Re: [CentOS] Cannot get rtorrent to run

2013-06-22 Thread Nux!
On 22.06.2013 03:54, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:06:12PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:02:47PM -0400, Yves S. Garret wrote:
>>> I got it from here:
>>> http://pkgs.repoforge.org/rtorrent/


I'm using rtorrent from EPEL with success. I suggest you try it.

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Cannot get rtorrent to run

2013-06-22 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>$ rtorrent foobar.torrent
>rtorrent: symbol lookup error: rtorrent: undefined symbol:
>_ZN7torrent10ThreadBase8m_globalE
>
>Why is this happening?

The first hit on google leads you to 
https://github.com/rakshasa/rtorrent/issues/81
which points you to https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/issues/206 which finally
offers a repo that works: http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/RHEL6/base/.

I have been using those packages for some time w/o issue.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What method would you suggest for installing the Pinta screenshot editor on CentOS 6.4?

2013-06-22 Thread Rock
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:34:38 +, Rock wrote:
 
> Given that information, what avenue would you pick to install Pinta on a 
> 64-bit CentOS 6.4 laptop to test it out?

Now that I know the arrowing isn't implemented yet; and that it's 
problematic to install on CentOS, I'll give up.

I do appreciate the help, as I had stumbled against a wall in trying 
to install this. It's nice to know help exists. Thanks.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Oddity with CentOS 6.4 instasll

2013-06-22 Thread Scott Robbins
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:09:27AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:


Ok, to answer my own post.

In a nutshell, 

Tried to install CentOS 6.4 on two different machines and it would fail at
examining basic storage--usually crashing, sometimes just hanging.  CentOS
6.3 didn't have the problem.

After a great deal of googling and thinking, I realized the difference
between the time I'd successfully installed 6.4 on the laptop and failed to
do so was changing the filesystem of a Fedora install that shared the test
laptop.

If I use BTRFS on the Fedora system, the CentOS system won't install.  If
Fedora is using ext4, it installs as expected.  Interesting that this is a
regression on RH's part (I say RH because I had the same results with
Scientific Linux, and regression because the issue doesn't occur in CentOS
6.3)  The failure comes early, at examining basic storage.


So, I realize it's a fairly unusual case, but figured I'd put it here for
posterity.

-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Oddity with CentOS 6.4 instasll

2013-06-22 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:36:32AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:

> 
> If I use BTRFS on the Fedora system, the CentOS system won't install.  If
> Fedora is using ext4, it installs as expected.  Interesting that this is a
> regression on RH's part (I say RH because I had the same results with
> Scientific Linux, and regression because the issue doesn't occur in CentOS
> 6.3)  The failure comes early, at examining basic storage.

I should add that if there is already a CentOS system on the machine, there
are no problems with installing Fedora using BTRFS.  Additionally, if one
wants to reinstall CentOS after installing the Fedora system with BTRFS one
can use 6.3.


-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Oddity with CentOS 6.4 instasll

2013-06-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 06/22/2013 04:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:36:32AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
>>
>> If I use BTRFS on the Fedora system, the CentOS system won't install.  If
>> Fedora is using ext4, it installs as expected.  Interesting that this is a
>> regression on RH's part (I say RH because I had the same results with
>> Scientific Linux, and regression because the issue doesn't occur in CentOS
>> 6.3)  The failure comes early, at examining basic storage.
>
> I should add that if there is already a CentOS system on the machine, there
> are no problems with installing Fedora using BTRFS.  Additionally, if one
> wants to reinstall CentOS after installing the Fedora system with BTRFS one
> can use 6.3.
>
>

I think Btrfs was depreciated in favor of XFS for RHEL 7:

 [W]e're looking to make XFS the new default for boot, for root and 
for user data predictions because it's a better match for our enterprise 
customers than btrfs seems to be.

 Denise Dumas, director of software engineering at Red Hat Inc.

So maybe it started with 6.4 kernels, or maybe there was just a bug in 
initial kernel.

Also, there could be two causes:

1. You tried to use btrfs partitions with only formatting them.

2. You used GPT partition table that 6.4 can not see properly?


-- 
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What method would you suggest for installing the Pinta screenshot editor on CentOS 6.4?

