Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3, cron and mail script output
check out the crontab file if you have these, SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAILTO=root ===> that's what you are looking for HOME=/ # run-parts 01 * * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.hourly 02 4 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.daily 22 4 * * 0 root run-parts /etc/cron.weekly 42 4 1 * * root run-parts /etc/cron.monthly Banyan He Blog: http://www.rootong.com Email: ban...@rootong.com On 2012-11-23 3:52 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > Hi all > > I have a '/etc/cron.daily/push-to-backup' script which the content is: > > #!/bin/bash > /usr/bin/rsync [... long options line ...] > echo "finished pushing to the backup" > > Launched manually, it's OK. > > Waiting for cron to execute it, > In the "/var/log/cron", I see the starting time and the finish time, and > I see it take about 10 minutes to make the job. That's very fine, it's > the expected executioon time > > The problem is: I get no EMail. > In "/etc/cron.daily/", I also have "logwatch", whose EMail comes to me > without problem. > "/etc/aliases" is already setup to forward root and cron emails to my > email adress. > Testing the MTA (Exim) on command-line: success (anyway, logwatch also > success on sending email) > > > On another centos5 machine, the same script, the mail is sent. > > On the Centos 6: > $ rpm -aq | grep cron > crontabs-1.10-33.el6.noarch > cronie-1.4.4-7.el6.x86_64 > cronie-anacron-1.4.4-7.el6.x86_64 > > On the Centos 5: > $ rpm -aq | grep cron > crontabs-1.10-8 > vixie-cron-4.1-81.el5 > anacron-2.3-45.el5.centos > > > How to setup the Centos6 system so that the cron sends me an email the > script output?? > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3, cron and mail script output
On 23/11/2012 10:28, Banyan He wrote: > check out the crontab file if you have these, If it's centos 6, maybe /etc/anacrontab > > SHELL=/bin/bash > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin > MAILTO=root ===> that's what you are looking for > HOME=/ > > # run-parts > 01 * * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.hourly > 02 4 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.daily > 22 4 * * 0 root run-parts /etc/cron.weekly > 42 4 1 * * root run-parts /etc/cron.monthly > > > Banyan He > Blog: http://www.rootong.com > Email: ban...@rootong.com > > On 2012-11-23 3:52 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I have a '/etc/cron.daily/push-to-backup' script which the content is: >> >> #!/bin/bash >> /usr/bin/rsync [... long options line ...] >> echo "finished pushing to the backup" >> >> Launched manually, it's OK. >> >> Waiting for cron to execute it, >> In the "/var/log/cron", I see the starting time and the finish time, and >> I see it take about 10 minutes to make the job. That's very fine, it's >> the expected executioon time >> >> The problem is: I get no EMail. >> In "/etc/cron.daily/", I also have "logwatch", whose EMail comes to me >> without problem. >> "/etc/aliases" is already setup to forward root and cron emails to my >> email adress. >> Testing the MTA (Exim) on command-line: success (anyway, logwatch also >> success on sending email) >> >> >> On another centos5 machine, the same script, the mail is sent. >> >> On the Centos 6: >> $ rpm -aq | grep cron >> crontabs-1.10-33.el6.noarch >> cronie-1.4.4-7.el6.x86_64 >> cronie-anacron-1.4.4-7.el6.x86_64 >> >> On the Centos 5: >> $ rpm -aq | grep cron >> crontabs-1.10-8 >> vixie-cron-4.1-81.el5 >> anacron-2.3-45.el5.centos >> >> >> How to setup the Centos6 system so that the cron sends me an email the >> script output?? >> > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3, cron and mail script output
Le ven. 23 nov. 2012 10:52:50 CET, Mihamina Rakotomandimby a écrit: > Hi all > > I have a '/etc/cron.daily/push-to-backup' script which the content is: > >#!/bin/bash >/usr/bin/rsync [... long options line ...] >echo "finished pushing to the backup" > > Launched manually, it's OK. > > Waiting for cron to execute it, > In the "/var/log/cron", I see the starting time and the finish time, and > I see it take about 10 minutes to make the job. That's very fine, it's > the expected executioon time > ... Compare the execution time to the timeout option of your smtp server. I don't know about exim, but on my postfix I added : smtpd_timeout = 30m Another possibility is to "spool" the mail, something like : rsync ...options... 2>&1 > LOGFILE echo -e "finished pushing to the backup \n$LOGFILE" hth, -- Philippe Naudin UMR MISTEA : Mathématiques, Informatique et STatistique pour l'Environnement et l'Agronomie INRA, bâtiment 29 - 2 place Viala - 34060 Montpellier cedex 2 tél: 04.99.61.26.34, fax: 04.99.61.29.03, mél: nau...@supagro.inra.fr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos 6.3, cron and mail script output
Le ven. 23 nov. 2012 10:42:19 CET, Philippe Naudin a écrit: > ... > rsync ...options... 2>&1 > LOGFILE > echo -e "finished pushing to the backup \n$LOGFILE" Nonsense, sorry. If the output is short, you can do : LOGS=$(rsync ... 2>&1) echo -e "finished pushing to the backup \n$LOGS" I you expect longer output : rsync ...options... 2>&1 > LOGFILE echo -e "finished pushing to the backup" cat LOGFILE -- Philippe Naudin UMR MISTEA : Mathématiques, Informatique et STatistique pour l'Environnement et l'Agronomie INRA, bâtiment 29 - 2 place Viala - 34060 Montpellier cedex 2 tél: 04.99.61.26.34, fax: 04.99.61.29.03, mél: nau...@supagro.inra.fr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 93, Issue 13
