Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 and Sieve/Dovecot

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am 06.11.2014 um 01:08 schrieb Benjamin Smith:


Nearest I can tell, all should be good. If I copy any of the ~/sieve/*.sieve
scripts to ~/.dovecot.sieve they work fine, but they just aren't being "seen"
in the ~/sieve directory. Because of this, I can't manage sieve scripts in a
user's email client. (EG: KMail)

Am I missing something? As the user:
[spadmin@edison ~]$ ll
total 12
drwx--   8 spadmin spadmin 4096 Nov  6 00:00 Maildir
drwx--   3 spadmin spadmin 4096 Nov  4 23:46 sieve
[spadmin@edison ~]$ ll sieve/
total 12
-rw--- 1 spadmin spadmin   88 Nov  4 23:46 Knox.sieve
-rw--- 1 spadmin spadmin   96 Nov  4 23:46 Socrates.sieve
drwx-- 2 spadmin spadmin 4096 Nov  4 23:46 tmp


So it is just a misunderstanding on your end. The active sieve script 
under ~/sieve must be symlinked to the .dovecot.sieve file.


cd ~
ln -s sieve/Socrates.sieve .dovecot.sieve

Then dovecot will build the bytecode version of the plaintext sieve 
ruleset as ~/.dovecot.svbin.


Alexander


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Setting up NFS on Centos 6.6

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

On 11/06/2014 06:33 AM, c...@qgenuity.com wrote:

Hello,

I'm having an unusual amount of trouble setting up Centos 6.6 as an NFS
server. I have already created my exportfs file and run "chkconfig nfs
on".

When I try to start the nfs service with "service nfs start", I get

FATAL: Module nfsd not found.
FATAL: Error running install command for nfsd
Starting NFS services:  exportfs: internal: no supported addresses in
nfs_client
exportfs: 127.0.0.1:/dir-to-share: No such file or directory


your exportfs file seems wrong
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Setting up NFS on Centos 6.6

[John Doe]

From: "c...@qgenuity.com" 

> FATAL: Module nfsd not found.
> FATAL: Error running install command for nfsd
> Starting NFS services:  exportfs: internal: no supported addresses in
> nfs_client

uname -r
locate nfsd.ko
grep -v "^#" /etc/sysconfig/nfs 
cat /etc/exports 


JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ProFTPD SFTP with SELinux

[Daniel J Walsh]

On 11/05/2014 09:41 PM, Philip Gardner, Jr. wrote:
> Has anyone attempted to make SFTP on ProFTPD with SELinux work? I'd
> like to keep SELinux enabled on this particular system, but I prefer
> ProFTPD's SFTP solution over OpenSSH. The aureport tool reports the
> following:
>
> 28. 11/05/2014 12:58:58 proftpd
> unconfined_u:system_r:ftpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 4 file getattr
> system_u:object_r:sshd_key_t:s0 denied 86877
>
> I have the SFTP config setup to just use the OpenSSH host keys, and it
> appears to be getting denied read access to it. Thoughts?
>
If the access makes sense, then build a custom policy module and open a
bugzilla for it.
Probably should be a boolean to allow it.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 4

[centos-announce-request]

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CEBA-2014:1806  CentOS 6 zsh BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2014:1803 Important CentOS 6 mod_auth_mellon Security
  Update (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CEBA-2014:1804 CentOS 6 java-1.6.0-openjdk BugFix Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   4. Infra - CentOS Bug tracker migration (Fabian Arrotin)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:05:56 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1806  CentOS 6 zsh BugFix Update
Message-ID: <20141105120556.ga22...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1806 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1806.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
202127b4c7ae36af7ba509afe7dd8e331879a8b76e0166c02af4bca1f057f159  
zsh-4.3.10-9.el6.i686.rpm
4bb755d4713294af914c91b9829ffb26c067d0cb7718118574f4464ed7fe87dc  
zsh-html-4.3.10-9.el6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
bfe0e62f658aeec276f73b1aca27bc31dc57cbbb2c985a2bde313dba7fc4de13  
zsh-4.3.10-9.el6.x86_64.rpm
b82198356d48715c93d7f1148787694445ea805106bf0b32208b502409d5030f  
zsh-html-4.3.10-9.el6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
2a50598b33958767b774e2f110fe97f648a9bf039571c9f0f17e3ba8e8a3c20a  
zsh-4.3.10-9.el6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:06:15 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1803 Important CentOS 6
mod_auth_mellon Security Update
Message-ID: <20141105120615.ga22...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1803 Important

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1803.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
6055e9600cce5bf4dec3568d497336417daaf549e3f2931adacaab0f06edc1a4  
mod_auth_mellon-0.8.0-3.el6_6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
d71fdd630677e5f75b9ea81047116614b77f73a45125455ec7642f6e4f2c660e  
mod_auth_mellon-0.8.0-3.el6_6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
637af449c5a250ea6b90642522c5381e78144920dc45da31a88ab3ae9cbed906  
mod_auth_mellon-0.8.0-3.el6_6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:07:07 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1804 CentOS 6 java-1.6.0-openjdk
BugFix  Update
Message-ID: <20141105120707.ga22...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1804 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1804.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
ce8b6c57c7952533e4b1e0609833d8b71f530d901383a048b5efd6c44baec8ff  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm
26a08f91c45a7ec687e6b080e56588e457fecdf7fdb7a233e3545995a4d57502  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm
0602657ccce302a98ad1b8ea2c53ae4161e4d1629a69222d84cd0f19758f9236  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm
a6c001c8bc3fc186885690d814174abf5f807e4d2b33830cf8300aede4323af4  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm
2d3c4ee7b9e6d763de258cd64d5c1b7e1b139470c22f199589d9ca7cf53673f0  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
06b1e12ccf3ef51e2a722cdc7a17ba28e82e7da87ebea56b185625a851c8fa9d  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
ee7acf681faf4f0edf9b16e0e0f6fabc8508e1769123155088124fa282796170  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-demo-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
49bc35f90f0fc6dc5691cfeb7f6f858b19d0606dd68a0f8a2810490a13a688a6  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
b47074cd00d0fc21a7a65a13fc31947c10ea48fc897a6ca7aec8c537a0e2bce3  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
d36b22d8c675e73be34499d9eb63cdbc9e7a5002aede2516a121906e19552d88  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-src-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
64f539da9e808ac2ae0151b6c3fc68e301d71736561ad172085a7556c568b8cd  
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.33-1.13.5.1.el6_6.src

Re: [CentOS] Setting up NFS on Centos 6.6

[cl]

Hello,

Here are my outputs

uname -r:

2.6.32-042stab093.5

locate nfsd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.32-431.20.5.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
/lib/modules/2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko

grep -v "^#" /etc/sysconfig/nfs



# NFS Exports File

/dir-to-share   127.0.0.1(rw,insecure,all_squash)

Thanks!

> From: "c...@qgenuity.com" 
>
>> FATAL: Module nfsd not found.
>> FATAL: Error running install command for nfsd
>> Starting NFS services:  exportfs: internal: no supported addresses in
>> nfs_client
>
> uname -r
> locate nfsd.ko
> grep -v "^#" /etc/sysconfig/nfs
> cat /etc/exports
>
>
> JD
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Setting up NFS on Centos 6.6

[Jonathan Billings]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:09:51PM +0900, c...@qgenuity.com wrote:
> uname -r:
> 
> 2.6.32-042stab093.5

Your "CentOS" system is actually an OpenVZ container.  Your container
can't load its own kernel modules, there has to be a support in your
hosting provider's kernel.  

I suggest contacting the admins who administer your containers and ask
them about NFS support.

-- 
Jonathan Billings 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

[Phelps, Matthew]

I know you've been busy, but is there any update on this?



On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Johnny Hughes  wrote:

> On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> > I found this bug fix report
> >
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
> >
> > I thought we were not able to get Chromium for C6. Apparently it looks
> like
> > the work has been already done.
> >
> > Is it possible we (hi Johnny) can get this package into C6? This would
> be a
> > wonderful addition to CentOS 6.  Please and thank you.
>
> They (Red Hat) do not release the Supplemental packages, usually because
> they can't.  (IE, Sun/Oracle Java, Flash, etc.)
>
> This is usually because the sources are not completely open or there is
> a license issue for distribution or a payment required for support, etc.
>
> Red Hat enters into an agreement with said vendors (as required) to be
> able to distribute said packages only to paying customers.
>
> But, I'll see what I can find out.
>
> Thanks,
> Johnny Hughes
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>


-- 
Matt Phelps
System Administrator, Computation Facility
Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

[Phelps, Matthew]

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Phelps, Matthew 
wrote:

>
> I know you've been busy, but is there any update on this?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Johnny Hughes  wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>> > I found this bug fix report
>> >
>> > http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
>> >
>> > I thought we were not able to get Chromium for C6. Apparently it looks
>> like
>> > the work has been already done.
>> >
>> > Is it possible we (hi Johnny) can get this package into C6? This would
>> be a
>> > wonderful addition to CentOS 6.  Please and thank you.
>>
>> They (Red Hat) do not release the Supplemental packages, usually because
>> they can't.  (IE, Sun/Oracle Java, Flash, etc.)
>>
>> This is usually because the sources are not completely open or there is
>> a license issue for distribution or a payment required for support, etc.
>>
>> Red Hat enters into an agreement with said vendors (as required) to be
>> able to distribute said packages only to paying customers.
>>
>> But, I'll see what I can find out.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Johnny Hughes
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>
(Sorry for the top post earlier)


Found this post on Oct. 17th 2014 at
https://access.redhat.com/discussions/650963:

Chris Scarff:

As of RHEL 6.6 (October 2014) it's now included with
rhel-6-workstation-supplementary-rpms or rhel-6-server-supplementary-rpms

sudo yum install chromium-browser

   - Results:

Installing:
chromium-browser x86_64 38.0.2125.101-2.el6_6
rhel-6-workstation-supplementary-rpms 48 M
Installing for dependencies:
audit-libs-python x86_64 2.3.7-5.el6 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 62 k
libcgroup x86_64 0.40.rc1-15.el6_6 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 129 k
libsemanage-python x86_64 2.0.43-4.2.el6 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 81 k
policycoreutils-python x86_64 2.0.83-19.47.el6_6.1 rhel-6-workstation-rpms
346 k
setools-libs x86_64 3.3.7-4.el6 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 400 k
setools-libs-python x86_64 3.3.7-4.el6 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 222 k
Updating for dependencies:
audit x86_64 2.3.7-5.el6 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 208 k
audit-libs i686 2.3.7-5.el6 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 72 k
audit-libs x86_64 2.3.7-5.el6 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 71 k
policycoreutils x86_64 2.0.83-19.47.el6_6.1 rhel-6-workstation-rpms 680 k
  October 17 2014 at 4:58 PM

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Bounced email processing

[James B. Byrne]

On Wed, November 5, 2014 16:00, Keith Keller wrote:
>
> It's also inappropriate (IMO of course) to intentionally circumvent
> controls which have been implemented to restrict someone from posting to
> the list.

If the posting is a pertinent technical question then I submit that it is
unethical not to circumvent the restriction.  This is a technical forum and if
there is no possibility of said posting being off-topic or intended to be
unpleasant then it should be seen and answered if at all possible.

Banning from a mailing list is just a rather ham-fisted way of saying that the
job of moderating an individual disruptive user is deemed too burdensome. 
And, having moderated lists myself, I can sympathize with that position.  But
if other, un-banned, list members are willing to judiciously moderate said
individual on a case by case basis then I see no difficulty at all.


-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

[Leon Fauster]

Am 14.10.2014 um 21:29 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
> On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>> I found this bug fix report
>> 
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
>> 
>> I thought we were not able to get Chromium for C6. Apparently it looks like
>> the work has been already done.
>> 
>> Is it possible we (hi Johnny) can get this package into C6? This would be a
>> wonderful addition to CentOS 6.  Please and thank you.
> 
> They (Red Hat) do not release the Supplemental packages, usually because
> they can't.  (IE, Sun/Oracle Java, Flash, etc.)
> 
> This is usually because the sources are not completely open or there is
> a license issue for distribution or a payment required for support, etc.
> 
> Red Hat enters into an agreement with said vendors (as required) to be
> able to distribute said packages only to paying customers.
> 
> But, I'll see what I can find out.


BTW: http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/

--
LF


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 re-install

[James B. Byrne]

On Wed, November 5, 2014 19:41, Richard wrote:
>
>
>  Original Message 
>> Date: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 15:53:53 -0500
>> From: "James B. Byrne" 
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-7 re-install
>>
>> I have booted the system from a live cd.  I am looking at a 1.1GB
>> volume that I presume is the /boot partition I created in the
>> installer.  Inside I see this:
>>
>> config-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
>> /grub
>> /grub2
>> initramfs-0-rescue-[md5. . .].img
>> initramfs-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
>> initrd-plymouth.img
>> symvers-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
>> System-map-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
>> vmlinuz-0-rescue-[md5 as above]
>> vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
>>
>> /grub contains:
>>  splash.xpm.gz
>>
>> /grub2 contains:
>>  /themes
>>
>> /grub2/themes contains:
>> /system
>>
>> /grub2/themes/system contains:
>>
>>   nothing at all
>>
>> So, what does CentOS-7 boot from?  I take it that this is not
>> normal?  So where are the boot configuration files?  Note, that I
>> have only been working on this system through the GUI and I I did
>> was install, update, played around with Gnome3, installed KDE,
>> shutdown and re-installed over the original.
>>
>> So, whatever happened it is not because of anything one can only
>> screw up from the cli.  Since the re-install I have not been able
>> to boot from the HDD. Seeing as there are no boot configuration
>> files I can see why booting is a problem.  But, how does the
>> installer operate such that these critical files were not
>> provided?
>
> The /boot/grub2 directory should have the files:
>
> device.map
> grub.cfg
> grubenv
>
> The grub.cfg looks kind of like grub/grub.conf and can be generated
> using grub2-mkconfig (based on the files in /etc/grub.d and
> /etc/default/grub).
>
> If you booted from a live cd I suspect that the full boot setup
> isn't completed on the installed system, which would be why you
> don't seem to be seeing the grub2 boot files.
>

I booted from the liveCD simply to see what the regular installer had done to
the HDD.  Eventually I did install from the liveCD and that has allowed the
system to boot from the HDD again.

I am sort of perplexed as to why there is no simple provision to reuse the
entire disk as I recall was the case with previous versions of CentOS.  Why
the laborious requirement to delete each mount point from an install one
wishes to remove entirely?

In any case, I have gotten past the difficulty and have built zfs for
3.10.0-123-9.2.  Now to see if I can figure out how to rebuild the system
using zfs.


-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

[Phelps, Matthew]

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Leon Fauster 
wrote:

> Am 14.10.2014 um 21:29 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
> > On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> >> I found this bug fix report
> >>
> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
> >>
> >> I thought we were not able to get Chromium for C6. Apparently it looks
> like
> >> the work has been already done.
> >>
> >> Is it possible we (hi Johnny) can get this package into C6? This would
> be a
> >> wonderful addition to CentOS 6.  Please and thank you.
> >
> > They (Red Hat) do not release the Supplemental packages, usually because
> > they can't.  (IE, Sun/Oracle Java, Flash, etc.)
> >
> > This is usually because the sources are not completely open or there is
> > a license issue for distribution or a payment required for support, etc.
> >
> > Red Hat enters into an agreement with said vendors (as required) to be
> > able to distribute said packages only to paying customers.
> >
> > But, I'll see what I can find out.
>
>
> BTW:
> http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
>
> --
> LF
>
>
Yes, I'm aware of that build, but I'd love something more "official."

-- 
Matt Phelps
System Administrator, Computation Facility
Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 re-install

[Tony Molloy]

On Thursday 06 November 2014 14:27:31 James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Wed, November 5, 2014 19:41, Richard wrote:
> >  Original Message 
> >
> >> Date: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 15:53:53 -0500
> >> From: "James B. Byrne" 
> >> To: centos@centos.org
> >> Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-7 re-install
> >>
> >> I have booted the system from a live cd.  I am looking at a
> >> 1.1GB volume that I presume is the /boot partition I created in
> >> the installer.  Inside I see this:
> >>
> >> config-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
> >> /grub
> >> /grub2
> >> initramfs-0-rescue-[md5. . .].img
> >> initramfs-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
> >> initrd-plymouth.img
> >> symvers-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
> >> System-map-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
> >> vmlinuz-0-rescue-[md5 as above]
> >> vmlinuz-3.10.0-123.el.x86_64
> >>
> >> /grub contains:
> >>  splash.xpm.gz
> >>
> >> /grub2 contains:
> >>  /themes
> >>
> >> /grub2/themes contains:
> >> /system
> >>
> >> /grub2/themes/system contains:
> >>
> >>   nothing at all
> >>
> >> So, what does CentOS-7 boot from?  I take it that this is not
> >> normal?  So where are the boot configuration files?  Note, that
> >> I have only been working on this system through the GUI and I I
> >> did was install, update, played around with Gnome3, installed
> >> KDE, shutdown and re-installed over the original.
> >>
> >> So, whatever happened it is not because of anything one can only
> >> screw up from the cli.  Since the re-install I have not been
> >> able to boot from the HDD. Seeing as there are no boot
> >> configuration files I can see why booting is a problem.  But,
> >> how does the installer operate such that these critical files
> >> were not provided?
> >
> > The /boot/grub2 directory should have the files:
> >
> > device.map
> > grub.cfg
> > grubenv
> >
> > The grub.cfg looks kind of like grub/grub.conf and can be
> > generated using grub2-mkconfig (based on the files in /etc/grub.d
> > and /etc/default/grub).
> >
> > If you booted from a live cd I suspect that the full boot setup
> > isn't completed on the installed system, which would be why you
> > don't seem to be seeing the grub2 boot files.
> 
> I booted from the liveCD simply to see what the regular installer
>  had done to the HDD.  Eventually I did install from the liveCD and
>  that has allowed the system to boot from the HDD again.
> 
> I am sort of perplexed as to why there is no simple provision to
>  reuse the entire disk as I recall was the case with previous
>  versions of CentOS.  Why the laborious requirement to delete each
>  mount point from an install one wishes to remove entirely?
> 
> In any case, I have gotten past the difficulty and have built zfs
>  for 3.10.0-123-9.2.  Now to see if I can figure out how to rebuild
>  the system using zfs

Hi James,

>From an old email of mine to the list.

>  > 
> Hi Tony
> 
> Did you receive an answer to your question ? I didn't see anything
> on the list ! I'm interested too.
> 
> Thank you


No but I sorted it out myself. I just took a chance, it was on a test 
server anyway ;-)

In the disk partitioning screen you will see the old 6.5 installation. 
Clicking on it will bring up the existing 6.5 partitions. Then select 
each of the existing partitions and a configuration menu comes up which 
allows you to reformat the partition if required. So just don't 
reformat the partitions you want to keep .They then become part of the 
new 7.0 installation.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Tony



-- 
Linux nogs.tonyshome.ie 2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jul 31 
17:20:51 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


-- 
Linux nogs.tonyshome.ie 2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 15 
04:27:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 Vault Repository missing

[Johnny Hughes]

On 11/06/2014 09:52 AM, Will McKeon wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> I went to go and pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.5 vault, but the 
> CentOS-Vault repo file is referencing urls that no longer exist.  Navigating 
> to the URL, I noticed that the OS folder now only contains the SOURCE folder. 
>  I noticed that this is also true for 6.6, 7.0, and others.  I already have 
> the most up-to-date centos-release rpm.  I've done some searching and can't 
> find any information about those repos.  Are those repos down for maintenance 
> or has the structure been modified permanently?
> 

We have not moved 6.5 from the main mirror to vault yet ... I can do
that now though.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS 6.5 Vault Repository missing

[Will McKeon]

Hey all,

I went to go and pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.5 vault, but the CentOS-Vault 
repo file is referencing urls that no longer exist.  Navigating to the URL, I 
noticed that the OS folder now only contains the SOURCE folder.  I noticed that 
this is also true for 6.6, 7.0, and others.  I already have the most up-to-date 
centos-release rpm.  I've done some searching and can't find any information 
about those repos.  Are those repos down for maintenance or has the structure 
been modified permanently?

Thanks,
Will
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] updating pandoc and converting to UTF-8

[Jason T. Slack-Moehrle]

Hi guys,

I need to run pandoc. (http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/installing.html)

I did this:

rpm -ivh
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm

yum install -y pandoc

This is version 1.9.4.1

They are up to 13.1.1.

How can I update to the latest? Yum doesn't have anything more that I can
see.

Also, is there a tool like 'iconv' on OS X where I can convert between
encodings? It seems when moving this from OS X to Linux I am getting a few
encoding errors when building my project.

Thoughts are appreciated.

Jason
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 Vault Repository missing

[Valeri Galtsev]

On Thu, November 6, 2014 9:59 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 11/06/2014 09:52 AM, Will McKeon wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I went to go and pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.5 vault, but the
>> CentOS-Vault repo file is referencing urls that no longer exist.
>> Navigating to the URL, I noticed that the OS folder now only contains
>> the SOURCE folder.  I noticed that this is also true for 6.6, 7.0, and
>> others.  I already have the most up-to-date centos-release rpm.  I've
>> done some searching and can't find any information about those repos.
>> Are those repos down for maintenance or has the structure been modified
>> permanently?
>>
>
> We have not moved 6.5 from the main mirror to vault yet ... I can do
> that now though.
>

On a similar subject: How can I mirror centos-vault? To the contrary to
CentOS public mirror I do realize I need to run mirroring script not 4
times a day but maybe 4 time a Month at most...

Valeri


Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 Vault Repository missing

[Will McKeon]

>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf 
>Of Johnny Hughes
>Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 9:59 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 Vault Repository missing
>
>>On 11/06/2014 09:52 AM, Will McKeon wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> 
>> I went to go and pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.5 vault, but the 
>> CentOS-Vault repo file is referencing urls that no longer exist.  Navigating 
>> to the URL, I noticed that the OS folder now only contains the SOURCE 
>> folder.  I noticed that this is also true for 6.6, 7.0, and others.  I 
>> already have the most up-to-date centos-release rpm.  I've done some 
>> searching and can't find any information about those repos.  Are those repos 
>> down for maintenance or has the structure been modified permanently?
>> 
>
>We have not moved 6.5 from the main mirror to vault yet ... I can do that now 
>though.

That sounds good.  Thank you.

Will


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Bounced email processing

[Александр Кириллов]

James B. Byrne писал 2014-11-06 16:58:

On Wed, November 5, 2014 16:00, Keith Keller wrote:


It's also inappropriate (IMO of course) to intentionally circumvent
controls which have been implemented to restrict someone from posting 
to

the list.


If the posting is a pertinent technical question then I submit that it 
is
unethical not to circumvent the restriction.  This is a technical forum 
and if
there is no possibility of said posting being off-topic or intended to 
be

unpleasant then it should be seen and answered if at all possible.

Banning from a mailing list is just a rather ham-fisted way of saying 
that the
job of moderating an individual disruptive user is deemed too 
burdensome.
And, having moderated lists myself, I can sympathize with that 
position.  But
if other, un-banned, list members are willing to judiciously moderate 
said

individual on a case by case basis then I see no difficulty at all.


You're making too much of a hassle about a person I don't consider 
exceptionally polite to other list members. Please keep this discussion 
off list if at all possible. TIA.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 Vault Repository missing

[Fabian Arrotin]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 06/11/14 17:12, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> 

> 
> On a similar subject: How can I mirror centos-vault? To the
> contrary to CentOS public mirror I do realize I need to run
> mirroring script not 4 times a day but maybe 4 time a Month at
> most...
> 
> Valeri
> 

Well, there is no direct possibility to mirror centos-vault, at least
not with rsync (you can mirror http content if you want).
Each time I see people pointing their yum config to vault I want to
cry ...

*but* because it's a free world and that people can run machines
without any security updates (as long as they don't complain , but
still a *really* bad idea ...), vault.centos.org nodes exist

As stated in the http://vault.centos.org/notonvault.html file, two
external mirrors are providing full access to Vault content, and also
available through rsync :

mirror.nsc.liu.se::centos-store/
mirror.symnds.com::CentOS-vault-full/

Cheers,

- -- 

Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlRbqqsACgkQnVkHo1a+xU45IACfeF5bSETFWHaS5oauXrSY66/E
lS0AniEEvEHFLyJxkChqzQk8VHphOWTW
=QVYZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 Vault Repository missing

[Valeri Galtsev]

On Thu, November 6, 2014 11:06 am, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/11/14 17:12, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
> 
>>
>> On a similar subject: How can I mirror centos-vault? To the
>> contrary to CentOS public mirror I do realize I need to run
>> mirroring script not 4 times a day but maybe 4 time a Month at
>> most...
>>
>> Valeri
>>
>
> Well, there is no direct possibility to mirror centos-vault, at least
> not with rsync (you can mirror http content if you want).
> Each time I see people pointing their yum config to vault I want to
> cry ...

