Re: [CentOS] built kernel-3.10.0-229.7.2.el7 OK but install fails

[Akemi Yagi]

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Nicholas Geovanis
 wrote:
> Thanks! Up on kernel 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.centos.
> Page http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel specifically states using
> rpm and not yum for the new kernel install, so perhaps needs that slight
> revision for 7..Nick G

Thanks for pointing this out. The wiki article now has additional
notes and includes the yum command.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] HP Elitebook 8460p

[Phil Dobbin]

Hi, all.

I'm intending to install CentOS 7 on a HP Elitebook 8460p. Does anybody
have any experience of this?

Many thanks for any help.

Cheers,

  Phil...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] HP Elitebook 8460p

[anax]

Hi Phil
I have Fedora 20, Fedora21, and Fedora 22 installed on an HP Elitebootk 
Folio 1040.
The only problem with Fedora 22 was, that anaconda required a GPT 
partition table to install an UEFI system. But after having changed from 
MBR to GPT partition table (using gdisk), no problems any more.
I can not explain why anaconda required the UEFI installation: The 
SD-disk on the laptop is far less then 2 Terabytes.


suomi

On 07/10/2015 11:34 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:

Hi, all.

I'm intending to install CentOS 7 on a HP Elitebook 8460p. Does anybody
have any experience of this?

Many thanks for any help.

Cheers,

   Phil...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] mcrypt 2.6.8 on centos 6

[Jerry Geis]

I downloaded mcyrpt 2.6.8, untar, cd into the tree and did
./configure and I get errors.

checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed
checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3
checking for libmcrypt-config... no
checking for libmcrypt - version >= 2.5.0... no
*** Could not run libmcrypt test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for
the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means LIBMCRYPT was incorrectly
installed
*** or that you have moved LIBMCRYPT since it was installed. In the latter
case, you
*** may want to edit the libmcrypt-config script: no
configure: error: *** libmcrypt was not found

I'm still on ./configure  not the make

Anyone installed from source? I found libmcrypt on a fedora repo but its
only 2.5.8

Thanks!

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] mcrypt 2.6.8 on centos 6

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

On 07/10/2015 01:14 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:

I downloaded mcyrpt 2.6.8, untar, cd into the tree and did
./configure and I get errors.

checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed
checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3
checking for libmcrypt-config... no
checking for libmcrypt - version >= 2.5.0... no
*** Could not run libmcrypt test program, checking why...
*** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for
the
*** exact error that occured. This usually means LIBMCRYPT was incorrectly
installed
*** or that you have moved LIBMCRYPT since it was installed. In the latter
case, you
*** may want to edit the libmcrypt-config script: no
configure: error: *** libmcrypt was not found

I'm still on ./configure  not the make

Anyone installed from source? I found libmcrypt on a fedora repo but its
only 2.5.8

Thanks!


mcrypt 2.6.8 is in epel for el6.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] built kernel-3.10.0-229.7.2.el7 OK but install fails

[Nicholas Geovanis]

>>* Thanks! Up on kernel 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.centos.
*>*> Page http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
 specifically states
using
*>*> rpm and not yum for the new kernel install, so perhaps needs that slight
*>*> revision for 7..Nick G
*>
>Thanks for pointing this out. The wiki article now has additional
>notes and includes the yum command.
>Akemi

Thank you much.

So far, the newer 3.10.0-229 feels a bit faster on my hardware than

the previous 3.10.0-123 despite being about 80K larger (removed
the GFS2 modules: only have 2GB RAM).

--

>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 125, Issue 4

[centos-announce-request]

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2015:1218 Moderate CentOS 6 php Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:23:41 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1218 Moderate CentOS 6 php
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20150709192341.ga59...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1218 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1218.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
97908585a91585137ccb6eee94f45568936c29c3358ddcf2f0fecef66aa807e3  
php-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
904b300d398ee3d5ce0f55e4099c45f51b7753c855720c7d1c245cf5425b7f3e  
php-bcmath-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
53a07be26838874150138ca397e92eb467ba682b7cbc6d9fade3e9979cc2ca57  
php-cli-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
09bb5673d2894ddf9de223ded3f9a1eef51956301d6ba735be10c0246cd4ffb5  
php-common-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
e1235f6cffd68c85eaa0216db76f4b628d5e9aa5b080936f6c4e82397440715e  
php-dba-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
72b398096f27035b56e4e46223d18e76692c771e7a2cdadebf8808da9c782ab3  
php-devel-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
7b65855b6c9f6bfa7fb760ce61335974bd0d43e8713ae573243cf83986b594b6  
php-embedded-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
a52c5dfb1e0eb52c83965c0dc5e6b7ff1c6c50553fe1a9b29e49b977f0aeae0d  
php-enchant-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
1e287c54d1b76e9adc169ca6b446e08c1b7013f2c68408eae0c79923f3c58d73  
php-fpm-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
18d933596c1def34379b5d0d1bf9a789ca0034d3930bbe1566dddfad6085bbd5  
php-gd-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
3042e3eaed7876445b3acf07ef482259fe8413f3e4e55405d1d76366d8afde8b  
php-imap-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
3e5fc5c46acb4fb1249f2b3e8e580caa07f4cda05e8e2dbef83d2f81dcd845ff  
php-intl-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
a40d0e8fafb5d54cde0cae013ef3ab19b559fd93dc8a8cb6ab93a0ebc3147bfa  
php-ldap-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
75b0cf46e035aed61c4714a517b2ccef8850cfadeb9543e34eb18b6dfdf398cb  
php-mbstring-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
9ca19170b19d9c6917dc407fafeb31d4cb7ad76992bee021cdcb976c021571e4  
php-mysql-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
6e85aaa43ee1dd174292fbcdd8e3e35ced65e8d69a88b6266acc0add645a7163  
php-odbc-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
82256356a0bde09f945f99096815423dc675ce853380d4ae6d4c15567ba066a2  
php-pdo-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
22d30a8346618e1f09e266ba2b22b491e8daa65c5eb6c4bb86cc05329ce3c60d  
php-pgsql-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
2693447fa0ad5632f248b7f3e07c8b418dc36da5d117fb30ae80e7a26c05ac6e  
php-process-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
164b189cac9a834a9721c4f323d6e3a58ac0cdfefd64dcc21607de54556c9bfe  
php-pspell-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
0a278f4abe0eb142c864e1087c93b8d127adcb5708299e98f39453393aad8922  
php-recode-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
efeae4c0cbbc4a9d7643fc13f93d5665e4ef99c900de565dd34346e81d0fa64c  
php-snmp-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
3b32736c6698616a820f187ed430140f7ac93c9e6b478aa140b87bda0218a3ae  
php-soap-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
b76458a0d402e52d3eb0bed3c8276c469165d3290cffa934b47674065041bad1  
php-tidy-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
98c57680a6582c2460c7c4f95153e19560b0a9b762f531bdc88d6251e3243bf9  
php-xml-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
11e4721c452a2e691e71d2e4530d0bd03e1817a7bfd36a99170b70bcdfef9231  
php-xmlrpc-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm
1b10dcc2a9140e3b515c5a5028e1ec29898b92d914ab2b0d4be892f4e25c0a5f  
php-zts-5.3.3-46.el6_6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
0c45509eff8fe9176329691a60dbfde48d3ad02fa496c8c383d180203d605d63  
php-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
c7a9ea7d8e9250adcd45312394cdf57969490e18d5f46f48b788333b1cdce512  
php-bcmath-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
017d7ae9cca8701ee461634d5baae9598cf78921955a4f77de85d6f5eb0109f6  
php-cli-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
6b78b92fbd734e70743913c684ab1859850fdb8ac5eaf17b167e37444c883202  
php-common-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
7b7c7712e78b169d49a0dbb91a58c8a9e755df347067e563258e85475081f685  
php-dba-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
20fa622e155bf1ff739152321105bc91b3d5b99a312ec0bf5336905016c05b51  
php-devel-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
94c0f77389b09896ee9e1053671cc592a03b6e817a9da200118eb533bd63c648  
php-embedded-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
729dee2897ced5fade373520d2fa3328c065263a369177b1baa1bd3bc0d1992d  
php-enchant-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
ab2a88d6f414d008354e987b2eca4641bc72cbc24d348120d04a1a2675732173  
php-fpm-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
01f2a681f2b90511dc4b4db3a4a8b70fe604cf31e08c6e0fb8a3c2e97000801c  
php-gd-5.3.3-46.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
ba53e43da7c0

[CentOS] HP Elitebook 8460p

[Phil Dobbin]

Hi, all.

I'm looking to install CentOS 7 to my HP Elitebook 8460p (Intel i5, 4gig
of RAM, 250 HD). Has anybody had any experience with this laptop &
CentOS 7?

Many thanks for any help.

Regards,

   Phil...

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] HP Elitebook 8460p

[Phil Dobbin]

Hi, suomi.

Thanks very much for the reply. Looks like I'll go ahead & install.

(Sorry for the top post: I'm on Google's webmail)

Cheers,

 Phil...

On 10 July 2015 at 12:00, anax  wrote:

> Hi Phil
> I have Fedora 20, Fedora21, and Fedora 22 installed on an HP Elitebootk
> Folio 1040.
> The only problem with Fedora 22 was, that anaconda required a GPT
> partition table to install an UEFI system. But after having changed from
> MBR to GPT partition table (using gdisk), no problems any more.
> I can not explain why anaconda required the UEFI installation: The SD-disk
> on the laptop is far less then 2 Terabytes.
>
> suomi
>
>
> On 07/10/2015 11:34 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> I'm intending to install CentOS 7 on a HP Elitebook 8460p. Does anybody
>> have any experience of this?
>>
>> Many thanks for any help.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>Phil...
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>  ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] OT, hardware: HP smart array drive issue

[m . roth]

Hi. Anyone working with these things? I've got a drive in "predictive
failure" on in a RAID5. Now here's the thing: there was an issue yesterday
when I got in, and I wound up power cycling the RAID; first boot of
attached server had issues, and said the controller had a failure, and a
drive had failed, and wouldn't continue booting; when I gave it the
three-finger salute, this time on the way up, during POST, it noted the
controller issue... but the thing came up, looking like it did a couple of
days ago.

Trying to prevent this from happening again, I've decided to replace the
drive that's in predictive failure. The array has a hot spare. I tried to
remove, using hpacucli, it refuses "operation not permitted", and there
doesn't *seem* to be a "mark as failed" command. *Do* I just yank the
drive?

 mark



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OT, hardware: HP smart array drive issue

[m . roth]

Jason Warr wrote:
> On July 10, 2015 11:47:09 AM CDT, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Hi. Anyone working with these things? I've got a drive in "predictive
>> failure" on in a RAID5. Now here's the thing: there was an issue
>> yesterday when I got in, and I wound up power cycling the RAID;
>> first boot of attached server had issues, and said the controller
>> had a failure, and a drive had failed, and wouldn't continue
>> booting; when I gave it the three-finger salute, this time on the
>> way up, during POST, it noted the controller issue... but the
>> thing came up, looking like it did a couple of days ago.
>>
>> Trying to prevent this from happening again, I've decided to replace
>> the drive that's in predictive failure. The array has a hot spare.
>> I tried to remove, using hpacucli, it refuses "operation not
>> permitted", and there doesn't *seem* to be a "mark as failed"
>> command. *Do* I just yank the drive?
>>
> Yep, just yank it.  It should start auto rebuilding on the spare.
>
> If you didn't have a spare you would pull the suspect drive and replace it
> with one of equal or greater capacity and it would auto rebuild as well.
>
> I have a bunch of them at home and have been using them at work for years.

Thanks for your quick reply, Jason. I'm used to LSI/MegaRAID/PERCs, where
you have to fail it, first. Oddity: I had the drive out for more then five
minutes while getting it out of the sled, putting the new one in, oh, and
dusting out the slot (gotta do that for all of them, next maintenance
window), but after I put in the replacement, and used hpacucli to check,
to my surprise it was rebuilding with the replacement, *not* with the
spare.

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OT, hardware: HP smart array drive issue

[Jason Warr]

On 7/10/2015 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

Jason Warr wrote:

On July 10, 2015 11:47:09 AM CDT, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

Hi. Anyone working with these things? I've got a drive in "predictive
failure" on in a RAID5. Now here's the thing: there was an issue
yesterday when I got in, and I wound up power cycling the RAID;
first boot of attached server had issues, and said the controller
had a failure, and a drive had failed, and wouldn't continue
booting; when I gave it the three-finger salute, this time on the
way up, during POST, it noted the controller issue... but the
thing came up, looking like it did a couple of days ago.

Trying to prevent this from happening again, I've decided to replace
the drive that's in predictive failure. The array has a hot spare.
I tried to remove, using hpacucli, it refuses "operation not
permitted", and there doesn't *seem* to be a "mark as failed"
command. *Do* I just yank the drive?


Yep, just yank it.  It should start auto rebuilding on the spare.

If you didn't have a spare you would pull the suspect drive and replace it
with one of equal or greater capacity and it would auto rebuild as well.

I have a bunch of them at home and have been using them at work for years.

Thanks for your quick reply, Jason. I'm used to LSI/MegaRAID/PERCs, where
you have to fail it, first. Oddity: I had the drive out for more then five
minutes while getting it out of the sled, putting the new one in, oh, and
dusting out the slot (gotta do that for all of them, next maintenance
window), but after I put in the replacement, and used hpacucli to check,
to my surprise it was rebuilding with the replacement, *not* with the
spare.

 mark
It has been a while since I have used a spare but what might have 
happened is the spare went back to being a spare when the real drive was 
replaced.  It seems to me that is the default behavior as a spare can be 
attached to more than one raid group.  That way it keeps your physical 
drive placement consistent.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OT, hardware: HP smart array drive issue

[Thomas Eriksson]

On 07/10/2015 10:49 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Jason Warr wrote:
>> On July 10, 2015 11:47:09 AM CDT, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Hi. Anyone working with these things? I've got a drive in "predictive
>>> failure" on in a RAID5. Now here's the thing: there was an issue
>>> yesterday when I got in, and I wound up power cycling the RAID;
>>> first boot of attached server had issues, and said the controller
>>> had a failure, and a drive had failed, and wouldn't continue
>>> booting; when I gave it the three-finger salute, this time on t
>>> way up, during POST, it noted the controller issue... but the
>>> thing came up, looking like it did a couple of days ago.
>>>
>>> Trying to prevent this from happening again, I've decided to replace
>>> the drive that's in predictive failure. The array has a hot spare.
>>> I tried to remove, using hpacucli, it refuses "operation not
>>> permitted", and there doesn't *seem* to be a "mark as failed"
>>> command. *Do* I just yank the drive?
>>>
>> Yep, just yank it.  It should start auto rebuilding on the spare.
>>
>> If you didn't have a spare you would pull the suspect drive and replace it
>> with one of equal or greater capacity and it would auto rebuild as well.
>>
>> I have a bunch of them at home and have been using them at work for years.
> 
> Thanks for your quick reply, Jason. I'm used to LSI/MegaRAID/PERCs, where
> you have to fail it, first. Oddity: I had the drive out for more then five
> minutes while getting it out of the sled, putting the new one in, oh, and
> dusting out the slot (gotta do that for all of them, next maintenance
> window), but after I put in the replacement, and used hpacucli to check,
> to my surprise it was rebuilding with the replacement, *not* with the
> spare.
> 

HP's raid controllers appears to have some logic that if the rebuild to
spare disk have not yet reached 50% when you insert the replacement, it
will abandon the rebuild to the spare and rebuild to the replacement
instead.

I don't have any documentation to prove it, but I have observed it
numerous of times.

Thomas
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Using gpg to encrypt a URL line on CentOS 6.

[Jerry Geis]

Is there a way to use GPG to encrypt
a URL line with parameters  ?

I was looking at libmcrypt also but it
is not part of CentOS.

I have found examples for mcrypt but not for gpg.

Thoughts? Thanks.

jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Using gpg to encrypt a URL line on CentOS 6.

[Frank Cox]

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:53:28 -0400
Jerry Geis wrote:

> Is there a way to use GPG to encrypt a URL line with parameters  ?

You can encrypt any text file with gpg, and the contents of text file can be 
anything you want.

I don't think you have stated your problem in sufficient detail.


-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Using gpg to encrypt a URL line on CentOS 6.

[zep]

On 07/10/2015 11:36 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:53:28 -0400
> Jerry Geis wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to use GPG to encrypt a URL line with parameters  ?
> You can encrypt any text file with gpg, and the contents of text file can be 
> anything you want.
>
> I don't think you have stated your problem in sufficient detail.

+1.   also, it'd probably be good to state what you're trying to accomplish 
rather 
than if you can throw a technology at vague something or another.   I think 
you'd
find gpg's password input cumbersome for symmetric keys, the output too long in 
ascii 
armor and possibly annoying to deal with public keys... but you don't really 
say what
you're trying to fix/avoid/do/not do.
-- 
public gpg key id: AE60F64C


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos