[CentOS] Computer doesn't boot with new 6.4 kernel

2013-03-28 Thread Markus Lindholm
Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static,
and nothing more happens. With the old kernel (2.6.32-279) it boots
fine. The motherboard is a Asus E45M1-M Pro. There's no separate
graphics card, but I use the one on the motherboard, a AMD Radeon HD
6320. Should I file bug report or is there something else to try?

/Markus
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Computer doesn't boot with new 6.4 kernel

2013-03-28 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Markus Lindholm
 wrote:
> Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
> it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
> screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static,
> and nothing more happens. With the old kernel (2.6.32-279) it boots
> fine. The motherboard is a Asus E45M1-M Pro. There's no separate
> graphics card, but I use the one on the motherboard, a AMD Radeon HD
> 6320. Should I file bug report or is there something else to try?
>
> /Markus

What graphics driver are you using? It may not be compatible with the
version of Xorg in 6.4. This ELRepo page has some info on the
proprietary AMD driver:

http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-fglrx

(see the 'Issues on EL6.4' section)

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Computer doesn't boot with new 6.4 kernel

2013-03-28 Thread Markus Lindholm
On 28 March 2013 08:42, Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Markus Lindholm
>  wrote:
>> Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
>> it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
>> screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static,
>> and nothing more happens. With the old kernel (2.6.32-279) it boots
>> fine. The motherboard is a Asus E45M1-M Pro. There's no separate
>> graphics card, but I use the one on the motherboard, a AMD Radeon HD
>> 6320. Should I file bug report or is there something else to try?
>>
>> /Markus
>
> What graphics driver are you using? It may not be compatible with the
> version of Xorg in 6.4.

I've never used any special graphics driver on this machine. Just
plain vanilla what came with the distro.

/Markus
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] silencing Passenger "ps" SELinux errors

2013-03-28 Thread ign...@vault13.lt
On 2013.03.27 16:59, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 03/27/2013 10:01 AM, Paul Norton wrote:
>> On 27 March 2013 13:09, ign...@vault13.lt  wrote:
>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> how do people cope with constant SELinux errors like this from Fusion
>>> Passenger:
>>>
>>> 36886. 03/27/2013 14:20:05 ps unconfined_u:system_r:passenger_t:s0 2 file
>>> open system_u:system_r:udev_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 denied 1922 36887.
>>> 03/27/2013 14:20:05 ps unconfined_u:system_r:passenger_t:s0 4 dir getattr
>>> unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 denied 1927 36888. 03/27/2013 14:20:05
>>> ps unconfined_u:system_r:passenger_t:s0 2 dir search
>>> unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 denied 1928
>>>
>>> It happens when Passenger v3 tries to determine memory stats with "ps".
>>> There is an Apache directive to turn it of (
>>>
>>> http://www.modrails.com/documentation/Users%20guide%20Apache.html#PassengerMemoryLimit
>>>
>>>
> ), unfortunately it does not work in community version of Passenger.
>>>
>>> The cause is always ps running as passenger_t trying to read files in
>>> /proc with various types of security context.
>>>
>>> Thank you, IgnasR ___ CentOS
>>> mailing list CentOS@centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>
>
>> Hello IgnasR I think that you've posted to the wrong list. The app server
>> support list is here
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!forum/phusion-passenger Dan
>> Walsh is a great place to start with SELinux
>> http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/ SElinux by example takes a great theory
>> and hands on approach
>> http://www.amazon.com/SELinux-Example-Using-Security-Enhanced/dp/0131963694
>
>>   All the best Paul
>
> domain_read_all_domains_state(passenger_t)  # This is what RHEL6.4 has
>
> Or
>
> domain_dontaudit_read_all_domains_state(passenger_t)

Thank you very much, solved.

***
[root@c01 ps]# cat i-passenger-ps-sepolicy.te

policy_module(i-passenger-ps,1.0.0)
gen_require(`
 type passenger_t;
')
domain_read_all_domains_state(passenger_t)
***

Source: http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/51435.html


> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Computer doesn't boot with new 6.4 kernel

2013-03-28 Thread anax
Hi Markus
could probably the legacy vga kernel parameter help you? or is the 
frame-buffer mode no longer used by up-to-date boot processes?

vga = 791 : 1024x768@64K means: screen resolution 1024x768 pixels with 
64K colors
vga = 788 : 800x600@64K means: screen resolution 800x600 pixels with 64K 
colors

suomi



On 2013-03-28 08:55, Markus Lindholm wrote:
> On 28 March 2013 08:42, Akemi Yagi  wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Markus Lindholm
>>  wrote:
>>> Yesterday a upgraded a machine that I have from Centos 6.3 to 6.4, but
>>> it doesn't boot with the new kernel (2.6.32-358). Right after grub the
>>> screen shows a distorted image, a bit like war of the ants but static,
>>> and nothing more happens. With the old kernel (2.6.32-279) it boots
>>> fine. The motherboard is a Asus E45M1-M Pro. There's no separate
>>> graphics card, but I use the one on the motherboard, a AMD Radeon HD
>>> 6320. Should I file bug report or is there something else to try?
>>>
>>> /Markus
>>
>> What graphics driver are you using? It may not be compatible with the
>> version of Xorg in 6.4.
>
> I've never used any special graphics driver on this machine. Just
> plain vanilla what came with the distro.
>
> /Markus
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 97, Issue 16

2013-03-28 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2013:0687 Moderate CentOS 6 pixman Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:15:17 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0687 Moderate CentOS 6 pixman
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20130327221517.ga31...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0687 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0687.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
0f9e4f5ae1ebfd5e5bc2795621784a9c7371dabbfd961c12fada1076b98bc4e9  
pixman-0.26.2-5.el6_4.i686.rpm
e0d916a60cc92f986df77adf7ebaa436447fd0eeebad2575e3dafe6951213e41  
pixman-devel-0.26.2-5.el6_4.i686.rpm

x86_64:
0f9e4f5ae1ebfd5e5bc2795621784a9c7371dabbfd961c12fada1076b98bc4e9  
pixman-0.26.2-5.el6_4.i686.rpm
77d5656e9868ee915d1bc8e06b89faf28dd1b3872d8ea3ef86f5eb7fbd66a9d2  
pixman-0.26.2-5.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
e0d916a60cc92f986df77adf7ebaa436447fd0eeebad2575e3dafe6951213e41  
pixman-devel-0.26.2-5.el6_4.i686.rpm
63338bdf43d7c1df0ff0662102f95654c6cf3b42b697fe2928c6633d3194c1eb  
pixman-devel-0.26.2-5.el6_4.x86_64.rpm

Source:
2dd2dfaf867c7093e510cc034237eeb6fddd11690d7f5cee0f48788e2532bf5d  
pixman-0.26.2-5.el6_4.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce


End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 97, Issue 16
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-28 Thread Max Pyziur
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Louis Lagendijk wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:14 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
>> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there.  Possible?
>
> yes, they are ghost files, not really included in the package

I cribbed mine from a prior release from another machine of mine, 
and dropped them in /etc.

One favorite of mine is being able to -Z out of a program. The 
default installation of alpine, with no *.conf files, wouldn't allow that. 
Now, I can.

> Louis
>


Max Pyziur
p...@brama.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Benjamin

On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
 Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
>>>   tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
>>> use -v or -w for all protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB
>>> (Ethernet), capturing size 65535 bytes, and a blinking cursor which I
>>> left for 20 min and re-started, tried with  -v  got listening on eth0,
>>> type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes. re-started and meant
>>> to use  -w but forgot and just typed tcpdump. That gave tons of output
>>> which I can't fathom  and let it go for 30 minutes. Re-started one more
>>> time and pinged nytimes.com  That returned screenful  of data packets
>>> all ok. Then shutdown  til tomorrow.
>> I think he meant port 53 instead of 50 to catch the DNS exchange -
>> which now sounds like it is working anyway.When you start, does
>> gnome eventually work normally now?.I'd do a 'yum update' on
>> general principles if you at least have the network running.
>>
> Thanks, Les, that was what I meant. I've been snowed under all week, and
> more so today: it's not one thing after another, it's three things all at
> the same time
>
>  mark
 tcpdump with port 53 was no different than with port 50.
 Waited an hour after startup and still had that same blue 
screen. Is that the gnome desktop screen? So no it doesn't eventually 
work. An hour is eventually right?  :-)
yum update installed 23 packages successfully.
 Should I re-instal again? It will be the 3rd time.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread m . roth
Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin 
>>> wrote:
> Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
   tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
 use -v or -w for all protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type
 EN10MB (Ethernet), capturing size 65535 bytes, and a blinking cursor
which I
 left for 20 min and re-started, tried with  -v  got listening on eth0,
 type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes. re-started and meant
 to use  -w but forgot and just typed tcpdump. That gave tons of output
 which I can't fathom  and let it go for 30 minutes. Re-started one
 more time and pinged nytimes.com  That returned screenful  of data
packets
 all ok. Then shutdown  til tomorrow.

>>> I think he meant port 53 instead of 50 to catch the DNS exchange -
>>> which now sounds like it is working anyway.When you start, does
>>> gnome eventually work normally now?.I'd do a 'yum update' on
>>> general principles if you at least have the network running.
>>>
>> Thanks, Les, that was what I meant. I've been snowed under all week, and
>> more so today: it's not one thing after another, it's three things all
>> at the same time
>>
>  tcpdump with port 53 was no different than with port 50.
>  Waited an hour after startup and still had that same blue
> screen. Is that the gnome desktop screen? So no it doesn't eventually
> work. An hour is eventually right?  :-)
> yum update installed 23 packages successfully.
>  Should I re-instal again? It will be the 3rd time.

Mmmm, another nasty thought I just went, and found your original post,
where you said you'd done an install using minimal. I'm, well, let us say
underwhelmed by "minimal" - I have to add stuff on a headless server to
get online.

What's your goal here - is it to have a working desktop environment? If
so, and you have not done so yet, there's an option for desktop; I'd
install that, though you can always choose that, then check "customize
now", and add or subtract things.

With minimal... I'd have to sit at your keyboard and figure out what's
missing.

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] a-gnome-oyences

2013-03-28 Thread m . roth
Most of my users are on kde, as am I (I really don't like gnome). I've got
one on gnome, though, CentOS 6.4, and I have a problem: I have to start an
agent running ->on login<-, so that the same one is in the environment of
every term window he opens. In kde, no problem, I modify
/etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc-common so that code in there calls our (newer)
ssh-agent instead of the stock one. (And, of course, it's killed on
logout, and there's only one running, not one every time that never go
away unless killed manually.)

/etc/gdm/Xsession *says* that it sources that file, so it should be
running when he logs in. I've just had him log out and log back in,
, and no matter what, it just ain't running.

So, gnome fans, how do I get that to work? Edit /etc/gdm/custom.conf? Edit
something else? gconftool-2 (ga)?

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Benjamin

On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Les Mikesell wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin 
 wrote:
>> Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
>tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
> use -v or -w for all protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type
> EN10MB (Ethernet), capturing size 65535 bytes, and a blinking cursor
> which I
> left for 20 min and re-started, tried with  -v  got listening on eth0,
> type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes. re-started and meant
> to use  -w but forgot and just typed tcpdump. That gave tons of output
> which I can't fathom  and let it go for 30 minutes. Re-started one
> more time and pinged nytimes.com  That returned screenful  of data
> packets
> all ok. Then shutdown  til tomorrow.
 I think he meant port 53 instead of 50 to catch the DNS exchange -
 which now sounds like it is working anyway.When you start, does
 gnome eventually work normally now?.I'd do a 'yum update' on
 general principles if you at least have the network running.

>>> Thanks, Les, that was what I meant. I've been snowed under all week, and
>>> more so today: it's not one thing after another, it's three things all
>>> at the same time
>>>
>>   tcpdump with port 53 was no different than with port 50.
>>   Waited an hour after startup and still had that same blue
>> screen. Is that the gnome desktop screen? So no it doesn't eventually
>> work. An hour is eventually right?  :-)
>>  yum update installed 23 packages successfully.
>>   Should I re-instal again? It will be the 3rd time.
> Mmmm, another nasty thought I just went, and found your original post,
> where you said you'd done an install using minimal. I'm, well, let us say
> underwhelmed by "minimal" - I have to add stuff on a headless server to
> get online.
I corrected that minimal install by starting over from a DVD with a 
full install and ticking the Gnome GUI. It did once after the long wait 
let me log in to Centos 6.4 with gnome and I could use it, instead of 
win 7 for browsing, email etc.

What's your goal here - is it to have a working desktop environment? If
so, and you have not done so yet, there's an option for desktop; I'd
install that, though you can always choose that, then check "customize
now", and add or subtract things.

Goal is to use Centos 6.4 with gnome as my OS and not win 7. Yes, I'd 
like a working desktop environment with FF and TB and other programs, 
Libre Office,  Gimp etc Did the customize now on last time I 
re-installed. Now I'm still trying to get online. I had things set up on 
the desktop the last time it let me log in and I want to get back there 
in a reasonable time frame.  Just like to use Centos as I can win 7 or 
Ubuntu or mint 14. It just doesn't want me to log back it anymore.  :-(
>
> With minimal... I'd have to sit at your keyboard and figure out what's
> missing.
>
>mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Benjamin

On 3/28/2013 10:13 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
> On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>>> On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin 
> wrote:
>>> Did you mean ping nytimes.com ?
>> tcpdump -A port 50 output is tcpdump: verbose output suppressed,
>> use -v or -w for all protocol decode listening on eth0, link-type
>> EN10MB (Ethernet), capturing size 65535 bytes, and a blinking cursor
>> which I
>> left for 20 min and re-started, tried with  -v  got listening on eth0,
>> type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes. re-started and meant
>> to use  -w but forgot and just typed tcpdump. That gave tons of output
>> which I can't fathom  and let it go for 30 minutes. Re-started one
>> more time and pinged nytimes.com  That returned screenful  of data
>> packets
>> all ok. Then shutdown  til tomorrow.
> I think he meant port 53 instead of 50 to catch the DNS exchange -
> which now sounds like it is working anyway.When you start, does
> gnome eventually work normally now?.I'd do a 'yum update' on
> general principles if you at least have the network running.
>
 Thanks, Les, that was what I meant. I've been snowed under all week, and
 more so today: it's not one thing after another, it's three things all
 at the same time

>>>tcpdump with port 53 was no different than with port 50.
>>>Waited an hour after startup and still had that same blue
>>> screen. Is that the gnome desktop screen? So no it doesn't eventually
>>> work. An hour is eventually right?  :-)
>>>   yum update installed 23 packages successfully.
>>>Should I re-instal again? It will be the 3rd time.
>> Mmmm, another nasty thought I just went, and found your original post,
>> where you said you'd done an install using minimal. I'm, well, let us say
>> underwhelmed by "minimal" - I have to add stuff on a headless server to
>> get online.
>  I corrected that minimal install by starting over from a DVD with a
> full install and ticking the Gnome GUI. It did once after the long wait
> let me log in to Centos 6.4 with gnome and I could use it, instead of
> win 7 for browsing, email etc.
>
> What's your goal here - is it to have a working desktop environment? If
> so, and you have not done so yet, there's an option for desktop; I'd
> install that, though you can always choose that, then check "customize
> now", and add or subtract things.
>
> Goal is to use Centos 6.4 with gnome as my OS and not win 7. Yes, I'd
> like a working desktop environment with FF and TB and other programs,
> Libre Office,  Gimp etc Did the customize now on last time I
> re-installed. Now I'm still trying to get online. I had things set up on
> the desktop the last time it let me log in and I want to get back there
> in a reasonable time frame.  Just like to use Centos as I can win 7 or
> Ubuntu or mint 14. It just doesn't want me to log back it anymore.  :-(
>> With minimal... I'd have to sit at your keyboard and figure out what's
>> missing.
>>
>> mark
Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then 
yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some 
pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it 
worth a try?Bob
>>   ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>
> Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
> worth a try?Bob

I thought you said you had Gnome to a point where you could log in.
If you get that far I'd stick with it because it is the default
desktop and there will be more people with similar configurations to
help sort out any other problems.If you did get to a login once
but can't now, please describe what you did to make it work before.


-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Benjamin

On 3/28/2013 11:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>>  Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
>> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
>> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
>> worth a try?Bob
> I thought you said you had Gnome to a point where you could log in.
> If you get that far I'd stick with it because it is the default
> desktop and there will be more people with similar configurations to
> help sort out any other problems.If you did get to a login once
> but can't now, please describe what you did to make it work before.
>
> I started Centos, booting up with the HD and waited to login. When the blue 
> screen appeared, and nothing else, I wnet out for coffee and on my return 
> there was a login screen so I logged in and seet up FF, TB etc. Hoping things 
> were OK, I shut down, and next day I started up and never let me log in even 
> today, after waiting an hour. Guess this isn't much help but it is how I 
> logged in that one time.   Bob


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg

Robert Benjamin wrote:
>  Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
> worth a try?Bob

you can always install KDE and try, but there's no reason to uninstall 
gnome (they can coexist peacefully).
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] a-gnome-oyences

2013-03-28 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 03/28/2013 07:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Most of my users are on kde, as am I (I really don't like gnome). I've got
> one on gnome, though, CentOS 6.4, and I have a problem: I have to start an
> agent running ->on login<-, so that the same one is in the environment of
> every term window he opens.

That would be the normal configuration.

> In kde, no problem, I modify
> /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc-common so that code in there calls our (newer)
> ssh-agent instead of the stock one. (And, of course, it's killed on
> logout, and there's only one running, not one every time that never go
> away unless killed manually.)

You're already making things more complicated than they should be.  The 
ssh agent is supposed to be the parent process of your login session. 
That is, your login session should be:

  ssh-agent startkde
or:
  ssh-agent gnome-session

You get just one, and it closes when the session ends.  You *can* set it 
up otherwise, but other configurations are less reliable and more 
complex.  Don't make your life difficult.

With GDM, you'd modify the session file in /usr/share/xsessions.  You'd 
prefix the "Exec" line with "ssh-agent ", and be done.  As those files 
would be over-written during updates, you'd actually probably make a 
copy, edit that to prefix the command in Exec=, and tell your users to 
use the session that you'd edited.  No problem.

I'm not sure which DM you're using, but if it's actually using xinitrc 
(and thereby, xinitrc-common), that's already the configuration that's 
used.  The SSH_AGENT arg is set, and it's the parent process of 
Xclients, which runs your session.  You shouldn't need to change 
anything at all, unless your newer ssh-agent is at a different path. 
So, in that case, the only thing you should need to change is to run 
gnome-session-properties, and uncheck "SSH Key Agent".


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Benjamin

On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Robert Benjamin wrote:
>>   Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
>> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
>> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
>> worth a try?Bob
> you can always install KDE and try, but there's no reason to uninstall
> gnome (they can coexist peacefully).
 Will try that. nothing to lose I guess. Bob
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:

>> I thought you said you had Gnome to a point where you could log in.
>> If you get that far I'd stick with it because it is the default
>> desktop and there will be more people with similar configurations to
>> help sort out any other problems.If you did get to a login once
>> but can't now, please describe what you did to make it work before.
>>
>> I started Centos, booting up with the HD and waited to login. When the blue 
>> screen appeared, and nothing else, I wnet out for coffee and on my return 
>> there was a login screen so I logged in and seet up FF, TB etc. Hoping 
>> things were OK, I shut down, and next day I started up and never let me log 
>> in even today, after waiting an hour. Guess this isn't much help but it is 
>> how I logged in that one time.   Bob

Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
that's probably not the real solution.  So when you established that
your network and DNS was working, Gnome was working too?   Can you log
in on a virtual character-mode terminal session (control-alt-F2) and
try the ifconfig and dig commands again?If everything appears to
work there, I'd try a 'yum update' just on general principles.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Benjamin

On 3/28/2013 1:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>
>>> I thought you said you had Gnome to a point where you could log in.
>>> If you get that far I'd stick with it because it is the default
>>> desktop and there will be more people with similar configurations to
>>> help sort out any other problems.If you did get to a login once
>>> but can't now, please describe what you did to make it work before.
>>>
>>> I started Centos, booting up with the HD and waited to login. When the blue 
>>> screen appeared, and nothing else, I wnet out for coffee and on my return 
>>> there was a login screen so I logged in and seet up FF, TB etc. Hoping 
>>> things were OK, I shut down, and next day I started up and never let me log 
>>> in even today, after waiting an hour. Guess this isn't much help but it is 
>>> how I logged in that one time.   Bob
> Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
> that's probably not the real solution.  So when you established that
> your network and DNS was working, Gnome was working too?   Can you log
> in on a virtual character-mode terminal session (control-alt-F2) and
> try the ifconfig and dig commands again?If everything appears to
> work there, I'd try a 'yum update' just on general principles.
 Sure. Will do dig and ifconfig again. Did yum update this morning, 
23 packets updated .Worked fine. You need the output from dig and 
ifconfig again?
>

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>

>> Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
>> that's probably not the real solution.  So when you established that
>> your network and DNS was working, Gnome was working too?   Can you log
>> in on a virtual character-mode terminal session (control-alt-F2) and
>> try the ifconfig and dig commands again?If everything appears to
>> work there, I'd try a 'yum update' just on general principles.
>  Sure. Will do dig and ifconfig again. Did yum update this morning,
> 23 packets updated .Worked fine. You need the output from dig and
> ifconfig again?

No, if yum update worked we know the network is OK.   What happens if
run 'init 3' (should shut down the partly-working X session), and then
'startx' which will start a new one under your existing login?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] DNS forwarding vs recursion

2013-03-28 Thread John R Pierce
I have 2 CentOS servers that are both authoritative DNS for several 
domains and local resolvers.As configured, they are publicly visible 
resolvers, which I've known for awhile is not a good thing.

whats the appropriate way of configuring the bind on CentOS 5.current to 
not allow recursion on queries from the public side, but still allow 
recursion locally? is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with 
the appropriate private subnets and localhost to named.conf ?


-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] DNS forwarding vs recursion

2013-03-28 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with  the appropriate private
> subnets and localhost to named.conf ?

Yes.  That's basically it.

-- 
Jorge
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] [Mildly OT] Re: (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-28 Thread Beartooth
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:25:31 -0400, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
[]
>> And Usenet is effectively gone.
> 
> It's still there. And some newsgroups are still busy, though not like in
> the good days of the early nineties.

Indeed, alas! But there is Gmane, which is a huge help, 
especially for those of us who are still (and doubtless irremediably) 
subtechnoid. In particular, point your reader (Let's hear it for Pan, too!
) at news.gmane.org, and look at fedora.general.

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] DNS forwarding vs recursion

2013-03-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 3/28/2013 11:11 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 02:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >is it as simple as adding allow-recursion{} with  the appropriate private
>> >subnets and localhost to named.conf ?
> Yes.  That's basically it.

k, thanks, looks like its working!




-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-28 Thread Rex Dieter
Max Pyziur wrote:

> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration
> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there.  Possible?

It's a packaging trick, those files are marked

%ghost %config 

-- rex

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Benjamin

On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>>> Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
>>> that's probably not the real solution.  So when you established that
>>> your network and DNS was working, Gnome was working too?   Can you log
>>> in on a virtual character-mode terminal session (control-alt-F2) and
>>> try the ifconfig and dig commands again?If everything appears to
>>> work there, I'd try a 'yum update' just on general principles.
>>   Sure. Will do dig and ifconfig again. Did yum update this morning,
>> 23 packets updated .Worked fine. You need the output from dig and
>> ifconfig again?
> No, if yum update worked we know the network is OK.   What happens if
> run 'init 3' (should shut down the partly-working X session), and then
> 'startx' which will start a new one under your existing login?
>
  init 3 it did shutdown the partly working X session. Several line 
flashed on screen and 2 had FAILED at end of line. Too fast to readtwhat 
it said.
  startx  Fatal server error:
   Server is already active for display 0
  If the server is no longer running, remove /tmp/ 
.X0-lock and start again.
 I did yum remove /tmp/ .X0-lock. It removed 17 packages and 
then I did startx (again)  Got the same  re: remove /tmp/ .X0-lock. One 
other line I saw Unable to connect to X server was present in output of 
startx.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>
> On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
 Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
 that's probably not the real solution.  So when you established that
 your network and DNS was working, Gnome was working too?   Can you log
 in on a virtual character-mode terminal session (control-alt-F2) and
 try the ifconfig and dig commands again?If everything appears to
 work there, I'd try a 'yum update' just on general principles.
>>>   Sure. Will do dig and ifconfig again. Did yum update this morning,
>>> 23 packets updated .Worked fine. You need the output from dig and
>>> ifconfig again?
>> No, if yum update worked we know the network is OK.   What happens if
>> run 'init 3' (should shut down the partly-working X session), and then
>> 'startx' which will start a new one under your existing login?
>>
>   init 3 it did shutdown the partly working X session. Several line
> flashed on screen and 2 had FAILED at end of line. Too fast to readtwhat
> it said.
>   startx  Fatal server error:
>Server is already active for display 0
>   If the server is no longer running, remove /tmp/
> .X0-lock and start again.
>  I did yum remove /tmp/ .X0-lock. It removed 17 packages and
> then I did startx (again)  Got the same  re: remove /tmp/ .X0-lock. One
> other line I saw Unable to connect to X server was present in output of
> startx.

That should have just been an 'rm /tmp/.X0-lock'  (a file, not
packages).   Not sure how much damage has been done at this point.  If
you know the package names, try to 'yum install' them back again.
And rm the file, and try startx again.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread m . roth
Robert Benjamin wrote:
>
> On 3/28/2013 10:13 AM, Robert Benjamin wrote:
>> On 3/28/2013 9:38 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Robert Benjamin wrote:
 On 3/27/2013 5:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Robert Benjamin 
>> wrote:

  Waited an hour after startup and still had that same blue
 screen. Is that the gnome desktop screen? So no it doesn't eventually
 work. An hour is eventually right?  :-)
   yum update installed 23 packages successfully.
Should I re-instal again? It will be the 3rd time.

>> What's your goal here - is it to have a working desktop environment? If
>> so, and you have not done so yet, there's an option for desktop; I'd
>> install that, though you can always choose that, then check "customize
>> now", and add or subtract things.
>>
>> Goal is to use Centos 6.4 with gnome as my OS and not win 7. Yes, I'd
>> like a working desktop environment with FF and TB and other programs,

> Just a thought. Would it help if I did yum install KDE, and then
> yum remove gnome? Reason is that I see on the different fora some
> pro/cons with Gnome and KDE. Since Gnome won't let me back in is it
> worth a try?Bob

I'd leave gnome - there's a few programs it provides I like, like
gwenview, which I think is gnome, and we won't mention freecell or
mines...

However... thinking about this, now that I've got a chance to catch my
breath here at work... a couple of years ago, I think it was, I updated a
fedora box here at work to 13? 14? and gnome was hosed, as in the gui
would come up, but instead of a window with a login, all I had was about a
pencil point width by about six inch high - the hight of the login box,
and I never was able to get it to actually give me the login.  I wound up
having to pull out gnome, because I couldn't find a way to force a KDE
login.

Anyone know what the current replacement is for switchdesk?

In the meantime, here's another thought: you could try to yum groupremove
and groupinstall Desktop, which I think is gnome, to see if there's some
configuration files that are mangled.

The one time you did log in - did you change any settings?

   mark
mark


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread m . roth
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>>
>> On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin 
>>> wrote:
> Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
> that's probably not the real solution.  So when you established that

It's always a problem, if there's too much blood in your caffeine
stream 

>>> No, if yum update worked we know the network is OK.   What happens if
>>> run 'init 3' (should shut down the partly-working X session), and then
>>> 'startx' which will start a new one under your existing login?
>>>
>>   init 3 it did shutdown the partly working X session. Several line
>> flashed on screen and 2 had FAILED at end of line. Too fast to readtwhat
>> it said.
>>   startx  Fatal server error:
>>Server is already active for display 0
>>   If the server is no longer running, remove /tmp/
>> .X0-lock and start again.
>>  I did yum remove /tmp/ .X0-lock. It removed 17 packages and
>> then I did startx (again)  Got the same  re: remove /tmp/ .X0-lock. One
>> other line I saw Unable to connect to X server was present in output of
>> startx.
>
> That should have just been an 'rm /tmp/.X0-lock'  (a file, not
> packages).   Not sure how much damage has been done at this point.  If
> you know the package names, try to 'yum install' them back again.
> And rm the file, and try startx again.

Ok, first, as Les said, NO! Just rm the file. Now, to reinstall what got
yum removed, look at /var/log/yum.log, and it's the last bunch of stuff,
nicely timestamped, so you won't accidentally go too far.

Then, take a look at /var/log/Xorg.0.log, and you'll be able to see, at
the bottom, what it was trying to tell you.

Note: if you haven't figured it out yet, all the system-related logs are
in /var/log/.

Note 2: find a copy of Fraesch's Essential Systems Administration,
published by O'Reilly. I know the last update was '03; doesn't matter.
Read chapter 1 and *esp* chapter 2, "The Unix Way", which will give you a
really, really clear picture of how the whole thing hangs together, and
the rationale behind why the filesystem is the way it is.

Finally, I've seen so many issues over the years, that at home, I run at
runlevel 3, and have startx in my .bashrc. Doing it that way, if you have
problems, when you hit , you're back at your command
line, and you can look to see what was wrong with X. If you do want to
stay at runlevel 5, work it out this way, and once you've got it fixed,
you can do so.

mark
   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:49 PM,   wrote:
>
> Finally, I've seen so many issues over the years, that at home, I run at
> runlevel 3, and have startx in my .bashrc. Doing it that way, if you have
> problems, when you hit , you're back at your command
> line, and you can look to see what was wrong with X. If you do want to
> stay at runlevel 5, work it out this way, and once you've got it fixed,
> you can do so.
>

Agreed.  If you edit /etc/intiitab and change:
id:5:initdefault:
to
id:3:initdefault:
the system will not start X or a GUI desktop at bootup and you would
log in in character mode.  After logging in, 'startx' will start up X
and your desktop session.   I was hoping this might display a better
diagnostic for whatever problem you have - and as Mark says you can
easily kill it and drop back to the character mode session.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Benjamin

On 3/28/2013 3:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>>> On 3/28/2013 1:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Benjamin 
 wrote:
>> Things never work very well for me before having coffee either, but
>> that's probably not the real solution.  So when you established that
> It's always a problem, if there's too much blood in your caffeine
> stream 
> 
 No, if yum update worked we know the network is OK.   What happens if
 run 'init 3' (should shut down the partly-working X session), and then
 'startx' which will start a new one under your existing login?

>>>init 3 it did shutdown the partly working X session. Several line
>>> flashed on screen and 2 had FAILED at end of line. Too fast to readtwhat
>>> it said.
>>>startx  Fatal server error:
>>> Server is already active for display 0
>>>If the server is no longer running, remove /tmp/
>>> .X0-lock and start again.
>>>   I did yum remove /tmp/ .X0-lock. It removed 17 packages and
>>> then I did startx (again)  Got the same  re: remove /tmp/ .X0-lock. One
>>> other line I saw Unable to connect to X server was present in output of
>>> startx.
>> That should have just been an 'rm /tmp/.X0-lock'  (a file, not
>> packages).   Not sure how much damage has been done at this point.  If
>> you know the package names, try to 'yum install' them back again.
>> And rm the file, and try startx again.
> Ok, first, as Les said, NO! Just rm the file. Now, to reinstall what got
> yum removed, look at /var/log/yum.log, and it's the last bunch of stuff,
> nicely timestamped, so you won't accidentally go too far.
>
> Then, take a look at /var/log/Xorg.0.log, and you'll be able to see, at
> the bottom, what it was trying to tell you.
>
> Note: if you haven't figured it out yet, all the system-related logs are
> in /var/log/.
>
> Note 2: find a copy of Fraesch's Essential Systems Administration,
> published by O'Reilly. I know the last update was '03; doesn't matter.
> Read chapter 1 and *esp* chapter 2, "The Unix Way", which will give you a
> really, really clear picture of how the whole thing hangs together, and
> the rationale behind why the filesystem is the way it is.
>
> Finally, I've seen so many issues over the years, that at home, I run at
> runlevel 3, and have startx in my .bashrc. Doing it that way, if you have
> problems, when you hit , you're back at your command
> line, and you can look to see what was wrong with X. If you do want to
> stay at runlevel 5, work it out this way, and once you've got it fixed,
> you can do so.
 Thought it was not a good idea to use yum remove  but had to 
try. In my head I could see you asking me to try it and I should have 
TRIED something, not just sit here. Well, hopefully I can put those 
packages back as you said, tomorrow. Will look for Fraesch book. Thanks 
for the suggestion. Not sure if I'm at runlevel 5 .It's at whatever it 
was set at during the install. Never changed any settings unless told 
to. In the one login I only installed FF, TB, Calc Gimp etc from the 
Applications menu .Entered email addys and bookmarks and logged out 
thinking I'd be OK to get back in again. HA!
>  mark
> mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Help with thread Centos 6.4 won't reboot on install

2013-03-28 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Robert Benjamin  wrote:
>
>  Thought it was not a good idea to use yum remove  but had to
> try. In my head I could see you asking me to try it and I should have
> TRIED something, not just sit here. Well, hopefully I can put those
> packages back as you said, tomorrow. Will look for Fraesch book. Thanks
> for the suggestion. Not sure if I'm at runlevel 5 .It's at whatever it
> was set at during the install. Never changed any settings unless told
> to. In the one login I only installed FF, TB, Calc Gimp etc from the
> Applications menu .Entered email addys and bookmarks and logged out
> thinking I'd be OK to get back in again. HA!

Default install would be runlevel 5, at least if you include desktop
components.   And your assumption that you would be able to log in
again wasn't bad - you seem to have some very unusual issue that no
one else has.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Does CentOS support dual graphics cards with 2 monitors each?

2013-03-28 Thread Alfred von Campe
I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system.  
I know that you
can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what 
about two PCI
video cards?  The system seems to recognize them as shown by the lspci -v 
output below, but
I can't get Xorg to use the second card.  Has anyone done this?  If so, what is 
the trick to
get it to work?

Alfred



00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family 
DRAM Controller (rev 09)
Subsystem: Dell Device 04ad
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0
Capabilities: [e0] Vendor Specific Information 

00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200/2nd Generation Core 
Processor Family PCI Express Root Port (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0
Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
I/O behind bridge: 4000-4fff
Memory behind bridge: ed00-ee0f
Prefetchable memory behind bridge: e000-e9ff
Capabilities: [88] Subsystem: Dell Device 04ad
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [90] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
Capabilities: [a0] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel 
Capabilities: [140] Root Complex Link 
Kernel driver in use: pcieport

00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series 
Chipset Family MEI Controller #1 (rev 04)
Subsystem: Dell Device 04ad
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 11
Memory at eebb (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16]
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [8c] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+

00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network 
Connection (rev 04)
Subsystem: Dell Device 047e
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 32
Memory at eeb0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Memory at eeb8 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
I/O ports at 5040 [size=32]
Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 2
Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [e0] PCI Advanced Features
Kernel driver in use: e1000e
Kernel modules: e1000e

00:1a.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family 
USB Enhanced Host Controller #2 (rev 04) (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
Subsystem: Dell Device 04ad
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16
Memory at eeb7 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Capabilities: [58] Debug port: BAR=1 offset=00a0
Capabilities: [98] PCI Advanced Features
Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd

00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family 
High Definition Audio Controller (rev 04)
Subsystem: Dell Device 04ad
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 31
Memory at eeb6 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Capabilities: [60] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [70] Express Root Complex Integrated Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel 
Capabilities: [130] Root Complex Link 
Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel

00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI 
Express Root Port 1 (rev b4) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0
Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=0
Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
Capabilities: [90] Subsystem: Dell Device 04ad
Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2

00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI 
Express Root Port 3 (rev b4) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0
Bus: primary=00, secondary=03, subordinate=03, sec-latency=0
I/O behind bridge: 3000-3fff
Memory behind bridge: ee10-eeaf
Prefetchable memory behind bridge: ea10-eaaf
Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+), MSI 00
Capabilities: [80] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
Capabilities: [90] Subsystem: Dell Device 04ad
Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2

00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6 Series/C200 Series Chipset Family PCI 
Express Root Port 5 (rev b4) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0
Bus: primary=00, secondary=04, subordinate=04, sec-lat

Re: [CentOS] Does CentOS support dual graphics cards with 2 monitors each?

2013-03-28 Thread Jay Leafey

On 03/28/2013 05:08 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:

I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system.  
I know that you
can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what 
about two PCI
video cards?  The system seems to recognize them as shown by the lspci -v 
output below, but
I can't get Xorg to use the second card.  Has anyone done this?  If so, what is 
the trick to
get it to work?

Alfred



It appears you are running the open-source nouveau drivers.  I'm running 
dual monitors, albeit on a single nVidia card, but I'm using the nVidia 
packages from the elrepo repository.  Look at 
http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-nvidia for more details.


Just my $.02
--
Jay Leafey - jay.lea...@mindless.com
Memphis, TN

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Does CentOS support dual graphics cards with 2 monitors each?

2013-03-28 Thread John R Pierce
On 3/28/2013 3:08 PM, Alfred von Campe wrote:
> I know that you
> can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time,

actually with newer systems, the hardware does allow you to use builtin 
and pci-express video concurrently.   I had 3 monitors briefly on my 
home (MS Windows 8) system, 2 were on a Nvidia GT640, the 3rd was hot 
plugged into the onboard (Intel i5-3570k HD4000) and it just came up as 
another screen without any intervention or even rebooting. When I 
first got the GT640, I had one monitor plugged into each until I got 
another suitable DVI cable.



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Does CentOS support dual graphics cards with 2 monitors each?

2013-03-28 Thread Dale Dellutri
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Alfred von Campe  wrote:
> I have a user who wants to have 4 monitors attached to his CentOS 6.4 system. 
>  I know that you
> can't use both on-board video and a PCI video card at the same time, but what 
> about two PCI
> video cards?  The system seems to recognize them as shown by the lspci -v 
> output below, but
> I can't get Xorg to use the second card.  Has anyone done this?  If so, what 
> is the trick to
> get it to work?

What does xrandr report?

(I've used Matrox M9140 and the matrox prop driver.  That combo provides
quad monitors with one graphics card.)

-- 
Dale Dellutri
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos