Re: [CentOS] Loss of network connectivity | kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, James A. Peltier wrote: | Every few months I lose network connectivity and have to restart the | server: What kind of machine are you running this on? If you have a BIOS check to see if there is an update available for it. Assuming that you have the latest BIOS on the machine try booting with MSI-X disabled and see if it becomes more stable. I'll second the suggestion for disabling MSI-X and add one: add pcie_aspm=off to your boot-time kernel options. You wouldn't happen to be running a SuperMicro mainboard with onboard Intel 82574L NICs, would you? If so, I'll also suggest installing the kmod-e1000e package from elrepo.org, which includes a workaround for the bad PROM that's involved. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Loss of network connectivity | kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
James & Paul, Thank you for your suggestions, I will give them a try. Paul, it is indeed a SuperMicro with onboard Intel 82574L's. So I will try the kmod-e1000e package as well. Very grateful for your help to and to this list. Thanks, PJF On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Sat, 8 Mar 2014, James A. Peltier wrote: > > | Every few months I lose network connectivity and have to restart the >> | server: >> >> What kind of machine are you running this on? If you have a BIOS check >> to see if there is an update available for it. Assuming that you have the >> latest BIOS on the machine try booting with MSI-X disabled and see if it >> becomes more stable. >> > > I'll second the suggestion for disabling MSI-X and add one: add > pcie_aspm=off to your boot-time kernel options. > > You wouldn't happen to be running a SuperMicro mainboard with onboard > Intel 82574L NICs, would you? If so, I'll also suggest installing the > kmod-e1000e package from elrepo.org, which includes a workaround for the > bad PROM that's involved. > > -- > Paul Heinlein > heinl...@madboa.com > 45°38' N, 122°6' W > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Loss of network connectivity | kernel: irq 68: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
On Sun, 9 Mar 2014, P J wrote: James & Paul, Thank you for your suggestions, I will give them a try. Paul, it is indeed a SuperMicro with onboard Intel 82574L's. So I will try the kmod-e1000e package as well. Don't neglect the pcie_aspm=off in grub.conf; that and the elrepo package made the problem go away for me. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Question about trademarks
I've tried emailing this to centos...@redhat.com , but mailer-dae...@googlemail.com sent me this Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: centos...@redhat.com Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain redhat.com by mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 5.2.1... Mailbox disabled for this recipient So I'm emailing this to you guys I'm thinking of creating a project based on JBoss EAP the same way CentOS does with RHEL. Obviously I can't call it JBoss EAP so I thought I could call it CentAP, for Community Enterprise Application Platform. Will this infringe on the Red Hat and/or CentOS trademarks? -- Pouar ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question about trademarks
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pouar wrote: > I've tried emailing this to centos...@redhat.com , but > mailer-dae...@googlemail.com sent me this > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > centos...@redhat.com > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server > for the recipient domain redhat.com by mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]. > > The error that the other server returned was: > 550 5.2.1... Mailbox disabled for this recipient > > So I'm emailing this to you guys > > I'm thinking of creating a project based on JBoss EAP the same way > CentOS does with RHEL. Obviously I can't call it JBoss EAP so I thought > I could call it CentAP, for Community Enterprise Application Platform. > Will this infringe on the Red Hat and/or CentOS trademarks? > Given the recent discussion in the thread below [0], you probably shouldn't name it as such. Unless your "spin/project" becomes an official variant. Read Johnny's response (URL below) and respond back if you have any questions. [0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-February/141070.html > -- > Pouar > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cachefs
Yes, compiler cache is different. I suppose I should ask is there something similar to cache? On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:24 AM, Nux! wrote: > On 02.03.2014 15:58, Rita wrote: > > thanks steve. seems like we are in the same boat. > > > > I was wondering if there was an alternative to cachefs like > > http://ccache.samba.org/ > > I don't see how a compiler cache could help you with your problem. > That's a totally different thing. > > HTH > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- --- Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.-- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question about trademarks
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pouar wrote: > > > > I'm thinking of creating a project based on JBoss EAP the same way > > CentOS does with RHEL. Obviously I can't call it JBoss EAP so I thought > > I could call it CentAP, for Community Enterprise Application Platform. > > Will this infringe on the Red Hat and/or CentOS trademarks? On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 18:06 -0400, SilverTip257 wrote: > > Given the recent discussion in the thread below [0], you probably shouldn't > name it as such. > > Unless your "spin/project" becomes an official variant. > Read Johnny's response (URL below) and respond back if you have any > questions. > > > [0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-February/141070.html So Centipede is OK, since it is distinctive different from Centos but CentAP infringes. How about CentsAPP or Centsapp ? That won't infringe. -- Paul. England, EU. Our systems are exclusively Centos. No Micro$oft Windoze here. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question about trademarks
On 09/03/14 08:26 PM, Always Learning wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pouar wrote: >>> >>> I'm thinking of creating a project based on JBoss EAP the same way >>> CentOS does with RHEL. Obviously I can't call it JBoss EAP so I thought >>> I could call it CentAP, for Community Enterprise Application Platform. >>> Will this infringe on the Red Hat and/or CentOS trademarks? > > On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 18:06 -0400, SilverTip257 wrote: >> >> Given the recent discussion in the thread below [0], you probably shouldn't >> name it as such. >> >> Unless your "spin/project" becomes an official variant. >> Read Johnny's response (URL below) and respond back if you have any >> questions. >> >> >> [0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-February/141070.html > > So Centipede is OK, since it is distinctive different from Centos but > CentAP infringes. > > How about CentsAPP or Centsapp ? That won't infringe. Centipede, as a technical thing/program, looks to be fine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centipede_(disambiguation) Personally, I would: a) Not use Cent* b) Ask a trademark lawyer -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question about trademarks
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Pouar wrote: > > > > > > I'm thinking of creating a project based on JBoss EAP the same way > > > CentOS does with RHEL. Obviously I can't call it JBoss EAP so I thought > > > I could call it CentAP, for Community Enterprise Application Platform. > > > Will this infringe on the Red Hat and/or CentOS trademarks? > > On Sun, 2014-03-09 at 18:06 -0400, SilverTip257 wrote: > > > > Given the recent discussion in the thread below [0], you probably > shouldn't > > name it as such. > > > > Unless your "spin/project" becomes an official variant. > > Read Johnny's response (URL below) and respond back if you have any > > questions. > > > > > > [0] http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-February/141070.html > > So Centipede is OK, since it is distinctive different from Centos but > CentAP infringes. > > How about CentsAPP or Centsapp ? That won't infringe. > > Good point. I linked to Johnny's response for just this reason ... read and interpret for yourself! :) After all, the person choosing the name is ultimately responsible. I read the OP's message too quickly and skimmed right by the "AP" replacing the "OS". It's still darn close to CentOS (as Digimer points out as well) and I'd be cautious to choosing CentAP. > > > -- > Paul. > England, > EU. > >Our systems are exclusively Centos. No Micro$oft Windoze here. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