2013-06-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 06/21/2013 02:06 AM, Rock wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:43:08 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Have you looked for or tried anything in java like
>> http://www.heliospaint.com/.
>
> The description looks enticing.
> I couldn't find anything in the aforementioned repos; so I downloaded
> the java applet.
>
> But nothing happened when I ran:
> $ java -jar HeliosPaint.jar
>
> No error whatsoever. Reminds me of the last java applet I tried
> to run, which had the same problem. So, it's probably something
> on my system that is amiss.
>
>

Have you set proper java alternative (default java to use)? Maybe it 
requires specific java version.


-- 
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Oddity with CentOS 6.4 instasll

2013-06-22 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 06:15:01PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 06/22/2013 04:41 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:36:32AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If I use BTRFS on the Fedora system, the CentOS system won't install.  If
> >> Fedora is using ext4, it installs as expected.  Interesting that this is a
> >> regression on RH's part (I say RH because I had the same results with
> >> Scientific Linux, and regression because the issue doesn't occur in CentOS
> >> 6.3)  The failure comes early, at examining basic storage.
> >

> 
> So maybe it started with 6.4 kernels, or maybe there was just a bug in 
> initial kernel.
> 
> Also, there could be two causes:
> 
> 1. You tried to use btrfs partitions with only formatting them.
> 
> 2. You used GPT partition table that 6.4 can not see properly?

It's an MSDOS partition table.  Just to be sure I was clear--I did NOT try
to install CentOS to BTRFS.  If there is a Fedora partition, whether it be
/dev/sda1 or a2 (the only ones I tried) and it is formatted in BTRFS, with
Fedora installed and working, I cannot install CentOS using the 6.4 disk.  
Note that i only tried this with 64 bit, and I'm not overly concerned about
it now that I know I can workaround it.  Generally, I only install CentOS
by itself, these two laptops were sort of a special case.


-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] First problem with new xen repo

2013-06-22 Thread C. L. Martinez
Hi all,

 I am trying to test new xen packages from official centos repos. This
centos 6.4 x86_64 host is my main virt platform at home (KVM based).

 My idea is to use kvm and xen in this same host (using init level 3
for kvm and init level 4 for xen), but when I try to install xen
packages (using the procedure described in wiki), xen installs new
kernel and tries to remove my kvm-kernel aware (remember, official
kernel from centos repos).

 From my point of view, it is not admissible.

 Do I need to do another complete centos OS install to use xen
packages?? Is not possible to use both kernels with only one OS
install??

Thanks.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What method would you suggest for installing the Pinta screenshot editor on CentOS 6.4?

2013-06-22 Thread Rock
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 18:16:44 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:

> Have you set proper java alternative (default java to use)? Maybe it 
> requires specific java version.

Unfortunately, I've set up nothing overt with respect to Java, so this
is all I know about the java that is installed currently: 

$ java -version
==> java version "1.6.0_24"
==> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.11) 
(rhel-1.61.1.11.11.el6_4-x86_64)
==> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b12, mixed mode)


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] What method would you suggest for installing the Pinta screenshot editor on CentOS 6.4?

2013-06-22 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 06/22/2013 08:13 PM, Rock wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 18:16:44 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
>> Have you set proper java alternative (default java to use)? Maybe it
>> requires specific java version.
>
> Unfortunately, I've set up nothing overt with respect to Java, so this
> is all I know about the java that is installed currently:
>
> $ java -version
> ==> java version "1.6.0_24"
> ==> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.11) 
> (rhel-1.61.1.11.11.el6_4-x86_64)
> ==> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.0-b12, mixed mode)
>
>

You performed this:
granting execute permissions first if needed using command
"sudo chmod 775 HeliosPaint.jar".
first ???

It works for me...

[root@kancelarija /]# java -version
java version "1.7.0_25"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_25-b15)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.25-b01, mixed mode)

-- 
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] LVM + XFS + external log + snapshots

2013-06-22 Thread aurfalien

On Jun 21, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:

>> So I have an XFS file system within LVM  which has an external log.
> 
>> A snapshot volume is created w/o issue;
> 
>> But when i try to mount the file system;
>> mount: /dev/mapper/vg_spock_data-datasnapshot already mounted or /snapshot 
>> busy
> 
> So the filesystem was built requiring an external log device?
> Let me guess, the original block device is still mounted and accessing its 
> log device?

Based on some superb feed back from the XFS list, I have decided to place the 
log on an LVM rather then raw device that its on now and then freeze both and 
run the snapshot.

I'll first move the log to a diff device and convert sdc1 to LVM, move the log 
back and then snap away.

Word is that as of Centos 6.2, there is no need to use an external log due to 
this thing called delaylog.

However my env this server is being used for is very metadata intense, more so 
then normal.

Hence I do feel an external mirrored SSD log is the way to go.

- aurf


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Bluetooth 4.0 with chip BCM20702A0 on CentOS6.4

2013-06-22 Thread Heng Su
Hi All,

  I bought a USB Bluetooth dongle.

However, it's not working for me. Please help, how to debug and get more
information as I can not see any error or warning message from system log
message.

I checked http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.bluez.kernel/22183/focus=22211,
however, also find another page
https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/6.3_Release_Notes/index.html
said
already support BCM20702A0.

Please help, thank you.

# uname -a
Linux Host-004 2.6.32-358.11.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jun 12 03:34:52 UTC
2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux


After plugin USB dongle system print out below messages:

Jun 23 13:46:33 Host-004 kernel: usb 1-1.3.4: new full speed USB device
number 7 using ehci_hcd
Jun 23 13:46:33 Host-004 kernel: usb 1-1.3.4: New USB device found,
idVendor=0a5c, idProduct=21e8
Jun 23 13:46:33 Host-004 kernel: usb 1-1.3.4: New USB device strings:
Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
Jun 23 13:46:33 Host-004 kernel: usb 1-1.3.4: Product: *BCM20702A0*
Jun 23 13:46:33 Host-004 kernel: usb 1-1.3.4: Manufacturer: Broadcom Corp
Jun 23 13:46:33 Host-004 kernel: usb 1-1.3.4: SerialNumber: 0002723348A8
Jun 23 13:46:33 Host-004 kernel: usb 1-1.3.4: configuration #1 chosen from
1 choice


Below is the verbose information via lsusb:

Bus 001 Device 007: ID 0a5c:21e8 Broadcom Corp.
Device Descriptor:
  bLength18
  bDescriptorType 1
  bcdUSB   2.00
  bDeviceClass  255 Vendor Specific Class
  bDeviceSubClass 1
  bDeviceProtocol 1
  bMaxPacketSize064
  idVendor   0x0a5c Broadcom Corp.
  idProduct  0x21e8
  bcdDevice1.12
  iManufacturer   1 Broadcom Corp
  iProduct2 BCM20702A0
  iSerial 3 0002723348A8
  bNumConfigurations  1
  Configuration Descriptor:
bLength 9
bDescriptorType 2
wTotalLength  218
bNumInterfaces  4
bConfigurationValue 1
iConfiguration  0
bmAttributes 0xe0
  Self Powered
  Remote Wakeup
MaxPower0mA
Interface Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 4
  bInterfaceNumber0
  bAlternateSetting   0
  bNumEndpoints   3
  bInterfaceClass   255 Vendor Specific Class
  bInterfaceSubClass  1
  bInterfaceProtocol  1
  iInterface  0
  Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x81  EP 1 IN
bmAttributes3
  Transfer TypeInterrupt
  Synch Type   None
  Usage Type   Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0010  1x 16 bytes
bInterval   1
  Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x82  EP 2 IN
bmAttributes2
  Transfer TypeBulk
  Synch Type   None
  Usage Type   Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040  1x 64 bytes
bInterval   1
  Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x02  EP 2 OUT
bmAttributes2
  Transfer TypeBulk
  Synch Type   None
  Usage Type   Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x0040  1x 64 bytes
bInterval   1
Interface Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 4
  bInterfaceNumber1
  bAlternateSetting   0
  bNumEndpoints   2
  bInterfaceClass   255 Vendor Specific Class
  bInterfaceSubClass  1
  bInterfaceProtocol  1
  iInterface  0
  Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x83  EP 3 IN
bmAttributes1
  Transfer TypeIsochronous
  Synch Type   None
  Usage Type   Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x  1x 0 bytes
bInterval   1
  Endpoint Descriptor:
bLength 7
bDescriptorType 5
bEndpointAddress 0x03  EP 3 OUT
bmAttributes1
  Transfer TypeIsochronous
  Synch Type   None
  Usage Type   Data
wMaxPacketSize 0x  1x 0 bytes
bInterval   1
Interface Descriptor:
  bLength 9
  bDescriptorType 4
  bInterfaceNumber1
  bAlternateSetting   1
  bNumEndpoints   2
  bInterfaceClass   255 Vendor Specific Class
  bInterfaceSubClass  1
  bInterfac