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2012:1484 CentOS 6 libvirt Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:07:27 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1484 CentOS 6 libvirt Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20121122150727.ga...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1484
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1484.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
b6d922ec05a4381ae519dcd659189ebda4b9632f9cf9ee2bdd5447909c6ebfbf
libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.i686.rpm
3dc90ea49730597ac47467717b7b0d23f052162dae95d44b98bb824f4d941a84
libvirt-client-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.i686.rpm
58484d43f486f31d356a5c8e00ed14fe0606ba19e21b03bf290aad9b39df7159
libvirt-devel-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.i686.rpm
f39720ed7cc14ddf6541296015b7567d0eae6e9b137359768ab4b045d9627d2e
libvirt-python-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
7e71a00bcf5d2e5b186cbcfd469aa39e2a53277dc4f6ae742158d1408f8cdfd9
libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.x86_64.rpm
3dc90ea49730597ac47467717b7b0d23f052162dae95d44b98bb824f4d941a84
libvirt-client-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.i686.rpm
08dee0084a6bf09c20890e2c944df93165a3524030102c49fab8d57e3240d71c
libvirt-client-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.x86_64.rpm
58484d43f486f31d356a5c8e00ed14fe0606ba19e21b03bf290aad9b39df7159
libvirt-devel-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.i686.rpm
4dc8c3e53d82288ce4cf093ace97379af95a414c831579f4f23f4d0384beb643
libvirt-devel-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.x86_64.rpm
6f06422d56fd6a557f72a173bf20c2ee04bbb7c7c34e3d6c5d61486e1a8632cb
libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.x86_64.rpm
6844e227616361a663b2cc65057ba1d6c5324da8f69b3ca61d21b24cfa922ec8
libvirt-python-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
49a85820551f900036ab6c59019bbfb3d8f268efdcad150367f818f0425055ce
libvirt-0.9.10-21.el6_3.6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 93, Issue 13
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cannot install glibc.i686 on x86_64
Johnny Hughes wrote on Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:11:17 -0600: Thank you both for the replies. This was my own mistake combined with some depsolving weirdness of yum. I have 386 and 686 excluded from the repo's because of the greediness to install all versions of a package. At least in earlier versions of the 5.x series. When I first hit the error I checked and commented out the line. But there was no change with the error. I looked on mirror.centos.org and there was no glibc-common.i686. (Didn't look in updates then, but did now, there's really none.) My mistake was that I commented out the exclude for the base repo, but not for updates. After commenting out for updates there is no problem to get glibc.i686. And it doesn't ask for glibc-common. Seems there is a dependency in the i686 package that is resolved by the x86_64 package of glibc-common, but as I was accidentally trying to install an older version of glibc.i686 the installed newer version didn't match. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Slow login to system without internet connection
Hi Hakan, > "UseDns no" doesn't solve the problem because GSS Api needs reverse > lookup. good point. I disable the GSS API along with some other things in routine initial server hardening anyway so this did not occur to me. > If (do not need GSS Authentication) then > put "GSSAPIAuthentication no" in the host /etc/ssh/sshd_config > else > put your server ip and server name in the client /etc/hosts > "xxx.xxx..xxx yourserver.name" > :) I'd rather put the client IP address in the server's /etc/hosts ... Best regards, Peter. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cannot install glibc.i686 on x86_64
On 11/23/2012 06:46 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote on Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:11:17 -0600: > > Thank you both for the replies. > This was my own mistake combined with some depsolving weirdness of yum. > > I have 386 and 686 excluded from the repo's because of the greediness to > install all versions of a package. At least in earlier versions of the 5.x > series. > > When I first hit the error I checked and commented out the line. But there > was no change with the error. I looked on mirror.centos.org and there was > no glibc-common.i686. (Didn't look in updates then, but did now, there's > really none.) > > My mistake was that I commented out the exclude for the base repo, but not > for updates. After commenting out for updates there is no problem to get > glibc.i686. And it doesn't ask for glibc-common. > > Seems there is a dependency in the i686 package that is resolved by the > x86_64 package of glibc-common, but as I was accidentally trying to > install an older version of glibc.i686 the installed newer version didn't There is a better way to only get the i[3,6]86 packages you want and not get the rest. Use this option in yum.conf INSTEAD of excluding i386/i686 packages: multilib_policy=best Here is some info on this option: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html/Software_Management_Guide/ch04s07.html The only problem is that for CentOS-5.x anaconda initially installs with the equivalent setting of "all" ... so what I do on new installs is a minimal install, remove i[3,6]86 rpms, add "multilib_policy=best" to /etc/yum.conf, then configure the server the way I want. You can add specific i[3,6]86 packages and they will continue to get updates, etc ... BUT, only x86_64 will be used when installing new packages unless you specifically also install i[3,6]86 This is the default for CentOS-6, except anaconda actually installs this way too, so you don't need to remove i[3,6]86 packages. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ip6tables REJECT target 3s timeout
On 22.11.2012 12:21, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 21.11.2012 17:40, Markus Falb wrote:
>> connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(80), inet_pton(AF_INET6,
>> "2a02:180::1::551f:b966", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0,
>> sin6_scope_id=0}, 28
> There are 2 destination unreachables sent, one immediate and the second
> after 3 seconds. There are also 2 log entries from ip6tables. It looks
> like the connect() is really trying a second time.
btw, on CentOS 6 the timeout is 1 second instead of 3, but the questions
remains the same.
Why is a retry necessary? The kernel says no, but it is retried anyways.
Why? Is it CentOS/RHEL specific?
I realize that I got not many answers. Do you know of a better place to
ask such things?
--
Kind Regards, Markus Falb
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
I have not touched my Centos systems for over a year; it is time to get current to do some new, interesting things. So of course, 6.3, but which install? I run a local repo that I rsync from a mirror near me. So I believe I can use the Netinstall iso, but which one? How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor? If x86_64 how do I determine if I use EFI or not? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On 11/23/2012 02:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have not touched my Centos systems for over a year; it is time to get > current to do some new, interesting things. > > So of course, 6.3, but which install? > > I run a local repo that I rsync from a mirror near me. So I believe I > can use the Netinstall iso, but which one? > > How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor? > > If x86_64 how do I determine if I use EFI or not? Almost all systems sold in the last few years are 64 bit, so if in doubt, try installing. If the CPU is 32 bit only, it'll fail to install almost immediately. If you know what CPU you have, you can look it up on the manufacturer's website or on wikipedia to see what features it has. As for what media, well, that depends entirely on how often you plan to (re)install and what your bandwidth costs. It also depends on what you want to use CentOS for. For me, I usually use the minimal install and just install what I need, but it's not at all user friendly as almost nothing but the bare system is installed (not even man pages!). Welcome back :) -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor? less /proc/cpuinfo ? > > If x86_64 how do I determine if I use EFI or not? I don't know that much, but would the flags from the above indicate? > Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On 11/23/2012 02:30 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 11/23/2012 02:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I have not touched my Centos systems for over a year; it is time to get >> current to do some new, interesting things. >> >> So of course, 6.3, but which install? >> >> I run a local repo that I rsync from a mirror near me. So I believe I >> can use the Netinstall iso, but which one? >> >> How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor? >> >> If x86_64 how do I determine if I use EFI or not? > Almost all systems sold in the last few years are 64 bit, so if in > doubt, try installing. If the CPU is 32 bit only, it'll fail to install > almost immediately. If you know what CPU you have, you can look it up on > the manufacturer's website or on wikipedia to see what features it has. > > As for what media, well, that depends entirely on how often you plan to > (re)install and what your bandwidth costs. It also depends on what you > want to use CentOS for. For me, I usually use the minimal install and > just install what I need, but it's not at all user friendly as almost > nothing but the bare system is installed (not even man pages!). But what is the difference for the x86_64-netinstall vs x86_84-netinstall-EFI? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor? > less /proc/cpuinfo ? So I need the liveCD to boot to get to this point? Which one. Oh, my current systems are running Centos 5.4 (I think) and only have 256Mb and 512Mb memory. To go to 6.n, I need more memory, like 1Gb. So I have a couple systems on the floor that I dropped new drives into so they don't have a running OS yet. > >> If x86_64 how do I determine if I use EFI or not? > I don't know that much, but would the flags from the above indicate? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor? >> less /proc/cpuinfo ? > > So I need the liveCD to boot to get to this point? Which one. > > Oh, my current systems are running Centos 5.4 (I think) and only have > 256Mb and 512Mb memory. To go to 6.n, I need more memory, like 1Gb. So > I have a couple systems on the floor that I dropped new drives into so > they don't have a running OS yet. > The i386 one should boot on both 32/64bit platforms, but with only 256/512M of RAM I don't think you can install CenOS 6.x. The CPU flag you're looking for in /proc/cpuinfo is "lm" (Long Mode). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 02:54:41PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 11/23/2012 02:30 PM, Digimer wrote: > > On 11/23/2012 02:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> I have not touched my Centos systems for over a year; it is time to get > >> current to do some new, interesting things. > >> > >> So of course, 6.3, but which install? > >> > >> I run a local repo that I rsync from a mirror near me. So I believe I > >> can use the Netinstall iso, but which one? > >> > >> How do I determine if I have a i386 or x86_64 processor? > >> > >> If x86_64 how do I determine if I use EFI or not? > > Almost all systems sold in the last few years are 64 bit, so if in > > doubt, try installing. If the CPU is 32 bit only, it'll fail to install > > almost immediately. If you know what CPU you have, you can look it up on > > the manufacturer's website or on wikipedia to see what features it has. > > > > As for what media, well, that depends entirely on how often you plan to > > (re)install and what your bandwidth costs. It also depends on what you > > want to use CentOS for. For me, I usually use the minimal install and > > just install what I need, but it's not at all user friendly as almost > > nothing but the bare system is installed (not even man pages!). > > But what is the difference for the x86_64-netinstall vs > x86_84-netinstall-EFI? the latter is for EFI systems (EFI instead of BIOS), while the latter would be for traditional BIOS. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. -- Philippians 4:13 --- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:12 +0100, Radu Anghel wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Robert Moskowitz > wrote: > > > > On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > >> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >>> > >>> > The i386 one should boot on both 32/64bit platforms, but with only > 256/512M of RAM I don't think you can install CenOS 6.x. IIRC, 512 s/b enough for a text-mode install. > > The CPU flag you're looking for in /proc/cpuinfo is "lm" (Long Mode). > Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On 11/23/2012 03:26 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:12 +0100, Radu Anghel wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Robert Moskowitz >> wrote: >>> On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > >> The i386 one should boot on both 32/64bit platforms, but with only >> 256/512M of RAM I don't think you can install CenOS 6.x. > IIRC, 512 s/b enough for a text-mode install. And then you can't work with your partitions. You are stuck with the defaults. That is only one challenge with text-mode install that I never liked. I accept that I need new systems with 1Gb. The Compaq SSFs I have are around 15 years old and cannot support more memory. Time for somethings a little newer. >> The CPU flag you're looking for in /proc/cpuinfo is "lm" (Long Mode). >> > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cannot install glibc.i686 on x86_64
Johnny Hughes wrote on Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:16:41 -0600: > multilib_policy=best Perfect, thanks! I've never heard of this option before. I've been actively following the list during the first major CentOS 5 releases and I should have noticed it :-) I added it immediately to some systems now. I didn't know the problem exists only because of anaconda greediness on first package options installation. In that case I may not have needed to exclude at all since I do the initial install with custom kickstart files that install only core plus the packages I want. Good to know. Again, thanks! Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long time away for Centos installs, need some info
On 11/23/2012 08:26 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 21:12 +0100, Radu Anghel wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Robert Moskowitz >> wrote: >>> >>> On 11/23/2012 02:37 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 14:24 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > > >> The i386 one should boot on both 32/64bit platforms, but with only >> 256/512M of RAM I don't think you can install CenOS 6.x. > IIRC, 512 s/b enough for a text-mode install. >> >> The CPU flag you're looking for in /proc/cpuinfo is "lm" (Long Mode). >> I've got a couple of VMs running minimal 6.3 with 256 MB. They're only good for testing purposes against very low activity stuff but they run quite happily. Just don't try running '# yum update' though. They crash real good :-) Cheers, Phil.. -- currently (ab)using CentOS 5.8 & 6.3, Debian Squeeze & Wheezy, Fedora Beefy, OS X Snow Leopard & Ubuntu Precise & Quantal signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
