[CentOS] NSS Tools certutil buggy ? Centos 6 nss-tools-3.18.0
Hi, I try to add a certificate to a fresh certificate db, but the trust attributes are not set as expected. Neither can I change tham. The cert/pem is valid and double checked :) Any idea/suggestion? certutil -N -d certdb-test certutil -A -n "foobar" -t "u,u,u" -d certdb-test/ -i foobar.pem certutil -L -d certdb-test/ Certificate NicknameTrust Attributes SSL,S/MIME,JAR/XPI foobar ,, certutil -M -n "foobar" -t "u,u,u" -d /tmp/certdb-test/ certutil -L -d certdb-test/ Certificate NicknameTrust Attributes SSL,S/MIME,JAR/XPI foobar ,, Thanks and regards . Götz -- Götz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-Württemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jürgen Walter MdL Staatssekretär im Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg Geschäftsführer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using Mariadb databases from old server
Todor Petkov wrote: >> I'm running CentOS-7, but I left some MySQL databases >> on my old CentOS-6.5 partition which I'd like to retrieve. >> I assume they are contained in the file /var/lib/mysql/ibdata1 ? >> >> Could I just copy this file to /var/lib/mysql in CentOS-7? >> Or is there some way Mariadb or phpMyAdmin can import mysql databases >> from a server that is no longer running? > > The C6 partition is part of the new server, so you are able to mount it > and copy files from it, is this correct? Have you done something with > the MariaDB or it's still clean installation? I did add something to Mariadb on the new CentOS-7 system, but I don't mind deleting it and starting again. I can mount the partition with the old mysql files on it. Could I just copy the contents of /mnt/var/lib/mysql to the new system? There are files with the same name, eg ibdata1, on both systems. Could I have an ibdata2 ? Any suggestions gratefully received. -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using Mariadb databases from old server
On 29/05/2015 02:00 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I did add something to Mariadb on the new CentOS-7 system, but I don't mind deleting it and starting again. I can mount the partition with the old mysql files on it. Could I just copy the contents of /mnt/var/lib/mysql to the new system? There are files with the same name, eg ibdata1, on both systems. Could I have an ibdata2 ? Any suggestions gratefully received. If you don't care about the new data, you can: 1) shut down MariaDB 2) rename /var/lib/mysql to /var/lib/mysql.orig 3) copy the old directory /var/lib/mysql - /mnt/var/lib/mysql in your case - do not forget the permissions! - to /var/lib/mysql 4) systemctl start mysql (or mysqld, can't remember) 5) run mysql_upgrade - this is a script, which changes the mysql.user etc tables with the new columns 6) There are some issues with PHP for example, when you have an user in mysql system tables, that has an old hash password, so you need to reenter the password to update the hash I did it many times this way and everything went smoothly. Good luck and don't forget to make some backups just in case;) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Booting back into CentOS-6
This, IMHO, is one of the more annoying bugs with the newer GRUB (which i assume is the bootloader you are using). Specifically the newer grub can't, won't boot from a drive other than the one grub is on. suggest you revert to grub 0.97 or, if any boot loader is or can be put on the drive with the 6.5 distro you can make that drive the boot drive in the bios, which is how i do it. i.e. i just put grub on any drive i might want to boot from and install etc. with the drive i want to be able to boot to set as the boot drive in the bios. of course, depending on how you are mounting drives this may break links etc. since the bios will have different names for the drives due to the different order of the boot media list in the bios. hope that helps, it is highly annoying. "We kill when we close our eyes to poverty, affliction or infamy. We kill when, because it is easier, we countenance or pretend to approve of atrophied social, political, educational and religious institutions instead of resolutely combating them." - Hesse > Message: 13 > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 02:23:44 +0100 > From: Timothy Murphy > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Booting back into CentOS-6 > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > I'm currently running CentOS-7, > but I'd like to re-boot into CentOS-6.5 > which I have on another partition. > Although this OS is in the grub list when I boot, > if I try to run it I get a segfault. > I guess this is something to do with the change from grub to grub2? > > In any case, I'm wondering if there is any simple way > of booting into both CentOS-6 and CentOS-7? > > -- > Timothy Murphy > gayleard /at/ eircom.net > School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin > > > > > -- > > Message: 14 > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 02:52:53 +0100 > From: Timothy Murphy > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Using Mariadb databases from old server > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > I'm running CentOS-7, but I left some MySQL databases > on my old CentOS-6.5 partition which I'd like to retrieve. > I assume they are contained in the file /var/lib/mysql/ibdata1 ? > > Could I just copy this file to /var/lib/mysql in CentOS-7? > Or is there some way Mariadb or phpMyAdmin can import mysql databases > from a server that is no longer running? > > -- > Timothy Murphy > gayleard /at/ eircom.net > School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin > > > > > -- > > Message: 15 > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:55:41 -0700 > From: Gordon Messmer > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] New controller card issues > Message-ID: <5567d52d.5060...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > On 05/28/2015 03:02 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > > If I get you correctly you are saying that 3ware RAID cards are prone to > > hardware failures - as opposed to software RAID which is not (as it does > > not include hardware, so never has a hardware failures), right? No this is > > a joke of course. But it's the one one asked for ;-) > > Software RAID uses whatever controller the disks are connected to. > Often, that's the AHCI controller on the motherboard. And those > controllers are almost always more reliable than 3ware. Seriously. No > joke. > > > Again, I don't know your statistics: i.e. how many did you use, > > Hundreds of systems, both with 3ware and with software RAID. > > > how many > > of them died (failed as hardware). > > Not many, but some. A handful of data corruption cases (maybe 5? I > don't have logs). One BBU failure that resulted in a system that > wouldn't boot until it was removed (and a couple of hours down time > while 3ware techs worked that ticket). A couple of times when we really > wanted to move an array of disks and couldn't. > > Vs zero reliability issues with software RAID. > > > How well surge-free the power is. > > We always used trusted UPS hardware. > > > How > > well the guys who installed your cards into your boxes followed static > > discharge precautions > > Our systems were built by a professional VAR. Employees always wore > ground straps. There were other anti-static measures in place as well. > I had been to the facility. > > And I'll throw you a curveball: > > I've argued that software RAID is more reliable than 3ware cards, > specifically. In the world of ZFS and btrfs, you absolutely should not > use hardware RAID. As you mentioned earlier, hardware RAID volumes > should scan disks regularly. However, scanning only tells you if disks > have bad sectors. It can also detect data (parity) errors, but it can't > repair them. Hardware RAID cards don't have information that can tell > them which sectors are correct. ZFS and btrfs, on the other hand, > checksum their data and metadata. They can tell which sectors are > damaged in the case of corruption such
Re: [CentOS] Booting back into CentOS-6
Am 29.05.2015 um 03:23 schrieb Timothy Murphy : > I'm currently running CentOS-7, but I'd like to re-boot into CentOS-6.5 > which I have on another partition. Although this OS is in the grub list > when I boot, if I try to run it I get a segfault. "Where" did this segfault happend? > I guess this is something to do with the change from grub to grub2? Did it (C6) run before C7 on the same machine? How is your root fs mounted (c6:/etc/fstab)? > In any case, I'm wondering if there is any simple way > of booting into both CentOS-6 and CentOS-7? normally this is not a problem ... -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 7 selinux policy bug
Hi, folks, CentOS 7.1. Selinux policy, and targetted, updated two days ago. May 28 17:02:41 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file /usr/bin/bash.#012#012* <...> May 28 17:02:45 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file /usr/bin/uname.#012#012* <...> May 28 17:02:45 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/uname from execute_no_trans access on the file /usr/bin/uname.#012#012* <...> May 28 17:02:47 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file /usr/bin/mailx.#012#012* <...> I did do an ll =Z /usr/bin, and everything looks correct (system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0). Given that, looks to me like a policy bug. No? Yes? File a bug report? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Native ZFS on Linux
I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, political, etc? Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6. I used ZFS for a couple of large file servers with no problems. The only annoying part was having to manually install the kernel module each time a kernel update was issued. Because FreeBSD has built-in drivers for LSI cards (I use JBOD mode) and strong ZFS support, I've switched to FreeNAS with it's default native ZFS and driver support for LSI. I would have preferred to stick with CentOS, but FreeNAS just made things easier to manage. It also seems about twice as fast as ZFS on Linux (same hardware), but that may simply be a tuning issue. Is there any chance that a native ZFS (rather than btrfs) will ever emerge in RHEL/CentOS? Just curious, because I'd love to return to CentOS/SL next time I build large file servers. As an aside, I have used only WD Black and WD RedPro drives for RAID, and not had any issues. Green drives are scary :-) Chuck ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 selinux policy bug
On 29 May 2015 at 16:27, wrote: > Hi, folks, > >CentOS 7.1. Selinux policy, and targetted, updated two days ago. > > May 28 17:02:41 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/bash > from execute access on the file /usr/bin/bash.#012#012* <...> > May 28 17:02:45 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/bash > from execute access on the file /usr/bin/uname.#012#012* <...> May 28 > 17:02:45 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/uname from > execute_no_trans access on the file /usr/bin/uname.#012#012* <...> > May 28 17:02:47 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/bash > from execute access on the file /usr/bin/mailx.#012#012* <...> > > I did do an ll =Z /usr/bin, and everything looks correct > (system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0). Given that, looks to me like a policy bug. > No? Yes? File a bug report? > > mark > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I saw the same behaviour this morning, however the labels changed to "unlabelled" for a number of programs; e.g. /etc/ssh/sshd_config, /etc/shadow, /etc/pam/* and a few others. I saw this after I was not able to login to my laptop, login to single user mode and saw tonnes of SELinux errors and changed it from enforcing to permissive and then I was able to restore the labels. Most certainly believe its a bug. -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Native ZFS on Linux
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:51:58AM -0700, Chuck Munro wrote: > I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what > is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with > the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, > political, etc? > > Although btrfs is making progress, ZFS is far more mature, has a few > more stable features (especially Raid-z3) and has worked flawlessly > for me on CentOS-6 and Scientific Linux-6. I used ZFS for a couple > of large file servers with no problems. The only annoying part was > having to manually install the kernel module each time a kernel > update was issued. > > Because FreeBSD has built-in drivers for LSI cards (I use JBOD mode) > and strong ZFS support, I've switched to FreeNAS with it's default > native ZFS and driver support for LSI. I would have preferred to > stick with CentOS, but FreeNAS just made things easier to manage. > It also seems about twice as fast as ZFS on Linux (same hardware), > but that may simply be a tuning issue. > > Is there any chance that a native ZFS (rather than btrfs) will ever > emerge in RHEL/CentOS? Just curious, because I'd love to return to > CentOS/SL next time I build large file servers. > > As an aside, I have used only WD Black and WD RedPro drives for > RAID, and not had any issues. Green drives are scary :-) > > Chuck Licensing, IMO. Redistributing ZoL is likely fraught with a bit of legal peril, or at best, technical peril if you want to try and skirt the legal edges. Oracle is notoriously litigious and having a target liked Red Hat would probably have their lawyers whetting their chops. Ironically, btrfs was also an Oracle thing -- in that Chris Mason worked for them (believe he's now at Google?). Do agree that ZFS feels like what btrfs is trying to become. I use ZoL on some production boxes and its been quite stable, but am also considering the approach you've taken with FreeNAS for some larger deployments to chase after a bit more performance and tighter integration with the OS... Ray ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 selinux policy bug
What is your environment set up for? Is this just straight out of the box, or have you harden the systems any? -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Earl A Ramirez Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:53 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 selinux policy bug On 29 May 2015 at 16:27, wrote: > Hi, folks, > >CentOS 7.1. Selinux policy, and targetted, updated two days ago. > > May 28 17:02:41 python: SELinux is preventing > /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file > /usr/bin/bash.#012#012* <...> May 28 17:02:45 python: > SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file > /usr/bin/uname.#012#012* <...> May 28 > 17:02:45 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/uname > from execute_no_trans access on the file /usr/bin/uname.#012#012* > <...> May 28 17:02:47 python: SELinux is preventing > /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file > /usr/bin/mailx.#012#012* <...> > > I did do an ll =Z /usr/bin, and everything looks correct > (system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0). Given that, looks to me like a policy bug. > No? Yes? File a bug report? > > mark > > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I saw the same behaviour this morning, however the labels changed to "unlabelled" for a number of programs; e.g. /etc/ssh/sshd_config, /etc/shadow, /etc/pam/* and a few others. I saw this after I was not able to login to my laptop, login to single user mode and saw tonnes of SELinux errors and changed it from enforcing to permissive and then I was able to restore the labels. Most certainly believe its a bug. -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Native ZFS on Linux
Once upon a time, Chuck Munro said: > I have a question that has been puzzling me for some time ... what > is the reason RedHat chose to go with btrfs rather than working with > the ZFS-on-Linux folks (now OpenZFS)? Is it a licensing issue, > political, etc? Licensing. Sun chose an Open Source license that is incompatible with the GPLv2 as used by the Linux kernel, so it is not legally possible to distribute a combined work of the kernel and the Sun ZFS code (at least that's the opinion of a number of lawyers, including Red Hat's; not all agree, but not worth arguing about here). It is possible to access ZFS filesystems through the FUSE layer using Sun-derived code (because that doesn't create a combined work), but that's not really an "enterprise" filesystem access method. The only legal way to use ZFS natively under Linux would be to not use any of the Sun code and reimplement ZFS from scratch for Linux. That would be a large job. BTRFS also is much better integrated with the Linux kernel's way of doing things. The Linux ZFS port keeps its own cache separate from the kernel's page cache, which complicates memory management. Also, BTRFS has features that ZFS does not. I expect BTRFS to get a lot more mature in the near future, as Facebook is putting resources into moving parts of their infrastructure to BTRFS. -- Chris Adams ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Native ZFS on Linux - green drive cmt
Chuck Munro wrote: > As an aside, I have used only WD Black and WD RedPro drives for RAID, > and not had any issues. Green drives are scary :-) It's the TLER that kills you. We tried some early 3TB greens in some of our Penguins (OEM, rebranded Supermicro), and within a month, they'd start giving DRDY errors. It turns out that there were two issues: 1. They keep trying to spin down; ok in desktops, bad, bad, bad on servers. And this is *not* RAID, just as a plain vanilla drive. 2. Around '09, led by WD, they changed the firmware. Previously, you could use hdparm to set the TLER; after then, it was not user settable. TLER: if the drive finds a bad sector, this is how long it will retry before giving up, and rewriting it to another sector, marking that bad. The greens try for up to two ->minutes<-; servers' firmware expects this to happen in < 7 ->seconds<-. System is *not* happy mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 selinux policy bug
Conley, Matthew M CTR GXM wrote: > What is your environment set up for? Is this just straight out of the box, > or have you harden the systems any? > Straight out of the box policy. I've just looked, and I don't think I've even created any local policies to shut up selinux for things my users might do. I can tell, since I always create the local policies in /root. Luckily, we're in permissive mode - these aren't production servers, they're work machines, compute nodes or research. mark "one of my annual goals: shut up selinux babble" > > -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Earl A Ramirez > Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:53 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 selinux policy bug > > On 29 May 2015 at 16:27, wrote: > >> Hi, folks, >> >>CentOS 7.1. Selinux policy, and targetted, updated two days ago. >> >> May 28 17:02:41 python: SELinux is preventing >> /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file >> /usr/bin/bash.#012#012* <...> May 28 17:02:45 python: >> SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file >> /usr/bin/uname.#012#012* <...> May 28 >> 17:02:45 python: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/uname >> from execute_no_trans access on the file /usr/bin/uname.#012#012* >> <...> May 28 17:02:47 python: SELinux is preventing >> /usr/bin/bash from execute access on the file >> /usr/bin/mailx.#012#012* <...> >> >> I did do an ll =Z /usr/bin, and everything looks correct >> (system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0). Given that, looks to me like a policy bug. >> No? Yes? File a bug report? >> >> mark >> >> >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > I saw the same behaviour this morning, however the labels changed to > "unlabelled" for a number of programs; e.g. /etc/ssh/sshd_config, > /etc/shadow, /etc/pam/* and a few others. I saw this after I was not able > to login to my laptop, login to single user mode and saw tonnes of SELinux > errors and changed it from enforcing to permissive and then I was able to > restore the labels. > > Most certainly believe its a bug. > > > -- > Kind Regards > Earl Ramirez > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Getting Megaraid Software Manager Installed On CentOS 7
Well I'm pleased that my raid card post brought all the enthusiasts out of the woodwork. So who has installed LSI's MSM software under CentOS 7? I've downloaded the linux-x64 package from: http://www.lsi.com/products/raid-controllers/pages/megaraid-sas-9361-8i.aspx Extracted the files and run "install.csh -a". This installs vivaldiframeworkd under /etc/rc.d/init.d and that runs fine. I can access the host from a Windows install of MSM just fine. What seems to missing is the monitoring software. I think the run-time script is called mr_monitor. It doesn't seem to be installed. Attempts to configure monitor alerts from Windows returns "monitor is unreachable." Does anyone have any idea what is going on? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] VNC Server Centos 7 specify window manager
I have a simple question, how do I specify a gnome session with VNc Server. I correctly setup up the connections but when I log in all I get is a blue screen with a checkbox in the upper left corner saying "Accept clipboard from viewers". My guess is that I am loading generuc X11 by default. How do I specify in the etc/systemd/system/vncserver@:4.service file that I want it to load gnome? I tried editing my .vnc/xstartup file but that seems to have no effect. my xstartup file #!/bin/sh exec gnome-session & ~ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] EPEL metalink offline?
Hey guys, is EPEL metalink offline? Could not get metalink https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 error was 14: curl#6 - "Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org" Everything else works for me. Regards Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] EPEL metalink offline?
On Fri, May 29, 2015 4:08 pm, Tim wrote: > Hey guys, > > is EPEL metalink offline? > > Could not get metalink > https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 error > was > 14: curl#6 - "Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org" > > Everything else works for me. > I've noticed this yesterday when I was trying to install something not EPEL in the box configured to use EPEL as well. If you need something urgent, you may go directly to one of the mirrors. Here is URL of the one I maintain: http://bay.uchicago.edu/epel/ Thanks. Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] EPEL metalink offline?
Original Message > Date: Friday, May 29, 2015 11:08:50 PM +0200 > From: Tim > > Hey guys, > > is EPEL metalink offline? > > Could not get metalink > https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 > error was 14: curl#6 - "Could not resolve host: > mirrors.fedoraproject.org" > > Everything else works for me. > > Regards > Tim This works fine for me, and the DNS for mirrors.fedoraproject.org looks fine too -- points to the cname wildcard.fedoraproject.org., which resolves to 8 A-records, with 60sec TTLs (for my US/east coast location). Did you check to see what your DNS is showing? - Richard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] gcc34 from centos 6 install on CentOS 7
is there any issue with installing the compat-gcc34 package from centos 6 on centos 7 ? Thanks, jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VNC Server Centos 7 specify window manager
Never mind. I tried it again and it worked with just the gnome-session in the xstartup file. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] EPEL metalink offline?
I used to configure Googles DNS 8.8.8.8 as additional dns-server and it works now here from germany. Strange thing... Am 29.05.2015 um 23:20 schrieb Richard: > > > Original Message >> Date: Friday, May 29, 2015 11:08:50 PM +0200 >> From: Tim >> >> Hey guys, >> >> is EPEL metalink offline? >> >> Could not get metalink >> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 >> error was 14: curl#6 - "Could not resolve host: >> mirrors.fedoraproject.org" >> >> Everything else works for me. >> >> Regards >> Tim > > This works fine for me, and the DNS for mirrors.fedoraproject.org > looks fine too -- points to the cname wildcard.fedoraproject.org., > which resolves to 8 A-records, with 60sec TTLs (for my US/east coast > location). Did you check to see what your DNS is showing? > > - Richard > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] gcc34 from centos 6 install on CentOS 7
On 5/29/2015 2:23 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: is there any issue with installing the compat-gcc34 package from centos 6 on centos 7 ? probably won't work at all, as its dependencies are very likely to be all wrong. compat packages in RHEL/CentOS are designed to go back one major release. So, compat-gcc34 on EL6 was designed for EL5 compatibility. on EL7, there's a compat-gcc-44 to provide EL6 compatibility. I suggest you recompile whatever software depends on gcc 3.4 to run with el7's native gcc 4.8 -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Project Management Software
I have a need to use a project management software package under Centos 6.6 and have started looking at ProjectLibre which is a Java package. Unfortunately it seems to have shortcomings when it comes to following up projects and my current understanding is that it falls short of Microsoft Project 2010, i.e., a previous version. Does anyone have experience with this type of software and what would you recommend? Thank you in advance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Using Mariadb databases from old server
On 05/29/2015 07:00 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Todor Petkov wrote: I'm running CentOS-7, but I left some MySQL databases on my old CentOS-6.5 partition which I'd like to retrieve. I assume they are contained in the file /var/lib/mysql/ibdata1 ? Could I just copy this file to /var/lib/mysql in CentOS-7? Or is there some way Mariadb or phpMyAdmin can import mysql databases from a server that is no longer running? The C6 partition is part of the new server, so you are able to mount it and copy files from it, is this correct? Have you done something with the MariaDB or it's still clean installation? I did add something to Mariadb on the new CentOS-7 system, but I don't mind deleting it and starting again. I can mount the partition with the old mysql files on it. Could I just copy the contents of /mnt/var/lib/mysql to the new system? There are files with the same name, eg ibdata1, on both systems. Could I have an ibdata2 ? This is what I ran into trying to clone a web server on C7 (doing this from memory): There is something in the database file /var/lib/mysql that has to match something elsewhere on the machine. Apparently the match is created during the mariadb-server.rpm installation. I found two ways to transfer a /var/lib/mysql file successfully. 1. Transfer the file before installing mariadb-server.rpm or 2. After copying the file over the existing one, yum reinstall mariadb-server Hope this helps, Ted Miller, Indiana, USA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
