[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 3

2013-05-08 Thread centos-announce-request 
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CEBA-2013:0789 CentOS 5 system-config-kdump Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 20:55:14 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0789 CentOS 5 system-config-kdump
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20130507205514.ga10...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0789 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0789.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
021d9f4df1f3b077f5f6d0da0cb60ceaea1d8bf2a3fa096e42a6634eef7e9171  
system-config-kdump-1.0.14-5.el5_9.noarch.rpm

x86_64:
021d9f4df1f3b077f5f6d0da0cb60ceaea1d8bf2a3fa096e42a6634eef7e9171  
system-config-kdump-1.0.14-5.el5_9.noarch.rpm

Source:
235f7f9e880f9e8706823e69cb14eb7f5a51e0d581d582be831ee089a1828e8e  
system-config-kdump-1.0.14-5.el5_9.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 3
**
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] failed exaile install (Can't find gtkmozembed)

2013-05-08 Thread Steve 

 Steve  wrote: 
> 
>  SilverTip257  wrote: 
> > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Steve  wrote:
> > 
> > > Forgot to put the thread link in:
> > >
> > > https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=DESC&topic_id=32333&forum=56#threadtop
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >  Steve  wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to install the exaile package on my newly upgraded CentOS 6.4
> > > machine.
> > > > It fails (see below) with missing dependencies on python-cddb and
> > > gnome-python2-gtkmozembed.
> > > >

I found a src rpm for python-cddb, modified the spec file a little and was able 
to build and install the rpm.

I wanted to do the same for gnome-pthon2-gtkmozembed but it seems that the src 
rpm for this is gnome-python2-extras
and I already have that installed but it doesn't include gtkmozembed.

Note: I'm running these commands on a 6.3 system, not my 6.4.

# rpm -qa | grep gnome-python2-extras
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.fc13.src.rpm

#  rpm -q --provides gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-20.el6.i686
pkgconfig(gnome-python-extras-2.0) = 2.25.3
gnome-python2-extras = 2.25.3-20.el6
gnome-python2-extras(x86-32) = 2.25.3-20.el6

So where has gtkmozembed gone? 
Anybody know the history on this?

Just to see, I tried rebuilding the gnome-python2-extras src rpm but it failed 
miserably:

$ rpmbuild --rebuild ~/Downloads/gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.fc13.src.rpm
Installing /home/steve/Downloads/gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.fc13.src.rpm
warning: InstallSourcePackage at: psm.c:244: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, 
key ID e8e40fde: NOKEY
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root
warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root
error: Failed build dependencies:
gecko-devel-unstable >= 1.9.2.18 is needed by 
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.el6.i686
gnome-panel-devel >= 2.2.0 is needed by 
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.el6.i686
gnome-python2-devel >= 2.10.0 is needed by 
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.el6.i686
gtkhtml2-devel >= 2.3.1 is needed by 
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.el6.i686
gtkspell-devel >= 2.0.7 is needed by 
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.el6.i686
libgda-devel >= 3.99.9 is needed by 
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.el6.i686
libgdl-devel >= 2.24.0 is needed by 
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.el6.i686


Thanks,
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6?

2013-05-08 Thread Rock 
Q: What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6?

I've been successfully using Pan 0.135 from the RPMForge repository 
for about a year now:

$ yum --noplugins --showduplicates --enablerepo \* --disablerepo 
c6-media,\*-source,\*debug\* provides "*/pan"
==> 1:pan-0.135-1.el6.rf.x86_64 : The Pan Newsreader
==> Repo: installed
$ sudo yum --enablerepo rpmforge install pan -y
==> Package 1:pan-0.135-1.el6.rf.x86_64 already installed and latest version

For a good reason (native SSL support), I'm interested in testing out Pan 
version 0.136 (or above). So, the question arises, how 'best' to find and 
install Pan 0.136 (or above)?

A search at http://rpm.pbone.net failed to find any RPM for 0.136 or above:
http://www1.picturepush.com/photo/a/12878464/img/12878464.png

But I do find the later Pan RPMs in later Fedora releases:
http://pkgs.org/download/pan (e.g., Fedora 17 & 18 have later RPMs): 
http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/12878508/img/12878508.png

Or, I can compile Pan version 0.139 from source code:
http://pan.rebelbase.com/download/

Given these seem to be my choices (and, given that only about half my compiles 
ever work); may I ask first the basic question:

Q: What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6?


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Parted Bug? in C 5.9

2013-05-08 Thread Andrew Reis 
I'm receiving the following error when trying to repartition and reformat a
USB flash drive via parted using a simple script. The bug follows:

 

/sbin/parted -s /dev/sdb mkpart primary fat32

Backtrace has 14 calls on stack:

  14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b]

  13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194]

  12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d]

  11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7]

  10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7]

  9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65]

  8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3]

  7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505]

  6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23]

  5: /sbin/parted [0x804e2ef]

  4: /sbin/parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c]

  3: /sbin/parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58]

  2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc]

  1: /sbin/parted [0x804b521]

You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:

Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.

Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:

Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking

the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:

http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/

Please check this version prior to bug reporting.

If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,

please visit the GNU Parted website:

http://www.gnu.org/software/parted

for further information.

Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1)

along with the error message below, the output of

parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print

and additional information about your setup you consider important.

Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:623 in function
probe_partition_for_geom()

failed.

Backtrace has 15 calls on stack:

  15: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b]

  14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194]

  13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d]

  12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7]

  11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7]

  10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65]

  9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3]

  8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505]

  7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a7a5]

  6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23]

  5: /sbin/parted [0x804e2ef]

  4: /sbin/parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c]

  3: /sbin/parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58]

  2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc]

  1: /sbin/parted [0x804b521]

You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:

Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.

Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:

Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking

the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:

http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/

Please check this version prior to bug reporting.

If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,

please visit the GNU Parted website:

http://www.gnu.org/software/parted

for further information.

Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1)

along with the error message below, the output of

parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print

and additional information about your setup you consider important.

Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:623 in function
probe_partition_for_geom()

failed.

 

Output of parted /dev/sdb unit co print unit s print:

 

parted /dev/sdb unit co print unit s print

Backtrace has 14 calls on stack:

  14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b]

  13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194]

  12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d]

  11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7]

  10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7]

  9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65]

  8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3]

  7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505]

  6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23]

  5: parted [0x804d21b]

  4: parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c]

  3: parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58]

  2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc]

  1: parted [0x804b521]

You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:

Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.

Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:

Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking

the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:

http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/

Please check this version prior to bug reporting.

If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,

please visit the GNU Parted website:

http://www.gnu.org/software/parted

for further information.

Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1)

along with the error message below, the output of

parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print

and additional information about your setup you consider important.

Assertion (head_

Re: [CentOS] What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6?

2013-05-08 Thread Frank Cox 
On Wed, 8 May 2013 20:26:04 + (UTC)
Rock wrote:

> What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6?

If it were me, I would be inclined to download a srpm from the F17 or 18 repo
and try to compile it and see what happens.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for Centos 6?

2013-05-08 Thread Nux! 
On 08.05.2013 21:26, Rock wrote:
> Q: What is the recommended method to obtain Pan 0.136+ (with SSL) for 
> Centos 6?

Your best bet is run the Windows installer in wine. Natively is very 
difficult to run because it requires stuff that's too new to be found in 
EL6. :)
That or find an alternative to Pan.

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] failed exaile install (Can't find gtkmozembed) [SOLVED]

2013-05-08 Thread Steve Blackwell 
On Wed, 8 May 2013 9:24:06 -0400
Steve  wrote:

> 
>  Steve  wrote: 
> > 
> >  SilverTip257  wrote: 
> > > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Steve  wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Forgot to put the thread link in:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=DESC&topic_id=32333&forum=56#threadtop
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > >  Steve  wrote:
> > > > > I'm trying to install the exaile package on my newly upgraded
> > > > > CentOS 6.4
> > > > machine.
> > > > > It fails (see below) with missing dependencies on python-cddb
> > > > > and
> > > > gnome-python2-gtkmozembed.
> > > > >
> 
> I found a src rpm for python-cddb, modified the spec file a little
> and was able to build and install the rpm.
> 
> I wanted to do the same for gnome-pthon2-gtkmozembed but it seems
> that the src rpm for this is gnome-python2-extras and I already have
> that installed but it doesn't include gtkmozembed.
> 
> Note: I'm running these commands on a 6.3 system, not my 6.4.
> 
> # rpm -qa | grep gnome-python2-extras
> gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-30.fc13.src.rpm
> 
> #  rpm -q --provides gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-20.el6.i686
> pkgconfig(gnome-python-extras-2.0) = 2.25.3
> gnome-python2-extras = 2.25.3-20.el6
> gnome-python2-extras(x86-32) = 2.25.3-20.el6
> 
> So where has gtkmozembed gone? 
> Anybody know the history on this?

Answering myself...
I found this link:
http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/2012-February/022725.html

It appears that gnome-python2-gtkmozembed has been replaced by
gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 which I already have installed so I downloaded
the exaile src rpm, edited the spec file to remove the dependency on
gnome-python2-gtkmozembed, rebuilt the rpm and installed it. 

Yea! exaile!

Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Missing printer driver

2013-05-08 Thread Steve Blackwell 
I have a Lexmark 2600 series printer but when I plug in the USB I get
an alert saying the printer driver is missing and this appears
in /var/log/messages:

May  8 19:33:17 localhost kernel: generic-usb 0003:093A:2510.0071: 
input,hidraw0: USB HID v1.11 Mouse [PixArt USB Optical Mouse] on 
usb-:00:1d.0-1.7/input0
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: new full speed USB device number 4 
using ehci_hcd
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: New USB device found, 
idVendor=043d, idProduct=011d
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, 
Product=2, SerialNumber=3
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: Product:  2600 Series
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: Manufacturer: Lexmark
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: SerialNumber: X
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usb 1-1.6: configuration #1 chosen from 1 
choice
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 4 if 1 
alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x043D pid 0x011D
May  8 19:33:22 localhost kernel: generic-usb 0003:043D:011D.0072: 
hiddev96,hidraw1: USB HID v1.00 Device [Lexmark  2600 Series] on 
usb-:00:1a.0-1.6/input2
May  8 19:33:22 localhost udev-configure-printer: invalid or missing
IEEE 1284 Device ID

Can anyone tell me what I need to install to get this working?
Thanks,
Steve

# rpm -qa | egrep -i "cups|foomatic|hplip"
cups-pk-helper-0.0.4-12.el6.x86_64
hplip-libs-3.12.4-4.el6.x86_64
foomatic-4.0.4-1.el6_1.1.x86_64
gutenprint-cups-5.2.5-2.el6.x86_64
foomatic-db-ppds-4.0-7.20091126.el6.noarch
cups-libs-1.4.2-50.el6_4.4.x86_64
foomatic-db-filesystem-4.0-7.20091126.el6.noarch
hplip-common-3.12.4-4.el6.x86_64
foomatic-db-4.0-7.20091126.el6.noarch
hplip-3.12.4-4.el6.x86_64
hplip-gui-3.12.4-4.el6.x86_64
cups-1.4.2-50.el6_4.4.x86_64
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos