Re: [CentOS] default gw route has gone? SOLVED
On 01/16/2014 11:28 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Weird behaviour. A couple of days ago I installed another DSL router. During the process I have somehow caused the default gw route to disappear - on system start up the interface comes up fine, I can see and connect to the local subnet but not to the internet. [rkampen@timsws network-scripts]$ route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 link-local * 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0 is what I get at startup. I need to add sudo route add default gw 192.168.1.1 to get things working properly. [rkampen@timsws network-scripts]$ route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 link-local * 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0 default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 Google shows me a number of responses that all tell me to add a line to /etc/sysconfig/network which I already had. [rkampen@timsws network-scripts]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=timsws GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 and [rkampen@timsws network-scripts]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE="eth0" NM_CONTROLLED="yes" ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=no IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no NAME="System eth0" UUID=5fb06bd0-0bb0-7ffb-45f1-d6edd65f3e03 HWADDR=00:24:8C:80:0B:15 PEERDNS=yes PEERROUTES=yes LAST_CONNECT=1389583930 So what am I missing? Thanks to those that responded. Turns out that having defroute=no is the problem - really helps to actually read what is in the ifcfg-eth0 file. On a side note - the various ADSL broadband routers supplied by the NZ telcos all seem to have missing or broken bits - the vodafone one doesn't open the firewall properly for incoming http - the telecom device allows one to specify a different IP address for the router but not the gw address - thus it only works if you use their default IP/gw address. So many hours wasted. BTW - all other devices are working just fine - just my main CentOS 6.5 WS fails. TIA ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 107, Issue 9
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2014:0026 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update
(Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2014:0027 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:04:23 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0026 Critical CentOS 6
java-1.7.0-openjdk Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20140115110423.ga23...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0026 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0026.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
23a0398eef38be83195eb0fccc24ebe54b3ca51edd350b09fa6a05d256ee63cc
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.i686.rpm
64371a3e7b476b95f4bfda3f805f237fa431ef21d3e79f786f2ff8e355dfcb82
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.i686.rpm
bb0c14e74121c9c2ca9a28d0f2f4aae69ca9efc151d484c5d2f064bf7dcf1d18
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.i686.rpm
f9099825fd1474021c73792e11f06722ae6d2ccaa0fd44bc63bb88624543edde
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.noarch.rpm
f7290801eeb6a3b01fe36c973fbaa2131c3ae4dad9d01fc542c9d721b37abb67
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.i686.rpm
x86_64:
c4314a7f9938f7beb7d106ecd26844a3d883d91077d4bdeec40ce5e9d086b85e
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
b9d76670ba0dc34bace9c995e6b3dc6c17cc8dade24a862243c2d75d18c0329b
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
9440abb63aa7a5bb75e61c5a2e58483aeb302a1dbcac50d72290949783830029
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
f9099825fd1474021c73792e11f06722ae6d2ccaa0fd44bc63bb88624543edde
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.noarch.rpm
dac184e8c4d88dbc5da9db40561d08a75f3424b4e9502141a021f3d54e348de5
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
e38afbec2f04dfc0982594724a371805b278a431e0ee9d220f003adda5ef348d
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el6_5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:16:34 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0027 Important CentOS 5
java-1.7.0-openjdk Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20140115111634.ga11...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0027 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0027.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
30812d30d8ede7fa1c21174522d59bf12187bd99006475d1fcaf6bb76cf4e8ed
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
697b27dabe7ea3d0cc7a7b6ad307ce08c35295064dd09958a5516c5afd3d2afb
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
b5f7a2a90818e54abde223abf151907d714971dd7fef5d8b19c1c5743b406ffe
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
30b3270acfd54ff77e9ad50c76b0eb3443ba97f36b702b5bd8b15fb14cb56d9e
