Re: [CentOS] grub color on C6 (not)
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Ted Miller > Sent: den 17 december 2013 05:19 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] grub color on C6 (not) > > I have tried more than half a dozen different combinations of the "color" > command in my grub.conf file, and see nothing but black and white. > > Is there > * a problem with the Centos grub command? > * a problem with grub figuring out how to do color on my hardware? > * a true-false day, when everything is either true or false, no in between > grays, and no color? Was this resolved? I'm seeing the same thing. -- //Sorin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 106, Issue 12
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2013:1857 CentOS 6 openssl Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2013:1858 CentOS 6 systemtap Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2013:1861 Moderate CentOS 6 nss Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2013:1861 Moderate CentOS 5 nss Update (Johnny Hughes)
5. CESA-2013:1866 Moderate CentOS 6 ca-certificates Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:54:07 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1857 CentOS 6 openssl Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20131219115407.ga48...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1857
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1857.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
5b47240202bc7d6178d8cb373e6ce2e766a390d19ee6792f6263ccf4a94a2573
openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.i686.rpm
117089181b271984ce2b784216e9dcf6fd644d4999219ca7ad2136c1d08004d3
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.i686.rpm
4428673f7eb08c419a1ba52738c468debc47b1aa4a382247beae1c92847ff840
openssl-perl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.i686.rpm
f3a48e3b9260fdafe7dd82a797e058a6b0cca3c40cd8490eaaeaa560a5b239fb
openssl-static-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
5b47240202bc7d6178d8cb373e6ce2e766a390d19ee6792f6263ccf4a94a2573
openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.i686.rpm
4f180eaa172c9f12e17b8231d2677cdf0467f2c7e61ad8fb7f6f5f040cf2bfe2
openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm
117089181b271984ce2b784216e9dcf6fd644d4999219ca7ad2136c1d08004d3
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.i686.rpm
694aaacd1c0acd20bc2fc1b11e31a7ef1c1d800f2cf91874cb6b074ceb0fb4ed
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm
5f4cbf00d66e7d416ca185fc6c2d7d6e57468307d82711a4085577106fb5aaf5
openssl-perl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm
194725525331d44e59b1e12a6b103c0f79810a2096d503e9c44006bfb97f
openssl-static-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
3667ff1ca1fcfab4083722de8f5923e9eb2ffa1cd842afd9e356acfa6ab0ca9e
openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:03:40 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1858 CentOS 6 systemtap Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20131219160340.ga56...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1858
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1858.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
44c4a9c1d76fd1d64fb959a58507b15d3137d102848ee46929180dd618d2aebd
systemtap-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
a6d4bb8e6a7ef344b1f97b85c173a0333fc3cb832180599b89960f82d7f09244
systemtap-client-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
10c2cef31f5d865cbc927305b1221bd2e5d0aee6ea4a6ac14390b446c6570f59
systemtap-devel-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
17bb213b498cda052a8a82af89f04275e405bca0017faf68f03fbdcd4bd84950
systemtap-initscript-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
779c9984cc5084599a29e57f5a5f610f6c8d6a41ba38787668b36c7bd0fa1086
systemtap-runtime-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
33b23856f0cbf967079ac232fe658a3f9afe28fe862b28efa13e52818fe3374f
systemtap-sdt-devel-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
1aa4d984bfe963bbbe81e272df90f21f75abe10aec35a443833f16251f5738c3
systemtap-server-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
dc2eae47b7dd43e27f6652b4f1d77f41d8d235adf6ad5e18cb3b24803351cf0a
systemtap-testsuite-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
x86_64:
41456c8bccc726fe61e26adb69826c1b6dc050c8fdbfb54d33dadb9cde594e20
systemtap-2.3-4.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
773e6ad481b6fa0fb528192b7df4b9fc214fdd9d62962ee152415980e7e01d04
systemtap-client-2.3-4.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
166c72baa26ed865917cf427e71b289013c1002bd2d4d74308ba92f8e3ee0c62
systemtap-devel-2.3-4.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
3b95a538cfc7f6a3d653c286f89f49dfcaeb5fb555cf95a950d3cac3119f68a8
systemtap-initscript-2.3-4.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
6ab7196f9718acc5429bf34596a79b32f35accee5d45f84adb97a5e19d51adbe
systemtap-runtime-2.3-4.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
33b23856f0cbf967079ac232fe658a3f9afe28fe862b28efa13e52818fe3374f
systemtap-sdt-devel-2.3-4.el6_5.i686.rpm
d80f4cc68b31c0b577cf705bc86b784bb0cc60b4f850150511028db18110fe0c
systemtap-sdt-devel-2.3-4.el6_5.x86_64.rpm
32b979ae0f44f0eef4512c3d173a784698844aba1936e0d22e6cdf9c57fb6db5
systemtap-server-2.3-4.el6_5.
Re: [CentOS] Simple-Scan
Thank you everybody for your help. I have "simple-scan" installed and working. Happy New Year! Joe On 12/19/2013 07:48 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:22:25AM -0600, Joseph Hesse wrote: >> Hi, >> I just upgraded from 6.4 to 6.5. In 6.4 I had a scanner program >> "simple-scan". I can't seem to get it for 6.5. I tried the elrepo and >> forge repositories but they are not available there. I tried to rebuild >> it from source but that didn't work. Any suggestions would be >> appreciated. FYI: My Fujitsu scanner is not TWAIN compliant but it >> works with "simple-scan". > It looks like Nux Desktop and LinuxTECH repos have it. Untested by me. > In the case of the Nux Desktop x86_64 one (LinuxTECH only has i686) > > http://pkgs.org/centos-6/nux-dextop-x86_64/simple-scan-2.32.0.2-1.el6.nux.x86_64.rpm.html > > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > Does anyone know of secret plans to eventually support Chrome/Chromium > on C6? (crossing fingers) I heard a rumour about such a "secret" plan (RH talking with Google) but cannot confirm ... Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
Hello, I'm trying to configure my system such that I have a TCP port listening which will send all data it receives to a serial port. ie: tcp/2112 --> /dev/ttyS0 My goal would be to be able to: Use netcat to create the listen and redirect to a serial port: $ nc -l 2112 > /dev/ttyS0 Then in another window, run minicom at /dev/ttyS0 Then in a 3rd window, $ telnet localhost 2112 "Type things, hello world" But, I can never get the text to show up in the minicom window. I read different variations on the netcat command, including: $ nc -l 2112 <> /dev/ttyS0 or $ nc -l 2112 > /dev/ttyS0 < /dev/ttyS0 But none seem to do the trick. Anyone have any ideas on what I'm missing here? Any help would be great. Thanks! If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons. "~heart~ Sticker" fixer: http://microflush.org/stuff/stickers/heartFix.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MySQL stale socket
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Luigi Rosa wrote: I can confirm that this is a bug added to the latest releases og MySQL. I tested it only in VM (both VMware and XEN). How to reproduce. * start a CentOS VM with MySQL * abruptly turn the VM off (not shutdown, of course) * restart VM * MySQL starts but the connections via /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock do not work I've seen this too, and not just on VMs. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
On 12/20/2013 04:13 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote: > Use netcat to create the listen and redirect to a serial port: >$ nc -l 2112 > /dev/ttyS0 > > Then in another window, run minicom at /dev/ttyS0 Is this on the same machine? I.e. you have only one machine and one serial port? Do you have some sort of loopback cable connected to the serial port? If it is on two different machines I would check handshaking settings on the serial ports. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
No consolation for CentOS 6, but Chrome does appear to work on the upstream 7 beta. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MySQL stale socket
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Heinlein said the following on 20/12/2013 16:50: > On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Luigi Rosa wrote: > >> I can confirm that this is a bug added to the latest releases og MySQL. >> >> I tested it only in VM (both VMware and XEN). >> >> How to reproduce. >> >> * start a CentOS VM with MySQL * abruptly turn the VM off (not shutdown, >> of course) * restart VM * MySQL starts but the connections via >> /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock do not work > > I've seen this too, and not just on VMs. A friend just told me that he saw this issue recently on a Debian server, so is definitively a MySQL problem. Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Customer: I have Windows Vista on my computer. Tech: Yes. Customer: My computer isn't working right. Tech: Yes. You already told me that. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlK0bLcACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZQsuACfcYHQuEgGThvBuTwCDITqqULS IVsAoJwtbkLBxvahWDgqdVfuySAh41vl =FyA0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
Mogens: Thanks for reply! Here's the actual scenario: I have a system running an application which wants to get its data from a physical serial port. My goal is to provide this data from a network connection, and ~trick~ the application into thinking it's still getting it from the serial port. Technically it is still on the serial port, but the data is arriving via TCP. So, it's all on the same machine. The idea would be for the machine to run an application, pointed at the serial port. My netcat would receive the data being pushed to it on a TCP port, and redirect it to the serial port. If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons. "~heart~ Sticker" fixer: http://microflush.org/stuff/stickers/heartFix.html On Friday, December 20, 2013 8:58 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 12/20/2013 04:13 PM, Joseph Spenner wrote: > Use netcat to create the listen and redirect to a serial port: > $ nc -l 2112 > /dev/ttyS0 > > Then in another window, run minicom at /dev/ttyS0 Is this on the same machine? I.e. you have only one machine and one serial port? Do you have some sort of loopback cable connected to the serial port? If it is on two different machines I would check handshaking settings on the serial ports. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote: > Mogens: > Thanks for reply! > Here's the actual scenario: > > I have a system running an application which wants to get its data from a > physical serial port. My goal is to provide this data from a network > connection, and ~trick~ the application into thinking it's still getting it > from the serial port. Technically it is still on the serial port, but the > data is arriving via TCP. > So, it's all on the same machine. The idea would be for the machine to run > an application, pointed at the serial port. My netcat would receive the data > being pushed to it on a TCP port, and redirect it to the serial port. Do you need a real serial port involved at all? It sounds like what you really want is a linux device that looks like a tty in terms of accepting ioctl's from a program that thinks it is a serial port, but actually accepts a tcp connection.I suppose you could rig a loopback cable and actually have a separate program writing to the serial port with the loopback returning it to your listening application. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Hello How are you ?
Hello How are you ? Hello How are you ? Hello How are you ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
On Friday, December 20, 2013 10:17 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote: >> Mogens: >> Thanks for reply! >> Here's the actual scenario: >> >> I have a system running an application which wants to get its data from a >> physical serial port. My goal is to provide this data from a network >> connection, and ~trick~ the application into thinking it's still getting it >> from the serial port. Technically it is still on the serial port, but the >> data is arriving via TCP. >> So, it's all on the same machine. The idea would be for the machine to run >> an application, pointed at the serial port. My netcat would receive the >> data being pushed to it on a TCP port, and redirect it to the serial port. >Do you need a real serial port involved at all? It sounds like what >you really want is a linux device that looks like a tty in terms of >accepting ioctl's from a program that thinks it is a serial port, but >actually accepts a tcp connection. I suppose you could rig a >loopback cable and actually have a separate program writing to the >serial port with the loopback returning it to your listening >application. > >-- Les: Actually, no-- I do not really need a physical "port". It could all be virtual. (sorry about previous 'top post'. Yahoo email has "improved" their interface making it hard to know what's going on with the thread) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
It is good. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Joseph Spenner > wrote: > > Mogens: > > Thanks for reply! > > Here's the actual scenario: > > > > I have a system running an application which wants to get its data from > a physical serial port. My goal is to provide this data from a network > connection, and ~trick~ the application into thinking it's still getting it > from the serial port. Technically it is still on the serial port, but the > data is arriving via TCP. > > So, it's all on the same machine. The idea would be for the machine to > run an application, pointed at the serial port. My netcat would receive > the data being pushed to it on a TCP port, and redirect it to the serial > port. > > Do you need a real serial port involved at all? It sounds like what > you really want is a linux device that looks like a tty in terms of > accepting ioctl's from a program that thinks it is a serial port, but > actually accepts a tcp connection.I suppose you could rig a > loopback cable and actually have a separate program writing to the > serial port with the loopback returning it to your listening > application. > > -- >Les Mikesell > lesmikes...@gmail.com > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] quota and selinux on centos 6.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/19/2013 02:31 PM, EljiUdia wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm facing a challenge with selinux and because I don't got an explanation > elsewhere, I'm trying to explain here. I have decided to mount > /var/spool/cron on a separate partition and apply quota for regular users. > But quotacheck replyes with a "permission denied" . > > quotacheck: Cannot create new quotafile /var/spool/cron/aquota.user.new: > Permission denied quotacheck: Cannot initialize IO on new quotafile: > Permission denied > > > Indeed, files in that directory has a context witch denies quotacheck > process to write files. To became suitable fo quota, those files > (aquota.user and aquota.group) must have quota_db_t type(in context). If I > use restorecon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user , it reports that is no default > context for that file. > > > [root@CentOS active]# touch /var/spool/cron/aquota.user [root@CentOS > active]# restorecon /var/spool/cron/ [root@CentOS active]# ls -lZ > /var/spool/cron/ -rw-r--r--. root root > unconfined_u:object_r:user_cron_spool_t:s0 aquota.user > > > [root@CentOS active]# restorecon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user restorecon: > Warning no default label for /var/spool/cron/aquota.user > > Semanage reports this > > [root@CentOS active]# semanage fcontext -l|grep quota > /a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /boot/a?quota\.(user|group) > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 > /etc/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /sbin/quota(check|on) > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/convertquota > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/quota_nld > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_nld_exec_t:s0 > /usr/sbin/rpc\.rquotad regular file > system_u:object_r:rpcd_exec_t:s0 /var/a?quota\.(user|group) > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 > /var/lib/openshift/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /var/lib/quota(/.*)? > all files system_u:object_r:quota_flag_t:s0 > /var/lib/stickshift/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /var/run/quota_nld\.pid > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_nld_var_run_t:s0 > /var/spool/(.*/)?a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 > > > > Take a look on the last file . Isn't a default context for > /var/spool/cron/aquota.user ?It looks like > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703871 > > > What's your opinion? > > Elji Udia ___ CentOS mailing > list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > The problem is the way the algorithm that figures out the best match works. restorecon is using /var/spool/cron/[^/]* -- <> inseard of /var/spool/(.*/)?a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 I just added /var/spool/cron/a?quota\.(user|group) -- system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 Which now gets matchpathcon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user /var/spool/cron/aquota.user system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 If you want to fix this on your machine just add semanage fcontext -a -t quota_db_t /var/spool/cron/aquota\.user restorecon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlK0fo8ACgkQrlYvE4MpobPDSACgmUcb+jsWTegHPL99/c0w1i5N /tAAoJgPyPuc67UMpDVmjVq3bwePJtFG =A4ww -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] RH
Here is link. http://www.redhat.com/training/certifications/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RH
Hey what is it ? On 20/12/2013 11:22 PM, Mercedes Goins wrote: > Here is link. > > http://www.redhat.com/training/certifications/ > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Hello How are you ?
Fine you ? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
All, I don't know if this will help y'all, but I have gotten Chrome working with CentOS 6.x: http://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedora-linux/ On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Kwan Lowe wrote: > No consolation for CentOS 6, but Chrome does appear to work on the upstream > 7 beta. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote: > >>Do you need a real serial port involved at all? It sounds like what >>you really want is a linux device that looks like a tty in terms of >>accepting ioctl's from a program that thinks it is a serial port, but >>actually accepts a tcp connection.I suppose you could rig a >>loopback cable and actually have a separate program writing to the >>serial port with the loopback returning it to your listening >>application. >> > Les: > Actually, no-- I do not really need a physical "port". It could all be > virtual. What does the actual application do? If it is just collecting/logging data - or even something slightly more complicated you might be able to replace it with kermit (ckermit package in EPEL) which can work the same way on serial or tcp connections. But, I think socat will do what you need if you can make it connect a PTY (perhaps with optional symlink name) with a TCP4-LISTEN, and have your application open the pty. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 20/12/2013 11:51 PM, Scot P. Floess wrote: > All, > > I don't know if this will help y'all, but I have gotten Chrome working > with CentOS 6.x: > > http://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedora-linux/ > > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Kwan Lowe wrote: > >> No consolation for CentOS 6, but Chrome does appear to work on the upstream >> 7 beta. >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Good. > Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) > Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware > http://flossware.sourceforge.net > https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 20/12/2013 11:51 PM, Scot P. Floess wrote: > All, > > I don't know if this will help y'all, but I have gotten Chrome working > with CentOS 6.x: > > http://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedora-linux/ > Not Good! *RL* > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Kwan Lowe wrote: > >> No consolation for CentOS 6, but Chrome does appear to work on the upstream >> 7 beta. >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) > Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware > http://flossware.sourceforge.net > https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
That script by Richard Lloyd is not a good idea. I think it's using libs from other distros (maybe even EOL distros) . I'd be surprised if that works stable for any length of time. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Scot P. Floess wrote: > > All, > > I don't know if this will help y'all, but I have gotten Chrome working > with CentOS 6.x: > > http://www.tecmint.com/install-google-chrome-on-redhat-centos-fedora-linux/ > > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2013, Kwan Lowe wrote: > >> No consolation for CentOS 6, but Chrome does appear to work on the upstream >> 7 beta. >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) > Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware > http://flossware.sourceforge.net > https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Hello How are you ?
Mercedes Goins wrote: > Fine you ? Ok! I think we need to report gmail to NixSpam, since their servers are pumping out spam to the list mark "what was that about a 'better' hosting provider that doesn't ever let spam be sent out, the last time I complained about being blocked?" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 12/19/2013 19:50, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/19/2013 6:43 PM, Darr247 wrote: >> On 20 DEC 2013 @02:06 zulu, John R Pierce wrote: how many XP systems are still in use? >> We have 3 XP desktops connected to the LAN in our home. > > that was a rhetorical question, of course I'd expect THIS email list to > be skewed heavily away from the global norm. > > I suspect there's 100 to 1000 XP systems for every RHEL/CentOS desktop > workstation on a global basis. Web site browser stats are often misused to talk about OS market share, but in this case, they're perfect. They measure exactly what we want here. One set I looked at[*] says the XP:Linux ratio is about 20:1. Others roughly confirm this. I was unable to find stats that broke the Linux portion down, which is unfortunate because it's difficult to build a browser that runs on all Linuxes out-of-the-box. Netscape used to ship an "any Linux" tarball, through Netscape 4. To pull that trick off, they had to include copies of *all* of the libraries it was built against except libc, even when the platform came with one or more of these libraries. The lowest-common-denominator result didn't take advantage of any platform-specific desktop features. NS4 looked and worked like CDE/Motif no matter where it ran. Chromium doesn't try to do that. They'd have to dedicate build resources -- test VMs, develoer time -- to each OS they specifically support. They'd then have to choose to either do the sort of LCD effort Netscape did, or spend development time creating workarounds for missing features on the older platforms they want to support. To hit your 100:1 number, John, EL6 would have to be 1/5 the Linux interactive desktop market. I'd be stunned if it is that high, given how popular Ubuntu and Mint are for that. I also agree that 1000:1 seems like the far edge of the probability curve. That would mean EL6 is 1/50 the total interactive desktop Linux market. It could be that bad, given that most EL6 machines are probably headless servers. [*] http://gs.statcounter.com/#desktop-os-ww-monthly-201211-201311 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 12/20/2013 10:47 AM, Warren Young wrote: > I also agree that 1000:1 seems like the far edge of the probability > curve. That would mean EL6 is 1/50 the total interactive desktop Linux > market. It could be that bad, given that most EL6 machines are probably > headless servers. the 50 or so dedicated and virtual EL systems I wrangle are all headless. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 2013-12-20 1:24 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > That script by Richard Lloyd is not a good idea. I think it's using > libs from other distros (maybe even EOL distros) . I'd be surprised if > that works stable for any length of time. The script pointed to in the tecmint.com article's the same script I cited in http://www.spinics.net/lists/centos/msg140591.html I used it more than 6 months ago to get Chrome 28 installed in CentOS 6.4, and it's updated with yum from the google repo at least half a dozen times since then to v31.something. Nothing unstable about it. It sequesters the fedora 15 libs away (in /opt/google/chrome/lib if you're looking for them) so only Chrome uses them. After that script installs Chrome, if you run $ strings /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBC the newest versions found will still be GLIBCXX_3.4.13 and GLIBC_2.4 (just like it should on your current CentOS 6.5 machine) but if you run $ strings /opt/google/chrome/lib/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBC then it will find the newer libs grabbed from the f15 repo. CentOS 6.x is based on kernels circa fedora 14 if you want to talk about EOL distros. :) While the current Chrome works in the upstream beta, the same thing could/will happen again if/when it moves to more-secure updated libs during 7's lifespan. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
On 20.12.2013 15:13, Joseph Spenner wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to configure my system such that I have a TCP port > listening which will send all data it receives to a serial port. > > Check out socat, http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 20.12.2013 15:13, Joseph Spenner wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm trying to configure my system such that I have a TCP port >> listening which will send all data it receives to a serial port. >> >> > > Check out socat, http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/ It's packaged in EPEL. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 12/20/2013 11:12 AM, Darr247 wrote: > > CentOS 6.x is based on kernels circa fedora 14 if you want to talk about > EOL distros. :) > With the difference being that while RHEL/Centos have bugs and security fixes applied, Fedora is left dead in the water from the day it's EOLd. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?
On 12/20/2013 08:13, Joseph Spenner wrote: > > But, I can never get the text to show up in the minicom window. You know the aphorism about hammers and nails? minicom is an awesome hammer, and here you are, presenting a problem that calls for a ratcheting box wrench. minicom is great for interactive use. When you want to do something programmatically, there's always a better way. Nux's suggestion, socat, looks like a much better choice here. I found a blog post that tells you how to create virtual serial ports connected to TCP listeners, here: http://justcheckingonall.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/howto-vsp-socat/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/20/2013 10:47 AM, Warren Young wrote: >> I also agree that 1000:1 seems like the far edge of the probability >> curve. That would mean EL6 is 1/50 the total interactive desktop Linux >> market. It could be that bad, given that most EL6 machines are probably >> headless servers. > > the 50 or so dedicated and virtual EL systems I wrangle are all headless. I generally run the NX client remotely from a windows or mac when I want something resembling a Centos desktop. But I nearly always use the windows/mac browser - along with some other desktop apps instead of the outdated Centos versions. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] quota and selinux on centos 6.5
With semanage it works. The new rule will be included in next release? On Friday, December 20, 2013 7:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/19/2013 02:31 PM, EljiUdia wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm facing a challenge with selinux and because I don't got an explanation > elsewhere, I'm trying to explain here. I have decided to mount > /var/spool/cron on a separate partition and apply quota for regular users. > But quotacheck replyes with a "permission denied" . > > quotacheck: Cannot create new quotafile /var/spool/cron/aquota.user.new: > Permission denied quotacheck: Cannot initialize IO on new quotafile: > Permission denied > > > Indeed, files in that directory has a context witch denies quotacheck > process to write files. To became suitable fo quota, those files > (aquota.user and aquota.group) must have quota_db_t type(in context). If I > use restorecon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user , it reports that is no default > context for that file. > > > [root@CentOS active]# touch /var/spool/cron/aquota.user [root@CentOS > active]# restorecon /var/spool/cron/ [root@CentOS active]# ls -lZ > /var/spool/cron/ -rw-r--r--. root root > unconfined_u:object_r:user_cron_spool_t:s0 aquota.user > > > [root@CentOS active]# restorecon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user restorecon: > Warning no default label for /var/spool/cron/aquota.user > > Semanage reports this > > [root@CentOS active]# semanage fcontext -l|grep quota > /a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /boot/a?quota\.(user|group) > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 > /etc/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /sbin/quota(check|on) > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/convertquota > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/quota_nld > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_nld_exec_t:s0 > /usr/sbin/rpc\.rquotad regular file > system_u:object_r:rpcd_exec_t:s0 /var/a?quota\.(user|group) > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 > /var/lib/openshift/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /var/lib/quota(/.*)? > all files system_u:object_r:quota_flag_t:s0 > /var/lib/stickshift/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /var/run/quota_nld\.pid > regular file system_u:object_r:quota_nld_var_run_t:s0 > /var/spool/(.*/)?a?quota\.(user|group) regular file > system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 > > > > Take a look on the last file . Isn't a default context for > /var/spool/cron/aquota.user ?It looks like > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703871 > > > What's your opinion? > > Elji Udia ___ CentOS mailing > list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > The problem is the way the algorithm that figures out the best match works. restorecon is using /var/spool/cron/[^/]* -- <> inseard of /var/spool/(.*/)?a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 I just added /var/spool/cron/a?quota\.(user|group) -- system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 Which now gets matchpathcon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user /var/spool/cron/aquota.user system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 If you want to fix this on your machine just add semanage fcontext -a -t quota_db_t /var/spool/cron/aquota\.user restorecon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlK0fo8ACgkQrlYvE4MpobPDSACgmUcb+jsWTegHPL99/c0w1i5N /tAAoJgPyPuc67UMpDVmjVq3bwePJtFG =A4ww -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >> Does anyone know of secret plans to eventually support Chrome/Chromium >> on C6? (crossing fingers) > > I heard a rumour about such a "secret" plan (RH talking with Google) > but cannot confirm ... Well, turns out it was more than a rumour. Here it is, some test version: http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 12/20/2013 03:14 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >> >>> Does anyone know of secret plans to eventually support Chrome/Chromium >>> on C6? (crossing fingers) >> I heard a rumour about such a "secret" plan (RH talking with Google) >> but cannot confirm ... > Well, turns out it was more than a rumour. Here it is, some test version: > > http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ > I would recommend trying those RPMs .. I will see if I can get it to build and get it into my chromium soon. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
Am 20.12.2013 um 22:14 schrieb Akemi Yagi : > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >> >>> Does anyone know of secret plans to eventually support Chrome/Chromium >>> on C6? (crossing fingers) >> >> I heard a rumour about such a "secret" plan (RH talking with Google) >> but cannot confirm ... > > Well, turns out it was more than a rumour. Here it is, some test version: > > http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ Awesome! -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