No, I'm not going to point _my_ yum config to vault... But it is just
convenient to have local copy of vault. You can easily shuffle packages
etc. One example: I have a few workstations in the Department that have
powerful a bit older NVIDIA cards, "legacy" as NVIDIA considers them. With
screen configuration we have it is only proprietary binary driver that we
can use. Legacy NVIDIA driver didn't survive the jump from CentOS 6.5 to
6.6 (so much for Enterprisiness...). And NVIDIA is (and will be) reluctant
to do something as well. So, I'm rolling back xorg,...

>
> *but* because it's a free world and that people can run machines
> without any security updates (as long as they don't complain , but
> still a *really* bad idea ...), vault.centos.org nodes exist
>
> As stated in the http://vault.centos.org/notonvault.html file, two
> external mirrors are providing full access to Vault content, and also
> available through rsync :
>
> mirror.nsc.liu.se::centos-store/
> mirror.symnds.com::CentOS-vault-full/

Great, thanks I'll see if I can mirror from one of them.

Also, I don't mind the mirror of CentOS vault on bay.uchicago.edu to be
added to the list of the two public mirrors above - once I have it in sync
that is (once you have dedicated box for mirrors, a few extra mirrors do
not change things much).

In the past I was mirroring vault from kernel.org, but they dropped
maintaining CentOS vault mirror a year or two ago. If I do not succeed,
I'll ask you for extra help if you do not mind.

Thanks.
Valeri

>
> Cheers,
>
> - --
>
> Fabian Arrotin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlRbqqsACgkQnVkHo1a+xU45IACfeF5bSETFWHaS5oauXrSY66/E
> lS0AniEEvEHFLyJxkChqzQk8VHphOWTW
> =QVYZ
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Samba guest no write access after update to samba -3.6.23-12.el6.x86_64

[Mike Watson]

I have an established server initially created with CentOS 6.5 and
updated weekly. Last week there was a massive update that I believe
upgraded my server to 6.6.

I had a number of issues after the upgrade---like my firewall being
turned on and blocking all inbound ports. (I have an external firewall.)
I've fixed all the issues created by this upgrade except for one.

I have a number of samba shares on this server used by some WinXP boxes
on my network and two other linux (Fedora) workstations. Since the
upgrade, guest/nobody write access no longer works. The smb.conf file is
unchanged.

The config file below has been unchanged since my initial installation.
Anyone know how I can restore guest write access? Guest can read, but
not write to the share.

Mike W

#=== Global Settings
=

[global]
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
lpq command = lpq -L   
restrict anonymous = no
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY
sync always = yes
ntlm auth = no   
guest ok = yes   
client use spnego = no   
null passwords = yes 
hide dot files = no  
domain master = no   
username map = /etc/samba/user.map   
use spnego = no  
winbind trusted domains only = yes   
winbind use default domain = yes 
lprm command = lprm  
logon home = \\%25N\%25U 
cups options = raw   
print command = lpr -l -P%p %s   
read only = no   
server string = Orion Samba Server Version %v
default service = global
path = /var/spool/samba 
remote announce = 192.168.1.5/MAYNARD 192.168.1.10/MAYNARD
192.168.1.16/MAYNARD 192.168.1.20/MAYNARD 192.168.1.25/MAYNARD
192.168.1.30/MAYNARD 192.168.1.100/MAYNARD 192.168.1.101/MAYNARD
192.168.1.102/MAYNARD 192.168.1.103/MAYNARD 192.168.1.104/MAYNARD
192.168.1.105/MAYNARD 192.168.1.106/MAYNARD 192.168.1.107/MAYNARD
192.168.1.108/MAYNARD 192.168.1.109/MAYNARD

workgroup = maynard
 

logon path =
\\%25N\%25U\profile 
   

preload =
global  
  

security =
share   
 

max log size =
50  
 

encrypt passwords =
no  




# Share Definitions
==

[Home]
comment = Home Directories
delete readonly = yes
path = /home 
strict sync = yes
;   valid users = %S 
;   valid users = MYDOMAIN\%S

[printers]
comment = All Printers
browseable = no  
printable = yes

[Var]
comment = Var-Web-Ebooks
delete readonly = yes
inherit permissions = yes
path = /var
strict sync = yes

[mikew]
comment = Home Directory
delete readonly = yes
inherit permissions = yes
path = /home/Home


[Stuff]
path = /home/stuff

[Root]
path = /

-- 
--

"Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rises up and smites thee."
  -- William Kershner
http://crucis-court.com
http://www.crucis.net/1632search

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Samba guest no write access after update to samba -3.6.23-12.el6.x86_64

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am 2014-11-06 19:05, schrieb Mike Watson:

I have an established server initially created with CentOS 6.5 and
updated weekly. Last week there was a massive update that I believe
upgraded my server to 6.6.

I had a number of issues after the upgrade---like my firewall being
turned on and blocking all inbound ports. (I have an external 
firewall.)

I've fixed all the issues created by this upgrade except for one.

I have a number of samba shares on this server used by some WinXP boxes
on my network and two other linux (Fedora) workstations. Since the
upgrade, guest/nobody write access no longer works. The smb.conf file 
is

unchanged.

The config file below has been unchanged since my initial installation.
Anyone know how I can restore guest write access? Guest can read, but
not write to the share.

Mike W


Check for SELinux AVCs.

Alexander

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Setting up NFS on Centos 6.6

[zep]

On 11/06/2014 08:09 AM, c...@qgenuity.com wrote:

> From: "c...@qgenuity.com" 
>
>> FATAL: Module nfsd not found.
>> FATAL: Error running install command for nfsd
>> Starting NFS services:  exportfs: internal: no supported addresses in
>> nfs_client
> uname -r; locate nfsd.ko ; grep -v "^#" /etc/sysconfig/nfs ; cat
> /etc/exports
> Hello,
>
> Here are my outputs
>
> uname -r:
>
> 2.6.32-042stab093.5
>
> locate nfsd.ko
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-431.20.3.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-431.20.5.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko
>
have you done something weird with your kernel?   like trying to compile
a new kernel from source?
my system gives back...
  [root@nemesis ~]# uname -r
  2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64
so the stab093 looks a bit unusual to me.
what does your  cat /boot/grub/menu.lst
look like and what does yum check-update show as available?

it'd also be very helpful for posterity if you didn't toppost responses
to the messages.  these are archived in case someone has the same
problem and top posting can make things more difficult than they need to be.

-- 
public gpg key id: AE60F64C

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Samba guest no write access after update to samba -3.6.23-12.el6.x86_64

[Mike Watson]

--

"Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rises up and smites thee."
  -- William Kershner
http://crucis-court.com
http://www.crucis.net/1632search

On 11/06/2014 12:08 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 2014-11-06 19:05, schrieb Mike Watson:
>> I have an established server initially created with CentOS 6.5 and
>> updated weekly. Last week there was a massive update that I believe
>> upgraded my server to 6.6.
>>
>> I had a number of issues after the upgrade---like my firewall being
>> turned on and blocking all inbound ports. (I have an external firewall.)
>> I've fixed all the issues created by this upgrade except for one.
>>
>> I have a number of samba shares on this server used by some WinXP boxes
>> on my network and two other linux (Fedora) workstations. Since the
>> upgrade, guest/nobody write access no longer works. The smb.conf file is
>> unchanged.
>>
>> The config file below has been unchanged since my initial installation.
>> Anyone know how I can restore guest write access? Guest can read, but
>> not write to the share.
>>
>> Mike W
>
> Check for SELinux AVCs.
>
> Alexander
>
SELinux is/has been disabled.

mw
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Samba guest no write access after update to samba -3.6.23-12.el6.x86_64

[Bowie Bailey]

On 11/6/2014 1:05 PM, Mike Watson wrote:

I have an established server initially created with CentOS 6.5 and
updated weekly. Last week there was a massive update that I believe
upgraded my server to 6.6.

I had a number of issues after the upgrade---like my firewall being
turned on and blocking all inbound ports. (I have an external firewall.)
I've fixed all the issues created by this upgrade except for one.

I have a number of samba shares on this server used by some WinXP boxes
on my network and two other linux (Fedora) workstations. Since the
upgrade, guest/nobody write access no longer works. The smb.conf file is
unchanged.

The config file below has been unchanged since my initial installation.
Anyone know how I can restore guest write access? Guest can read, but
not write to the share.


I don't see anything obvious.  The first thing I would do is to take a 
look at 'smbstatus' while a guest user is logged on and make sure it is 
connecting as the user you expect.


--
Bowie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

[Robert Arkiletian]

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster 
wrote:

>
> BTW:
> http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
>
>
Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official
"supplementary" ones from RH?

In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment,
etc... ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

[Phelps, Matthew]

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian  wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster 
> wrote:
>
> >
> > BTW:
> >
> http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
> >
> >
> Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official
> "supplementary" ones from RH?
>
> In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment,
> etc... ?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


I don't know, and that's the point! Personally, I'd be OK with using it,
but since my work is audited by the Federal Gum'mint, I don't know how
they'd feel about it. :)



-- 
Matt Phelps
System Administrator, Computation Facility
Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] group install KDE does not enable runtime?

[James B. Byrne]

In my continuing investigation of CentOS-7 I did yet another minimal install. 
Subsequent to that I ran yum update kernel, and then yum group install KDE.

Now, KDE installed about 480Mb of stuff, which compares favourably to Gnome's
971Mb.  However, when I run startx from the command line, instead of getting a
desktop I see these errors instead:

xauth: file /root/.serverauth.12462 does not exist

xinit: unable to run server "/usr/bin/X": No such file or directory

Followed by instructions on how to link "/usr/bin/X" to ones choice of display
server.  This seems a little awkward for a mature distro.  Is it really the
case that one must hand link files to get any other desktop instead of gnome? 
is this by design?


