[CentOS] SSL vulnerabilities

[Anumeha Prasad]

Hi,

Following 2 vulnerabilities were detected in VA scan required for PCI
compliance:

1. SSL Weak Cipher Suites Supported
2. SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported

I'm using CentOS 5.8 with open ssl version "openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4". Any
idea how to get rid of this?

Thanks,
Anumeha
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] What on Centos is wiping out my eth0 IP address every 5 minutes?

[Rock]

On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 02:04:05 +0300, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:

> By the way the nanobridge is nice but since it has so much Dbm in it you
> should try to open the case and verify what bugs are inside to make sure
> it's not "just works" like sisco.

I'm not sure *what* that meant!


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Centos and percona5.5

[Birta Levente]

Hi

I have centos 6.4 and installed percona 5.5... everything works fine, 
but in phpmyadmin (which is installed on the same box), i get this error:


Your PHP MySQL library version 5.1.66 differs from your MySQL server 
version 5.5.32. This may cause unpredictable behavior.


How should handle this?

Somewhere exists the correct php-mysql library?

Thanks
Levi



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] What on Centos is wiping out my eth0 IP address every 5 minutes?

[Rock]

On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:36:36 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:

> note thats 5 miles in open space.
> 
> you said the router is in the middle of the house, what all is between 
> it and your 'BBQ' ?   

The Negear N600 router is in the middle of the house, and it's only about 
18 dBi and, I think, about 5 dBm for about 23 dB in toto.
(I haven't looked up the spec in a while though.)

The NanoBridge M2 is pointed *at* the house, and has to go through two
walls to get to the router, but, it has an 18 dBi antenna coupled
to a 23 dBm transmitter with a sensitivity in the -90 dBm range.

Assuming the numbers are close to correct (I do realize the manufacturers
lie about this stuff), that's 23 dB versus 41 dB, which is a whoppingly
huge difference of 18 dB. 

Since every 3 dB is a doubling of the signal strength, that's 
2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 64 times the signal strength of the Netgear
home broadband router (which is admittedly rather anemic).

That's a lot of signal, so, I'm *not* at all worried about going a 
few hundred feet, and through a couple of walls.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SSL vulnerabilities

[Rob Kampen]

On 07/31/2013 08:52 PM, Anumeha Prasad wrote:

Hi,

Following 2 vulnerabilities were detected in VA scan required for PCI
compliance:

1. SSL Weak Cipher Suites Supported
2. SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported

I'm using CentOS 5.8 with open ssl version "openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4". Any
idea how to get rid of this?

Are you using SSL /https?
If so, edit the SSL settings to remove the offending ciphers.
Where else are you using SSL - check configs for ciphers supported.
Edit to taste.
HTH

Thanks,
Anumeha
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SSL vulnerabilities

[Eero Volotinen]

http://pof.eslack.org/2011/06/07/disable-apache2-weak-medium-ciphers-pci-compliance/


2013/7/31 Anumeha Prasad 

> Hi,
>
> Following 2 vulnerabilities were detected in VA scan required for PCI
> compliance:
>
> 1. SSL Weak Cipher Suites Supported
> 2. SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported
>
> I'm using CentOS 5.8 with open ssl version "openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4". Any
> idea how to get rid of this?
>
> Thanks,
> Anumeha
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos and percona5.5

[mark]

On 07/31/13 06:14, Birta Levente wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have centos 6.4 and installed percona 5.5... everything works fine, but
> in phpmyadmin (which is installed on the same box), i get this error:
>
> Your PHP MySQL library version 5.1.66 differs from your MySQL server
> version 5.5.32. This may cause unpredictable behavior.
>
> How should handle this?
>
> Somewhere exists the correct php-mysql library?

Did you yum install both from the normal repositories?

mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 101, Issue 19

[centos-announce-request]

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2013:1119 Moderate CentOS 6 389-ds-base  Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CESA-2013:1120 Moderate CentOS 6 haproxy Update (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CESA-2013:1121 Low CentOS 5 sos Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:55:00 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1119 Moderate CentOS 6
389-ds-base Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20130730185500.ga11...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1119 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1119.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
e7a7848579f30b7bbe5fc08971bdeaf91f4af4b70696fbd6c3f783d5b787964e  
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.i686.rpm
7f65459e3274cc33e3f9f3d349fc3514786910bbbd6c4133f16f5a2235ef6471  
389-ds-base-devel-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.i686.rpm
35d27c9650c1225386c6a96f16346aa865d5a153b2e2fa475f0050855c33a7be  
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.i686.rpm

