start ### [ ca ] default_ca = CA_default [ CA_default ] x509_extensions = server_cert [ server_cert ] basicConstraints=CA:FALSE keyUsage = nonRepudiation, dataEncipherment, digitalSignature, keyEncipherment extendedKeyUsage = serverAuth, clientAuth nsCertType = server, client ### end ### I think the nsCertType directive may be unnecessary these days, but I keep it around because it doesn't hurt anything. The important bit is the extendedKeyUsage line; I'm pretty sure that an OpenVPN server needs the serverAuth extension. For instance, here is the X509 extensions configuration for a server used by EasyRSA: basicConstraints = CA:FALSE subjectKeyIdentifier = hash authorityKeyIdentifier = keyid,issuer:always extendedKeyUsage = serverAuth,clientAuth keyUsage = digitalSignature,keyEncipherment You can ask openssl to tell you the purpose of a certificate: [bash]$ openssl x509 -noout -purpose -in cert.pem | grep SSL SSL client : Yes SSL client CA : No SSL server : Yes SSL server CA : No Netscape SSL server : Yes Netscape SSL server CA : No Anyway, those are the extensions that should do away with these errors: Mon Apr 18 05:34:50 2016 VERIFY OK: depth=1, C=US, ST=California, L=San Francisco, OU=Certificate Authority, O=, CN=X.X.X Mon Apr 18 05:34:50 2016 Certificate does not have key usage extension -- Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Machine-readble cloud-image list
Hi there, I would like to write a script to download the CentOS generic cloud images with the intention of making them eventually available to oVirt users via the oVirt public Glance repository. For that purpose I need to: 1. list the CentOS generic cloud images 2. list mirrors from where I could potentially download those images I could try to parse the HTML here [1], but I'd rather just get the lists from somewhere in some machine readble format if possible. So is this information or parts of it available in some machine-readable format somewhere? [1]: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ Thanks, Barak -- Barak Korren bkor...@redhat.com RHEV-CI Team ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] how do I use only black ink? success
Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Michael Hennebry wrote: > >> On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> >>> I have an HP Photosmart C3180 All-in-one. >>> As I haven't had any need for color lately, >>> when I last replaced ink, I only replaced the black cartridge. >>> It didn't work, even when printing grayscale-only images, >>> even when telling print-set-up grayscale-only. >> >> To be precise: Black lines were black, >> but pale gray areas were an even paler yellow. >> I've just discoverd that the printer does >> the right thing with text from a pdf. >> The black ink cartridge is getting used, >> just not enough. > > Much to my surprise, the color option black only grayscale > does what I want when printing from a GUI. Have you gone to the CUPS page (http://localhost:631), to the printer, and see if there's an option for grayscale only? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/2016 02:47 AM, Chandran Manikandan wrote: For my system shows like below. df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda2 909G 576G 287G 67% / tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 3.9G 160M 3.5G 5% /boot /dev/sdb1 916G 382G 488G 44% /bkhdd Unmount /bkhdd temporarily, and then run "du -hs /*" again. One possibility is that you ran a backup while /dev/sdb1 was not mounted, and now you are consuming a bunch of space that you can't see because you've mounted another filesystem on top of it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/17/2016 09:27 PM, Chandran Manikandan wrote: Thanks for your help. I have tried above your commands I couldn't see that size of the file. What commands? I suggested that you look for deleted but open files using: # ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)' If you see any, you won't see their size. All you'll really see is the PID of the process that has the files open, and in that case, you must terminate that process. Do you see deleted files when you run the command above? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to configure VLAN in CentOS7
On 04/17/2016 07:39 PM, liyulei wrote: Could anybody teach me how to create a VLAN interface in CentOS7, or tell me what' s wrong with my configuration, more detailed more better. How is your switch configured? The CentOS configuration you described would only work when you set GATEWAY, and when the port it's connected to has no VLANs configured for untagged access (or no VLANs that you need to access), and when the VLAN you DO need to access is tagged. Are you providing access to one VLAN using tagged packets? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On Mon, April 18, 2016 1:02 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/17/2016 09:27 PM, Chandran Manikandan wrote: >> Thanks for your help. >> I have tried above your commands >> I couldn't see that size of the file. > > What commands? I suggested that you look for deleted but open files > using: > # ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)' > > If you see any, you won't see their size. All you'll really see is the > PID of the process that has the files open, and in that case, you must > terminate that process. > > Do you see deleted files when you run the command above? lsof command may be of help either... Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/16 13:07, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Mon, April 18, 2016 1:02 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 04/17/2016 09:27 PM, Chandran Manikandan wrote: >>> Thanks for your help. >>> I have tried above your commands >>> I couldn't see that size of the file. >> >> What commands? I suggested that you look for deleted but open files >> using: >> # ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)' >> >> If you see any, you won't see their size. All you'll really see is the >> PID of the process that has the files open, and in that case, you must >> terminate that process. >> >> Do you see deleted files when you run the command above? > > lsof command may be of help either... > ===> lsof | grep deleted would work better. ;-) -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/2016 11:17 AM, g wrote: lsof | grep deleted would work better. Better how? lsof hasn't always been installed by default, while /proc is pretty reliably available. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get >>> this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat >>> continues to push out updates even. E.g. >>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html >>> >> >> that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before. >> >> what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat >> where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not >> completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that >> might be ? >> >> regards >> >> - -- >> Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project > > > I suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin. > > Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary. > It is indeed not completely open source. I was told that the agreement between Red Hat and Google only allows the RPMs for RHEL to be released to subscribers on the supplemental channel. Sorry, but I can't release it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/16 13:31, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/18/2016 11:17 AM, g wrote: >> lsof | grep deleted would work better. > > Better how? > ===> 'lsof', aka, list open files, will list every open file on system, and there are a lot. 'grep deleted' will list _only_ the deleted files that are still open. > lsof hasn't always been installed by default, while /proc is pretty > reliably available. > ===> install lsof if not installed. -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/2016 01:18 PM, g wrote: 'lsof', aka, list open files, will list every open file on system, and there are a lot. 'grep deleted' will list_only_ the deleted files that are still open. That's exactly the same thing that "ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)'" will do. So how is lsof better, exactly? I know. I'm frustrated today. I spent the weekend dealing with people nit-picking. It's hard to exaggerate how much time and energy can be wasted by people insisting on meaningless changes. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/16 15:45, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/18/2016 01:18 PM, g wrote: >> 'lsof', aka, list open files, will list every open file on system, and there >> are a lot. >> >> 'grep deleted' will list_only_ the deleted files that are still open. > > That's exactly the same thing that "ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep > '(deleted)'" will do. So how is lsof better, exactly? > ===> i did not say it was. i was only correcting Valerie's post. > I know. I'm frustrated today. I spent the weekend dealing with people > nit-picking. It's hard to exaggerate how much time and energy can be > wasted by people insisting on meaningless changes. > ===> post was not to be nit-picking. adding 'grep deleted' is not meaningless. now, can we get back to op's problem? -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On Mon, April 18, 2016 4:22 pm, g wrote: > > > On 04/18/16 15:45, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 04/18/2016 01:18 PM, g wrote: >>> 'lsof', aka, list open files, will list every open file on system, and >>> there >>> are a lot. >>> >>> 'grep deleted' will list_only_ the deleted files that are still open. >> >> That's exactly the same thing that "ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep >> '(deleted)'" will do. So how is lsof better, exactly? >> > ===> > > i did not say it was. i was only correcting Valerie's post. Thanks, I was kind of indulging my laziness, mentioned the command name and assumed keen person will look up command usage him/herself. But on a receiving end being lazy person I would prefer to just copy and paste using _your_ post as opposed to my own ;-) Valeri > >> I know. I'm frustrated today. I spent the weekend dealing with people >> nit-picking. It's hard to exaggerate how much time and energy can be >> wasted by people insisting on meaningless changes. >> > ===> > > post was not to be nit-picking. > > adding 'grep deleted' is not meaningless. > > now, can we get back to op's problem? > > -- > peace out. > > If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... > ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! > -+- > in a world with out fences, who needs gates. > > CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 > > tc,hago. > > g > . > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Is there a comprehensive documentation about CentOS7?
Hello everyone, I visited https://www.centos.org/docs/ and found no documentation about CentOS7. Is the documentation about CentOS5 still suitable? Thanks. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Is there a comprehensive documentation about CentOS7?
On 4/18/2016 4:50 PM, Shawn Fang wrote: I visitedhttps://www.centos.org/docs/ and found no documentation about CentOS7. Is the documentation about CentOS5 still suitable? um, there are extensive changes between 5 and 7. this would be more suitable https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/ -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/16 17:26, Valeri Galtsev wrote: <> > Thanks, I was kind of indulging my laziness, mentioned the command name > and assumed keen person will look up command usage him/herself. But on a > receiving end being lazy person I would prefer to just copy and paste > using _your_ post as opposed to my own ;-) > ===> welcome and welcome to the 'lzpc', lazy people club'. charter members excuse it as terse. B-) being aware aware of your knowledge from your past post, i was a bit amazed at your reply. there is nothing wrong c&p. i am of habit when opportunity presents itself. it lessens typos and need for thinking about spelling. also good for adding a list member's name to my email address book. ;-) -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Machine-readble cloud-image list
On 18/04/16 18:36, Barak Korren wrote: > Hi there, I would like to write a script to download the CentOS > generic cloud images with the intention of making them eventually > available to oVirt users via the oVirt public Glance repository. > > For that purpose I need to: > 1. list the CentOS generic cloud images > 2. list mirrors from where I could potentially download those images > > I could try to parse the HTML here [1], but I'd rather just get the > lists from somewhere in some machine readble format if possible. > > So is this information or parts of it available in some > machine-readable format somewhere? > > [1]: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/ > > Thanks, > Barak > in the early days I had a json file that had the details in there, but it was dropped almost a year ago. If you file a requst at bugs.centos.org and point me at it ( ideally assign the issue to me ), I can work out the required bits. What sort of info would you expect to see in this beyond - filename - date of last upates - centos ver - arch - file format - sha256um regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On 04/18/2016 03:45 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/18/2016 01:18 PM, g wrote: 'lsof', aka, list open files, will list every open file on system, and there are a lot. 'grep deleted' will list_only_ the deleted files that are still open. That's exactly the same thing that "ls -l /proc/*/fd/* | grep '(deleted)'" will do. So how is lsof better, exactly? lsof will show the sizes of the deleted files. lsof | grep deleted | sort -k7n -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Suddenly increased my hard disk
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > lsof will show the sizes of the deleted files. > > lsof | grep deleted | sort -k7n That's a reasonable G.D. answer. The only problem is that on my system, the default output includes a TID column that is present in only some of the lines, so the size column is 8 for many lines and 7 for the others, so sort doesn't work as expected unless you change lsof's output. And you probably should "grep ' (deleted)$' unless you want to see files like /home/gordon/.thunderbird/xxx.default/calendar-data/deleted.sqlite. Still, I guess I learned one thing. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 答复: How to configure VLAN in CentOS7
On 04/18/2016 08:01 PM, liyulei wrote: And I used the command "tcpdump -i eno1.5 " to capture the datagrams through the vlan interface, there were only repeated outputs: ARP who has 192.68.81.254 Tell 192.168.81.3 Could you tell me the reason for that? My guess would be that the switch isn't configured to give you access to VLAN 5 with tagged packets. In that case, there's no need for you to configure eno1.5 Specifically what are you trying to accomplish by configuring a tagged VLAN interface? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] 答复: 答复: How to configure VLAN in CentOS7
Thank you again. I am deploying Liberty Neutron, according the official document, there are two NIC at least, but my physical machine has only one. Someone suggested me I could create a vlan interface, then everything would be ok. Until now, though I created the vlan interface, it can't attach to the Internet. Could other methods created virtual interface instead of vlan interface? Thanks Li yulei -邮件原件- 发件人: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] 代表 Gordon Messmer 发送时间: 2016年4月19日 11:18 收件人: CentOS mailing list 主题: Re: [CentOS] 答复: How to configure VLAN in CentOS7 On 04/18/2016 08:01 PM, liyulei wrote: > And I used the command "tcpdump -i eno1.5 " to capture the datagrams > through the vlan interface, there were only repeated > outputs: > ARP who has 192.68.81.254 Tell 192.168.81.3 > > Could you tell me the reason for that? My guess would be that the switch isn't configured to give you access to VLAN 5 with tagged packets. In that case, there's no need for you to configure eno1.5 Specifically what are you trying to accomplish by configuring a tagged VLAN interface? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Machine-readble cloud-image list
> in the early days I had a json file that had the details in there, but > it was dropped almost a year ago. If you file a requst at > bugs.centos.org and point me at it ( ideally assign the issue to me ), I > can work out the required bits. > Thanks for the quick response! I've opened a request here: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=10730, but it does not seem I can assign it to you directly. What about the mirror list? is that already available or does it need to be requested as well? -- Barak Korren bkor...@redhat.com RHEV-CI Team ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
