Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: lost udp packets
On 10/05/2012 11:53 AM, James Pifer wrote: > Now I need to figure out how to have the traps forwarded but retain the > real source of the trap. If you want to forward the traps without modifying the source address on the UDP packet, you'll need to use iptables. Add a DNAT rule to the PREROUTING chain in the nat table. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED] Re: lost udp packets
On 10/7/2012 4:03 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/05/2012 11:53 AM, James Pifer wrote: >> Now I need to figure out how to have the traps forwarded but retain the >> real source of the trap. > If you want to forward the traps without modifying the source address on > the UDP packet, you'll need to use iptables. Add a DNAT rule to the > PREROUTING chain in the nat table. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I was able to add the following to snmptrad.conf and the source address stays: format1 '%B [%b]: Trap %#v\n format2 '%B [%b]: Trap %#v\n Thanks, James ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Removing/disabling console-kit-daemon
I was trying to optimize a minimum memory VM and realized that this process was taking up over 560M of virt memory. On googling, it seems to be a known issue and doesn't seem to be needed except for graphical desktop. Although virt memory isn't actual memory usage, the daemon is still taking up almost 4MB of limited memory, which on a VM with only 384MB feels relatively significant to me. Earlier in May, there was also a mailing list thread that indicates removing console-kit-daemon requires getting rid of hal as well. Is it safe to remove both console-kit and hal for headless console-only web application VMs that also needs mdadm? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Removing/disabling console-kit-daemon
On 08.10.2012 07:10, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > I was trying to optimize a minimum memory VM and realized that this > process was taking up over 560M of virt memory. On googling, it seems > to be a known issue and doesn't seem to be needed except for > graphical > desktop. Although virt memory isn't actual memory usage, the daemon > is > still taking up almost 4MB of limited memory, which on a VM with only > 384MB feels relatively significant to me. > > Earlier in May, there was also a mailing list thread that indicates > removing console-kit-daemon requires getting rid of hal as well. > > Is it safe to remove both console-kit and hal for headless > console-only web application VMs that also needs mdadm? > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Emmanuel, I think you're going to be fine without hal and ckd. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