x86_64:
7f6cf7f2c4c91d1cb25e3f0d302af788fc87e43d2afbe054fabe19efef455677  
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
7f65459e3274cc33e3f9f3d349fc3514786910bbbd6c4133f16f5a2235ef6471  
389-ds-base-devel-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.i686.rpm
1a8defa87282bbbd1f27e5261bd3bb0fc3b91a9c96c697e6f35a7f1e2c79aca4  
389-ds-base-devel-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
35d27c9650c1225386c6a96f16346aa865d5a153b2e2fa475f0050855c33a7be  
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.i686.rpm
0c33ac9093cd211dd0f90910905db61cb0e9386efbfc66cd82b8fecd9a0e7fd1  
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.x86_64.rpm

Source:
ff8588f94c34b6d09b6e1d31dcf9175e4b0059628c3d9aa2875961d404002326  
389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:55:18 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1120 Moderate CentOS 6 haproxy
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20130730185518.ga11...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1120 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1120.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
b89b3098b127d18c78ed0965bdccac4c9099d47ad43d313b5aa79c64ffe6a116  
haproxy-1.4.22-5.el6_4.i686.rpm

x86_64:
321d50a8209e5427e00a3369c779fd3f85c29db5d4c20b726bf30a31b30f220a  
haproxy-1.4.22-5.el6_4.x86_64.rpm

Source:
4c7110a2ef9c884388f3ab9f1644c5c3c2d1f3621fb88dcc374862ab3ebec7f9  
haproxy-1.4.22-5.el6_4.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:58:57 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:1121 Low CentOS 5 sos Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20130730185857.ga28...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1121 Low

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1121.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
1e2972ebedc4a8dff7524acaf7911e494718e499e675a41f3b28b7c341b60d19  
sos-1.7-9.62.el5_9.1.noarch.rpm

x86_64:
1e2972ebedc4a8dff7524acaf7911e494718e499e675a41f3b28b7c341b60d19  
sos-1.7-9.62.el5_9.1.noarch.rpm

Source:
fd07a41fca3aca304fb149d6c1a67b0c281b773a5aaf2204b92a3f270622  
sos-1.7-9.62.el5_9.1.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 101, Issue 19

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel 3.10 and CentOS 5

[Stephen Harris]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:25:43PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:

> HAve you checked ElRepo third-party reposiroty?
> kmod packaged drivers for stock kernels. Just go to 
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/DeviceIDs and check for vendor:device ID pairing 
> that lspci command will show for your rtl8192cu device.

"lsusb" in my case, but yeah.  Interesting.  Thanks.  The driver
there ( kmod-r8192cu-3.4.4_4749-1.el5.elrepo ) appears to detect the
device and join the network.  We'll have to see how stable it is :-)

Thanks!

> Btw, RHEL/CentOS kernel is much more advanced then vanilla kernel of the 
> same numbering because Red Hat backports latest drivers  to their kernel.

USB wifi drivers tend to lag in the RH kernel.  The first thing I do is see
if there's a driver of the right name before hunting elsewhere :-)

-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos and percona5.5

[Birta Levente]

On 31/07/2013 14:57, mark wrote:

On 07/31/13 06:14, Birta Levente wrote:

Hi

I have centos 6.4 and installed percona 5.5... everything works fine, but
in phpmyadmin (which is installed on the same box), i get this error:

Your PHP MySQL library version 5.1.66 differs from your MySQL server
version 5.5.32. This may cause unpredictable behavior.

How should handle this?

Somewhere exists the correct php-mysql library?


Did you yum install both from the normal repositories?



Yes, but before I have installed "orig" centos mysql (5.1) with many 
dependencies, so I followed the instructions on the Percona site:


http://www.percona.com/doc/percona-server/5.5/upgrading_guide_51_55.html
the Upgrading using the Percona repositories section.

mysql-server, mysql-client, mysql-libs removed with rpm -e --nodeps


Thanks

Levi


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Query on Online RPM Maker

[Rajagopal Swaminathan]

Greetings,

I have a (T)GZ source file.

I am aware of the owlriver.com post

http://www.owlriver.com/tips/non-root/

Is there a webservice which will do the same?

-- 
Thanks and Regards,

Rajagopal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] surveillance DVR

[m . roth]

Does anyone know of a DVR that runs Linux that does NOT USE Active-X,
and/or allows logging in directly?

All I keep running into are crap that ->requires<- IE, and don't allow
directly logging in.

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Rajagopal Swaminathan]

Greetings,

http://www.zoneminder.com/

does this help you?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] run script on cron job only run on first Saturdat every month???

