[CentOS] postfix login problem
Dear Friend, I have postfix mail server. I open my mail server and put my username = jha and password= 123456 it is giving my error "*ERROR*Unknown user or password incorrect." and In a log it is showing -- Sep 20 13:03:22 neumann dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=10.112.1.2, lip=192.168.1.2, secured but When I put username = j...@xxx.ac.in so it is allow me to login in mail server . Why it is taking full Domain Name . I want like gmail and yahoo when we open it they just ask for username and password not full domain name. Please help me.. Thanks & Regards Jitendra Jha +91-7498370550 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix login problem
Am 20.09.2012 09:46, schrieb jiten jha: > Dear Friend, > > I have postfix mail server. I open my mail server and put my username = jha > and password= 123456 it is giving my error "*ERROR*Unknown user or password > incorrect." > > and In a log it is showing > > -- Sep 20 13:03:22 neumann dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth failed, > 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=10.112.1.2, lip=192.168.1.2, > secured > > but When I put username = j...@xxx.ac.in so it is allow me to login in mail > server . > > Why it is taking full Domain Name . Because you have configured dovecot to act this way. > I want like gmail and yahoo when we open it they just ask for username and > password not full domain name. > > Please help me.. Which part of the dovecot documentation regarding authentication is unclear to you? http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication > Thanks & Regards > Jitendra Jha > +91-7498370550 Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix login problem
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 20.09.2012 09:46, schrieb jiten jha: > > Dear Friend, > > > > I have postfix mail server. I open my mail server and put my username = > jha > > and password= 123456 it is giving my error "*ERROR*Unknown user or > password > > incorrect." > > > > and In a log it is showing > > > > -- Sep 20 13:03:22 neumann dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login (auth > failed, > > 1 attempts): user=, method=PLAIN, rip=10.112.1.2, lip=192.168.1.2, > > secured > > > > but When I put username = j...@xxx.ac.in so it is allow me to login in > mail > > server . > > > > Why it is taking full Domain Name . > > Because you have configured dovecot to act this way. > > > I want like gmail and yahoo when we open it they just ask for username > and > > password not full domain name. > > > > Please help me.. > > Which part of the dovecot documentation regarding authentication is > unclear to you? > > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication > > > Thanks & Regards > > Jitendra Jha > > +91-7498370550 > > Alexander > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > I am not getting your question. -- Thanks & Regards Jitendra Jha +91-7498370550 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix login problem
From: jiten jha >I have postfix mail server. I open my mail server >... >-- Sep 20 13:03:22 neumann dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login Maybe you should ask on the dovecot mailing list.. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] RHSA-2012:1288 libxml2 security update for centos6 skiped?
I saw libxml2 have a security update on https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1288.html. But centos only update libxml2 for centos 5., it also affect centos6. Centos already update ppid(RHSA-2012:1269), looks like libxml(RHSA-2012:1288) skiped Any explanation? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHSA-2012:1288 libxml2 security update for centos6 skiped?
I see the same behavior. My el5 boxes got the libxml2 update and my el6 boxes did not. ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:05 AM, ownssh wrote: > I saw libxml2 have a security update on > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1288.html. > But centos only update libxml2 for centos 5., it also affect centos6. > Centos already update ppid(RHSA-2012:1269), looks like > libxml(RHSA-2012:1288) skiped > Any explanation? > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] How do boot a xen domu into run level 1
Hi, I have a C5.8 machine with several DomU's. I fubared the fstab on one of them and I need to get it into single user mode. Does anyone know how to do that? I tried adding single to the extras line in /etc/xen/machine_name but it still tries to start in level 3. To make things worse, the root partition is on LVM. Alternatively, does anyone know how to access the image from DomU? I tried to use kpartx but when I run VGscan, I do not get the lvm activated. Regards, -- Tom m...@tdiehl.org Spamtrap address me...@tdiehl.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Sendmail log entries
Recently we began seeing lots of these log entries on our off-site mx smtp host. I have googled this but I am not clear from what I have read if this is something we can stop altogether or should even worry about. Comments? Logwatch. . . - sendmail Begin SMTP SESSION, MESSAGE, OR RECIPIENT ERRORS -- WARNING Possible Attack: Attempt from 104.Red-83-50-106.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.50.106.104] with: command=HELO/EHLO, count=3: 1 Time(s) -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sendmail log entries
James B. Byrne wrote: > Recently we began seeing lots of these log entries on our off-site mx > smtp host. I have googled this but I am not clear from what I have > read if this is something we can stop altogether or should even worry > about. > > Comments? > I'm not real good with smtp, but it looks as though someone from Spain is trying to directly connect to your smtp server. Unless you know that they're legitimately using your system, I'd block that IP now. fail2ban's your friend mark > Logwatch. . . > > - sendmail Begin > > SMTP SESSION, MESSAGE, OR RECIPIENT ERRORS > -- > > WARNING Possible Attack: > Attempt from 104.Red-83-50-106.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net > [83.50.106.104] with: >command=HELO/EHLO, count=3: 1 Time(s) > > > -- > *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** > James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca > Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca > 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 > Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 > Canada L8E 3C3 > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] placing x11 libraries in an alternate location
On 09/18/2012 03:56 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > I had a look at Puppet early this year, planning to migrate to it from > existing Bcfg2 set up. Out of curiosity, what features motivated the migration? I use bcfg2, and the idea of using a system that doesn't feature reporting, interactive mode, or a "diff" from the running system is... difficult. Rather like trying to imagine using git or mercurial if they didn't support a "diff" command. You could still use them to manage your files, but would you want to? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHSA-2012:1288 libxml2 security update for centos6 skiped?
On 09/20/2012 07:05 AM, ownssh wrote: > I saw libxml2 have a security update on > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1288.html. > But centos only update libxml2 for centos 5., it also affect centos6. > Centos already update ppid(RHSA-2012:1269), looks like > libxml(RHSA-2012:1288) skiped > Any explanation? Thank you ... should be fixed now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 91, Issue 14
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ...@centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-ow...@centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2012:1269 Moderate CentOS 6 qpid Update (Johnny Hughes) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:53:18 + From: Johnny Hughes Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1269 Moderate CentOS 6 qpid Update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20120920005318.ga11...@chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1269 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1269.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 293df4e212d169d2c52478b2370a4836f6e9583c04397bf087edb7a2c306946c python-qpid-0.14-11.el6_3.noarch.rpm da4549ce7efea26c92b7df8e91188f561c5cd189a46ee497bce517ed34c11ef2 python-qpid-qmf-0.14-14.el6_3.i686.rpm c19ed1370e192a03712489857eff1fdbad8c7d5812fd7b4fed1156d0d211d57d qpid-cpp-client-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 187ad34dabd277e532218cb08d6d6d0746b3fe773c0462867b6a26c7f47c2d8c qpid-cpp-client-devel-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm fcad512736d954705997f3390a672fdb1e362b93e078a23a227e0ff7e52ca8d1 qpid-cpp-client-devel-docs-0.14-22.el6_3.noarch.rpm 676aa2646560a854b1d66597ad777d931aa653d63aef82959add591a44e29141 qpid-cpp-client-rdma-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 1067307efa95a62dbc53f502a547b080afaf698b46ea9baa8e0a8c4da895fd47 qpid-cpp-client-ssl-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 351b2c45b98b6632fd470ea60c35182405ba2e6bc2445bb4aaac37ab41f2307d qpid-cpp-server-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 760c8ec7212bd3a0775b6cf4d62e53c8c8bf6a5f87920c9c73a8753d2205734c qpid-cpp-server-cluster-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 0a9d3b9906dab99e86c60c1ce5d6b2977ad1b23e1d9628ee70fa2046dd8b440e qpid-cpp-server-devel-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 8e17fd53d67f0220bb3e8858406069b4d727c044ff89150589a7b5c9d30101e6 qpid-cpp-server-rdma-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 9a9df61841991f2ad15ccbd2c84a41ea14a5d4b43a0358249c941abd9c016960 qpid-cpp-server-ssl-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm dc05460b3acd710f55c04a2012f1cc20441eecf23cb1c7c8e6fdac9c3fde13c7 qpid-cpp-server-store-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm e8a201b5fbb71f5daf26a1dbdae19200d207b856882c42283c20a121a062077d qpid-cpp-server-xml-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 51e2bd60d84c08d917cdd0cd9932dd064e5f6a3fa04f76b6f4394225cfd71887 qpid-qmf-0.14-14.el6_3.i686.rpm f98a886f92f3f5ea3737dd1a2d537be355df7f1ced42c3e2f0a59f665f03bf82 qpid-qmf-devel-0.14-14.el6_3.i686.rpm 4e322cf51b601076ed84bb3ba735962a40397891db425b73b3130b7aacc18170 qpid-tools-0.14-6.el6_3.noarch.rpm f36117dff040729d7c4aa58edc2d3019293f0962e8cea6491ad0d8e602f7a0f7 rh-qpid-cpp-tests-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 753a489ca9df4fc7352c3e0b0abd075682a13a690a94d43f51c2efe61b267f50 ruby-qpid-qmf-0.14-14.el6_3.i686.rpm x86_64: fd7c205549fbd20d5c81799e72ab8af596a7faf380ee11a8d34006d497a98810 python-qpid-0.14-11.el6_3.noarch.rpm 2d3d9cc48ab052805ed627c0e0ccb4d7d32e561c2ef82f69d2bf6a8ddf149e22 python-qpid-qmf-0.14-14.el6_3.x86_64.rpm c19ed1370e192a03712489857eff1fdbad8c7d5812fd7b4fed1156d0d211d57d qpid-cpp-client-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 5d859f4c39b0fe3f6b9303c39317fe32501b264bbdb14d7bc16a0b55575e6254 qpid-cpp-client-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm 8b4b685f52ec9ec567eb20cbec861679cb4d8a8850d42bbd44024027fc174f19 qpid-cpp-client-devel-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm d8a5d272e8ba91e9051ff54f41477eb4680656c1c46f5b7c9dd96519d53b1c64 qpid-cpp-client-devel-docs-0.14-22.el6_3.noarch.rpm 2fabdf4a2612ba4e0081a23e5274af4cd645661343bc74741e3a8d439ac4b511 qpid-cpp-client-rdma-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm 1067307efa95a62dbc53f502a547b080afaf698b46ea9baa8e0a8c4da895fd47 qpid-cpp-client-ssl-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm 6dbfb209d44fd2145e75c03a842f99cf4b66866b52e256d69a607038bb9dfe05 qpid-cpp-client-ssl-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm 351b2c45b98b6632fd470ea60c35182405ba2e6bc2445bb4aaac37ab41f2307d qpid-cpp-server-0.14-22.el6_3.i686.rpm c00684b73478a5df2f32b148865f2779571a1b7da3158a281de99256862050e2 qpid-cpp-server-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm 4bb00085e58b07085f38b7fcaef8b0c40c85fa4eb7d1c1a8f69f9be32d8b qpid-cpp-server-cluster-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm 0cb57bdf718fb757aedebdd76f7c5666352892996a040561518324212f0ec52f qpid-cpp-server-devel-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm 813e9c55cc698d273b45b0fe24044dec721f1c67165c493fd186f08a8e393fc6 qpid-cpp-server-rdma-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm 5e34a457be1cb1292e680bca34eee9ddb76d1c85c97b78970341f89942a30ef0 qpid-cpp-server-ssl-0.14-22.el6_3.x86_64.rpm 21bf901986eef25e33bfe24c693a15d0b6fe3f163a24f1e0b9fea11f7
Re: [CentOS] placing x11 libraries in an alternate location
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/18/2012 03:56 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: >> I had a look at Puppet early this year, planning to migrate to it from >> existing Bcfg2 set up. > > Out of curiosity, what features motivated the migration? And has anyone looked at salt (http://saltstack.org/) yet? I like the concept of clients always being connected over an encrypted zeromq link, but haven't tackled anything more than running commands over it yet (which isn't really the right way to use it). -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] postfix login problem
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:46 PM, John Doe wrote: > From: jiten jha > > >I have postfix mail server. I open my mail server > >... > >-- Sep 20 13:03:22 neumann dovecot: imap-login: Aborted login > > Maybe you should ask on the dovecot mailing list.. > > JD > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Thanks friend my problem solve now. I have one question about mail server . I have done postfix mail server installation and all configuration , restriction and filters .What should I have to do for my mail server so it is full protect and working fine and fast. -- Thanks & Regards Jitendra Jha +91-7498370550 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] More about Postifx mail server configuration and all
I have done postfix mail server installation and all configuration , restriction and filters .What should I have to do more for my mail server so it is full protect and working fine and fast. like : Milter and spamassassin is necessary for my mail server . -- Thanks & Regards Jitendra Jha +91-7498370550 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sendmail log entries
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, James B. Byrne wrote: Recently we began seeing lots of these log entries on our off-site mx smtp host. I have googled this but I am not clear from what I have read if this is something we can stop altogether or should even worry about. WARNING Possible Attack: Attempt from 104.Red-83-50-106.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.50.106.104] with: command=HELO/EHLO, count=3: 1 Time(s) My understanding is that this is indicative of a (almost certainly malicious) SMTP client trying different HELO or EHLO identities within the same session. Sendmail is hard-coded to reject the connection after three HELO/EHLO commands. So you've got a dynamic address (83.50.106.104) trying to identify itself as three different hostnames -- and finally Sendmail gets angry and slams the door. If you've configured a blacklist service like spamhaus, you're likely to see the 'possible SMTP attack' warning shortly after Sendmail has already rejected mail from the remote host, e.g., Aug 19 11:45:01 myserv sendmail[16804]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=ill90.internetdsl.tpnet.pl, arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=ill90.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [79.190.37.90], reject=550 5.7.1 mail rejected - see http://www.spamhaus.org/ Aug 19 11:45:02 myserv sendmail[16804]: q7JIj1pM016804: ill90.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [79.190.37.90]: possible SMTP attack: command=HELO/EHLO, count=3 -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com 45°38' N, 122°6' W___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sendmail log entries
On Thu, September 20, 2012 11:10, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I'm not real good with smtp, but it looks as though someone from > Spain is trying to directly connect to your smtp server. Unless > you know that they're legitimately using your system, I'd block > that IP now. > The list of sources is far too long to include in a message to the list. Suffice to say that each IP address is automatically blocked for varying lengths of time following any failed attempt. What I am trying to discover is what in particular, if anything, caused this traffic to suddenly start hitting our external server and whether or not we should be concerned about a specific vulnerability. This host is our last remaining Sendmail server. All the rest have been switched to Postfix. None of the other MX hosts are reporting this and so the questions arise: Is this an attack? Is it specifically directed at the Sendmail server or is it just a co-incidence? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sendmail log entries
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > > > The list of sources is far too long to include in a message to the > list. Suffice to say that each IP address is automatically blocked > for varying lengths of time following any failed attempt. What I am > trying to discover is what in particular, if anything, caused this > traffic to suddenly start hitting our external server and whether or > not we should be concerned about a specific vulnerability. Where does it fit with the MX preference number ordering? If it is a higher value (lower priority) the others should be tried first so traffic might be an indication that other servers are unreachable or failing. However, it is a common ploy for spammers to try to send to the low priority target first on the chance that the spam filtering isn't as good as on the primary server(s). -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com > This host is our last remaining Sendmail server. All the rest have > been switched to Postfix. None of the other MX hosts are reporting > this and so the questions arise: Is this an attack? Is it > specifically directed at the Sendmail server or is it just a > co-incidence? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SpamAssassin reporting help
On 9/19/2012 1:34 PM, Giles Coochey wrote: > On 19/09/2012 16:45, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> CentOS release 6.3 (Final) >> >> I am getting e-mails now where they are: >> >> Subject: Cron /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | >> tee -a /var/log/sa-update.log >> >> Body: http: GET http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/asf/1387055.tar.gz >> request failed: 404 Not Found: > HTML 2.0//EN"> 404 Not Found >> Not Found The requested URL /sa-update/asf/1387055.tar.gz >> was not found on this server. Apache/2.2.6 (Fedora) >> Server at daryl.dostech.ca Port 80 >> >> Can anyone help me understand what is happening here? > I've been getting these too... if I run sa-update manually it appears > that I'm on the latest version, so I'm just lazily waiting to see if > anyone will fix the cron email.. > So until someone else chirps up, I guess we're on our own :-), but I > thought you might appreciate that you're not alone. The issue is with the particular file you are trying to update. You are looking for a 3rd party rule set from daryl.dostech.ca. Apparently, it is not available at the moment, so you're getting a 404. I don't use this rule set, so I haven't seen it. If you ask on the SpamAssassin mailing list, someone might be able to help. -- Bowie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] placing x11 libraries in an alternate location
On 09/20/2012 09:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > And has anyone looked at salt (http://saltstack.org/) yet? I've looked at its documentation and talked to a few users. As far as I can tell, it has fewer features than bcfg2 -- including no "diff" function. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] placing x11 libraries in an alternate location
On 09/20/2012 04:47 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Out of curiosity, what features motivated the migration? I use bcfg2, > and the idea of using a system that doesn't feature reporting, > interactive mode, or a "diff" from the running system is... difficult. you should look at puppet, since it does all of those things and a bunch more - add in mcollective and theforeman to the mix, and you have quite a nice provision, manage and maintain environ ( I'd say add zabbix, while keeping an eye on sensu and extramon, in and you have an almost complete stack there ). The only bit that I think were still missing in the open source world is a good inventory management layer that interfaces upstream and downstream. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] placing x11 libraries in an alternate location
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > you should look at puppet, since it does all of those things and a bunch > more - add in mcollective and theforeman to the mix, and you have quite > a nice provision, manage and maintain environ ( I'd say add zabbix, > while keeping an eye on sensu and extramon, in and you have an almost > complete stack there ). The only bit that I think were still missing in > the open source world is a good inventory management layer that > interfaces upstream and downstream. I keep hoping someone will glue racktables and ocsinventory-ng together... Someone is at least working on a rest api for racktables. And you might like opennms for monitoring since they've added a provisioning concept to interface with an inventory database. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] placing x11 libraries in an alternate location
On 09/20/2012 03:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > you should look at puppet, since it does all of those things and a bunch > more So I'd log in to a client managed by puppet and type what to see a 'diff' style report indicating how the puppet master would modify the system? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