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
71acfb7f04742a70a0b905cc677d7cf8b72990b03f0a6f9b27298e78820fc897
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.i386.rpm
x86_64:
189f7dd3675dc9fb44e3410deae51340fc05b4ff27379715e8c6f5b9f75776c9
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
73336ebf7af849ec5e54335793fc651a2444f6e0b5362bbd21e30f157862c6ae
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
2e8db52d26a53505cb20eac30147543b9ae6cc6aadd32b2801ff1c6725b56a5f
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
d9cc947dd116121bc0ee7e50780e45f4b7ee64f2eb03960c847801473de221cf
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
0f12680bcb206978475ac6f7b1b724eed7396ec71a04f63ea34177e39e0afdce
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.x86_64.rpm
Source:
7c14457f4849035141a63445e25f650aef4c155e525862117c1bad97ba76725f
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.51-2.4.4.1.el5_10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou
[CentOS] Your opinion about RHCSA certification
Hello to all, I'm currently studying (and collecting notes here https://github.com/fdicarlo/RHCSA_cs) for RHCSA. My plan is to RHCSA -> RHCE and then RHCSS. What I want to ask you is: - What do you think about it? - Did you find it useful? - Do you have any advices? Best regards, Fabrizio -- "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift." (A. Einstein) "La mente intuitiva è un dono sacro e la mente razionale è un fedele servo. Noi abbiamo creato una società che onora il servo e ha dimenticato il dono." (A. Einstein) Fabrizio Di Carlo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Your opinion about RHCSA certification
RHCSA gives good opportunity to learn all basics on Redhat Linux. Good to start with this. Thanks On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Fabrizio Di Carlo < dicarlo.fabri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello to all, > > I'm currently studying (and collecting notes here > https://github.com/fdicarlo/RHCSA_cs) for RHCSA. My plan is to RHCSA > -> RHCE and then RHCSS. > > What I want to ask you is: > > - What do you think about it? > - Did you find it useful? > - Do you have any advices? > > Best regards, > Fabrizio > > -- > "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a > faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant > and has forgotten the gift." (A. Einstein) > > "La mente intuitiva è un dono sacro e la mente razionale è un fedele > servo. Noi abbiamo creato una società che onora il servo e ha > dimenticato il dono." (A. Einstein) > > Fabrizio Di Carlo > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Regards, Vishesh Kumar http://linuxmantra.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS on this Laptop
Hi List, Just wondering if anyone has tried CentOS on this laptop. HP ENVY 15-j067cl 15.6 Sam's club is selling it for $699 right now. http://www.samsclub.com/sams/hp-15-6-touch-nb-intel-core-i7-4700qm/prod11610128.ip?navAction=push HP ENVY 15-j067cl 15.6" Touchscreen Laptop Computer, Intel Core i7-4700QM, 8GB Memory, 750GB Hard Drive Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] odd issue with ipmitool
Got an older server running 6.5. I've been fighting it - I have two webcams for surveillance of the room; one works with motion, but it resizes the picture down Adjusting resolution from 640x480 to 360x296 and the video's dark and bad contrast. So I went back to the camer I'd been using before that worked fine... on CentOS 5.x, and then I remembered why I'd gone to the other camera - the bottom 40% of so of the screen is green - no picture, just green. Doing a *lot* of googling, I saw references to this, and a number of folks suggesting problems with USB messages. Now, I've tried plugging it in both front and back of the server, given the possibility that there was a difference in versions of USB support, but no joy. So this morning, I started wondering if there was something going on, hardware-wise, on the box. Installed OpenIPMI and ipmitools, fired it up, and tried to do a simple ipmitool sel list... and get "unspecified error". Ok, I said to myself, I tried ipmitool sel 1, ditto... but 2 gives me Get SDR 0003 command failed: Unspecified error Get SDR 0005 command failed: Unspecified error Get SDR 0009 command failed: Unspecified error Get SDR 0014 command failed: Unspecified error Get SDR 0017 command failed: Unspecified error and then a record. I tried jumping around - 200 (which I've seen as the limit on other machines), nothing, 150, yes, 156 or so, yes. Not some lower numbers. So, now the question is whether something screwy is going on with the hardware... or if just, for some reason, the SEL is screwed up. Note that ipmitool sdr list works fine mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Your opinion about RHCSA certification
On 01/16/2014 08:46 AM, Vishesh kumar wrote: > RHCSA gives good opportunity to learn all basics on Redhat Linux. Good to > start with this. > > Thanks > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Fabrizio Di Carlo < > dicarlo.fabri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello to all, >> >> I'm currently studying (and collecting notes here >> https://github.com/fdicarlo/RHCSA_cs) for RHCSA. My plan is to RHCSA >> -> RHCE and then RHCSS. >> >> What I want to ask you is: >> >> - What do you think about it? >> - Did you find it useful? >> - Do you have any advices? >> >> Best regards, >> Fabrizio >> >> -- >> "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a >> faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant >> and has forgotten the gift." (A. Einstein) >> >> "La mente intuitiva è un dono sacro e la mente razionale è un fedele >> servo. Noi abbiamo creato una società che onora il servo e ha >> dimenticato il dono." (A. Einstein) >> >> Fabrizio Di Carlo >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I too am studying for the RHCSA.and while it IS tough (SO different from when I had to study for Windows 2000 Server Administration certs!) I wonder if the fact that Red Hat is about to release version 7 if the 6.x exams are still going to be valid?...and if so..for how much longer? EGO II ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS on this Laptop
On 1/16/2014 8:20 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > Sam's club is selling it for $699 right now. > http://www.samsclub.com/sams/hp-15-6-touch-nb-intel-core-i7-4700qm/prod11610128.ip?navAction=push > HP ENVY 15-j067cl 15.6" Touchscreen Laptop Computer, Intel Core i7-4700QM, > 8GB Memory, 750GB Hard Drive some general comments... 15.6" screen with 1366x768? *w*. that resolution belongs on a 13" screen, a 15" screen should be significantly higher, maybe even 1920x1024 (such as my wife's XPS15) 15.6" is a big laptop, rather unweildy for carrying anywhere. 8.5 lbs is *heavy*, too. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS on this Laptop
On 01/16/2014 02:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/16/2014 8:20 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >> Sam's club is selling it for $699 right now. >> http://www.samsclub.com/sams/hp-15-6-touch-nb-intel-core-i7-4700qm/prod11610128.ip?navAction=push >> HP ENVY 15-j067cl 15.6" Touchscreen Laptop Computer, Intel Core i7-4700QM, >> 8GB Memory, 750GB Hard Drive > some general comments... > > 15.6" screen with 1366x768? *w*. that resolution belongs on a > 13" screen, a 15" screen should be significantly higher, maybe even > 1920x1024 (such as my wife's XPS15) > > 15.6" is a big laptop, rather unweildy for carrying anywhere. 8.5 lbs > is *heavy*, too. > > Hi John, I agree the screen resolution sucks - my current circa 2006 is 1280x800 - as far as the weight I generally never carry it anywhere - usually use it in my easy chair. I am looking specifically for more speed than my core 2 duo has. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] NetworkManger trying to start Supplicant
Folks In Centos 6.5, I am getting the message in the log file every few minutes: NetworkManager: Trying to start the supplicant... There is no wireless on that computer, but there are two NICs, because it is my home gateway. Is there some tweak that can prevent this message? The installation is a relatively new one, so all packages are "up-to-date". David Kurn ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NetworkManger trying to start Supplicant
david wrote: > Folks > > In Centos 6.5, I am getting the message in the log file every few minutes: > > NetworkManager: Trying to start the supplicant... > > There is no wireless on that computer, but there are two NICs, > because it is my home gateway. Is there some tweak that can prevent > this message? > > The installation is a relatively new one, so all packages are > "up-to-date". service NetworkManager stop chkconfig NetworkManager off chkconfig network --list If that's on, you should be fine. I still think there's no excuse for NetworkManager on a wired system mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] default gw route has gone? SOLVED
It will probably be the same elsewhere, because they are CHEAP. I've used a few NZ Telco supplied routers over the years and a couple of cheap bought ones. All had some issue or the other. Nowadays I put up with or workaround any issues. Cheers, Cliff On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: > On a side note - the various ADSL broadband routers supplied by the NZ > telcos all seem to have missing or broken bits - the vodafone one doesn't > open the firewall properly for incoming http - the telecom device allows > one to specify a different IP address for the router but not the gw address > - thus it only works if you use their default IP/gw address. So many hours > wasted. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 01/13/2014 09:14 AM, Andreas Kasenides wrote: > Apparently nto all is well with the take-over. > Here is an example. Should I stop mirroring CentOS in the fear of being > arrested next time a I visit the US on vacation? > I dont understand your question or statement, what are you saying here ? Can you say the same thing, but a bit in a more verbose manner ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
Am 17.01.2014 um 01:18 schrieb Karanbir Singh : > On 01/13/2014 09:14 AM, Andreas Kasenides wrote: >> Apparently nto all is well with the take-over. >> Here is an example. Should I stop mirroring CentOS in the fear of being >> arrested next time a I visit the US on vacation? >> > > I dont understand your question or statement, what are you saying here ? > Can you say the same thing, but a bit in a more verbose manner ? > I think he refers to: "You may not provide CentOS software or technical information to individuals or entities located in one of these countries or otherwise subject to these restrictions.“ He fears that he’s held responsible if someone from Iran uses e.g. his mirror to download the stuff. Maybe thinking of this incident: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/19/apple-store-refuses-to-sell-ipad-to-iranian_n_1609734.html Though the ban on iPhones seems to have been lifted, actually: http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/08/27/apple-to-start-sales-of-devices-going-to-iran-after-us-sanctions-lifted Can you check with „your“ legal department if Open Source operating systems are still not allowed to be exported to „certain" countries? I really hope someone at the treasury department gets the irony of not allowing a „free“ operating system being exported from a „free“ country to an „unfree“ country…. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On 08.01.2014 01:04, Always Learning wrote: > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 21:09 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> With great excitement I'd like to announce that we are joining the >> Red >> Hat family. The CentOS Project ( http://www.centos.org ) is joining >> forces with Red Hat. Working as part of the Open Source and Standards >> team ( http://community.redhat.com/ ) to foster rapid innovation >> beyond the platform into the next generation of emerging >> technologies. >> Working alongside the Fedora and RHEL ecosystems, we hope to further >> expand on the community offerings by providing a platform that is >> easily consumed, by other projects to promote their code while we >> maintain the established base. > > But there is more to Red Hat's de facto "take-over" including the > imposition of USA's domestic law on citizens all around the world. > > The compulsory imposition of USA law on all Centos downloaders creates > the possibility of being arrested in one's home country and sent to > the > USA for a criminal trial. A few people in Britain have been > extradited > to the USA for criminal trials for matters which are not criminal in > Britain. > > Can anyone remember seeing this on the old Centos ? These restrictions were always inherited. Theoretically if you use cryptographic software developed in USA you are "bound" to these rules. In many cases if you use for example OpenSSL in Windows, Ubuntu, Android etc etc you are still affected (I think), it's just that now it's written somewhere. In practice this is not very relevant and also pretty unenforceable; not to mention that - to my understanding - it contradicts the GPL. RH needs to specify this legal bit so uncle Sam is happy. Just do whatever everyone else does, ignore it. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Your opinion about RHCSA certification
> > - What do you think about it? > - Did you find it useful? > - Do you have any advices? > Yes, RHCSA is good start. You should buy this book: http://www.amazon.com/RHCSA-Linux-Certification-Study-Edition/dp/0071765654/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1389925859&sr=8-1&keywords=RHCE Eero, RHCE ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Your opinion about RHCSA certification
> I too am studying for the RHCSA.and while it IS tough (SO different > from when I had to study for Windows 2000 Server Administration certs!) > I wonder if the fact that Red Hat is about to release version 7 if the > 6.x exams are still going to be valid?...and if so..for how much longer? > http://www.redhat.com/training/certifications/recertification.html "RHCSA is considered current for 3 years from the date it is earned." As RHEL 7 is soon to be released you should take exam soon or take exam with RHEL 7 -- Eero, RHCE ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Your opinion about RHCSA certification
On 17 January 2014 02:32, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > > > - What do you think about it? > > - Did you find it useful? > > - Do you have any advices? > > > > Yes, RHCSA is good start. You should buy this book: > > http://www.amazon.com/RHCSA-Linux-Certification-Study-Edition/dp/0071765654/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1389925859&sr=8-1&keywords=RHCE > > > +1 I use this book and earned my RHCSA and RHCE on RHEL 6, you will have to do a little research on LUKS though apart from that it's the best I have seen on the market for these exams. > > Eero, RHCE > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Kind Regards Earl Ramirez ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
If I recall this was about a CentOS mirror in Iran and the new export restrictions prohibit that. Joe On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 00:18 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/13/2014 09:14 AM, Andreas Kasenides wrote: > > Apparently nto all is well with the take-over. > > Here is an example. Should I stop mirroring CentOS in the fear of being > > arrested next time a I visit the US on vacation? > > > > I dont understand your question or statement, what are you saying here ? > Can you say the same thing, but a bit in a more verbose manner ? > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:00:39PM -0500, Joseph Godino wrote: > If I recall this was about a CentOS mirror in Iran and the new export > restrictions prohibit that. There are no *new* export restrictions. You're just now aware of them. It's the US gubmint that puts those restrictions, not RedHat, and they've always applied to CentOS. -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
I say "new" because the original email referred to what I believe was about an existing CentOS mirror in Iran. This prompted me to look at the CentOS website and I found the export restrictions to which the email was referring. Then I looked at the Fedora project website and found the same restrictions. I don't know much about open source export restrictions. I know they must exist for proprietary software developed in the United States. I was merely pointing out what the the email stating and what it was referring to. Please retract the word new. Joe On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 22:12 -0500, Stephen Harris wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:00:39PM -0500, Joseph Godino wrote: > > If I recall this was about a CentOS mirror in Iran and the new export > > restrictions prohibit that. > > There are no *new* export restrictions. You're just now aware of them. > It's the US gubmint that puts those restrictions, not RedHat, and they've > always applied to CentOS. > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:29:09PM -0500, Joseph Godino wrote: > stating and what it was referring to. Please retract the word new. That's the point though. If "you" (for generic values of "you") export code under US legal restriction from the US then you're in breach of US regulations. Whether you know about it or not. Fun, huh? If "you" run a mirror then you get to determine your legal risk and whether you should keep the mirror. The CentOS team are not lawyers; they can't tell you. It's a fun legal question as to who does the export; the person making available for export on a web site or the person downloading from that website. As far as I know it's not really settled. In my opinion the RedHat wording is a prayer hoping that'll cover them :-) But I'm not a lawyer, either! If you're really concerned then consult a lawyer. (This actually applies to _any_ downloader, not just people who mirror). -- rgds Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Your opinion about RHCSA certification
Jangs book is really thorough, but if you ask me, it's too big. I studied for approx. 5 weekends and never made it half way through the book, due to it being so long and covering way to much. Eg. it covers sendmail and postfix setup, while postfix is the default. Red Hat's course only covers postfix. I took the RH300 rapid course, where there is 4 days classroom training and 1 day exam with both RHCSA and RHCE. I took the course with out ever setting up an email server or ftp server before, so it is possible to get through it without knowning everything. I actually learned a few things on the RHCSA I could use an hour later in the RHCE exam :) I scored 300 on RHCSA and 260 on RHCE. On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Earl A Ramirez wrote: > On 17 January 2014 02:32, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > > > > > > - What do you think about it? > > > - Did you find it useful? > > > - Do you have any advices? > > > > > > > Yes, RHCSA is good start. You should buy this book: > > > > > http://www.amazon.com/RHCSA-Linux-Certification-Study-Edition/dp/0071765654/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1389925859&sr=8-1&keywords=RHCE > > > > > > +1 I use this book and earned my RHCSA and RHCE on RHEL 6, you will have > to do a little research on LUKS though apart from that it's the best I have > seen on the market for these exams. > > > > > > Eero, RHCE > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > > -- > Kind Regards > Earl Ramirez > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