[Tony Molloy]

On Tuesday 30 July 2013 22:58:34 John R Pierce wrote:
> On 7/30/2013 2:32 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
> > 15 04 1-7 * 6 /home/app/oracle/backup/monthlybk.sh
> 
> maybe...
> 
>   15 04 * * 6 test $(date +"%d") -le 07 &&
>  /home/app/oracle/backup/monthlybk.sh
> 
> (untested)

Run an incremental backup every day of the month except sundays

03 03 1-31 * * test `date +\%a` != Sun && /usr/local/bin/backup-rsch-
inc


Run a full backup on the first sunday of the month

07 03 1-7  * * test `date +\%a` =  Sun && /usr/local/bin/backup-rsch-
full


Tony



-- 
Linux mufc.tonyshome.ie 2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 16 
23:51:20 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Arun Khan]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM,   wrote:
> Does anyone know of a DVR that runs Linux that does NOT USE Active-X,
> and/or allows logging in directly?
>

MythTV?  It has a web UI.


-- 
Arun Khan
Sent from my non-iphone/non-android device
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[m . roth]

Arun Khan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM,   wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a DVR that runs Linux that does NOT USE Active-X,
>> and/or allows logging in directly?
>
> MythTV?  It has a web UI.

No joy, either this, nor zoneminder. Right now, we just have motion
running on the servers that have the USB cameras plugged in; after the
recent grief we had with the last upgrade to CentOS, when I wound up
moving one camera that just would not work - the top 10% of the screen was
fine, and the rest green, and the other I had to change the resolution to
240x360 to get it to not do that, my manager asked me to look into
appliances that we could manage from our servers.

We've found Zmodo, and another one, but with *both* of them, though the
DVR that comes with the set is running Linux, web control *REQURES* IE,
and you can't log in directly using ssh or telnet.

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] run script on cron job only run on first Saturdat every month???

[m . roth]

Tony Molloy wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 July 2013 22:58:34 John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 7/30/2013 2:32 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>> > 15 04 1-7 * 6 /home/app/oracle/backup/monthlybk.sh
>>
>> maybe...
>>
>>  15 04 * * 6 test $(date +"%d") -le 07 &&
>>  /home/app/oracle/backup/monthlybk.sh
>>
>> (untested)
>
> Run an incremental backup every day of the month except sundays
>
> 03 03 1-31 * * test `date +\%a` != Sun && /usr/local/bin/backup-rsch-
> inc
>
>
> Run a full backup on the first sunday of the month
>
> 07 03 1-7  * * test `date +\%a` =  Sun && /usr/local/bin/backup-rsch-
> full

I agree with the original poster: why doesn't his work, which says 6 in
the location for day of week, which is Sat.? I'd think it meet the
criteria "it's somewhere between the 1st and the 7th of the month, and
it's a Sat", and that I think should be the same as yours

 makr

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SSL vulnerabilities

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am 31.07.2013 10:52, schrieb Anumeha Prasad:
> Hi,
> 
> Following 2 vulnerabilities were detected in VA scan required for PCI
> compliance:
> 
> 1. SSL Weak Cipher Suites Supported
> 2. SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported
> 
> I'm using CentOS 5.8 with open ssl version "openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4". Any
> idea how to get rid of this?
> 
> Thanks,
> Anumeha

You have far more security issues with your system than just providing
weak SSL ciphers, because you are not up to date. The current CentOS 5
minor release is 9 with a fair amount of additional bug and security
updates.

Update ASAP (`yum update').

Alexander


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] run script on cron job only run on first Saturdat every month???

[Bart Schaefer]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:35 AM,  wrote:

>
> I agree with the original poster: why doesn't his work, which says 6 in
> the location for day of week, which is Sat.? I'd think it meet the
> criteria "it's somewhere between the 1st and the 7th of the month, and
> it's a Sat", and that I think should be the same as yours
>

As Keith said, it's because the conditions are OR'd.  A careful reading of
crontab(5) shows that the algorithm is [minute AND hour AND (restricted day
of week OR restricted day of month) AND month].  Day of week and day of
month only restrict independently when one or both is "*".
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] run script on cron job only run on first Saturdat every month???

[m . roth]

Tony Molloy wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 July 2013 22:58:34 John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 7/30/2013 2:32 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>> > 15 04 1-7 * 6 /home/app/oracle/backup/monthlybk.sh


Ok, I just mentioned this to my manager, and he told me why: he said he'd
been bitten by this before, and what's happening is that the logic of cron
is odd: it's an OR, *not* and AND, so it's saying "if it's a Sat, *or* if
it's the first seven days of the month

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] run script on cron job only run on first Saturdat every month???

[John R Pierce]

On 7/31/2013 8:35 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I agree with the original poster: why doesn't his work, which says 6 in
> the location for day of week, which is Sat.? I'd think it meet the
> criteria "it's somewhere between the 1st and the 7th of the month, and
> it's a Sat", and that I think should be the same as yours

as someone said, the dao of week field is 'or'

-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] run script on cron job only run on first Saturdat every month???

[Stephen Harris]

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:52:02AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> As Keith said, it's because the conditions are OR'd.  A careful reading of
> crontab(5) shows that the algorithm is [minute AND hour AND (restricted day
> of week OR restricted day of month) AND month].  Day of week and day of
> month only restrict independently when one or both is "*".

The manpage explicitly says

   Note: The day of a command's execution can be specified by two fields --
   day of month, and day of week.  If  both  fields  are  restricted  (ie,
   aren't  *),  the command will be run when either field matches the cur-
   rent time.  For example,
   "30 4 1,15 * 5" would cause a command to be run at 4:30 am on  the  1st
   and 15th of each month, plus every Friday.


-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Brian Mathis]

If the camera is running on Windows, you can probably stream directly from
the device using ffmpeg.  See here for details:
http://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/DirectShow
You would set the input as  the camera and the output as a file, and add
any codec options you want, etc...

I'm sure there's probably a similar mode for Linux.  If nothing else, you
can probe the camera to see what modes it supports, etc..., to make sure
you're picking one that works,




❧ Brian Mathis


On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:33 AM,  wrote:

> Arun Khan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM,   wrote:
> >> Does anyone know of a DVR that runs Linux that does NOT USE Active-X,
> >> and/or allows logging in directly?
> >
> > MythTV?  It has a web UI.
>
> No joy, either this, nor zoneminder. Right now, we just have motion
> running on the servers that have the USB cameras plugged in; after the
> recent grief we had with the last upgrade to CentOS, when I wound up
> moving one camera that just would not work - the top 10% of the screen was
> fine, and the rest green, and the other I had to change the resolution to
> 240x360 to get it to not do that, my manager asked me to look into
> appliances that we could manage from our servers.
>
> We've found Zmodo, and another one, but with *both* of them, though the
> DVR that comes with the set is running Linux, web control *REQURES* IE,
> and you can't log in directly using ssh or telnet.
>
>mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Centos media repo

[Patrick]

I can't seem to check off the centos media repo from within the 
add/remove application.

Is there a way to do this?

I tried to invoke gpk-application from root but it didn't work.

Thanks-Patrick


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[m . roth]

Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:33 AM,  wrote:
>> Arun Khan wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:10 PM,   wrote:

>> >> Does anyone know of a DVR that runs Linux that does NOT USE
Active-X, and/or allows logging in directly?
>> >
>> > MythTV?  It has a web UI.
>>
>> No joy, either this, nor zoneminder. Right now, we just have motion
running on the servers that have the USB cameras plugged in; after the
recent grief we had with the last upgrade to CentOS, when I wound up
moving one camera that just would not work - the top 10% of the screen
was fine, and the rest green, and the other I had to change the
resolution to 240x360 to get it to not do that, my manager asked me to
look into appliances that we could manage from our servers.
>>
>> We've found Zmodo, and another one, but with *both* of them, though the
DVR that comes with the set is running Linux, web control *REQURES* IE,
and you can't log in directly using ssh or telnet.
> If the camera is running on Windows, you can probably stream directly
from the device using ffmpeg.  See here for details:
> http://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/DirectShow
> You would set the input as  the camera and the output as a file, and add
any codec options you want, etc...
>
> I'm sure there's probably a similar mode for Linux.  If nothing else,
you can probe the camera to see what modes it supports, etc..., to make
sure you're picking one that works,
>
Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
more time

We want an appliance, such as
,
that we can put on our network, and manage, and d/l videos for long-term
storage, onto a server. We have exactly, um, two? boxes running Windows,
and we normally do *nothing* with them. We've over 100 servers running
Linux, and that's where we live.

Currently, the USB cameras are connected to ->CENTOS SERVERS<-, no WinCrap
at all. We use the standard package motion to record for surveillance.
We're looking for an "appliance", like the link I give above, that we can
manage the same way that we manage an HP printer, which does *NOT* require
IE, and we can do with firefox, or probably even konqueror. At the very
least, we want to use, say, wget, to d/l the videos.

NOTHING RUNNING WINDOWS

Now, if I can calm myself down, have I made it clear what it is we're
looking for? If so, can anyone recommend a source for such an appliance?

mark



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[James Pifer]

> Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
> more time
>
> We want an appliance, such as
> ,
> that we can put on our network, and manage, and d/l videos for long-term
> storage, onto a server. We have exactly, um, two? boxes running Windows,
> and we normally do *nothing* with them. We've over 100 servers running
> Linux, and that's where we live.
>
> Currently, the USB cameras are connected to ->CENTOS SERVERS<-, no WinCrap
> at all. We use the standard package motion to record for surveillance.
> We're looking for an "appliance", like the link I give above, that we can
> manage the same way that we manage an HP printer, which does *NOT* require
> IE, and we can do with firefox, or probably even konqueror. At the very
> least, we want to use, say, wget, to d/l the videos.
>
> NOTHING RUNNING WINDOWS
>
> Now, if I can calm myself down, have I made it clear what it is we're
> looking for? If so, can anyone recommend a source for such an appliance?
>
>  mark
>

Not knowing if / how much you're willing to spend, take a look at a 
Synology NAS, which has Surveillance Station. You get one camera license 
with each one and then you have to buy additional camera licenses for 
about $55 each.

Of course you'd be getting a lot more than just a surveillance DVR, so 
may or may not fit your needs. They are great devices.

Good luck,
James

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Marios Zindilis]

On 07/31/2013 08:19 PM, James Pifer wrote:
>> Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
>> more time
>>
>> We want an appliance, such as
>> ,
>> that we can put on our network, and manage, and d/l videos for long-term
>> storage, onto a server. We have exactly, um, two? boxes running Windows,
>> and we normally do *nothing* with them. We've over 100 servers running
>> Linux, and that's where we live.
>>
>> Currently, the USB cameras are connected to ->CENTOS SERVERS<-, no WinCrap
>> at all. We use the standard package motion to record for surveillance.
>> We're looking for an "appliance", like the link I give above, that we can
>> manage the same way that we manage an HP printer, which does *NOT* require
>> IE, and we can do with firefox, or probably even konqueror. At the very
>> least, we want to use, say, wget, to d/l the videos.
>>
>> NOTHING RUNNING WINDOWS
>>
>> Now, if I can calm myself down, have I made it clear what it is we're
>> looking for? If so, can anyone recommend a source for such an appliance?
>>
>>   mark
>>
>
> Not knowing if / how much you're willing to spend, take a look at a
> Synology NAS, which has Surveillance Station. You get one camera license
> with each one and then you have to buy additional camera licenses for
> about $55 each.
>
> Of course you'd be getting a lot more than just a surveillance DVR, so
> may or may not fit your needs. They are great devices.
>
> Good luck,
> James
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

Hello. We are using Kmotion, which as far as I have seen in our setup 
stores static images (JPEG) every couple of seconds. I don't know many 
details about it though, as our Physical Infrastructure team set it up 
and manages it, but they are happy with it.

I think saving images as opposed to video was decided based on the cost 
of the storage (over 60 cameras, too much data).

-- 
Marios Zindilis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Marios Zindilis]

On 07/31/2013 08:39 PM, Marios Zindilis wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 08:19 PM, James Pifer wrote:
>>> Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
>>> more time
>>>
>>> We want an appliance, such as
>>> ,
>>>
>>> that we can put on our network, and manage, and d/l videos for long-term
>>> storage, onto a server. We have exactly, um, two? boxes running Windows,
>>> and we normally do *nothing* with them. We've over 100 servers running
>>> Linux, and that's where we live.
>>>
>>> Currently, the USB cameras are connected to ->CENTOS SERVERS<-, no
>>> WinCrap
>>> at all. We use the standard package motion to record for surveillance.
>>> We're looking for an "appliance", like the link I give above, that we
>>> can
>>> manage the same way that we manage an HP printer, which does *NOT*
>>> require
>>> IE, and we can do with firefox, or probably even konqueror. At the very
>>> least, we want to use, say, wget, to d/l the videos.
>>>
>>> NOTHING RUNNING WINDOWS
>>>
>>> Now, if I can calm myself down, have I made it clear what it is we're
>>> looking for? If so, can anyone recommend a source for such an appliance?
>>>
>>>   mark
>>>
>>
>> Not knowing if / how much you're willing to spend, take a look at a
>> Synology NAS, which has Surveillance Station. You get one camera license
>> with each one and then you have to buy additional camera licenses for
>> about $55 each.
>>
>> Of course you'd be getting a lot more than just a surveillance DVR, so
>> may or may not fit your needs. They are great devices.
>>
>> Good luck,
>> James
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
> Hello. We are using Kmotion, which as far as I have seen in our setup
> stores static images (JPEG) every couple of seconds. I don't know many
> details about it though, as our Physical Infrastructure team set it up
> and manages it, but they are happy with it.
>
> I think saving images as opposed to video was decided based on the cost
> of the storage (over 60 cameras, too much data).
>

I forgot to add that it fulfills some of your requirements: runs on 
Linux servers, ssh access available of course, is free.

-- 
Marios Zindilis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[m . roth]

Marios Zindilis wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 08:39 PM, Marios Zindilis wrote:
>> On 07/31/2013 08:19 PM, James Pifer wrote:
 Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
 more time

 We want an appliance, such as
 ,

>>> Not knowing if / how much you're willing to spend, take a look at a
>>> Synology NAS, which has Surveillance Station. You get one camera
>>> license with each one and then you have to buy additional camera
>>> licenses for about $55 each.
>>>
>>> Of course you'd be getting a lot more than just a surveillance DVR, so
>>> may or may not fit your needs. They are great devices.

I'm researching them. A bit higher than I was looking at - we need to
cover two rooms, floors apart, so it would probably be two appliances. I
do need to be aware of costs, as this is a US federal gov't agency
(non-defense), and there's this grandstanding thing called a
"sequester"
>>
>> Hello. We are using Kmotion, which as far as I have seen in our setup
>> stores static images (JPEG) every couple of seconds. I don't know many
>> details about it though, as our Physical Infrastructure team set it up
>> and manages it, but they are happy with it.

Looks like a variant of motion, which, as I mentioned, is a standard
CentOS package. That's not the same thing as an "appliance". Think
"something we can plug in, just like a printer, but has cameras attached
to *it*".

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] looking for a comprehensive list of centos-compatible yum repositories (for gnustep program)

[Dan Hitt]

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Keith Keller
 wrote:
> On 2013-07-30, Dan Hitt  wrote:
>>
.
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
>
.
> kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us

Thanks Mark. and Keith for your suggestions.

epel ("Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux") is key here (thanks Mark),
and the additional repositories link that Keith gave had enough
information and pointers for me to see how to add it in.

And epel does indeed have the gnustep packages --- or at least
the base ones.  (I have not yet found Camera.app in an rpm
that i can use, but i think this puts me much much closer.)

dan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[m . roth]

James Pifer wrote:
> mark wrote:
>> Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
>> more time
>>
>> We want an appliance, such as
>> ,
>> that we can put on our network, and manage, and d/l videos for long-term
>> storage, onto a server. We have exactly, um, two? boxes running Windows,
>> and we normally do *nothing* with them. We've over 100 servers running
>> Linux, and that's where we live.

>> NOTHING RUNNING WINDOWS
>
> Not knowing if / how much you're willing to spend, take a look at a
> Synology NAS, which has Surveillance Station. You get one camera license
> with each one and then you have to buy additional camera licenses for
> about $55 each.
>
> Of course you'd be getting a lot more than just a surveillance DVR, so
> may or may not fit your needs. They are great devices.

Well, that wasn't what I wanted, but it led me to the acronym I needed to
know: NVS, and thank you *very* much for leading me to that. Dunno if we
want to spend 2x$600 from newegg for something with four definitely
overkill cameras (we're just surveilling our "computer labs" (these aren't
data centers, no, really, honest (that's if you've read recently that the
gov't has suddenly started designating every server closet as a
"datacenter")), but at that price, it *does* support firefox, and ftp
so we're getting a lot closer.

 mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Joseph Spenner]

James Pifer wrote:
> mark wrote:
>> Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
>> more time
>>
>> We want an appliance, such as
>> ,
>> that we can put on our network, and manage, and d/l videos for long-term
>> storage, onto a server. We have exactly, um, two? boxes running Windows,
>> and we normally do *nothing* with them. We've over 100 servers running
>> Linux, and that's where we live.

>> NOTHING RUNNING WINDOWS
>
> Not knowing if / how much you're willing to spend, take a look at a
> Synology NAS, which has Surveillance Station. You get one camera license
> with each one and then you have to buy additional camera licenses for
> about $55 each.
>
> Of course you'd be getting a lot more than just a surveillance DVR, so
> may or may not fit your needs. They are great devices.

You mentioned ZoneMaster, and how it wouldn't work for you.
What does it lack?   I've recently been using it, and it seems to work quite 
well.
... just curious..

__
If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons.
"♥ Sticker" fixer:  http://microflush.org/stuff/stickers/heartFix.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Joseph Spenner]

James Pifer wrote:
> mark wrote:
>> Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
>> more time
>>
>> We want an appliance, such as
>> ,
>> that we can put on our network, and manage, and d/l videos for long-term
>> storage, onto a server. We have exactly, um, two? boxes running Windows,
>> and we normally do *nothing* with them. We've over 100 servers running
>> Linux, and that's where we live.

>> NOTHING RUNNING WINDOWS
>
> Not knowing if / how much you're willing to spend, take a look at a
> Synology NAS, which has Surveillance Station. You get one camera license
> with each one and then you have to buy additional camera licenses for
> about $55 each.
>
> Of course you'd be getting a lot more than just a surveillance DVR, so
> may or may not fit your needs. They are great devices.

You mentioned ZoneMinder, and how it wouldn't work for you.
What does it lack?   I've recently been using it, and it seems to work quite 
well.
... just curious..

__
If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons.
"♥ Sticker" fixer:  http://microflush.org/stuff/stickers/heartFix.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[m . roth]

Joseph Spenner wrote:
> James Pifer wrote:
>> mark wrote:
>>> Ok, I *must* not have made clear what I was asking for. Let me try one
>>> more time
>>>
>>> We want an appliance, such as
>>> ,
>>> that we can put on our network, and manage, and d/l videos for
>>> long-term storage, onto a server. We have exactly, um, two? boxes running
>>> Windows, and we normally do *nothing* with them. We've over 100
servers running
>>> Linux, and that's where we live.
> 
>>> NOTHING RUNNING WINDOWS
>>
>> Not knowing if / how much you're willing to spend, take a look at a
>> Synology NAS, which has Surveillance Station. You get one camera license
>> with each one and then you have to buy additional camera licenses for
>> about $55 each.
>>
>> Of course you'd be getting a lot more than just a surveillance DVR, so
>> may or may not fit your needs. They are great devices.
>
> You mentioned ZoneMinder, and how it wouldn't work for you.
> What does it lack?   I've recently been using it, and it seems to work
> quite well.
> ... just curious..

It's not a plug-in appliance, it's software. We are currently running the
cameras on our servers, and my manager, as I've said, was considering a
plug-in appliance, that we could access and back up from our Linux servers
or workstations, and not have to worry that, as just happened with the
last kernel update, it would break the drivers.

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel 3.10 and CentOS 5

[Keith Keller]

On 2013-07-30, Ljubomir Ljubojevic  wrote:
>
> HAve you checked ElRepo third-party reposiroty?

Just out of curiosity, how many people are using either the kernel-ml or
kernel-lt kernels from elrepo?  I've been using -ml on two machines for
a few weeks now, and it seems okay so far.  (I forget exactly why, but I
think it was to get want-replacement support in md.)

--keith



-- 
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel 3.10 and CentOS 5

[b.j. mcclure]

We have one workstation running the elrepo kernel-lt because that was
the only way I could get usb functionality.  Motherboard is a Gigabyte
990 chipset and stock centos kernel seemed to recognize the chip set and
usb chips but gave failure to enumerate errors.  Tried all fixes found
on google without success.

So far only drawback I have found to elrepo kernel is one cannot use
kmod-nvidia with it.  Building the driver from source the old way works
fine.  The kernel-lt without the nvidia driver would not find the second
monitor.  Stock kernel did.

B.J.

CentOS release 6.4 (Final) 

On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 14:17 -0700, Keith Keller wrote:

> On 2013-07-30, Ljubomir Ljubojevic  wrote:
> >
> > HAve you checked ElRepo third-party reposiroty?
> 
> Just out of curiosity, how many people are using either the kernel-ml or
> kernel-lt kernels from elrepo?  I've been using -ml on two machines for
> a few weeks now, and it seems okay so far.  (I forget exactly why, but I
> think it was to get want-replacement support in md.)
> 
> --keith
> 
> 
> 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Lorenzo]

>
>
> It's not a plug-in appliance, it's software. We are currently running the
> cameras on our servers, and my manager, as I've said, was considering a
> plug-in appliance, that we could access and back up from our Linux servers
> or workstations, and not have to worry that, as just happened with the
> last kernel update, it would break the drivers.
>
>mark
>
> ___
>

Maybe a couple of those wuold fit the bill:

http://www.ubnt.com/airvision#aircammini

and, according to the website, the control software (airVision) should
install also on linux

Regards
Lorenzo
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos media repo

[Jorge Fábregas]

On 07/31/2013 12:48 PM, Patrick wrote:
> Is there a way to do this?