-- 
***  E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel  ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited  http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive  vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada  L8E 3C3

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS 7 Manual Install

[Parvez Halim]

I am following the instructions from the CentOS website to manually install
CentOS 7 (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/ManualInstall) but the guide seems
to have some quality issues. I've partitioned the storage fine and now onto
setting up RPM. Unfortunately I am at a loss on how to do this. I am doing
this on VMware Workstation 10 and the host OS is Ubuntu 14.04.

Thanks

Parvez
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] yum/yumex resetting system and bios clock

[g]

greetings,

for some strange reason, for the past 6 or more months, when i run
yum or yumex, after updates are finished, i see that my clock in
panel has been changed.

what might be happening?

any suggestions as to how to cure problem?

thank you for any and all help.


-- 

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Samba guest no write access after update to samba -3.6.23-12.el6.x86_64

[Mike Watson]

On 11/06/2014 01:47 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 11/6/2014 1:05 PM, Mike Watson wrote:
>> I have an established server initially created with CentOS 6.5 and
>> updated weekly. Last week there was a massive update that I believe
>> upgraded my server to 6.6.
>>
>> I had a number of issues after the upgrade---like my firewall being
>> turned on and blocking all inbound ports. (I have an external firewall.)
>> I've fixed all the issues created by this upgrade except for one.
>>
>> I have a number of samba shares on this server used by some WinXP boxes
>> on my network and two other linux (Fedora) workstations. Since the
>> upgrade, guest/nobody write access no longer works. The smb.conf file is
>> unchanged.
>>
>> The config file below has been unchanged since my initial installation.
>> Anyone know how I can restore guest write access? Guest can read, but
>> not write to the share.
>
> I don't see anything obvious.  The first thing I would do is to take a
> look at 'smbstatus' while a guest user is logged on and make sure it
> is connecting as the user you expect.
>
It is.

Samba version 3.6.23-12.el6
PID Username  Group Machine
---
 

Service  pid machine   Connected at
---
Stuff16177   remington Thu Nov  6 15:21:12 2014
Var  16177   remington Thu Nov  6 15:21:56 2014

Locked files:
Pid  UidDenyMode   Access  R/W   
Oplock   SharePath   Name   Time
--
1617799 DENY_NONE  0x100081RDONLY
NONE /home/stuff   .   Thu Nov  6 15:21:25 2014

mw
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

[Johnny Hughes]

On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian  wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> BTW:
>>>
>> http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
>>>
>>>
>> Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official
>> "supplementary" ones from RH?
>>
>> In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment,
>> etc... ?

Yes, those use the Developer Tool Set .. the ones from Red Hat do not.

I can not get the Sources for the Red Hat supplemental channel because
they do distribute the pepperflash component.

I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] yum/yumex resetting system and bios clock

[g]

greetings,

for some strange reason, for the past 6 or more months, when i run
yum or yumex, after updates are finished, i see that my clock in
panel has been changed.

what might be happening?

any suggestions as to how to cure problem?

thank you for any and all help.


-- 

peace out.

in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 Manual Install

[Jitse Klomp]

>
> 2014-11-06 22:15 GMT+01:00 Parvez Halim :
>
I am following the instructions from the CentOS website to manually install
> CentOS 7 (http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/ManualInstall) but the guide seems
> to have some quality issues. I've partitioned the storage fine and now onto
> setting up RPM. Unfortunately I am at a loss on how to do this. I am doing
> this on VMware Workstation 10 and the host OS is Ubuntu 14.04.
>
​
The gist of 'setting up' rpm is mounting a CentOS (dvd)image under /source
and cd'ing to /source/Packages. Mind you, the instructions on that wiki are
intended for CentOS 5. You would have to improvise quite a lot to get them
to work for C7...

 - Jitse
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

[Leon Fauster]

Am 06.11.2014 um 23:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
> On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian  wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
>>> Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official
>>> "supplementary" ones from RH?
>>> 
>>> In other words, were they built with the same libs, patches, environment,
>>> etc... ?
> 
> Yes, those use the Developer Tool Set .. the ones from Red Hat do not.
> 
> I can not get the Sources for the Red Hat supplemental channel because
> they do distribute the pepperflash component.
> 
> I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.



Insight into the process would help to roll it. Speak, 
are the spec files to build under a GPL-similar force?

The above mentioned version are build and packaged in 
two different steps. It could be done smarter but that
is just cosmetic.

--
LF

 

 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 Vault Repository missing

[Leon Fauster]

Am 06.11.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Fabian Arrotin :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 06/11/14 17:12, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> 
> 
>> 
>> On a similar subject: How can I mirror centos-vault? To the
>> contrary to CentOS public mirror I do realize I need to run
>> mirroring script not 4 times a day but maybe 4 time a Month at
>> most...
>> 
>> Valeri
>> 
> 
> Well, there is no direct possibility to mirror centos-vault, at least
> not with rsync (you can mirror http content if you want).
> Each time I see people pointing their yum config to vault I want to
> cry ...


this possibility is great to test special configurations and 
the corresponding update process (e.g. setup 6.5 test system).

--
LF




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos