[CentOS] Lenovo T420 internal microphone not working
Hello, I have CentOS 7.1 installed on my Lenovo T420 Notebook. Now I will start to have some online meetings for a software project. In Bios the I/O-settings for camera and microphone are enabled. Camera is working (tested with cheese). In the audio settings of Gnome perferences I see an internal microphone which doesn't produce any input. The microphone is also not disabled by the key on the keyboard. Where can I take a look at? Thank you in advance Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssh failed only with nfs home directory
On 07/13/2015 11:14 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > > Here's the permissions and ownership on the directories and files: > > #ls -ld /home/bluethundr/ /home/bluethundr/.ssh > /home/bluethundr/.ssh/authorized_keys > > drwxr-x---. 37 bluethundr bluethundr 4096 Jul 13 20:57 /home/bluethundr/ > > drw---. 3 bluethundr bluethundr 4096 Jun 15 17:22 /home/bluethundr/.ssh I'd expect this directory to be mode 700. also assuming that your id is actually 'bluethundr' and not 'TimDunphy' as before from ssh -v output. if you do have user ID collision between the machines it could add to the confusion. > > -rw---. 1 bluethundr bluethundr 2614 Jun 15 17:22 > /home/bluethundr/.ssh/authorized_keys > > SELinux is set to permissve: > > #getenforce > Permissive > > If I unmount the nfs home directory I am able to log in: > > [root@nfs1:~] #umount -l /home > [root@nfs1:~] # > > #ssh bluethu...@nfs1.example.com > Last login: Mon Jul 13 23:08:35 2015 from ool-2f126f64.dyn.optonline.net > -bash-4.2$ > > The permissions on the non-nfs home directory are the same as the NFS > mounted home directory: > > #ls -ld /home/bluethundr/ /home/bluethundr/.ssh > /home/bluethundr/.ssh/authorized_keys > drwxr-x---. 37 bluethundr bluethundr 4096 Jul 13 20:57 /home/bluethundr/ > drw---. 3 bluethundr bluethundr 4096 Jun 15 17:22 /home/bluethundr/.ssh > -rw---. 1 bluethundr bluethundr 2614 Jun 15 17:22 > /home/bluethundr/.ssh/authorized_keys > > As soon as I mount it back, the issue returns and I am unable to ssh in: > > #ssh bluethu...@nfs1.example.com > Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-keyex,gssapi-with-mic). > > > I'd really appreciate any ideas you guys may have as to why this is > happening!! > > Thanks, > Tim > perhaps with a local mount it goes ahead and gives you the directory searching ability since you own the directory and it doesn't really make sense for you not to be able to do otherwise, but it can't do the same sort of logical override for NFS? I'm mostly shooting in the dark, but it's where I'd start. -- public gpg key id: AE60F64C ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM, wrote: > My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're > supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows > binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly > of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? > > mark > > I'm sure others will chime in on backuppc and the pro's and cons, I will throw out what I am currently using for winblows machines and while its not open source it is Free and well supported. I have been looking for quite sometime and there are pros and cons to each software so it may or may not be a good fit for you, YMMV. http://www.veeam.com/endpoint-backup-free.html It's not perfect but they are putting effort into and for me it has been working very well, my .01 for what its worth. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
I don't chime in very often but here it goes.
I'm running BackupPC-3.3.1-1.el6.x86_64 on CentOS 6.6. The server is an HP
ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2 (dynamic p400 controller DISABLED); 8gb ram, 1.5tb
raid1 . Boot/OS drive is an ssd and /var/lib/BackupPC is mounted on an
LVM/RADI1 array. I'm currently backing up 41 pc's and one Server 2011
Essentials.
BackupPC Server Status
General Server Information
The servers PID is 37442, on host backuppc, version 3.3.1, started at 7/13
16:20.
This status was generated at 7/14 11:08.
The configuration was last loaded at 7/13 16:20.
PCs will be next queued at 7/14 14:00.
Other info:
0 pending backup requests from last scheduled wakeup,
0 pending user backup requests,
0 pending command requests,
Pool is 530.20GB comprising 2040949 files and 4369 directories (as of
7/12 14:15),
Pool hashing gives 1909 repeated files with longest chain 25,
Nightly cleanup removed 5788 files of size 0.03GB (around 7/12 14:15),
Pool file system was recently at 42% (7/14 11:02), today's max is 42%
(7/14 00:42) and yesterday's max was 39%.
Hosts with good Backups
There are 42 hosts that have been backed up, for a total of:
124 full backups of total size 4990.74GB (prior to pooling and compression),
191 incr backups of total size 388.68GB (prior to pooling and compression).
** I just recently changed my setup to keep 3 full and 6 incremental backups so
these numbers are in the process of growing **
I USED to run various renditions of rsync and finally GAVE UP on it as it NEVER
would backup up the Windows computers to my satisfaction. (rsync on linux
rocks however)
I finally switched over to using SMB to back up the Windows boxen. I use the
admin account for this as creating a "backuppc" user account assigned to the
"backup operators" group wouldn't even back up the boxes correctly.
While not ideal security wise I CAN SAY I backup 42 computers every night,
important files like outlook.pst GETS BACKED UP, and my BackupPC life is
significantly easier.
I use the following for the wakeup schedule: $Conf{WakeupSchedule} = [14,17];
For backing up the BackupPC pool, I am running software raid. I use mdadm to
attach a 3rd disk to the mirror which sync's the mirror to the 3rd drive, then
fail the 3rd disk and shrink the array back to two. Others have suggested Btrfs
or zfs? For a send/receive backup method and I am going to try this as time
allows.
You can NEVER have too many backups. I'd slap it to tape if I could...
Hopefully some of this information helps out...
Regards,
Richard
---
Richard Zimmerman
Systems / Network Administrator
River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc.
S Main Street
South Bend, IN 46601-3337
(574) 233-1133
(574) 280-7284 Fax
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:17 AM
To: CentOS
Subject: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting.
Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now
not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments
on that, or other packaged solutions?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
Whatever you pick, test the restore to make sure you're getting the system back to the state you expect it in. Without clearly understanding the restore liabilities, the backup strategy is incomplete. Starting with Windows 8, the system supports a fairly stateless system, so the system itself doesn't need a full backup. Short of a dead drive, the built-in recovery volume can boot and fix pretty much any problem, including wiping system and boot volumes and restoring them to factory state. For a dead drive, then you need recovery media on something like a USB flash drive or external hard drive. Be sure to find out if the backup utility you pick actually backs up everything on the drive. Most of them will only backup and restore the boot and system volumes, not litany of partitions now on contemporary UEFI Windows 8.x computers: EFI system partition, OEM diagnostics partition, recovery partition, boot partition, system partition, and an IRST swap partition. My suggestion is to create USB recovery media using either the OEM tool for this purpose, or a decrapified install media from Microsoft: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/02/save-yourself-from-your-oems-bad-decisions-with-a-clean-install-of-windows-8-1/ http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-8/create-reset-refresh-media The Microsoft one arrives as an image. The OEM one usually doesn't create an image, it creates a USB stick, so you'll have to image it yourself and then keep a backup of the image. If you write zeros to the USB stick first, that image will be more compressible, if you intend to back it up with dd. I've also tested using dosfsck -v (fsck.vfat) to get details of the FAT file system the OEM tool creates and writes its files to. So I have a readme.txt that tells me how to format any USB stick properly, and then a tar of the recovery files which I untar onto the stick - and of course I've tested this recreated recovery stick all the way to a completed reinstallation of the OS. It saves some space and time in the end, but dd is fine too. >From this point my Windows backups are terribly unsophisticated because I don't have any really important data on it. But I think it's a model to start from because it's so brain dead easy. It depends entirely on an Outlook account. By default, Windows 8 wants you to create you user login with an Outlook account. You can lie and say you don't have one, lie again and say you want to create one, and then at the bottom there's a way to opt out and create a local only account that isn't Outlook based. But if you do create an Outlook based account (or use AD I presume), all the relevant settings are backed up to the Microsoft cloud automatically. And when I do a completely clean install and sign back into this same Outlook account, all of it gets restored: settings, documents, pictures, everything. Problem A: lockin, proprietary, it's Microsoft dependent. So you could use SAMBA 4 and AD all of this to avoid the Outlook part. Problem B: It's a single point of failure. But if you could figure out a way to backup what Outlook is backing up to the cloud, and also figure out how to restore that - you'd work around this and not have to do these crazy monolithic backups and restores. I did a pile of these when doing Windows 8 + Fedora dual boot testing back in January and it's very much like doing an Android/Cyanogen reset and restore from (cloud) backup if not easier and faster. I got the entire reformat, reinstall, restore down to less than 30 minutes. One could probably argue that only backing up the user directly in a conventional manner is sane, and just expect to never have to restore it unless the cloud backup-restore doesn't work. -- Chris Murphy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
Am 14.07.2015 um 16:17 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're > supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows > binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly > of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? This will continue to be the case, and we have planned a number of projects that are sponsored by Bacula Systems. The will probably begin to appear in the community version between March and July of 2015. A few of these new features will be: 1. Free Enterprise Windows binaries with all the latest features for individual community members. http://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/bacula-announce/?viewmonth=201501 -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 14.07.2015 um 16:17 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: >> My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're >> supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows >> binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks >> highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? > > > This will continue to be the case, and we have planned a number of > projects that are sponsored by Bacula Systems. The will probably begin > to appear in the community version between March and July of 2015. Sorry, your syntax has me slightly confused. Are you saying that it is the case that, in general, the Windows binaries will be pay-only? > > A few of these new features will be: > > 1. Free Enterprise Windows binaries with all the latest features for > individual community members. > > > http://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/bacula-announce/?viewmonth=201501 Which doesn't help me at all, since a) I'm not in the bacula community, and b) this is for an agency of the US federal gov't which shall remain nameless*, but whose budget is 20% *lower* than it was in 2003. mark * I do not represent myself as speaking for my employer, nor the US federal gov't, nor the view out my window, assuming I had a window in this cube. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ssh failed only with nfs home directory
On 07/13/2015 08:14 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: And I see this message in the secure log: Jul 13 23:09:28 nfsdb1 sshd[15305]: Connection closed by xx.xx.xx.xx [preauth] Is that the only message logged to the "secure" and "messages" files? As soon as I mount it back, the issue returns and I am unable to ssh in: #ssh bluethu...@nfs1.example.com Permission denied (publickey,gssapi-keyex,gssapi-with-mic). Well, if the problem isn't the permissions on the files and your server is set to allow only public key and Kerberos (GSSAPI) logins, then the obvious thing to check would be that you have the right key in that NFS mounted home directory. Are you sure it's the same as the one in the local home directory? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
On 07/14/2015 07:17 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? I would strongly recommend a product that supports VSS. Bacula does, and Veeam does as far as I can tell (mentioned by Tom). BackupPC does not. Without snapshots (VSS), you may back up inconsistent data, and you'll miss backups of open files. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
On Tue, July 14, 2015 12:49 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/14/2015 07:17 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're >> supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows >> binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks >> highly >> of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? > > I would strongly recommend a product that supports VSS. Bacula does, > and Veeam does as far as I can tell (mentioned by Tom). BackupPC does > not. Without snapshots (VSS), you may back up inconsistent data, and > you'll miss backups of open files. I use bacula to backup windows boxes. I do create full box image backup (using Windows image backup tool) every other year or so. As far as user data are concerned I rely on bacula (had to restore something they accidentally deleted or modified a couple of times - successfully). We don't have many Windows boxes though, - about a dozen. We are mostly Linux, FreeBSD and Macintosh shop. Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
backuppc does support pre- and post- backup scripts, so it is possible to implement backing up from vss. I've never done it, but there examples can be found On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/14/2015 07:17 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're >> supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows >> binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly >> of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? >> > > I would strongly recommend a product that supports VSS. Bacula does, and > Veeam does as far as I can tell (mentioned by Tom). BackupPC does not. > Without snapshots (VSS), you may back up inconsistent data, and you'll miss > backups of open files. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT, hardware: HP smart array drive issue
On Jul 10, 2015, at 10:47, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > Trying to prevent this from happening again, I've decided to replace the > drive that's in predictive failure. The array has a hot spare. I tried to > remove, using hpacucli, it refuses "operation not permitted", and there > doesn't *seem* to be a "mark as failed" command. *Do* I just yank the > drive? Hi Mark, I’ve never had any problem just pulling and replacing drives on HP hardware with the hardware RAID controllers (even the icky cheap one that came out around the DL360/380 Gen 8 timeframe, that isn’t really hardware RAID and needs closed drivers in Linux). That said, I also *test it*, long before putting anything important on them… From past experience with HP stuff, it usually won’t move the data over to the hot spare (especially if it’s a “Global” hot spare and not specific to that array) until an actual failure occurs. “Predictive failure” isn’t considered a failure in HP’s world. I don’t think there is any setting to tell the controller to move to the hot spare if there’s a “predictive failure”. I’ve also had disks that triggered a “predictive failure” under heavy load that were simply popped out and back in, and the controller rebuilt them, and the drive never did it again for *years*. The “predictive failure” error rate is pretty low. That last one is more a question of policy than anything. How much do you trust it? At one employer the game was to pop out and back in any drive that showed “predictive failure” on HP systems (Dell stuff we handled differently at the time, it was less prone to false alarms, so to speak) and if they did it again “soonish”, we’d call for the replacement disk. That’s how often the HP controllers did it. In a rather large farm of HP stuff, I popped and replaced an HP drive a week, whenever I happened by the data center. As for the question of whether you should be able to do it safely or not… if a hardware RAID controller won’t let me yank a physical drive out and shove another one in and rebuild itself back to whatever level of redundancy was defined by me as “nominal” for that system, I don’t want it anyway. Look at it this way… if the disk had a catastrophic electronics failure while installed in the array, the array should handle it… yanking it out is technically nicer than some of the failure modes that can affect the busses on the backplane with shorted electronics. (GRIN) Just sharing my thoughts… your call. :-) YMMV. We had a service contract at that place and a new disk was always just a phone call away and no additional $, and even with that level of service, we always did the “re-seat it once” thing. We’d log it and if anyone else saw that same disk flashing the next time they were at the data center (we just looked at the logged ones before doing the “re-seat”), they’d make the phone call and the service company would drop a drive off a few hours later. -- Nate Duehr denverpi...@me.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
On 07/14/2015 11:01 AM, Tony Schreiner wrote: backuppc does support pre- and post- backup scripts, so it is possible to implement backing up from vss. I've never done it, but there examples can be found http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/limitations.html "So far, the best that BackupPC can do is send warning emails to the user saying that their outlook files haven't been backed up in X days. (X is configurable.) The message invites the user to exit Outlook and gives a URL to manually start a backup." So, no, it doesn't look like that's possible. There *is* a link on that page to an MSDN post which describes a script which can use VSS to copy individual files to a new location. However, there's no integration with backuppc, and there's no identification of open files, so you need to know in advance which files might need to be copied with VSS. Don't do that to yourself. Just use a backup program that supports VSS. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/14/2015 07:17 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're >> supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows >> binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly >> of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? >> > > I would strongly recommend a product that supports VSS. Bacula does, and > Veeam does as far as I can tell (mentioned by Tom). BackupPC does not. > Without snapshots (VSS), you may back up inconsistent data, and you'll miss > backups of open files. > Veeam fully supports it, I don't have as much time with this product since it pretty new, but its based on their server stuff which I have been using for years and it's been solid. I have some really nasty window servers doing everything under the sun and they get backed up and replicated continuously, I don't have as much time on this new offering but I am using it and so far so good. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lenovo T420 internal microphone not working
On 07/14/2015 06:02 AM, Tim wrote: In the audio settings of Gnome perferences I see an internal microphone which doesn't produce any input. The microphone is also not disabled by the key on the keyboard. One thing to try is adjusting the gain on the microphone *after* you've started your conferencing application. I have to do this with my webcam mic. -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Lenovo T420 internal microphone not working
Hi Ian, thanks for your reply. I found the solution on my own: I needed to add an option model=thinkpad to snd_hda_intel. echo options snd_hda_intel model=thinkpad > /etc/modprobe.d/snd_hda_intel.conf Now it is working. Thanks Tim Am 14.07.2015 um 21:38 schrieb Ian Pilcher: > On 07/14/2015 06:02 AM, Tim wrote: >> In the audio settings of Gnome perferences I see an internal microphone >> which doesn't produce any input. The microphone is also not disabled by >> the key on the keyboard. > > One thing to try is adjusting the gain on the microphone *after* you've > started your conferencing application. I have to do this with my webcam > mic. > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
Am 14.07.2015 um 19:00 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > Leon Fauster wrote: >> >> This will continue to be the case, and we have planned a number of >> projects that are sponsored by Bacula Systems. The will probably begin >> to appear in the community version between March and July of 2015. > > Sorry, your syntax has me slightly confused. Are you saying that it is the > case that, in general, the Windows binaries will be pay-only? sorry for the missing context: i just quoted from the URI below. Kern Sibbald stated that the win binaries will be provided for free. >> >> A few of these new features will be: >> >> 1. Free Enterprise Windows binaries with all the latest features for >> individual community members. >> >> >> http://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/bacula-announce/?viewmonth=201501 > > Which doesn't help me at all, since a) I'm not in the bacula community, > and b) this is for an agency of the US federal gov't which shall remain > nameless*, but whose budget is 20% *lower* than it was in 2003. in the first post you (your manager) mentioned bacula as possible solution, therefore i came up with this information. So, the bacula packages are in the repositories :-). -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 7.1 doesn't seem to have a functional default pdf reader installed (interesting)
Hi; This is the first time that I've installed CentOS 7.1 with a GUI (I've just used a CLI previously). I'd like to read a pdf file and I don't see any pdf reader applications installed by default. This seems unusual to me. So I see that gs is installed, but it doesn't really work very well for me as I can't seem to scroll to the next page. So what pdf reader application should I install (preferably open source) that will install itself to the menu along with Shotwell? It looks like Gnome desktop. Thanks, Ken Wolcott ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.1 doesn't seem to have a functional default pdf reader installed (interesting)
evince is the PDF reader for Gnome ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.1 doesn't seem to have a functional default pdf reader installed (interesting)
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > evince is the PDF reader for Gnome > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Cool, thanks. Now I think it would be great to add that to the menu, it is installed already (I am using it from the CLI now). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.1 doesn't seem to have a functional default pdf reader installed (interesting)
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Kahlil Hodgson > wrote: >> evince is the PDF reader for Gnome > Cool, thanks. > > Now I think it would be great to add that to the menu, it is installed > already (I am using it from the CLI now). Now isn't that interesting. It now appears under the Utilities Menu. I must get my glasses/eyes checked :-) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.1 doesn't seem to have a functional default pdf reader installed (interesting)
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:29:19 -0700 Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > Now I think it would be great to add that to the menu, it is installed > already (I am using it from the CLI now). It's named "Document Viewer" under the Graphics menu. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.1 doesn't seem to have a functional default pdf reader installed (interesting)
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:29:19 -0700 > Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > >> Now I think it would be great to add that to the menu, it is installed >> already (I am using it from the CLI now). > > It's named "Document Viewer" under the Graphics menu. Interesting. Not on my box :-) I see it now under Utilities. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