Change enable=1 to 0 here:

/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo

HTH,
Jorge
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos media repo

[Patrick]

> Change enable=1 to 0 here:
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo
>
> HTH,
> Jorge
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
Hi Jorge

Thanks again for your post.

I just wanted to mention that I have this message from my a notification 
widget:

The package download failed Could not contact source 'c6-media', so it 
will be disabled

I guess this repo is down.

Thanks-Patrick


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Django 1.5 Upgrade

[Larry Martell]

Anyone here using django on centos.

On my Mac, running python 2.7, I upgraded from 1.4 to 1.5 by doing this:

rm -rf /Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/django

Followed by python setup.py install in the dir I untar-ed Django-1.5.1 to.
This all worked fine.


On a Centos system running python 2.6 I did:

rm -rf /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django followed by the
setup.py install. My django app is working, and appears to be running 1.5,
however anytime I use manage.py (for collectstatic or syncdb or test, for
example) I get these messages:

/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py:465:
DeprecationWarning: The 'execute_manager' function is deprecated, you
likely need to update your 'manage.py'; please see the Django 1.4
release notes (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.4/).
  DeprecationWarning)
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py:409:
DeprecationWarning: The 'setup_environ' function is deprecated, you
likely need to update your 'manage.py'; please see the Django 1.4
release notes (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.4/).
  DeprecationWarning)

So it seems I still have some 1.4 stuff around. I don't get this on my
Mac. How can I get rid of these messages?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Centos media repo

[Rob Kampen]

On 08/01/2013 02:35 PM, Patrick wrote:

Change enable=1 to 0 here:

/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo

HTH,
Jorge
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi Jorge

Thanks again for your post.

I just wanted to mention that I have this message from my a notification
widget:

The package download failed Could not contact source 'c6-media', so it
will be disabled

I guess this repo is down.

I believe
this is the DVD media repo - i.e. for when loading from a DVD


Thanks-Patrick


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Django 1.5 Upgrade

[Keith Keller]

On 2013-08-01, Larry Martell  wrote:
> Anyone here using django on centos.

Django is not a CentOS package.  It is very likely that you installed it
from a third-party repository or by hand.  In the future you should try
to post to a more appropriate location (like the django mailing list
where you already posted this question).

> On a Centos system running python 2.6 I did:
>
> rm -rf /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django followed by the
> setup.py install.

This was probably the wrong thing to do.  Use yum to upgrade if you
installed from a repo, or use the official Django upgrade docs if you
installed by hand:

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.5/howto/upgrade-version/

--keith

-- 
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] surveillance DVR

[Michael Hennebry]

On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

> It's not a plug-in appliance, it's software. We are currently running the
> cameras on our servers, and my manager, as I've said, was considering a
> plug-in appliance, that we could access and back up from our Linux servers
> or workstations, and not have to worry that, as just happened with the
> last kernel update, it would break the drivers.

What about just buying another computer that you do not have to update?
Give it only a local IP address so that the outside world cannot access it.
If I understand what you want correctly,
the new computer would not need to send data to the outside world.
The new computer and the outside world
could be blissfully unaware of each other.

-- 
Michael   henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"This dream is brought to you by Sharassin of Shan.  Dreams and
communication wizardry of all sorts at reasonable rates." -- Sharassin of Shan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] What is tools for remastering Centos 6 ?

[Iftakhul Anwar]

Hi All,

I have fully configured Centos 6.4 machine and my own application inside.
I want to remastering my own machine so that can used to another machine
without any configuration.

any software like remastersys on Centos which can use for remastering
Centos 6 ?

Thanks

-- 
*M.Iftakhul Anwar*
Meruvian Integrator
High Performance Computing / Cloud Computing (HPC/CC)


Office Phone  : 021-93586577
Mobile Phone : 085215331477
Blog   :  http://blog.mervpolis.com/roller/anwar
FB :  http://www.facebook.com/troya.adromeda
Website : www.meruvian.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] What is tools for remastering Centos 6 ?

[Frank Cox]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 13:28:59 +0700
Iftakhul Anwar wrote:

> I have fully configured Centos 6.4 machine and my own application inside.
> I want to remastering my own machine so that can used to another machine
> without any configuration.

If the hardware is completely identical you could use dd to write an image of
your hard drive and then just copy it back to the new machine.


-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos